Photography Is Not a Crime

Last updated
PINAC News
Type of site
News
Available inEnglish
OwnerPINAC News, Inc.
Created byCarlos Miller
URL pinacnews.com
CommercialYes
RegistrationOptional
Launched2007
Current statusInactive as of Dec. 2022.

Photography Is Not a Crime (PINAC, published under the trade name PINAC News) was an organization and news website that focused on rights of civilians who photograph and film police and other government organizations in the United States. It was founded in 2007 following the arrest of its creator, Carlos Miller, a veteran news reporter and photojournalist, and incorporated in June 2014 as PINAC Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation. In December 2022 Carlos Miller declared the site dead. [1]

Contents

Origin

In early 2007, Miller was on assignment for an article about the Biscayne Boulevard area of Miami, Florida. He observed five police officers interviewing an individual and began to take photographs. The officers asked Miller to move on, but he refused, informing them that he was on public property, where he held the right to photograph. The officers then arrested him for numerous misdemeanor offenses, including resisting arrest. [fn 1] [5] [6] [7] [8] Miller claims he was beaten by the officers during his arrest. [9] Miller created the blog as a result of his arrest, the freedom of the press and free speech violations by the Miami Police Department, and his desire to educate the public on the issue of the right of Americans to document the activities of public officials in the performance of their duties.

First Amendment issues

PINAC focuses on First Amendment issues that intersect with governmental oppression of those rights, normally by police officers. It also gives civilians tips on how to interact with the police and assert their constitutionally protected rights. [10]

General arrests

Police departments have harassed or made arrests of civilian photographers for charges such as obstruction [11] and making terror threats. [12] [13]

Wiretapping arrests

PINAC has covered a number of cases during which police officers have misused wiretapping laws against civilians such as Anthony Graber in Maryland. Graber was arrested after he posted a video of a police contact on YouTube. [fn 2] [16]

Homeland security

In addition, there have been numerous examples in which police or security officers have erroneously told civilians that filming or taking pictures of a particular building is unlawful and a violation, due to either national security or homeland security reasons. Examples covered in the blog include a police officer advising that photographing the National Laboratory at the University of Texas Medical Branch was prohibited, [17] and similar examples involving photographing an art exhibit in downtown Indianapolis, [18] and a train station in New York City. [19] [20]

Police seizure of footage

PINAC has documented a number of cases in which police officers seized cameras and cell phones or deleted photographs or video, apparently in an effort to cover up police misconduct, such as in the killing of Oscar Grant by BART Police officers. [21] In some cases, police have been accused of tampering with evidence by deleting photographs or videos. For example, in Broward County, an off-duty deputy sheriff pulled over a motorist, and then illegally seized and destroyed her cell phone in an attempt to get rid of the video that she had taken of police misconduct. [22]

On August 2, 2021, five Miami Beach police officers were charged with using excessive force against a bystander who recorded video of the officers beating a handcuffed suspect. [23]

Recognition

The blog has been featured or discussed mainstream publications including Playboy , [24] [25] The Washington Post , [16] The Boston Globe [26] and the Fort Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel . [27] It made ABC News when Andrew Meyer joined as a staff writer in 2014. [28]

PINAC was cited in law reviews including the Tennessee Law Review , [29] the Quinnipiac Law Review , [30] and the University of Pennsylvania Law Review . [31]

See also

Footnotes

  1. ↑ Miller was later acquitted of all charges except the resisting arrest charge, and that charge was overturned on appeal. Miller was supported during the trial by the Society of Professional Journalists, who contributed $3,000 towards his defense. [2] [3] [4]
  2. ↑ The use of wiretapping laws to suppress photographers clearly violate the First Amendment, and courts have noted that public officers in a public place have no expectation of privacy. [14] [15]

Related Research Articles

<i>Miranda</i> warning Notification given by U.S. police to criminal suspects on their rights while in custody

In the United States, the Miranda warning is a type of notification customarily given by police to criminal suspects in police custody advising them of their right to silence and, in effect, protection from self-incrimination; that is, their right to refuse to answer questions or provide information to law enforcement or other officials. Named for the U.S. Supreme Court's 1966 decision Miranda v. Arizona, these rights are often referred to as Miranda rights. The purpose of such notification is to preserve the admissibility of their statements made during custodial interrogation in later criminal proceedings. The idea came from law professor Yale Kamisar, who subsequently was dubbed "the father of Miranda."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1791 amendment prohibiting unreasonable searches and seizures

The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. It prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets requirements for issuing warrants: warrants must be issued by a judge or magistrate, justified by probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and must particularly describe the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bunny Yeager</span> American photographer and pin-up model (1929–2014)

Linnea Eleanor "Bunny" Yeager was an American photographer and pin-up model.

Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, on the matter of whether wiretapping of private telephone conversations, conducted by federal agents without a search warrant with recordings subsequently used as evidence, constituted a violation of the target’s rights under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. In a 5–4 decision, the Court held that the constitutional rights of a wiretapping target have not been violated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Knock-and-announce</span> United States law criminal procedure

Knock-and-announce, in United States law criminal procedure, is an ancient common law principle, incorporated into the Fourth Amendment, which requires law enforcement officers to announce their presence and provide residents with an opportunity to open the door prior to a search.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Perp walk</span> Parading an arrested criminal suspect before the media

A perp walk, walking the perp, is a practice in law enforcement of taking an arrested suspect, usually right after arrest, out in public, usually from the police station to the vehicle to the courthouse and then after the court hearing back to the vehicle, creating an opportunity for a media frenzy to take photographs and video of the event. The defendant is typically handcuffed or otherwise restrained, and is sometimes dressed in prison garb. Within the United States the perp walk is most closely associated with New York City. The practice rose in popularity in the 1980s under U.S. Attorney Rudolph Giuliani, when suspects charged with felonies were perp-walked.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forward intelligence team</span> UK uniformed police who surveil public gatherings

Forward Intelligence Teams (FITs) are two or more police officers who are deployed by UK police forces to gather intelligence on the ground and in some circumstances, to disrupt activists and deter anti-social behaviour. They use cameras, camcorders and audio recorders to conduct overt surveillance of the public. An unsuccessful legal challenge has been made against their use of overt surveillance, but in 2009 the Court of Appeal ruled that they must justify retention of photographs on a case-by-case basis. Any retained information is recorded on the Crimint database.

Scott J. Andreassi serves as District Attorney of Armstrong County, Pennsylvania.

Inevitable discovery is a doctrine in United States criminal procedure that permits admission of evidence that was obtained through illegal means if it would "inevitably" have been obtained regardless of the illegality. It is one of several exceptions to the exclusionary rule, or the related fruit-of-the-poisonous tree doctrine, which prevent evidence collected in violation of a defendant's constitutional rights from being admitted in court.

Fellers v. United States, 540 U.S. 519 (2004), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding the Sixth Amendment's right to counsel.

United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a federal statute prohibiting the "pandering" of child pornography did not violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, even if a person charged under the code did in fact not possess child pornography with which to trade.

Scott W. Rothstein is an American disbarred lawyer, convicted felon, and the former managing shareholder, chairman, and chief executive officer of the now-defunct Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler law firm. He funded an extravagant lifestyle with a $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme, one of the largest such in history.

Anthony Graber is an American who was charged, in 2010, with felony violation of Maryland wiretapping law for undisclosed recording of his roadside receipt of a speeding ticket from a plainclothes police officer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NW Raiders</span>

The NW Raiders is a police crime unit with the Fort Lauderdale Police Department in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

<i>Glik v. Cunniffe</i> 2011 court case regarding private citizens action

Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 is a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that a private citizen has the right to record video and audio of police carrying out their duties in a public place, and that the arrest of the citizen for a wiretapping violation violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights. The case arose when Simon Glik filmed Boston, Massachusetts, police officers from the bicycle unit making an arrest in a public park. When the officers observed that Glik was recording the arrest, they arrested him and Glik was subsequently charged with wiretapping, disturbing the peace, and aiding in the escape of a prisoner. Glik then sued the City of Boston and the arresting officers, claiming that they violated his constitutional rights.

People v. Aguilar, 2 N.E.3d 321, was an Illinois Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Aggravated Unlawful Use of a Weapon (AUUF) statute violated the right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment. The Court stated that this was because the statute amounted to a wholesale statutory ban on the exercise of a personal right that was specifically named in and guaranteed by the United States Constitution, as construed by the United States Supreme Court. A conviction for Unlawful Possession of a Firearm (UPF) was proper because the possession of handguns by minors was conduct that fell outside the scope of the Second Amendment's protection.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First Amendment audit</span> Largely American social movement

First Amendment audits are a largely American social movement that usually involves photographing or filming from a public space. It is often categorized by its practitioners, known as auditors, as activism and citizen journalism that tests constitutional rights, in particular the right to photograph and video record in a public space. Auditors have tended to film or photograph government buildings, equipment, and access control points, as well as any personnel present.

<i>Turner v. Driver</i> 2017 American appeals court decision

Turner v. Driver, No. 16-10312, is a 2017 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that affirmed the First Amendment right to record the police. One of the officers involved was criminally indicted for a similar incident around the same time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ culture in Miami</span>

Miami has one of the largest and most prominent LGBTQ communities in the United States. Miami has had a gay nightlife scene as early as the 1930s. Miami has a current status as a gay mecca that attracts more than 1 million LGBT visitors a year. The Miami area as a whole has been gay-friendly for decades and is one of the few places where the LGBTQ community has its own chamber of commerce, the Miami-Dade Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce (MDGLCC). As of 2005, Miami was home to an estimated 15,277 self-identifying gay and bisexual individuals. The Miami metropolitan area had an estimated 183,346 self-identifying LGBT residents.

Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided that the mere existence of probable cause for an arrest did not bar the plaintiff's First Amendment retaliatory arrest claim, but deferred consideration of the broader question of when it might. The case concerned a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit filed against Riviera Beach by Fane Lozman, who had been arrested while criticizing local politicians during the public comments section of a City Council meeting. The city argued that under Hartman v. Moore he could not sue for retaliation, as they had probable cause to arrest him for the offense of disturbing a lawful assembly. Lozman conceded that they had probable cause, but argued that Hartman, a case about retaliatory prosecutions, did not extend to retaliatory arrests, and that instead Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle allowed his suit.

References

  1. ↑ Miller, Carlos (December 29, 2022). "Rest in Power, PINAC News (2007 – 2022)". PINAC News. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 18, 2024.
  2. ↑ SPJ Legal Defense Fund grant aids photographer's defense, Press Release, Society of Professional Journalists, (March 9, 2007).
  3. ↑ SPJ leaders express disappointment in First Amendment violation in Miami, Press Release, Society of Professional Journalists. (June 19, 2008).
  4. ↑ Miller v. State, No. 08-326 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 2009). via Scribd.
  5. ↑ Evan Benn, Photojournalist claims unjust arrest , Miami Herald blog (February 27, 2007, 8:16 PM).
  6. ↑ Bob Norman, Cat305 Journo Arrested , Boward-Palm Beach New Times blog (February 27, 2007, 3:08 PM).
  7. ↑ Mark Frauenfelder, Take a picture in Miami, go to jail , Boingboing (February 28, 2007, 7:01 PM).
  8. ↑ Radley Balko, Straight Talk: Videotaping Police , FoxNews.com (June 19, 2007).
  9. ↑ Joshua Ceballos (August 3, 2021). "Hialeah State House Member's Proposed Law Would Make Criminals Out of Citizens Like Darnella Frazier". Miami New Times.
  10. ↑ How to photograph police , 43 Reason 14. (2011).
  11. ↑ Martha Nell, Constitutional Law: Supreme Court Gives Nod to Citizens Who Record Police, Amidst Reports of Multiple Arrests , ABAJournal.com (November 26, 2012).
  12. ↑ John Pacenti, Recording nets terror charge for videographer , Fulton County Daily Report, September 13, 2011, at 5.(subscription required)
  13. ↑ Richard Brenneman, 2008 Proved a Dismal Year for an Ailing Fourth Estate , Berkeley Daily Planet, January 8–14, 2009, at 7.
  14. ↑ Glik v. Cunniffe , 655 F.3d 78 (1st Cir. 2011)
  15. ↑ State v. Graber , No. 12-K-10-647, 2010 Md. Cir. Ct. LEXIS 7 (Md. Cir. Ct. Sept. 27, 2010).
  16. 1 2 Annys Shin, From YouTube to your local court; Video of traffic stop sparks debate on whether police are twisting Md. wiretap laws , Wash. Post, June 16, 2010, at A1.
  17. ↑ Morgan Leigh Manning, Less than Picture Perfect: The Legal Relationship between Photographers' Rights and Law Enforcement , 78 Tenn. L. Rev. 110-11 nn40-49 (2010).
  18. ↑ Manning, at 110-11, nn. 40-49.
  19. ↑ Manning, at 112-13 nn. 64-73.
  20. ↑ Ahnalese Rushmann, Photographers tangle with vague rules in transit hubs , 33 News Media & the Law 34 n. 2 (2009).
  21. ↑ The Substance of Truth 160 (Tolu Olorunda ed. 2011).
  22. ↑ David Smiley & Diana Moskovitz, A history of cops vs. cameras in Miami Beach , Miami Herald, June 14, 2011.
  23. ↑ Charles Rabin (August 2, 2021). "Five Miami Beach cops charged after pummeling two men in hotel lobby. Video released". Miami Herald.
  24. ↑ Tim Mohr, No photos allowed: who will protect us from the protectors? , Playboy, Nov. 1, 2009, at 126.
  25. ↑ Carlos Miller, Guess who made this month's Playboy Magazine? (not just Marge Simpson) Photography is Not a Crime: PINAC, Oct. 26, 2009, accessed Nov. 17, 2013.
  26. ↑ Mark Baard, Swann's latest security device has that sinister vibe , Boston Globe, July 5, 2010, at Business 7.
  27. ↑ Ihosvani Rodriguez, Lauderdale enforcing no-photo rule at 'Rock of Ages' filming location , Fort Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel, June 9, 2011, at 1B.
  28. ↑ "'Don't Tase Me Bro' Guy's Aftershock Surprise". ABC News.
  29. ↑ Manning, at 109-114.
  30. ↑ Mario Cerame, The Right to Record Police in Connecticut , 30 Quinnipiac L. Rev 385 (2012).
  31. ↑ Seth F. Kreimer, Pervasive Image Capture and the First Amendment: Memory, Discourse, and the Right to Record , 159 U. Pa. L. Rev. 335 (2011).
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.