Postfunctionalism

Last updated

Postfunctionalism is a theory of European integration put forward by Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks in 2008, in opposition to the previous two main theories of European integration Neofunctionalism and Intergovernmentalism, as they could not explain critical aspects of European integration such as referenda and European issues becoming a part of national politics.

Contents

Postfunctionalism emphasises that the EU has become politicised, and that it is now hard to separate the politics of the EU from that of member states. Hence, the preferences of political parties and national publics now play a crucial role in shaping the EU's politics and integration. Postfunctionalism also puts people's identities at the heart of the debate on European integration, as identifying as European vs. national has a strong correlation with a person's support of the EU and European integration. [1]

In 2019, Hooghe and Marks advocated for a pluralist approach to theories of European integration. On this account, Neofunctionalism, Intergovernmentalism and Postfunctionalism are not competing approaches but rather they provided lenses that discipline our thinking about "the behavior of key actors, the arenas in which they act, and the causal mechanisms that connect their actions to institutional outcomes". [2] Each approach offers a distinct analysis of EU crises where "the Eurocrisis, the migration crisis, Brexit, and illiberalism can be viewed as episodes of intergovernmental bargaining, path-dependent spillovers, and ideological conflict". [3] Rather than test the theories themselves, these theories can be "mined for conflicting hypotheses that can be systematically tested against each other". [4]

Summary of Hooghe and Marks (2019) Grand Theories of European Integration in the Twenty-First Century [5]

Liberal IntergovernmentalismNeofunctionalismPostfunctionalism
Key ActorsNational governments of MS [6] transnational social agents demand and supranational entrepreneurs supply further integrationEurosceptic publics and parties, and mainstream parties responding to new transnational cleavage
Driver of (Dis)integrationIntegration deepens because economic cooperation is beneficial to national leadersIntegration is driven by transnational social pressures for greater cooperationIdeological conflict between functional pressures for integration and nationalist resistance to integration
Main LogicMS decision process:
(1) government preferences formed by powerful domestic groups,

(2) intergovernmental bargaining is shaped by asymmetrical interdependence among MS,

(3) MS delegate authority to supranational institutions in order to secure compliance to the deal which typically take the form of LCM solutions.		spillover effect: when integration in one policy any spills over in other policy areas by creating opportunities for further cooperation or unanticipated problems that only further integration am resolve.Assessing the causes and effects of politicisation:
(1) mismatch between
institutional status quo and functional pressures for multi-level governance,

(2) is decision-making
insulated or politicised, meaning it takes place
in mass polities, which depends on issue and capacity of elites to depoliticise, and mass politics opens door for national identity to
constrain integration.

(3) how does integration structure political conflict? If integration touches upon the configuration of core state powers then this activates a durable socio-political cleavage that reconfigures domestic party politics.
Predicted outcomeUnanimity rules in the Council generate LCM solutions.
Integration blocked when it touches high politics which is when MS governments take over.		Further integration as integration trajectory is characterised by path dependence where past integration progressively narrows the range of options and crises push integration through be cause status quo is untenable but reversing course is not possible.characterised by path dependenceTransition from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus.
New GAL-TAN transnational cleavage that reconfigures domestic politics.
And opens the possibility for disintegration.
EurocrisisSouthern MS receiving bailouts in inferior position so the outcome of Eurozone governance favoured the Northern MSFailing forward dynamic is the result of prior incomplete policies (monetary union without financial backstop) and a path dependent logic that pushed through further integration.

Crisis arose from unintended spill over that materialised supranational empowerment		Explains the delayed and ineffective response to the Euro crisis as a result of domestic nationalist opposition to European integration.

Politicised procrastination carried a high cost in the Northern and Southern MS in the form of Eurosceptic parties.

Eurocrisis broke the permissive consensus that enabled elite problem solving and activated the GAL-TAN fault line that pitted pro-European solutions against defenders of national interest.
Migration CrisisDuring the migration crisis MS suspended migration agreements (Dublin rules) to secure their borders.

While financial interests successfully pushed for further integration during the Eurocrisis, humanitarian groups were weaker and failed to secure cooperation.		Migration crisis nonetheless generated further integration.

Dublin regime was an incomplete solution that supranational entrepreneurs sought to improve.

They failed but supranational institutions acquired authority over monitoring of borders and processing migrant applications.		Migration crisis forced racist Europeans to take-in racialised people.

Immigration became dominant issue in domestic politics which radical right parties used to garner support and forced their states to reintroduce border controls.

For example, Merkel's party shifted positions in early 2016 as their popularity fell and they negotiated a deal with Turkey to block migration flows.
BrexitBrexit is illusory and will not affect significantly affect UK's economic cooperation with the EU (Moravcsik 2016).

The UK will likely preserve a high degree of cooperation while symbolically preserving its sovereignty.		Predicts UK divorce from EU will be soft but does not really explain why it happened.Illustrates tensions between functionalist pressures to integration and nationalist resistance.

Brexit referendum was Cameron's calculated decision to suppress a rejectionist faction in the conservative party that back fired.

The GAL-TAN pole implies strong polarisation.

As predicted, the Brexit debate took place between Remainers that emphasised economic benefits and Leavers that emphasised national identity and the two sides never touched.

The decisive issue was migration.
Illiberalism in Poland and HungaryIlliberalism is consistent with maintaining economic interdependence.

Consensus decision making disables the effective application of Article 7.

National sovereignty sustained by making sanctions to rule-of- law breeches conditional on agreement among all MS.		Commission has expanded its toolkit to evaluate and punish rule of law breaches in Poland and Hungary.

Commission opened Article 7 proceedings against both countries.

In the Multi-Annual Financial Framework, it included funding for justice and rule-of-law, and made certain financial contributions conditional on fulfilling rule of law requirements.

ECJ expanded to include cases of infringement on domestic
independence of courts.		Where did illiberalism come from?

Pis and Fidesz took more politicised stances on the GALTAN dimension to rally against migrants, multinationals and the EU.

Fidesz constitutional reforms drove strong polarisation domestically.

EPP tolerated illiberalism in Poland and Hungary because it would cost them seats.

Illiberalism defended by allies and criticised by cosmopolitans.


See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maastricht Treaty</span> 1992 founding treaty of the European Union

The Treaty on European Union, commonly known as the Maastricht Treaty, is the foundation treaty of the European Union (EU). Concluded in 1992 between the then-twelve member states of the European Communities, it announced "a new stage in the process of European integration" chiefly in provisions for a shared European citizenship, for the eventual introduction of a single currency, and for common foreign and security policies, and a number of changes to the European institutions and their decision taking procedures, not least a strengthening of the powers of the European Parliament and more majority voting on the Council of Ministers. Although these were seen by many to presage a "federal Europe", key areas remained inter-governmental with national governments collectively taking key decisions. This constitutional debate continued through the negotiation of subsequent treaties, culminating in the 2007 Treaty of Lisbon.

Neofunctionalism is a theory of regional integration which downplays globalisation and reintroduces territory into its governance. Neofunctionalism is often regarded as the first European integration theory developed by Ernst B. Haas in 1958 as part of his PhD research on the European Coal and Steel Community. Neofunctionalism seeks to explain the European integration process and why states accept to become a part of supranational organization. Jean Monnet's approach to European integration, which aimed at integrating individual sectors in hopes of achieving spillover effects to further the process of integration, is said to have followed the neofunctional school's tack.

European integration is the process of industrial, economic, political, legal, social, and cultural integration of states wholly or partially in Europe, or nearby. European integration has primarily but not exclusively come about through the European Union and its policies.

Liberal intergovernmentalism is a political theory in international relations developed by Andrew Moravcsik in 1993 to explain European integration. The theory is based upon and has further developed the intergovernmentalist theory and offers a more authentic perspective than its predecessor with its inclusion of both neo-liberal and realist aspects in its theory.

Functionalism is a theory of international relations that arose during the interwar period principally from the strong concern about the obsolescence of the state as a form of social organization. Rather than the self-interest of nation states that realists see as a motivating factor, functionalists focus on common interests and needs shared by states in a process of global integration triggered by the erosion of state sovereignty and the increasing weight of knowledge and hence of scientists and experts in the process of policy-making. Its roots can be traced back to the liberal and idealist traditions that started with Immanuel Kant and goes as far as Woodrow Wilson's "Fourteen Points" speech.

Multi-level governance is a term used to describe the way power is spread vertically between levels of government and horizontally across multiple quasi-government and non-governmental organizations and actors. This situation develops because countries have multiple levels of government including local, regional, state, national or federal, and many other organisations with interests in policy decisions and outcomes. International governance operates based on multi-level governance principles. Multi-level governance can be distinguished from multi-level government which is when different levels of government share or transfer responsibility amongst each other. Whereas multi-level governance analyses the relationship of different state levels and interaction with different types of actors.'

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cleavage (politics)</span> Sociological concept

In political science and sociology, a cleavage is a historically determined social or cultural line which divides citizens within a society into groups with differing political interests, resulting in political conflict among these groups. Social or cultural cleavages thus become political cleavages once they get politicized as such. Cleavage theory accordingly argues that political cleavages predominantly determine a country's party system as well as the individual voting behavior of citizens, dividing them into voting blocs. These blocs are distinguished by similar socio-economic characteristics, who vote and view the world in a similar way. It is distinct from other common political theories on voting behavior in the sense that it focuses on aggregate and structural patterns instead of individual voting behaviors.

Ernst Bernard Haas was an American political scientist who was known for his contributions to international relations theory. He was the Robson Professor of Government at the political science department of the University of California, Berkeley.

Peter Nedergaard is a Danish professor of political science who has been employed at the Department of Political Science at the University of Copenhagen since 2008. Peter Nedergaard is member of the Order of Dannebrog.

Pink vote are the votes cast by gays and lesbians, and is typically considered a voting bloc. Most prevalent in Britain, the concept has already spread to US, where gays and lesbians are substantially more likely to vote Democratic, and Canada with many other countries like South Africa and Australia starting to acknowledge it. The Pink Vote is now well-established across countries in Western Europe, including Germany with gay and lesbian voters being notably more inclined to vote for social democratic parties over right-wing parties and to be far more supportive of EU integration. In addition, there are socio-political movements and political groups formed by LGBT people who are linked to political parties.

Gary Marks is an American-based academic and an expert on multilevel governance and the European Union. He is a Burton Craige Distinguished Professor of Political Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He is also a recurring Research Fellow at the Robert Schuman Centre, EUI, Florence. Marks developed the concept of "multilevel governance.”

Liesbet Hooghe is a Belgian political scientist, currently serving as the W. R. Kenan Jr. Professor of Political Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. She is also a research fellow at the European University Institute, Florence. In a list of 400 top political scientists at Ph.D. granting institutions in the US, published in Political Science & Politics, she was ranked as the fifth most-cited woman scholar in political science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tanja Börzel</span> German political scientist

Tanja A. Börzel is a German political scientist. Her research and teaching focus on the fields of European Integration, Governance, and Diffusion. She is professor of Political Science at the Otto-Suhr-Institute of Political Science of Freie Universität Berlin, director of the Center for European Integration, and holder of the Jean Monnet Chair for European Integration from 2006 until 2009. Currently, she is department chair of the Otto-Suhr-Institute of Political Science.

An informal trilogue meeting, more commonly known as a trilogue, is a type of interinstitutional negotiation used in the European Union (EU) legislative process. The bodies involved in trilogue negotiations are the European Commission, the Council of the European Union, and the European Parliament. The European Commission takes on the mediating function.

Renaud Dehousse is a Belgian lawyer and professor, born on the 2 June 1960 in Liège, Belgium. He was the President of the European University Institute (EUI) in Florence, Italy.

A joint committee is used in international relations to facilitate continued cooperation among states and the implementation of treaties by establishing a formal governance structure.

Philipp Genschel is a German political scientist. He currently holds the Joint Chair in European Public Policy at the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies and the Department of Political and Social Sciences of the European University Institute in Florence, Italy. Before joining the EUI, he was a professor of political science at Jacobs University Bremen, Germany, and a research associate at the Max-Planck-Institute for the Study of Societies in Cologne, Germany.

Politicisation is a concept in political science and theory used to explain how ideas, entities or collections of facts are given a political tone or character, and are consequently assigned to the ideas and strategies of a particular group or party, thus becoming the subject of contestation. Politicisation has been described as compromising objectivity, and is linked with political polarisation. Conversely, it can have a democratising effect and enhance political choice, and has been shown to improve the responsiveness of supranational institutions such as the European Union. The politicisation of a group is more likely to occur when justifications for political violence are considered acceptable within a society, or in the absence of norms condemning violence.

Grace Skogstad is a Canadian political scientist and professor at the University of Toronto. and a cross-appointed affiliate faculty in the Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy at the University of Toronto.

Opposition is a fundamental element of democracy. Without the right to challenge and criticise ones government, its policies and its actions, democracy cannot develop. Political opposition, “ when B is opposed to the conduct of government A", can include opposition from parties not in government, as well as actors other than political parties.

References

  1. ↑ Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks, ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science, published online by Cambridge University Press, 2008, doi : 10.1017/S000712340800
  2. ↑ Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2019. ‘Grand Theories of European Integration in the Twenty-First Century’. Journal of European Public Policy 26(8): 1128. doi : 10.1080/13501763.2019.1569711
  3. ↑ Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2019. ‘Grand Theories of European Integration in the Twenty-First Century’. Journal of European Public Policy 26(8): 1128. doi : 10.1080/13501763.2019.1569711
  4. ↑ Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2019. ‘Grand Theories of European Integration in the Twenty-First Century’. Journal of European Public Policy 26(8): 1128. doi : 10.1080/13501763.2019.1569711
  5. ↑ Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2019. ‘Grand Theories of European Integration in the Twenty-First Century’. Journal of European Public Policy 26(8): 1113–33. doi : 10.1080/13501763.2019.1569711
  6. ↑ Member States of the European Union


This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.