Pfaffian orientation

Last updated

In graph theory, a Pfaffian orientation of an undirected graph assigns a direction to each edge, so that certain cycles (the "even central cycles") have an odd number of edges in each direction. When a graph has a Pfaffian orientation, the orientation can be used to count the perfect matchings of the graph. This is the main idea behind the FKT algorithm for counting perfect matchings in planar graphs, which always have Pfaffian orientations. More generally, every graph that does not have the utility graph as a graph minor has a Pfaffian orientation, but does not, nor do infinitely many other minimal non-Pfaffian graphs.

Contents

Definitions

A Pfaffian orientation of an undirected graph is an orientation in which every even central cycle is oddly oriented. The terms of this definition have the following meanings:

Application to counting matchings

Pfaffian orientations have been studied in connection with the FKT algorithm for counting the number of perfect matchings in a given graph. In this algorithm, the orientations of the edges are used to assign the values to the variables in the Tutte matrix of the graph. Then, the Pfaffian of this matrix (the square root of its determinant) gives the number of perfect matchings. Each perfect matching contributes to the Pfaffian regardless of which orientation is used; the choice of a Pfaffian orientation ensures that these contributions all have the same sign as each other, so that none of them cancel. This result stands in contrast to the much higher computational complexity of counting matchings in arbitrary graphs. [2]

Pfaffian graphs

A graph is said to be Pfaffian if it has a Pfaffian orientation. Every planar graph is Pfaffian. [3] An orientation in which each face of a planar graph has an odd number of clockwise-oriented edges is automatically Pfaffian. Such an orientation can be found by starting with an arbitrary orientation of a spanning tree of the graph. The remaining edges, not in this tree, form a spanning tree of the dual graph, and their orientations can be chosen according to a bottom-up traversal of the dual spanning tree in order to ensure that each face of the original graph has an odd number of clockwise edges. [4]

More generally, every -minor-free graph has a Pfaffian orientation. These are the graphs that do not have the utility graph (which is not Pfaffian) as a graph minor. By Wagner's theorem, the -minor-free graphs are formed by gluing together copies of planar graphs and the complete graph along shared edges. The same gluing structure can be used to obtain a Pfaffian orientation for these graphs. [4]

Along with , there are infinitely many minimal non-Pfaffian graphs. [1] For bipartite graphs, it is possible to determine whether a Pfaffian orientation exists, and if so find one, in polynomial time. [5]

Related Research Articles

In graph theory, a perfect matching in a graph is a matching that covers every vertex of the graph. More formally, given a graph G = (V, E), a perfect matching in G is a subset M of edge set E, such that every vertex in the vertex set V is adjacent to exactly one edge in M.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tree (graph theory)</span> Undirected, connected and acyclic graph

In graph theory, a tree is an undirected graph in which any two vertices are connected by exactly one path, or equivalently a connected acyclic undirected graph. A forest is an undirected graph in which any two vertices are connected by at most one path, or equivalently an acyclic undirected graph, or equivalently a disjoint union of trees.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Three utilities problem</span> Mathematical puzzle of avoiding crossings

The classical mathematical puzzle known as the three utilities problem or sometimes water, gas and electricity asks for non-crossing connections to be drawn between three houses and three utility companies in the plane. When posing it in the early 20th century, Henry Dudeney wrote that it was already an old problem. It is an impossible puzzle: it is not possible to connect all nine lines without crossing. Versions of the problem on nonplanar surfaces such as a torus or Möbius strip, or that allow connections to pass through other houses or utilities, can be solved.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bipartite graph</span> Graph divided into two independent sets

In the mathematical field of graph theory, a bipartite graph is a graph whose vertices can be divided into two disjoint and independent sets and , that is, every edge connects a vertex in to one in . Vertex sets and are usually called the parts of the graph. Equivalently, a bipartite graph is a graph that does not contain any odd-length cycles.

In graph theory, a branch of mathematics, the (binary) cycle space of an undirected graph is the set of its even-degree subgraphs.

This is a glossary of graph theory. Graph theory is the study of graphs, systems of nodes or vertices connected in pairs by lines or edges.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eulerian path</span> Trail in a graph that visits each edge once

In graph theory, an Eulerian trail is a trail in a finite graph that visits every edge exactly once. Similarly, an Eulerian circuit or Eulerian cycle is an Eulerian trail that starts and ends on the same vertex. They were first discussed by Leonhard Euler while solving the famous Seven Bridges of Königsberg problem in 1736. The problem can be stated mathematically like this:

In the mathematical discipline of graph theory, a matching or independent edge set in an undirected graph is a set of edges without common vertices. In other words, a subset of the edges is a matching if each vertex appears in at most one edge of that matching. Finding a matching in a bipartite graph can be treated as a network flow problem.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edge coloring</span> Problem of coloring a graphs edges such that meeting edges do not match

In graph theory, a proper edge coloring of a graph is an assignment of "colors" to the edges of the graph so that no two incident edges have the same color. For example, the figure to the right shows an edge coloring of a graph by the colors red, blue, and green. Edge colorings are one of several different types of graph coloring. The edge-coloring problem asks whether it is possible to color the edges of a given graph using at most k different colors, for a given value of k, or with the fewest possible colors. The minimum required number of colors for the edges of a given graph is called the chromatic index of the graph. For example, the edges of the graph in the illustration can be colored by three colors but cannot be colored by two colors, so the graph shown has chromatic index three.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chordal graph</span> Graph where all long cycles have a chord

In the mathematical area of graph theory, a chordal graph is one in which all cycles of four or more vertices have a chord, which is an edge that is not part of the cycle but connects two vertices of the cycle. Equivalently, every induced cycle in the graph should have exactly three vertices. The chordal graphs may also be characterized as the graphs that have perfect elimination orderings, as the graphs in which each minimal separator is a clique, and as the intersection graphs of subtrees of a tree. They are sometimes also called rigid circuit graphs or triangulated graphs: a chordal completion of a graph is typically called a triangulation of that graph.

In the mathematical theory of matroids, a graphic matroid is a matroid whose independent sets are the forests in a given finite undirected graph. The dual matroids of graphic matroids are called co-graphic matroids or bond matroids. A matroid that is both graphic and co-graphic is sometimes called a planar matroid ; these are exactly the graphic matroids formed from planar graphs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Circuit rank</span> Fewest graph edges whose removal breaks all cycles

In graph theory, a branch of mathematics, the circuit rank, cyclomatic number, cycle rank, or nullity of an undirected graph is the minimum number of edges that must be removed from the graph to break all its cycles, making it into a tree or forest. It is equal to the number of independent cycles in the graph. Unlike the corresponding feedback arc set problem for directed graphs, the circuit rank r is easily computed using the formula

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tutte polynomial</span> Algebraic encoding of graph connectivity

The Tutte polynomial, also called the dichromate or the Tutte–Whitney polynomial, is a graph polynomial. It is a polynomial in two variables which plays an important role in graph theory. It is defined for every undirected graph and contains information about how the graph is connected. It is denoted by .

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Factor-critical graph</span> Graph of n vertices with a perfect matching for every subgraph of n-1 vertices

In graph theory, a mathematical discipline, a factor-critical graph is a graph with n vertices in which every subgraph of n − 1 vertices has a perfect matching.

In graph theory, a strong orientation of an undirected graph is an assignment of a direction to each edge that makes it into a strongly connected graph.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cycle basis</span> Cycles in a graph that generate all cycles

In graph theory, a branch of mathematics, a cycle basis of an undirected graph is a set of simple cycles that forms a basis of the cycle space of the graph. That is, it is a minimal set of cycles that allows every even-degree subgraph to be expressed as a symmetric difference of basis cycles.

The Fisher–Kasteleyn–Temperley (FKT) algorithm, named after Michael Fisher, Pieter Kasteleyn, and Neville Temperley, counts the number of perfect matchings in a planar graph in polynomial time. This same task is #P-complete for general graphs. For matchings that are not required to be perfect, counting them remains #P-complete even for planar graphs. The key idea of the FKT algorithm is to convert the problem into a Pfaffian computation of a skew-symmetric matrix derived from a planar embedding of the graph. The Pfaffian of this matrix is then computed efficiently using standard determinant algorithms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ear decomposition</span> Partition of graph into sequence of paths

In graph theory, an ear of an undirected graph G is a path P where the two endpoints of the path may coincide, but where otherwise no repetition of edges or vertices is allowed, so every internal vertex of P has degree two in G. An ear decomposition of an undirected graph G is a partition of its set of edges into a sequence of ears, such that the one or two endpoints of each ear belong to earlier ears in the sequence and such that the internal vertices of each ear do not belong to any earlier ear. Additionally, in most cases the first ear in the sequence must be a cycle. An open ear decomposition or a proper ear decomposition is an ear decomposition in which the two endpoints of each ear after the first are distinct from each other.

In graph theory, an orientation of an undirected graph is an assignment of a direction to each edge, turning the initial graph into a directed graph.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Acyclic orientation</span> Element of graph theory

In graph theory, an acyclic orientation of an undirected graph is an assignment of a direction to each edge that does not form any directed cycle and therefore makes it into a directed acyclic graph. Every graph has an acyclic orientation.

References

  1. 1 2 Norine, Serguei; Thomas, Robin (2008), "Minimally non-Pfaffian graphs", Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 98 (5): 1038–1055, doi: 10.1016/j.jctb.2007.12.005 , MR   2442595
  2. 1 2 Thomas, Robin (2006), "A survey of Pfaffian orientations of graphs" (PDF), International Congress of Mathematicians. Vol. III, vol. 3, Zürich: Eur. Math. Soc., pp. 963–984, doi:10.4171/022-3/47, ISBN   978-3-98547-038-9, MR   2275714
  3. Kasteleyn, P. W. (1967), "Graph theory and crystal physics", Graph Theory and Theoretical Physics, London: Academic Press, pp. 43–110, MR   0253689
  4. 1 2 Little, Charles H. C. (1974), "An extension of Kasteleyn's method of enumerating the 1-factors of planar graphs", Combinatorial Mathematics (Proc. Second Australian Conf., Univ. Melbourne, Melbourne, 1973), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 403, Springer, Berlin: 63–72, MR   0382062
  5. Robertson, Neil; Seymour, P. D.; Thomas, Robin (1999), "Permanents, Pfaffian orientations, and even directed circuits", Annals of Mathematics, Second Series, 150 (3): 929–975, arXiv: math/9911268 , doi:10.2307/121059, JSTOR   121059, MR   1740989