The political trilemma of the world economy is a concept created by economist Dani Rodrik to capture the trade-offs that governments faced in their responses to globalization. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] The trilemma holds that "democracy, national sovereignty and global economic integration are mutually incompatible: we can combine any two of the three, but never have all three simultaneously and in full." [6] According to Rodrik, states embraced globalization and national autonomy in the late 20th century, but sacrificed democratic decision-making. [7] In the post-World War II period, states sacrificed globalization while embracing democracy at home and national autonomy. [7] The trilemma suggests that the backlash against globalization in the last few decades is rooted in a desire to reclaim democracy and national autonomy, even if it undermines economic integration. [7] Rodrik first presented the trilemma in a 2000 paper. [8]
According to TheEconomist, one rebuttal to the trilemma is found in Albert Hirschman's writings. [9] Hirschman observed that diversification of trade (global economic integration) could bolster national sovereignty by making it harder for a state to be coerced by any other single state. [9]