Predatory imminence continuum

Last updated

Animals have many different tactics for defending themselves, depending on the severity of the threat they are encountering. [1] Stages of threat vary along a spectrum referred to as the "predatory imminence continuum", spanning from low-risk (pre-encounter) to high-risk (interaction) threats. [2] [3] The main assumption of the predatory imminence continuum is that as threat levels increase, defensive response strategies change. During the pre-encounter period, an animal may engage in activities like exploration or foraging. But if the animal senses that a predator is nearby, the animal may begin to express species specific defense reactions such as freezing [4] [5] in an attempt to avoid detection by the predator. However, in situations where a threat is imminent, once the animal is detected by its predator, freezing may no longer be the optimal behaviour for survival. At this point, the animal enters the circa-strike phase, where its behaviour will transition from passive freezing to active flight, or even attack if escape is not possible. [3]

Contents

Development

The development of the predatory imminence continuum began with the description of species-specific defence reactions. [5] [6] Species-specific defence reactions are innate responses demonstrated by an animal when they experience a threat. [5] Since survival behaviours are so vital for an animal to acquire and demonstrate rapidly, it has been theorized that these defence reactions would not have time to be learned and therefore, must be innate. [5] While these behaviours are species-specific, there are three general categories of defence reactions - fleeing, freezing, and threatening. [5] [6] [7] Species-specific defence reactions are now recognized as being organized in a hierarchical system where different behaviours are exhibited, depending on the level of threat experienced. [3] [6] However, when this concept was first proposed, the dominant species-specific defence reaction in a certain context was thought to be controlled by operant conditioning. [5] That is, if a species-specific defence reaction was unsuccessful in evading or controlling conflict, the hierarchical system would be rearranged because of the punishment, in the form of failure, experienced by an animal. [5] It would then be unlikely for that species-specific defence reaction to be used in a similar situation again; instead, an alternative behaviour would be dominant. [5] However, if the dominant behaviour was successful it would remain the recurring behaviour for that situation. [5] After experimentation, this theory was met with much opposition, even by the person who proposed it. [3] [7] [8] One point of opposition was found through the use of shock on rats and the species-specific defence reaction of freezing. [8] This experiment found that while punishment did seem to affect freezing, it was not through response weakening but through the evoking of different levels of the behaviour. [8] Other criticisms for this theory focused on the inability for species-specific defence reactions to effectively rearrange in this manner in natural situations. [7] It has been argued that there would not be enough time for punishment, in the form of an animal being unsuccessful in its defence, to reorder the hierarchy of species-specific defence reactions. [7] The rejection of the operant conditioning mechanism for the reorganization of species-specific defence reactions, led to the development of the predatory imminence continuum. The organization of defensive behaviours can be attributed to the level of threat an animal perceives itself to be in. [3] [6] This theory is one of adaptiveness, as the dominant defence reaction is the behaviour which is most effective in allowing the survival of the animal and the one which is most effective in preventing an increasing level of threat, also known as increasing imminence. [3] The probability of being killed by a predator, known as predatory imminence, is what is responsible for the expressed defensive behaviour. [3] The predatory imminence is dependent on many factors such as the distance from a predator, the potential for escape, and the likelihood of meeting a predator. [3] Three general categories of defensive behaviours, based on increasing predatory imminence, have been identified. [3] These are labelled as pre-encounter, post-encounter, and circa-strike defensive behaviours. [3]

Stages of threat

Pre-encounter

Behaviours exhibited by animals when the threat of a predator is extremely low are known as preferred activity patterns. [3] When the likelihood of predation increases above this point an animal enters into pre-encounter defensive behaviours. [3] These behaviours are used to reduce the probability of having to exhibit avoidance behaviours, which are evoked when a predator is detected. [3] Pre-encounter behaviours can be observed when an animal has left the safety of its residence to perform tasks such as mating or foraging, and occur before a predator has been identified. [3] [9] The animal does not perform these behaviours because of a predator, instead these behaviours are performed or altered depending on the probability of being detected by a predator when executing a task. [3] One well studied example of a pre-encounter behaviour is that of varying meal frequency and size seen in foraging rats. [3] [10] [11] When rats forage they do not typically hoard food, instead they either ingest the food where it was found or retreat to a nearby safe space to consume their meal. [12] Depending on the level of perceived threat, a rat will vary the frequency of foraging and the size of its meal. [3] [10] [11] In laboratory studies investigating this pre-encounter behaviour, density of shocks are often used to represent the risk of predation. [3] [10] [11] A number of shocks are administered daily on a random schedule, the more shocks administered per day the higher the perceived predatory imminence. [3] [10] [11] The shocks only affect the rats when they are outside of their safe nest area, but to get food they have to leave this area and press a lever to dispense their meal. [3] [10] [11] This models the real-life situation of a rat needing to leave the relative safety of its nest to go foraging for food. [3] [10] [11] The common finding is that, as the perceived threat of predation increases, the frequency of foraging decreases but the size of the consumed meal increases. [3] [10] [11] The increased meal size ensures that even though the rat leaves the safe area in search of food less often, it still consumes a relatively constant amount of food each day, regardless of shock density. [3] This organized modulation of foraging behaviour is consistent with a pre-encounter defensive behaviour. The frequency and meal size associated with foraging are reorganized depending on the perceived level of threat but they are not directly influenced by the interaction with a predator. [3]

Post-encounter

Post-encounter defensive behaviours are avoidance behaviours performed when a predator is present and has been detected. [3] When this stage of threat has been reached, behaviours are limited to species-specific defence reactions. [3] These behaviours are commonly freezing, fleeing or threatening. [5] The goal of a post-encounter defensive behaviour is to prevent the predatory imminence from further increasing. [3] The dominant post-encounter defensive behaviour can depend on whether the predator has also detected the prey and how far away the two animals are from one another. [3] [13] Varying levels of predatory imminence, even in post-encounter situations, can affect the expressed defensive behaviour. [13] If the prey has yet to be detected, the goal of the post-encounter behaviour will be to prevent the predator from detecting the prey. [3] If both the predator and prey have detected each other, the goal will be to avoid making contact with the predator. [3] Freezing behaviour in rats is an example of a post-encounter defensive behaviour which has been well studied. [3] [14] Freezing in rats is characterized by sudden, extended immobility, followed by a decreased heart rate and an increased respiration rate. [15] This behaviour is often the dominant post-encounter defence behaviour in rats. [3] In the laboratory setting, post-encounter defensive behaviours can be elicited by pairing a neutral stimulus, such as a light, with an aversive stimulus, such as a shock. [3] [14] The rat will engage in its post-encounter defensive behaviour when it becomes aware of the neutral stimulus, as the stimulus is acting as a predictor for the shock. [3] [14] Since the freezing behaviour is dominant in these situations, it can be assumed that it serves an adaptive function by preventing an additional increase in predatory imminence. [3] Freezing is the dominant post-encounter behaviour because even when there are alternative defensive reactions available, freezing has been observed to be the rat's response the majority of the time. [3] Even when a clear method of escape was made available, rats would freeze instead of fleeing. [3] Freezing can prevent the perceived level of threat from increasing in several ways. [16] If a rat becomes aware of a predator before the predator is aware of the prey, freezing can reduce the likelihood that the prey will be detected. [16] As well, since many predators rely on motion to keep track of their prey, freezing may cause the predator to either lose site of their prey or shift their attention to a more active object. [16]

Circa-strike

When a predator is prepared to strike or has stricken, the prey's behaviours change from post-encounter to circa-strike defensive behaviours. [3] These reactions are employed if the post-encounter behaviours are unsuccessful. [3] A predator making contact with its prey is the highest level of predatory imminence experienced before being killed by a predator. [3] Therefore, the goal of circa-strike behaviours are to survive and escape from the predator during or after contact. [3] These defence behaviours are often more reactive than post-encounter behaviours and are commonly in the form of jumping, vocalizing, striking or biting. [3] If the animal is successful in evading its predator then, when it has found a safe location, it will eventually return to its preferred activity patterns. [3] One example of an extremely successful circa-strike defensive behaviour is the evasive leaping of the kangaroo rat. [17] Kangaroo rats are desert dwelling mammals preyed upon by venomous sidewinder rattlesnakes. [17] [18] When rattlesnakes strike, kangaroo rats exhibit a quick and forceful circa-strike behaviour in the form of a leap using their hind legs. [17] [18] This leaping reaction serves several functions both to help escape and prevent envenomation. [17] [18] First, the kangaroo rat is able to jump within around 50ms after perceiving an incoming snake strike. [17] This gives the rat the ability to avoid contact with the predator all together, thus allowing it to escape unharmed. [17] [18] If the leap is unsuccessful in completely avoiding the snake's strike, it still serves the purpose of preventing the fangs from embedding. [17] The jumping action is so forceful that the rat may be able to disrupt the snake's striking movement. [17] Finally, if all else fails and the fangs have made contact with the kangaroo rat, it is still able to employ its evasive leaping behaviour, and with the use of its hind legs, forcefully dislodge the snake's fangs and prevent envenomation. [17] This leaping behaviour serves the function of preventing or escaping contact with a predator immediately before, during, or after an attack, therefore, it is consistent with a circa-strike defensive behaviour. [3] [17] [18]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fear</span> Basic emotion induced by a perceived threat

Fear is an intensely unpleasant emotion in response to perceiving or recognizing a danger or threat. Fear causes physiological changes that may produce behavioral reactions such as mounting an aggressive response or fleeing the threat. Fear in human beings may occur in response to a certain stimulus occurring in the present, or in anticipation or expectation of a future threat perceived as a risk to oneself. The fear response arises from the perception of danger leading to confrontation with or escape from/avoiding the threat, which in extreme cases of fear can be a freeze response.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Black rat</span> Species of rodent

The black rat, also known as the roof rat, ship rat, or house rat, is a common long-tailed rodent of the stereotypical rat genus Rattus, in the subfamily Murinae. It likely originated in the Indian subcontinent, but is now found worldwide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Predation</span> Biological interaction where a predator kills and eats a prey organism

Predation is a biological interaction where one organism, the predator, kills and eats another organism, its prey. It is one of a family of common feeding behaviours that includes parasitism and micropredation and parasitoidism. It is distinct from scavenging on dead prey, though many predators also scavenge; it overlaps with herbivory, as seed predators and destructive frugivores are predators.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kangaroo rat</span> Genus of mammals belonging to the kangaroo rats, kangaroo mice, and pocket mice family of rodents

Kangaroo rats, small mostly nocturnal rodents of genus Dipodomys, are native to arid areas of western North America. The common name derives from their bipedal form. They hop in a manner similar to the much larger kangaroo, but developed this mode of locomotion independently, like several other clades of rodents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California ground squirrel</span> Species of rodent

The California ground squirrel, also known as the Beechey ground squirrel, is a common and easily observed ground squirrel of the western United States and the Baja California Peninsula; it is common in Oregon and California and its range has relatively recently extended into Washington and northwestern Nevada. Formerly placed in Spermophilus, as Spermophilus beecheyi, it was reclassified in Otospermophilus in 2009, as it became clear that Spermophilus as previously defined was not a natural (monophyletic) group. A full species account was published for this species in 2016.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Animal communication</span> Transfer of information from animal to animal

Animal communication is the transfer of information from one or a group of animals to one or more other animals that affects the current or future behavior of the receivers. Information may be sent intentionally, as in a courtship display, or unintentionally, as in the transfer of scent from predator to prey with kairomones. Information may be transferred to an "audience" of several receivers. Animal communication is a rapidly growing area of study in disciplines including animal behavior, sociology, neurology and animal cognition. Many aspects of animal behavior, such as symbolic name use, emotional expression, learning and sexual behavior, are being understood in new ways.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-predator adaptation</span> Defensive feature of prey for selective advantage

Anti-predator adaptations are mechanisms developed through evolution that assist prey organisms in their constant struggle against predators. Throughout the animal kingdom, adaptations have evolved for every stage of this struggle, namely by avoiding detection, warding off attack, fighting back, or escaping when caught.

Apostatic selection is a form of negative frequency-dependent selection. It describes the survival of individual prey animals that are different from their species in a way that makes it more likely for them to be ignored by their predators. It operates on polymorphic species, species which have different forms. In apostatic selection, the common forms of a species are preyed on more than the rarer forms, giving the rare forms a selective advantage in the population. It has also been discussed that apostatic selection acts to stabilize prey polymorphisms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Apparent death</span> Behavior in which animals take on the appearance of being dead

Apparent death is a behavior in which animals take on the appearance of being dead. It is an immobile state most often triggered by a predatory attack and can be found in a wide range of animals from insects and crustaceans to mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and fish. Apparent death is separate from the freezing behavior seen in some animals.

A kairomone is a semiochemical, emitted by an organism, which mediates interspecific interactions in a way that benefits an individual of another species which receives it and harms the emitter. This "eavesdropping" is often disadvantageous to the producer. The kairomone improves the fitness of the recipient and in this respect differs from an allomone and a synomone. The term is mostly used in the field of entomology. Two main ecological cues are provided by kairomones; they generally either indicate a food source for the receiver, or the presence of a predator, the latter of which is less common or at least less studied.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Escape response</span>

Escape response, escape reaction, or escape behavior is a mechanism by which animals avoid potential predation. It consists of a rapid sequence of movements, or lack of movement, that position the animal in such a way that allows it to hide, freeze, or flee from the supposed predator. Often, an animal's escape response is representative of an instinctual defensive mechanism, though there is evidence that these escape responses may be learned or influenced by experience.

Prey detection is the process by which predators are able to detect and locate their prey via sensory signals. This article treats predation in its broadest sense, i.e. where one organism eats another.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Desert kangaroo rat</span> Species of rodent

The desert kangaroo rat is a rodent species in the family Heteromyidae that is found in desert areas of southwestern North America. It is one of the large kangaroo rats, with a total length greater than 12 inches (300 mm) and a mass greater than 3.2 ounces (91 g).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Merriam's kangaroo rat</span> Species of rodent

Merriam's kangaroo rat is a species of rodent in the family Heteromyidae. The species name commemorates Clinton Hart Merriam. It is found in the Upper and Lower Sonoran life zones of the southwestern United States, Baja California, and northern Mexico.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Banner-tailed kangaroo rat</span> Species of rodent

The banner-tailed kangaroo rat is a species of rodent in the family Heteromyidae. It is found in arid environments in the southwestern United States and Mexico where it lives in a burrow by day and forages for seeds and plant matter by night.

<i>Sphodromantis lineola</i> Species of praying mantis

Sphodromantis lineola, common name African mantis or African praying mantis, is a species of praying mantis from Africa sometimes raised in captivity. S. lineola is often colored green, however they can also be colored different types of brown. The brown colored individuals have also been observed with purple colored eyes. It may be distinguished from S. baccettii by the absence of blue-black spots on its forearms.

Freezing behavior, also called the freeze response or being petrified, is a reaction to specific stimuli, most commonly observed in prey animals. When a prey animal has been caught and completely overcome by the predator, it may respond by "freezing up/petrification" or in other words by uncontrollably becoming rigid or limp. Studies typically assess a conditioned freezing behavior response to stimuli that typically or innately do not cause fear, such as a tone or shock. Freezing behavior is most easily characterized by changes in blood pressure and lengths of time in crouching position, but it also is known to cause changes such as shortness of breath, increased heart rate, sweating, or choking sensation. However, since it is difficult to measure these sympathetic responses to fear stimuli, studies are typically confined to simple crouching times. A response to stimuli typically is said to be a "fight or flight", but is more completely described as "fight, flight, or freeze". In addition, freezing is observed to occur before or after a fight or flight response.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seismic communication</span>

Seismic or vibrational communication is a process of conveying information through mechanical (seismic) vibrations of the substrate. The substrate may be the earth, a plant stem or leaf, the surface of a body of water, a spider's web, a honeycomb, or any of the myriad types of soil substrates. Seismic cues are generally conveyed by surface Rayleigh or bending waves generated through vibrations on the substrate, or acoustical waves that couple with the substrate. Vibrational communication is an ancient sensory modality and it is widespread in the animal kingdom where it has evolved several times independently. It has been reported in mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, insects, arachnids, crustaceans and nematode worms. Vibrations and other communication channels are not necessarily mutually exclusive, but can be used in multi-modal communication.

Native to both South and Central America, Cane toads were introduced to Australia in the 1930s and have since become an invasive species and a threat to the continent's native predators and scavengers.

The predation risk allocation hypothesis attempts to explain how and why animals' behaviour and foraging strategies differ in various predatory situations, depending on their risk of endangerment. The hypothesis suggests that an animal's alertness and attention, along with its willingness to hunt for food, will change depending on the risk factors within that animal's environment and the presence of predators that could attack. The model assumes there are different levels of risk factors within various environments and prey animals will behave more cautiously when they are found in high-risk environments. The overall effectiveness of the model for predicting animal behaviour varies, therefore, its results are dependent on the prey species used in the model and how their behaviour changes. There are several reasons the predation risk allocation hypothesis was developed to observe how animal behaviour varies depending on its risk factors. Mixed results have been found for the model's effectiveness in predicting predator defensive behaviour for various species.

References

  1. ↑ Bolles, RCF; Fanselow, MS (1980). "A perceptual-defensive-recuperative model of fear and pain". Behav Brain Sci. 3 (2): 291–301. doi:10.1017/s0140525x0000491x. S2CID   144811322.
  2. ↑ Blanchard, DC; Blanchard, RJ (1969). "Passive and active reactions to fear-eliciting stimuli". J Comp Physiol Psychol. 68 (1): 129–135. doi:10.1037/h0027676. PMID   5793861.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Fanselow MS, Lester LS (1988) A functional behavioristic approach to aversively motivated behavior: Predatory imminence as a determinant of the topography of defensive behavior. In Evolution and Learning. Bolles RC, Beecher MD, Eds,; Earlbaum, Hillsdale NJ:185-211.
  4. ↑ Blanchard, DC; Blanchard, RJ (1969). "Crouching as an index of fear". J Comp Physiol Psychol. 67 (3): 370–375. doi:10.1037/h0026779. PMID   5787388.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Bolles, Robert C. (1970). "Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning". Psychological Review. 77 (1): 32–48. doi:10.1037/h0028589.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Fanselow, Michael S. (1994-12-01). "Neural organization of the defensive behavior system responsible for fear". Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1 (4): 429–438. doi: 10.3758/bf03210947 . ISSN   1069-9384. PMID   24203551.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Fanselow, Michael; Sigmundi, Ronald; Williams, Jon (1987). "Response Selection and the Hierarchical Organization of Species-Specific Defense Reactions: The Relationship Between Freezing, Flight, and Defensive Burying". The Psychological Record. 37: 381–386.
  8. 1 2 3 Bolles, Robert C.; Riley, Anthony L. (1973). "Freezing as an avoidance response: Another look at the operant-respondent distinction". Learning and Motivation. 4 (3): 268–275. doi:10.1016/0023-9690(73)90016-7.
  9. ↑ Kitaoka, A. (1994). "Defensive aspects of burrowing behavior in rats (Rattus Norvegicus): A descriptive and correlational study". Behavioural Processes. 31 (1): 13–27. doi:10.1016/0376-6357(94)90034-5. PMID   24897414. S2CID   23501112.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Fanselow, M. S.; Lester, L. S.; Helmstetter, F. J. (November 1988). "Changes in feeding and foraging patterns as an antipredator defensive strategy: a laboratory simulation using aversive stimulation in a closed economy". Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 50 (3): 361–374. doi:10.1901/jeab.1988.50-361. ISSN   0022-5002. PMC   1338904 . PMID   3209954.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Helmstetter, Fred J.; Fanselow, Michael S. (1993-06-01). "Aversively motivated changes in meal patterns of rats in a closed economy: The effects of shock density". Animal Learning & Behavior. 21 (2): 168–175. doi: 10.3758/bf03213397 . ISSN   0090-4996.
  12. ↑ Whishaw, Ian; Gorny, Borguslaw (1991). "The defensive strategies of foraging rats: A review and synthesis". Psychological Review. 41 (2): 185–205. doi:10.1007/bf03395105. S2CID   148960618.
  13. 1 2 Kawai, Nobuyuki; Kono, Reiko; Sugimoto, Sanae (2004). "Avoidance learning in the crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) depends on the predatory imminence of the unconditioned stimulus: a behavior systems approach to learning in invertebrates". Behavioural Brain Research. 150 (1–2): 229–237. doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(03)00261-4. PMID   15033297. S2CID   20724666.
  14. 1 2 3 Bouton, Mark E.; Bolles, Robert C. (1980-09-01). "Conditioned fear assessed by freezing and by the suppression of three different baselines". Animal Learning & Behavior. 8 (3): 429–434. doi: 10.3758/bf03199629 . ISSN   0090-4996.
  15. ↑ Hofer, M. A. (November 1970). "Cardiac and respiratory function during sudden prolonged immobility in wild rodents". Psychosomatic Medicine. 32 (6): 633–647. doi:10.1097/00006842-197011000-00008. ISSN   0033-3174. PMID   5530023. S2CID   180291.
  16. 1 2 3 Suarez, Susan D.; Gallup, Gordon G. (1981). "An ethological analysis of open-field behavior in rats and mice". Learning and Motivation. 12 (3): 342–363. doi:10.1016/0023-9690(81)90013-8.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Whitford, Malachi D.; Freymiller, Grace A.; Clark, Rulon W. (2017). "Avoiding the serpent's tooth: predator–prey interactions between free-ranging sidewinder rattlesnakes and desert kangaroo rats". Animal Behaviour. 130: 73–78. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.06.004 . S2CID   54320514.
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 Randall, Jan A.; Hatch, Susan M.; Hekkala, Evon R. (1995-04-01). "Inter-specific variation in anti-predator behavior in sympatric species of kangaroo rat". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 36 (4): 243–250. doi:10.1007/bf00165833. ISSN   0340-5443. S2CID   21825624.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.