Praise Marx and Pass the Ammunition

Last updated

Praise Marx and Pass the Ammunition
Praise Marx and Pass the Ammunition film Theatrical release poster (1968).png
Directed by Maurice Hatton
Screenplay byMaurice Hatton
Based onan idea by Michael Wood
Maurica Hatton
Produced byMaurice Hatton
Starring John Thaw
Edina Ronay
Louis Mahoney
CinematographyCharles Stewart
Edited by Eduardo Guedes
Music by Carl Davis
Production
company
Mithras Films Ltd.
Release date
  • 19 December 1968 (1968-12-19)
Running time
89 minutes
CountryUnited Kingdom
LanguageEnglish
Budget£25,000 [1]

Praise Marx and Pass the Ammunition is a 1968 British political comedy-drama film directed, written and produced by Maurice Hatton and starring John Thaw, Edina Ronay and Louis Mahoney. [2] It concerns the adventures of a young British political activist.

Contents

Plot

Dom is a 30-year-old Marxist–Leninist member of the Revolutionary Party of the Third World, a small group of political activists. He has a stream of girlfriends whom he lectures on political theory. After visiting Paris during the May 1968 demonstrations, on his return he urges his group that similar revolutionary tactics are urgently needed in England. He visits factories to talk to the workers and gets involved with a Liverpool company facing closure. At the same time he is put on a mock trial by members of his own group, accused of betraying the revolutionary cause.

Cast

Production

The film was made in four weeks on a budget of £25,000 sourced from the British Film Institute Production Fund, Hatton's own company Mithras Films, the National Film Finance Corporation and a German TV company. [1] [3]

Release

It was released in the UK on 19 December 1969, [4] and shown on Channel 4 TV on 19 April 1985. [5]

Critical reception

The Monthly Film Bulletin wrote:

In the context of the British cinema, Praise Marx and Pass the Ammunition is a considerable achievement. Maurice Hatton's first feature film, it was made on the extremely limited budget of £25,000, with a shooting schedule of only four weeks, using a full union crew. The film attempts to examine the dilemma of the extreme Left in Britain today, committed as it is to proletarian revolution .... John Thaw as Dom gives a suitably dry performance. Hatton's intention appears nevertheless to be to preach the revolutionary cause, using a commentary as his major device, and at the end we are told "The film ends here, but the struggle continues" as the train leaves for Liverpool and the possibility of a workers' take-over of the factory. In a series of crudely inserted documentary sequences consisting of a montage of stills on housing conditions, occupational diseases and educational opportunity, Hatton puts the case for radical social change ... At the same time, we are led to believe that Dom's encounter with the realities of the May revolution brings about a change in him so that his position within the party becomes untenable. At this level, however, the film is extremely muddled, largely because of the shortcomings of the script, which mixes commentary and dialogue in what appears to be too indiscriminate a fashion for any sustained argument to be deduced. [6]

Kine Weekly wrote:

Producer, director and scriptwriter Maurice Hatton has made several documentaries, and his experience in the documentary field is apparent in this, his first feature. It has been made with considerable assurance especially when its very low budget is taken into account. Episodic in construction, it is a kind of odyssey of a revolutionary who, by coming face to face with various real-life and fictitious political situations, is forced to analyse objective principles and tactics and his own subjective feelings – as, for instance, when he suddenly finds he is expected to torture an unknown drugged informer. But only those who agree with the very specialized and narrow line of revolution argument which the film puts forward can have the patience to follow it through. It works best during its faintly comic, self-mocking passages, which invite broader interest and involvement. [7]

The Radio Times Guide to Films gave the film 3/5 stars, writing: "Do not be deterred by this formidable-looking piece of political propaganda, made for virtually nothing and originally seen by virtually no one. Although it is part agitprop, with lots of facts and figures on social deprivation, it is, as the title suggests, mostly satire and takes amusing swipes at a Swinging Sixties stereotype, the Marxist-Leninist revolutionary with noble ideals and feet of clay. Partly shot during the Paris student riots, it is a fascinating testament to long-lost hopes." [8]

The Listener wrote: "If this is a comedy of the far Left trying to get it together, it is made all the more effective by the inclusion of documentary material which acknowledges that the underlying problems are real enough. ...In a way, this is [Hatton's] own attempt to import the bracing atmosphere of Paris '68, with his mixed method (fiction and documentary, revolutionary comedy and direct address on the need for social change) owing something to the work of Jean-Luc Godard." [9]

Time Out wrote: "Very much a product of the revolution in the air of 1968, Hatton's first feature has rather dated in its attempts to state a case for radical social change in Britain. More than a little muddled anyway when trying to be serious, it was always much better at digging satirically into areas of bad faith as its hero, a 30-year-old Marxist-Leninist of working class origins (sharply played by a pre- Sweeney Thaw), seduces a string of bourgeois beauties in the hope of also impregnating them with his revolutionary message. As in Long Shot (1978), Hatton's quirkish sense of humour is the thing." [10]

In Sixties British Cinema, film historian Robert Murphy describes the film as "a wonderfully authentic evocation of late-60s radical politics." [11]

Related Research Articles

Marxism–Leninism is a communist ideology that became the largest faction of the communist movement in the world in the years following the October Revolution. It was the predominant ideology of most communist governments throughout the 20th century. It was developed by Joseph Stalin and drew on elements of Bolshevism, orthodox Marxism, and Leninism. It was the state ideology of the Soviet Union, Soviet satellite states in the Eastern Bloc, and various countries in the Non-Aligned Movement and Third World during the Cold War, as well as the Communist International after Bolshevization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maoism</span> Variant of Marxism–Leninism

Maoism, officially called Mao Zedong Thought, is a variety of Marxism–Leninism that Mao Zedong developed while trying to realize a socialist revolution in the agricultural, pre-industrial society of the Republic of China and later the People's Republic of China. A difference between Maoism and traditional Marxism–Leninism is that a united front of progressive forces in class society would lead the revolutionary vanguard in pre-industrial societies rather than communist revolutionaries alone. This theory, in which revolutionary praxis is primary and ideological orthodoxy is secondary, represents urban Marxism–Leninism adapted to pre-industrial China. Later theoreticians expanded on the idea that Mao had adapted Marxism–Leninism to Chinese conditions, arguing that he had in fact updated it fundamentally and that Maoism could be applied universally throughout the world. This ideology is often referred to as Marxism–Leninism–Maoism to distinguish it from the original ideas of Mao.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist)</span> Far-left political party in India from 1969–72

The Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist) (CPI (ML)) was an Indian communist party formed by the All India Coordination Committee of Communist Revolutionaries (AICCCR) at a congress in Calcutta in 1969. The foundation of the party was declared by Kanu Sanyal at a mass meeting in Calcutta on 22 April, Vladimir Lenin's birthday. Later the CPI(ML) party splintered into several Naxalite groups.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Revolutionary Socialist Party (India)</span> Political party in India

Revolutionary Socialist Party (RSP) is a communist party in India. The party was founded on 19 March 1940 by Tridib Chaudhuri and has its roots in the Bengali liberation movement Anushilan Samiti and the Hindustan Socialist Republican Army.

Marxism is a political philosophy and method of socioeconomic analysis. It uses a dialectical materialist interpretation of historical development, better known as historical materialism, to analyse class relations, social conflict, and social transformation. Marxism originates with the works of 19th-century German philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Marxism has developed over time into various branches and schools of thought, and as a result, there is no single, definitive Marxist theory. Marxism has had a profound effect in shaping the modern world, with various left-wing and far-left political movements taking inspiration from it in varying local contexts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Otto Rühle</span> German writer, editor, teacher, Marxist theorist and politician

Karl Heinrich Otto Rühle was a German Marxist active in opposition to both the First and Second World Wars as well as a council communist theorist.

The Johnson–Forest Tendency, whose supporters are called the Johnsonites, is a radical left tendency in the United States associated with Marxist humanist theorists C. L. R. James and Raya Dunayevskaya, who used the pseudonyms J. R. Johnson and Freddie Forest respectively. They were joined by author/activist Grace Lee Boggs, who was considered the third founder.

The Marxist Group was an early Trotskyist group in the United Kingdom.

Communism is a left-wing to far-left sociopolitical, philosophical, and economic ideology within the socialist movement, whose goal is the creation of a communist society, a socioeconomic order centered around common ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange that allocates products to everyone in the society based on need. A communist society would entail the absence of private property and social classes, and ultimately money and the state.

Marxism is a method of socioeconomic analysis that originates in the works of 19th century German philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Marxism analyzes and critiques the development of class society and especially of capitalism as well as the role of class struggles in systemic, economic, social and political change. It frames capitalism through a paradigm of exploitation and analyzes class relations and social conflict using a materialist interpretation of historical development – materialist in the sense that the politics and ideas of an epoch are determined by the way in which material production is carried on.

Maurice Hatton was a British screenwriter and film director.

<i>Why Marx Was Right</i> 2011 non-fiction book by Terry Eagleton

Why Marx Was Right is a 2011 non-fiction book by the British academic Terry Eagleton about the 19th-century philosopher Karl Marx and the schools of thought, collectively known as Marxism, that arose from his work. Written for laypeople, Why Marx Was Right outlines ten objections to Marxism that they may hold and aims to refute each one in turn. These include arguments that Marxism is irrelevant owing to changing social classes in the modern world, that it is deterministic and utopian, and that Marxists oppose all reforms and believe in an authoritarian state.

The Communist Party (Marxist–Leninist) was a Maoist political party in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hardial Bains</span> Indian-Canadian communist (1939–1997)

Hardial Bains was an Indo-Canadian microbiology lecturer, but was primarily known as the founder of a series of left-wing movements and parties foremost of which was the Communist Party of Canada (Marxist–Leninist). Presenting himself as staunchly anti-revisionist and pro-Stalinist, until his death, Bains acted as the spokesperson and ideological leader of the CPC(M-L) — known in elections as the Marxist–Leninist Party of Canada. During his lifetime, Bains' outlook swung from supporting the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin, to Mao Zedong's China, then later to Enver Hoxha's Albania. Shortly before he died, and abandoning his previous sharp criticisms of the country, Bains turned to Fidel Castro's Cuba for inspiration. Spending most of his life in Canada, Bains was also politically active in England, Ireland, United States and India.

Eduardo Luis Santos Correia Guedes was a Portuguese film-maker involved with the independent British film collective Cinema Action.

Marxist–Leninist atheism, also known as Marxist–Leninist scientific atheism, is the antireligious element of Marxism–Leninism. Based upon a dialectical-materialist understanding of humanity's place in nature, Marxist–Leninist atheism proposes that religion is the opium of the people; thus, Marxism–Leninism advocates atheism, rather than religious belief.

In Marxist philosophy, the dictatorship of the proletariat is a condition in which the proletariat, or working class, holds control over state power. The dictatorship of the proletariat is the transitional phase from a capitalist to a communist economy, whereby the post-revolutionary state seizes the means of production, mandates the implementation of direct elections on behalf of and within the confines of the ruling proletarian state party, and institutes elected delegates into representative workers' councils that nationalise ownership of the means of production from private to collective ownership. During this phase, the administrative organizational structure of the party is to be largely determined by the need for it to govern firmly and wield state power to prevent counterrevolution, and to facilitate the transition to a lasting communist society.

Vanguardism, in the context of Leninist revolutionary struggle, relates to a strategy whereby the most class-conscious and politically "advanced" sections of the proletariat or working class, described as the revolutionary vanguard, form organizations to advance the objectives of communism. They take actions to draw larger sections of the working class toward revolutionary politics and to serve as manifestations of proletarian political power opposed to the bourgeoisie. This theory serves as the underpinning of the leading role of the Communist party, usually enshrined in the constitution, after the seizure of power in the state by Communists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Far-left politics in the United Kingdom</span>

Far-left politics in the United Kingdom have existed since at least the 1840s, with the formation of various organisations following ideologies such as Marxism, revolutionary socialism, communism, anarchism and syndicalism.

Joshua Moufawad-Paul is a Canadian academic and writer from Toronto, Canada. He is a professor of philosophy at York University. A Maoist philosopher, Moufawad-Paul has written several works on the topic and regularly posts on his blog M-L-M Mayhem which focuses on his conception of the philosophy of Maoism.

References

  1. 1 2 Mayne, Laura (10 August 2015). "When Morse was a Marxist-Leninist: Maurice Hatton's Praise Marx and Pass the Ammunition (1968)". Transformation and Tradition in Sixties British Cinema. Retrieved 9 February 2024.
  2. "Praise Marx and Pass the Ammunition". British Film Institute Collections Search. Retrieved 9 February 2024.
  3. "Channel 4 Press Packs, "Movie highlights: 1985 week 15 page 58"". British Universities Film & Video Council. Retrieved 10 February 2024.
  4. "Praise Marx and Pass the Ammunition". The British Board of Film Classification (BBFC). Retrieved 10 February 2024.
  5. "Praise Marx and Pass the Ammunition". Film Index International. Retrieved 10 February 2024.
  6. "Praise Marx and Pass the Ammunition". The Monthly Film Bulletin . 37 (432): 28. 1 January 1970. ProQuest   1305826603 via ProQuest.
  7. "Praise Marx and Pass the Ammunition". Kine Weekly . 631 (3250): 21. 24 January 1970. ProQuest   2600855241 via ProQuest.
  8. Radio Times Guide to Films (18th ed.). London: Immediate Media Company. 2017. p. 733. ISBN   9780992936440.
  9. Combs, Richard (11 April 1985). "Wide angled". The Listener . 113 (2904): 29 via ProQuest.
  10. "Praise Marx and Pass the Ammunition". Time Out. 10 September 2012. Retrieved 10 February 2024.
  11. Murphy, Robert (1992). Sixties British CInema. London: British Film Institute. p. 78. ISBN   0851703240.