Political Order and Political Decay

Last updated October 04, 2022

Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalisation of Democracy is a 2014 book by American political scientist Francis Fukuyama. The book follows Fukuyama's 2011 book, The Origins of Political Order , written to shed light on political institutions and their development in different regions.^[1]

Twenty years after his pivotal 1989 essay “The End of History?”, Fukuyama remains committed to the liberal democratic state as an ideal form of government, compared to alternatives such as the Chinese, Russian or Islamist governments.^[2] However, he warns against internal forces leading to stagnation and political decay within liberal democracies, which threatens the future of this form of government.^[3]

Three components of political order

The three components

Fukuyama stresses the importance of the three pillars of the modern state, as described in the first volume in the series, The Origins of Political Order :

The state (executive capability to exercise power).
Rule of Law (vs. Rule by Law)
Democratic Accountability.

In other words, in an ideal system, a powerful and efficient state is kept in check by the people, and by the law, which can bind the state itself.^[4] Importantly, Fukuyama distinguishes between an effective state and a large state.^[3] The former is simply about competence, and it can be present in states with little welfare (Singapore) or extensive welfare (Netherlands).^[3]

Different regions and countries developed these three institutions, if at all, at different times.^[2] China, for example, developed a strong state early on, but never fully developed the rule of law or political accountability. India developed institutions akin to the rule of law early in its history, but not strong states. An ideal modern state, as conceived by Fukuyama, must have all three institutions in a delicate balance. Only in certain parts of Europe, in the late 18th century, did all three institutions come together to what we now recognize as a modern liberal democratic state.

Development of the three components

The Origins of Political Order, the first book of the series, described the three important institutions and their development. Political Order and Political Decay begins where the first book left off, focusing on developments in various countries from the French Revolution to the present.^[2] The book traces the development of these institutions in China, Japan, Prussia, Latin America and the United States, before warning against the decay of institutions.

The United States

Fukuyama describes the early U.S. having a weak state, with goods and offices handed out based on corruption and patrimony,^[2] partially because democracy entrenched itself without a strong state with capacity to rule effectively.^[3] Before the Pendleton Act of 1883, for example, all political offices were allocated on the basis of patronage.^[5]

From the end of the 19th century to the mid-20th century, however, the Progressive Movement and the New Deal transformed the American state and made it much stronger and more effective.^[2] Scholars, administrators and politicians advocated for, and eventually built, agencies administered by experts selected on the basis of merit and education instead of political hacks.^[5] A workable bureaucracy, tax system and federal infrastructure were products of this transformation.^[3]

This governmental change reflects “a social revolution brought about by industrialization, which mobilized a host of new political actors with no interest in the old clientelist system.”^[2] The American example shows that democracies can build strong states, but Fukuyama argues that the process requires much effort, over time, by powerful players not tied to the older patrimonial political system.^[2]

Other case studies

The problem once faced by America is now seen in certain parts of Africa, where democracy weakens government capacity and authority by subjecting it to too many conflicts.^[3] By contrast, East Asian countries like Japan and South Korea, with a tradition of strong central government, meant that an authoritative state could survive democratic empowerment. Fukuyama also argues that war is sometimes an important shock to established systems, leading to institutional transformations.^[3] He contends that the two World Wars, while horrific, empowered the state and made it fit for more democracy after the war.^[3] Dysfunctional politics in Latin America, Fukuyama claims, is partially due to fewer wars and consequent weaker states.^[3]

Ideas in the book are exemplified throughout the first and the second volumes via different cases:

Denmark - used as an example for an ideal state, with a competent state, the rule of law, and accountability through democratic elections.
Nigeria - used as an example for a highly corrupted state that has been a case study of natural resources exploitation by its leaders.
Greece and Italy - used as examples of highly corrupted states with pervasive patronage and clientelism local systems.
China - an example of a strong state that has been able to organize in this form once and again, thousands years ago and nowadays. Although somewhat lacking in the rule of law and accountability, Fukuyama argues that China's sequence of acquiring the institutions is developmentally right, because the strong state came before democratization.^[3]

Fukuyama is skeptical of transplanting institutions, stating that “We should . . . be wary of foreigners bearing gifts of institutions”. While Western institutions and models of development have been successful within their own societies, “each society must adapt them to its own conditions and build on indigenous traditions.”^[4]

Clientelism and Patronage

Fukuyama makes the argument that patronage behavior is rooted in the following biological roots:

Reciprocal Altruism.
Kinship Selection.

Fukuyama argues that humans, by biological disposition, are likely to favor friends and family over others, leading to patrimonialism.^[6] Successful political order requires institutions that can check and channel these impulses, thereby allowing productivity and the public good.^[6] Fukuyama argues that in the modern world, the institutions best accomplish this feat is a strong state coupled with the rule of law and democratic accountability.^[6]

Political decay in the United States

In his 1968 book Political Order in Changing Societies , Samuel P. Huntington used the term "political decay" to describe the instability experienced by many newly independent countries after World War II.^[5] Political institutions are rules that ensure stability and predictability in human societies, and they also facilitate collection action. However, Huntington explains, sometimes old political institutions do not adapt to new circumstances because of self-interest of insiders, cognitive inertia, or conformism.^[5] Chaotic and sometimes violent transitions may then take place.^[5] Fukuyama argues that while democracies can theoretically reform through electoral politics, they are also potentially subject to decay when institutions do not adapt.^[5]

After tracing how a modern and effective government was developed in the U.S., Fukuyama asserts that it is experiencing political decay.^[2] When institutional structures developed from a previous time fail to evolve with societal changes, institutional decline results. It is possible for an effective democratic state to decline, and the dynamics of the U.S. decline are explored in the final section of the book.

State capture, vetocracy and judicialization

Fukuyama perceives this decay as manifesting in a declining quality of bureaucracy, resulting in a weaker and less efficient state.^[4] Fukuyama described American politics as a system of “courts and parties,” where legal and legislative mechanisms are valued more than a competent administrative government.^[3]

This favoritism towards excessive checks and balances lead to a "vetocracy," where a small interest group can veto a measure beneficial to the public good.^[4] Dysfunctional political divides results in small networks capturing political outcomes, through a process of “repatrimonialization.” Special interest groups capture Congress, excessively influence the legislative process, distort taxes and spending, introduce self-conflicting mandates to bureaucracies, and use the judicial process to challenge and delay actions in costly proceedings.^[5]

Unlike France, Germany or Japan, Fukuyama argued, state capacity in America came after the rule of law and democratic politics, and it has always been weaker and viewed with distrust.^[5] As a result, many administrative agencies do not have the rule-making power and authority enjoyed by more competent bureaucracies. Instead, Congress allows private parties to liberally sue in court, resulting in unthinkable transformations of the law and drastic growths in legal proceedings.^[5]^[7]^[8] The judicialization of processes then results in "uncertainty, procedural complexity, redundancy, lack of finality, [and] high transaction costs."^[8]

Consequences

The result of the process, Fukuyama argues, is a vicious cycle. When the American state performs poorly, it reinforces distrust and lessens investments in the state, which then leads to even poorer performances.^[2] Yet, in the United States, a veneration of the Constitution and the founding fathers have impeded necessary government reforms.^[4]

Fukuyama fears that America’s problems may increasingly come to characterize other liberal democracies, such as European countries, where “the growth of the European Union and the shift of policy making away from national capitals to Brussels” has made “the European system as a whole . . . resemble that of the United States to an increasing degree.”^[2]

Related Research Articles

Democracy is a form of government in which the people have the authority to deliberate and decide legislation, or to choose governing officials to do so. Who is considered part of "the people" and how authority is shared among or delegated by the people has changed over time and at different rates in different countries, but over time more and more of a democratic country's inhabitants have generally been included. Cornerstones of democracy include freedom of assembly, association, property rights, freedom of religion and speech, inclusiveness and equality, citizenship, consent of the governed, voting rights, freedom from unwarranted governmental deprivation of the right to life and liberty, and minority rights.

Yoshihiro Francis Fukuyama is an American political scientist, political economist, international relations scholar and writer.

The End of History and the Last Man is a 1992 book of political philosophy by American political scientist Francis Fukuyama which argues that with the ascendancy of Western liberal democracy—which occurred after the Cold War (1945–1991) and the dissolution of the Soviet Union (1991)—humanity has reached "not just ... the passing of a particular period of post-war history, but the end of history as such: That is, the end-point of mankind's ideological evolution and the universalization of Western liberal democracy as the final form of human government." For the book, which is an expansion of his essay "The End of History?", Fukuyama draws upon the philosophies and ideologies of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and Karl Marx, who define human history as a linear progression, from one socioeconomic epoch to another.

A failed state is a political body that has disintegrated to a point where basic conditions and responsibilities of a sovereign government no longer function properly. A state can also fail if the government loses its legitimacy even if it is performing its functions properly. For a stable state, it is necessary for the government to enjoy both effectiveness and legitimacy. Likewise, when a nation weakens and its standard of living declines, it introduces the possibility of total governmental collapse. The Fund for Peace characterizes a failed state as having the following characteristics:

Good governance is the process of measuring how public institutions conduct public affairs and manage public resources and guarantee the realization of human rights in a manner essentially free of abuse and corruption and with due regard for the rule of law. Governance is "the process of decision-making and the process by which decisions are implemented ". Governance in this context can apply to corporate, international, national, or local governance as well as the interactions between other sectors of society.

Democratization, or democratisation, is the transition to a more democratic political regime, including substantive political changes moving in a democratic direction. It may be the transition from an authoritarian regime to a full democracy, a transition from an authoritarian political system to a semi-democracy or transition from a semi-authoritarian political system to a democratic political system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iron law of oligarchy</span> Political theory developed by Robert Michels

The iron law of oligarchy is a political theory first developed by the German-born Italian sociologist Robert Michels in his 1911 book, Political Parties. It asserts that rule by an elite, or oligarchy, is inevitable as an "iron law" within any democratic organization as part of the "tactical and technical necessities" of the organization.

Modernization theory is used to explain the process of modernization within societies. The "classical" theories of modernization of the 1950s and 1960s drew on sociological analyses of Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim and a partial reading of Max Weber, and were strongly influenced by the writings of Harvard sociologist Talcott Parsons. Modernization theory was a dominant paradigm in the social sciences in the 1950s and 1960s, then went into a deep eclipse. It made a comeback after 1991, when Francis Fukuyama wrote about the end of the Cold War as confirmation on modernization theory and more generally of universal history. But the theory remains a controversial model.

Mixed government is a form of government that combines elements of democracy, aristocracy and monarchy, ostensibly making impossible their respective degenerations which are conceived as anarchy, oligarchy and tyranny. The idea was popularized during classical antiquity in order to describe the stability, the innovation and the success of the republic as a form of government developed under the Roman constitution.

State-building as a specific term in social sciences and humanities, refers to political and historical processes of creation, institutional consolidation, stabilization and sustainable development of states, from the earliest emergence of statehood up to the modern times. Within historical and political sciences, there are several theoretical approaches to complex questions related to role of various contributing factors in state-building processes.

Democratic consolidation is the process by which a new democracy matures, in a way that it becomes unlikely to revert to authoritarianism without an external shock, and is regarded as the only available system of government within a country. This is the case when: no significant political group seriously attempts to overthrow the democratic regime, the democratic system is regarded as the most appropriate way to govern by the vast majority of the public, and all political actors are accustomed to the fact that conflicts are resolved through established political and constitutional rules. The notion of democratic consolidation is contested because it is not clear that there is anything substantive that happens to new democracies that secures their continuation, beyond those factors that simply make it 'more likely' that they continue as democracies. Many scholars have attempted to explain the factors that are responsible for democracies consolidating, which has led to the emergence of different ‘consolidation theories’ in the academic literature. Unconsolidated democracies often suffer from formalized but intermittent elections and clientelism.

America at the Crossroads: Democracy, Power, and the Neoconservative Legacy is a 2006 book written by Francis Fukuyama.

Transitional justice is a process which responds to massive human rights violations through judicial redress, political reforms in a region or country, and other measures in order to prevent the recurrence of human rights abuse. Transitional justice consists of judicial and non-judicial measures implemented in order to redress legacies of human rights abuses. Such measures "include criminal prosecutions, truth commissions, reparations programs, and various kinds of institutional reforms". Transitional justice is instituted at a point of political transition classically from war to positive peace, or more broadly from violence and repression to societal stability and it is informed by a society’s desire to rebuild social trust, reestablish what is right from what is wrong, repair a fractured justice system, and build a democratic system of governance. The core value of transitional justice is the very notion of justice—which does not necessarily mean criminal justice. This notion and the political transformation, such as regime change or transition from conflict are thus linked to a more peaceful, certain, and democratic future.

With his famous book Political Order in Changing Societies, published in 1968, the American political scientist and Harvard professor Samuel P. Huntington is considered to be one of the ”Founding Fathers” of neo-institutionalism, the historical institutionalism. The book is dealing with the role of political institutions in changing political systems. Huntington stated that ”the most important political distinction among countries concerns not their form of government but their degree of government”. As stated by Francis Fukuyama, Huntington argued that political decay was "at least as likely as political development", and that neither "economic nor social development" could proceed without political order, the actual experience of newly independent countries being "one of increasing social and political disorder".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Liberal democracy</span> Political ideology and form of government

Liberal democracy is the combination of a liberal political ideology that operates under an indirect democratic form of government. It is characterized by elections between multiple distinct political parties, a separation of powers into different branches of government, the rule of law in everyday life as part of an open society, a market economy with private property, and the equal protection of human rights, civil rights, civil liberties and political freedoms for all people. To define the system in practice, liberal democracies often draw upon a constitution, either codified or uncodified, to delineate the powers of government and enshrine the social contract. After a period of expansion in the second half of the 20th century, liberal democracy became a prevalent political system in the world.

The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman times to the French Revolution is a 2011 book by political economist Francis Fukuyama. The main thesis of the book covers three main components that gives rise to a stable political order in a state: the state needs to be modern and strong, to obey the rule of law governing the state and be accountable. This theory is argued by applying comparative political history to develop a theory of the stability of a political system. The book covers several regions, and uses case studies of political developments from these regions, the scope is wide and consists of ancient history to the early modern period. Fukuyama refers to Amartya Sen's view that democracy remains the default political condition. Though not universally accepted as a form of government, even autocratic leaders have maintained semblance of democracy for legitimisation of their rule and use of media for their projection as democratic leaders. However, the situation in Iraq and Afghanistan challenges the assumption as there is no default reset to democracy once the sitting governments or leaders are removed.

Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, first published in 2012, is a book by economists Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson. The book applies insights from institutional economics, development economics and economic history to understand why nations develop differently, with some succeeding in the accumulation of power and prosperity and others failing, via a wide range of historical case studies.

Embedded democracy is a form of government in which democratic governance is secured by democratic partial regimes. The term "embedded democracy" was coined by political scientists Wolfgang Merkel, Hans-Jürgen Puhle, and Aurel Croissant, who identified "five interdependent partial regimes" necessary for an embedded democracy: electoral regime, political participation, civil rights, horizontal accountability, and the power of the elected representatives to govern. The five internal regimes work together to check the power of the government, while external regimes also help to secure and stabilize embedded democracies. Together, all the regimes ensure that an embedded democracy is guided by the three fundamental principles of freedom, equality, and control.

Political decay is a political theory, originally described by Samuel P. Huntington, which describes how chaos and disorder can arise from social modernization increasing more rapidly than political and institutional modernization. Huntington provides different definitions for political development and describes the forms of political decay according to the various definitions. Huntington focuses primarily on political development as modernization and institutionalization. However, he points to the different definitions of political development as being arbitrary ways to understanding the rise of political systems and the relationship between the political systems in different nations.

Democratic backsliding, also called autocratization, is the decline in the democratic characteristics of a political system: the opposite of democratization.

References

↑ Fukuyama, Francis. "Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy". Stanford.edu. Retrieved December 29, 2016.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Berman, Sheri (2014-09-11). "Global Warning". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331 . Retrieved 2020-05-15.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Runciman, David. "Francis Fukuyama's 'Political Order and Political Decay'". Financial Times.
1 2 3 4 5 Groot, Gerard De (2014-10-24). "What makes nations succeed and fail?". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286 . Retrieved 2020-05-15.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Fukuyama, Francis (2016-12-08). "America in Decay". Foreign Affairs: America and the World. ISSN 0015-7120 . Retrieved 2020-05-15.
1 2 3 Polansky, David (2014-10-02). "Book Review: 'Political Order and Political Decay' by Francis Fukuyama". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660 . Retrieved 2020-05-15.
↑ Kagan, Robert A. (8 October 2019). Adversarial legalism : the American way of law (Second ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts. ISBN 978-0-674-23836-7. OCLC 1090282556.
1 2 Farhang, Sean (April 2009). "The Political Development of Job Discrimination Litigation, 1963–1976". Studies in American Political Development. 23 (1): 23–60. doi:10.1017/S0898588X09000029. ISSN 0898-588X. S2CID 13922410.

External links

Presentation by Fukuyama on Political Order and Political Decay, October 25, 2014

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[1] Fukuyama, Francis. "Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy". Stanford.edu. Retrieved December 29, 2016.

[:0-2] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Berman, Sheri (2014-09-11). "Global Warning". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331 . Retrieved 2020-05-15.

[:1-3] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Runciman, David. "Francis Fukuyama's 'Political Order and Political Decay'". Financial Times.

[:2-4] 1 2 3 4 5 Groot, Gerard De (2014-10-24). "What makes nations succeed and fail?". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286 . Retrieved 2020-05-15.

[:3-5] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Fukuyama, Francis (2016-12-08). "America in Decay". Foreign Affairs: America and the World. ISSN 0015-7120 . Retrieved 2020-05-15.

[:4-6] 1 2 3 Polansky, David (2014-10-02). "Book Review: 'Political Order and Political Decay' by Francis Fukuyama". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660 . Retrieved 2020-05-15.

[7] Kagan, Robert A. (8 October 2019). Adversarial legalism : the American way of law (Second ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts. ISBN 978-0-674-23836-7. OCLC 1090282556.

[:5-8] 1 2 Farhang, Sean (April 2009). "The Political Development of Job Discrimination Litigation, 1963–1976". Studies in American Political Development. 23 (1): 23–60. doi:10.1017/S0898588X09000029. ISSN 0898-588X. S2CID 13922410.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]