Perceptual asynchrony

Last updated

Perceptual asynchrony refers to the phenomenon of two simultaneously presented attributes of the visual world being perceived by humans asynchronously instead of simultaneously. [1]

Contents

Perceptual asynchrony was first demonstrated in 1997 by Konstantinos Moutoussis and Semir Zeki. [1] The Moutoussis and Zeki provided evidence that people perceive the color and direction of motion of a visual stimulus with a time lag - they may perceive the color before the direction of motion. They quantified this time gap to be between 70 – 80 milliseconds.

Description

The experiments through which perceptual asynchrony was derived were pairing experiments in which subjects are asked to determine the color and direction of a single stimulus that is moving up and down (or right and left) and changing its color from, say red to green, while doing so – the change in the color and direction of motion being in and out of phase with respect to each other.

Minor variations of the 1997 experiment have yielded similar results. [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] An apparent asynchrony has also been documented for other visual features. For example, one study found evidence suggesting that the color of lines is perceived about 40 milliseconds before their orientation. [8] [9] [10] The degree of perceptual asynchrony can be considerably reduced by manipulating the stimuli in a variety of ways, [11] [12] [13] which complicates its attribution to a simple difference in processing times for color and motion.

Interpretation

According to Moutoussis and Zeki, the phenomenon shows:

Zeki went on to propose that color, motion, and shape are experienced via separate "micro-consciousnesses" evoked by distinct brain areas. [14]

The theory that the phenomenon is caused by difference in color and motion processing time has been challenged by multiple lines of evidence. For example, the evidence for an asynchrony is much smaller or absent when people are asked to judge the relative timing of color and motion changes rather than their pairing. [15] [16] [17] Perceiving changes in a feature seems to require less feature processing and yields higher temporal precision than the conventional feature pairing judgment. [18] This suggests a complex picture of how the timing of events is represented rather than a simple processing latency that applies to all aspects or uses of an event.

Nishida & Johnston proposed that the brain ordinarily relies on the neural responses evoked by the onset of a feature to estimate its relative timing and thereby compensate for the variation in processing times for different features. Nishida & Johnston suggested that these onset responses or "transients" are disrupted by dynamic displays such as that of Moutoussis & Zeki, because the constant motion means that transient responses occur continuously, preventing them from signaling the specific onset time of the motion. [15] Nishida & Johnston created displays in which the color onset also was not signalled by a unique feature and found that greatly reduced the asynchrony.

To further investigate what aspects of the intervals of color and motion determine the perceptual pairing, one study had participants judge the predominant pairing of color and motion when the alternating color and motion are of different durations. Changing the duration of the color, but not of the motion, shifted the timing required to maximize the consistency of pairing judgments. This suggested that the timing of the color onset was particularly important, as one would predict from the Nishida & Johnston timer-marker theory. [12] It was further found that the asynchrony could be eliminated by cuing with transients the time of the color and motion changes. [19]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Color</span> Visual perception of the light spectrum

Color or colour is the visual perception based on the electromagnetic spectrum. Though color is not an inherent property of matter, color perception is related to an object's light absorption, reflection, emission spectra and interference. For most humans, colors are perceived in the visible light spectrum with three types of cone cells (trichromacy). Other animals may have a different number of cone cell types or have eyes sensitive to different wavelength, such as bees that can distinguish ultraviolet, and thus have a different color sensitivity range. Animal perception of color originates from different light wavelength or spectral sensitivity in cone cell types, which is then processed by the brain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philosophy of perception</span> Branch of philosophy

The philosophy of perception is concerned with the nature of perceptual experience and the status of perceptual data, in particular how they relate to beliefs about, or knowledge of, the world. Any explicit account of perception requires a commitment to one of a variety of ontological or metaphysical views. Philosophers distinguish internalist accounts, which assume that perceptions of objects, and knowledge or beliefs about them, are aspects of an individual's mind, and externalist accounts, which state that they constitute real aspects of the world external to the individual. The position of naïve realism—the 'everyday' impression of physical objects constituting what is perceived—is to some extent contradicted by the occurrence of perceptual illusions and hallucinations and the relativity of perceptual experience as well as certain insights in science. Realist conceptions include phenomenalism and direct and indirect realism. Anti-realist conceptions include idealism and skepticism. Recent philosophical work have expanded on the philosophical features of perception by going beyond the single paradigm of vision.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Visual cortex</span> Region of the brain that processes visual information

The visual cortex of the brain is the area of the cerebral cortex that processes visual information. It is located in the occipital lobe. Sensory input originating from the eyes travels through the lateral geniculate nucleus in the thalamus and then reaches the visual cortex. The area of the visual cortex that receives the sensory input from the lateral geniculate nucleus is the primary visual cortex, also known as visual area 1 (V1), Brodmann area 17, or the striate cortex. The extrastriate areas consist of visual areas 2, 3, 4, and 5.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Optical illusion</span> Visually perceived images that differ from objective reality

In visual perception, an optical illusion is an illusion caused by the visual system and characterized by a visual percept that arguably appears to differ from reality. Illusions come in a wide variety; their categorization is difficult because the underlying cause is often not clear but a classification proposed by Richard Gregory is useful as an orientation. According to that, there are three main classes: physical, physiological, and cognitive illusions, and in each class there are four kinds: Ambiguities, distortions, paradoxes, and fictions. A classical example for a physical distortion would be the apparent bending of a stick half immerged in water; an example for a physiological paradox is the motion aftereffect. An example for a physiological fiction is an afterimage. Three typical cognitive distortions are the Ponzo, Poggendorff, and Müller-Lyer illusion. Physical illusions are caused by the physical environment, e.g. by the optical properties of water. Physiological illusions arise in the eye or the visual pathway, e.g. from the effects of excessive stimulation of a specific receptor type. Cognitive visual illusions are the result of unconscious inferences and are perhaps those most widely known.

A tactile illusion is an illusion that affects the sense of touch. Some tactile illusions require active touch, whereas others can be evoked passively. In recent years, a growing interest among perceptual researchers has led to the discovery of new tactile illusions and to the celebration of tactile illusions in the popular science press. Some tactile illusions are analogous to visual and auditory illusions, suggesting that these sensory systems may process information in similar ways; other tactile illusions don't have obvious visual or auditory analogs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Color constancy</span> How humans perceive color

Color constancy is an example of subjective constancy and a feature of the human color perception system which ensures that the perceived color of objects remains relatively constant under varying illumination conditions. A green apple for instance looks green to us at midday, when the main illumination is white sunlight, and also at sunset, when the main illumination is red. This helps us identify objects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phi phenomenon</span> Optical illusion of apparent motion

The term phi phenomenon is used in a narrow sense for an apparent motion that is observed if two nearby optical stimuli are presented in alternation with a relatively high frequency. In contrast to beta movement, seen at lower frequencies, the stimuli themselves do not appear to move. Instead, a diffuse, amorphous shadowlike something seems to jump in front of the stimuli and occlude them temporarily. This shadow seems to have nearly the color of the background. Max Wertheimer first described this form of apparent movement in his habilitation thesis, published 1912, marking the birth of Gestalt psychology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Color vision</span> Ability to perceive differences in light frequency

Color vision, a feature of visual perception, is an ability to perceive differences between light composed of different frequencies independently of light intensity. Color perception is a part of the larger visual system and is mediated by a complex process between neurons that begins with differential stimulation of different types of photoreceptors by light entering the eye. Those photoreceptors then emit outputs that are propagated through many layers of neurons and then ultimately to the brain. Color vision is found in many animals and is mediated by similar underlying mechanisms with common types of biological molecules and a complex history of evolution in different animal taxa. In primates, color vision may have evolved under selective pressure for a variety of visual tasks including the foraging for nutritious young leaves, ripe fruit, and flowers, as well as detecting predator camouflage and emotional states in other primates.

The consciousness and binding problem is the problem of how objects, background and abstract or emotional features are combined into a single experience.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Semir Zeki</span> British neurobiologist

Semir Zeki FMedSci FRS is a British and French neurobiologist who has specialised in studying the primate visual brain and more recently the neural correlates of affective states, such as the experience of love, desire and beauty that are generated by sensory inputs within the field of neuroesthetics. He was educated at University College London (UCL) where he was Henry Head Research Fellow of the Royal Society before being appointed Professor of Neurobiology. Since 2008 he has been Professor of Neuroesthetics at UCL.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ternus illusion</span>

The Ternus illusion, also commonly referred to as the Ternus Effect, is an illusion related to human visual perception involving apparent motion. In a simplified explanation of one form of the illusion, two discs, are shown side by side as the first frame in a sequence of three frames. Next a blank frame is presented for a very short, variable duration. In the final frame, two similar discs are then shown in a shifted position. Depending on various factors including the time intervals between frames as well as spacing and layout, observers perceive either element motion, in which L appears to move to R while C remains stationary or they report experiencing group motion, in which L and C appear to move together to C and R. Both element motion and group motion can be observed in animated examples to the right in Figures 1 and 2.

The opponent process is a color theory that states that the human visual system interprets information about color by processing signals from photoreceptor cells in an antagonistic manner. The opponent-process theory suggests that there are three opponent channels, each comprising an opposing color pair: red versus green, blue versus yellow, and black versus white (luminance). The theory was first proposed in 1892 by the German physiologist Ewald Hering.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Motion perception</span> Inferring the speed and direction of objects

Motion perception is the process of inferring the speed and direction of elements in a scene based on visual, vestibular and proprioceptive inputs. Although this process appears straightforward to most observers, it has proven to be a difficult problem from a computational perspective, and difficult to explain in terms of neural processing.

Multisensory integration, also known as multimodal integration, is the study of how information from the different sensory modalities may be integrated by the nervous system. A coherent representation of objects combining modalities enables animals to have meaningful perceptual experiences. Indeed, multisensory integration is central to adaptive behavior because it allows animals to perceive a world of coherent perceptual entities. Multisensory integration also deals with how different sensory modalities interact with one another and alter each other's processing.

Akinetopsia, also known as cerebral akinetopsia or motion blindness, is a term introduced by Semir Zeki to describe an extremely rare neuropsychological disorder, having only been documented in a handful of medical cases, in which a patient cannot perceive motion in their visual field, despite being able to see stationary objects without issue. The syndrome is the result of damage to visual area V5, whose cells are specialized to detect directional visual motion. There are varying degrees of akinetopsia: from seeing motion as frames of a cinema reel to an inability to discriminate any motion. There is currently no effective treatment or cure for akinetopsia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flash lag illusion</span> Optical illusion

The flash lag illusion or flash-lag effect is a visual illusion wherein a flash and a moving object that appear in the same location are perceived to be displaced from one another. Several explanations for this simple illusion have been explored in the neuroscience literature.

The study of time perception or chronoception is a field within psychology, cognitive linguistics and neuroscience that refers to the subjective experience, or sense, of time, which is measured by someone's own perception of the duration of the indefinite and unfolding of events. The perceived time interval between two successive events is referred to as perceived duration. Though directly experiencing or understanding another person's perception of time is not possible, perception can be objectively studied and inferred through a number of scientific experiments. Some temporal illusions help to expose the underlying neural mechanisms of time perception.

In cognitive neuroscience, visual modularity is an organizational concept concerning how vision works. The way in which the primate visual system operates is currently under intense scientific scrutiny. One dominant thesis is that different properties of the visual world require different computational solutions which are implemented in anatomically/functionally distinct regions that operate independently – that is, in a modular fashion.

Form perception is the recognition of visual elements of objects, specifically those to do with shapes, patterns and previously identified important characteristics. An object is perceived by the retina as a two-dimensional image, but the image can vary for the same object in terms of the context with which it is viewed, the apparent size of the object, the angle from which it is viewed, how illuminated it is, as well as where it resides in the field of vision. Despite the fact that each instance of observing an object leads to a unique retinal response pattern, the visual processing in the brain is capable of recognizing these experiences as analogous, allowing invariant object recognition. Visual processing occurs in a hierarchy with the lowest levels recognizing lines and contours, and slightly higher levels performing tasks such as completing boundaries and recognizing contour combinations. The highest levels integrate the perceived information to recognize an entire object. Essentially object recognition is the ability to assign labels to objects in order to categorize and identify them, thus distinguishing one object from another. During visual processing information is not created, but rather reformatted in a way that draws out the most detailed information of the stimulus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roland William Fleming</span> Anglo-German psychologist

Roland William Fleming, FRSB is a British and German interdisciplinary researcher specializing in the visual perception of objects and materials. He is the Kurt Koffka Professor of Experimental Psychology at Justus Liebig University of Giessen. and the Executive Director of the Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior of the Universities of Marburg and Giessen. He is also co-Spokesperson for the Research Cluster “The Adaptive Mind”.

References

  1. 1 2 Moutoussis K, Zeki S (March 1997). "A direct demonstration of perceptual asynchrony in vision". Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 264 (1380): 393–9. Bibcode:1997RSPSB.264..393M. doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0056. PMC   1688275 . PMID   9107055.
  2. Moutoussis K, Zeki S (October 1997). "Functional segregation and temporal hierarchy of the visual perceptive systems". Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 264 (1387): 1407–14. Bibcode:1997RSPSB.264.1407M. doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0196. PMC   1688701 . PMID   9364780.
  3. Zeki S, Moutoussis K (October 1997). "Temporal hierarchy of the visual perceptive systems in the Mondrian world". Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 264 (1387): 1415–9. Bibcode:1997RSPSB.264.1415Z. doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0197. PMC   1688708 . PMID   9364781.
  4. Arnold DH, Clifford CW, Wenderoth P (April 2001). "Asynchronous processing in vision: color leads motion". Current Biology. 11 (8): 596–600. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00156-7 . PMID   11369204. S2CID   3150786.
  5. Linares D, López-Moliner J (August 2006). "Perceptual asynchrony between color and motion with a single direction change". Journal of Vision. 6 (9): 974–81. doi: 10.1167/6.9.10 . hdl: 2445/109542 . PMID   17083289.
  6. Viviani P, Aymoz C (October 2001). "Colour, form, and movement are not perceived simultaneously". Vision Research. 41 (22): 2909–18. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00160-2 . PMID   11701183. S2CID   17176776.
  7. Self E (2014-11-01). "Color–motion asynchrony assessed along the chromatic axes and with luminance variation". Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 76 (8): 2184–2188. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0773-5 . ISSN   1943-393X. PMID   25280522. S2CID   30061427.
  8. Arnold DH, Clifford CW (March 2002). "Determinants of asynchronous processing in vision". Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 269 (1491): 579–83. doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1913. PMC   1690936 . PMID   11916473.
  9. Yazdanbakhsh A, Nishina S, Watanabe T (2010-03-24). "Perceptual asynchrony between sinusoidally modulated luminance and depth". Journal of Vision. 9 (8): 54. doi: 10.1167/9.8.54 . ISSN   1534-7362.
  10. Žaric G, Yazdanbakhsh A, Nishina S, De Weerd P, Watanabe T (2015-11-25). "Perceived temporal asynchrony between sinusoidally modulated luminance and depth". Journal of Vision. 15 (15): 13. doi:10.1167/15.15.13. PMC   5079707 . PMID   26605842.
  11. Arnold DH, Clifford CW (March 2002). "Determinants of asynchronous processing in vision". Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 269 (1491): 579–83. doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1913. PMC   1690936 . PMID   11916473.
  12. 1 2 Holcombe AO (2009-01-01). "Temporal binding favours the early phase of colour changes, but not of motion changes, yielding the colour–motion asynchrony illusion". Visual Cognition. 17 (1–2): 232–253. doi:10.1080/13506280802340653. ISSN   1350-6285. S2CID   27266824.
  13. Lo YT, Zeki S (2014). "Perceptual asynchrony for motion". Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 8: 108. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00108 . PMC   3941194 . PMID   24624071.
  14. Zeki S (2007). "A Theory of Micro-Consciousness". The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 580–588. doi:10.1002/9780470751466.ch46. ISBN   978-0-470-75146-6.
  15. 1 2 Nishida S, Johnston A (March 2002). "Marker correspondence, not processing latency, determines temporal binding of visual attributes". Current Biology. 12 (5): 359–68. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00698-x . PMID   11882286. S2CID   6587832.
  16. Huang, Jianrui; Su, Zhongbin; Zhou, Xiaolin (2023-01-10). "Revisiting the color-motion asynchrony". Journal of Vision. 23 (1): 6. doi:10.1167/jov.23.1.6. ISSN   1534-7362. PMC   9838589 . PMID   36626163.
  17. Bedell HE, Chung ST, Ogmen H, Patel SS (October 2003). "Color and motion: which is the tortoise and which is the hare?". Vision Research. 43 (23): 2403–12. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00436-X . PMID   12972391. S2CID   2146151.
  18. Fujisaki, Waka; Nishida, Shin'ya (2010-08-07). "A common perceptual temporal limit of binding synchronous inputs across different sensory attributes and modalities". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 277 (1692): 2281–2290. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0243. ISSN   0962-8452. PMC   2894908 . PMID   20335212.
  19. Holcombe AO, Cavanagh P (May 2008). "Independent, synchronous access to color and motion features". Cognition. 107 (2): 552–80. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.006. PMC   2766571 . PMID   18206865.