Proactive disclosure

Last updated

Proactive disclosure is the act of releasing information before it is requested. In Canada, this refers to an environment where information is released routinely through electronic means with the exception of information that the government is required to protect due to privacy risks. This could refer to information regarding citizens' social insurance numbers or military operations.

Contents

Proactive disclosure differs from reactive disclosure, as reactive disclosure occurs when a request is made, while proactive disclosure occurs without the filing of the request. [1] Proactive disclosure has also been referred to as stealing thunder, [2] active disclosure in the United States and suo moto disclosure in Latin which means upon its own initiative. [1]

History

The earliest way information was disclosed was seen in ancient Greece through criers or bellmen. Criers were hired in medieval times to walk the streets and call for attention, then read out important news such as royal proclamations or local bylaws. They would also play a role in passing the information across villages. This role changed when newspapers, radios, television and the internet became innovative parts of society. [1]

Governments

Within the government, proactive disclosure is meant to inform citizens of information that allows them to hold the government accountable. Information that puts private or public good in harm's way is not disclosed. This term is used frequently when discussing open government, meaning information is easily available to the public and at a regular basis due to the benefit of technology on disseminating information. [3]

Many consider proactive disclosure and the ability to have access to information as a way to watch over those in power within society. This is especially true for governments who collect a wide range of information, which citizens often use to hold the government accountable. [4]

Transparency and proactive disclosure are often associated in terms of creating open government.

Canada

In the case of Canada, the government has specific measures under the Treasury Board of Canada [5] that they proactively disclose data in order to highlight transparency and allow for the board to oversee public resources in the federal government.

However, all information released under proactive disclosure must be held under the Access to Information Act or the Privacy Act , with any information that is normally withheld under those acts not being disclosed on the website. [6]

The Canadian government has also made promises to be open by default with proactive disclosure in their Open Government Partnership (OGP) Third Action Plan [7]

The open by default principle not only provides Canadians with proactive information release, but is also meant to improve efficiency for requests for information or the ability to gain information such as personal details about themselves. [7] One of the key focuses is placed on the streamlining and increased progress on departments proactively disclosing information on spending and human resources online. The Government of Canada believes the proactive disclosure of information and self-service tools will strengthen the type of data being released. [7]

For instance, they have to disclose financial resources within departments such as travel expenses and human resource material, and allow this information to be available on the department websites. This means that the department is more easily monitored by the body in power, as well as citizens. The three things that must be published are the travel and hospitality expenses of specific government officials, contracts over $10,000 and when positions are reclassified. [5]

History in Canada

Proactive disclosure came into Canada in 2004 when it came to disclosing information on contracts over $10,000 and position reclassification, with grants and contributions being under the proactive disclosure policy since 2005. The Treasury Board of Canada discloses and observes these policies. [8]

The Canadian system was put in place in a way that allows for digital record management and could be a step towards a full proactive disclosure model at the federal level. There is an ongoing review of the Access to Information Act [8] and full proactive disclosure in the Office of the Information Commissioner of Canada.

The use of proactive disclosure at the federal level is seen within Natural Resources Canada, which has three web portals releasing raw data on subjects such as road networks, electoral boundaries, and topographic maps. [8]

Municipal and provincial levels

At the local level, open data and proactive disclosure are being linked together. Cities from Vancouver to Toronto began introducing open data portals in 2010. [5] These initiatives are focusing primarily on providing raw data proactively to fill an open government model.

All provinces nationwide now provide online portals to disclose data. However, Quebec and British Columbia were the first provinces to focus on proactive disclosure.

Quebec was the first to look into proactive disclosure in Canada in 2006. In 2009, the province of Quebec also regulated that municipalities in the province would have to migrate to proactive disclosure for data and internal documents. [5]

Federal

Federally, the purpose is said to improve the role of Parliament and allow Canadians to hold both elected officials and public sector officials accountable. [9] This is done through three main sections; travel and hospitality expenses, contracts and position reclassification.

Travel and hospitality expenses

An example within Canada is the travel and hospitality reimbursement for government employees. The government has provided a web page to showcase the travel and hospitality expenses that occurred under the Treasury Board Secretariat by the President, Parliamentary Secretary and their exempt staff and senior level employees, such as deputy ministers and other equal levels. [10] The proactive disclosure of this information is meant to highlight the agreements made under the National Joint Council in regards to the reimbursement of officials. [11]

Contracts

The government also has the proactive disclosure policy in regards to contracts that have a value of over $10,000. The website for the government sector will post document changes every three months, which includes new information or new contracts. The rule for this type of disclosure is once again laid out by the Treasury Board, as the governing body who monitors the government. The objective of this section is said to help construct services in a way that better represents a fair value for Canada. [12] This type of information release means that contracts must also stand up against the eyes of Canadians, as well as apply to other government policies and agreements. [13]

Position reclassification

The government of Canada also announced in 2004 [6] that information on position changes or reclassification of a position in the public service must release the information to Canadians. They state that the website must release this information and meet the guidelines set out by the Treasury Board of Canada. Reclassification can include changes such as: [6]

  • Department or program mandate change
  • Manager reorganization
  • More effective employment plans
  • Response to vacancies
  • Classification grievances
  • External conditions with resource change

In order to ensure the change in reclassification is done openly, especially in regards to the cost associated, the Canadian government states they will strive for publicly displaying the knowledge and being transparent and accountable for these decisions.

Debate over proactive disclosure in Canada

Proactive disclosure is often debated as it does not cover all realms of government employees. Elected officials expenses or those not listed directly under the act are not obligated to disclose this information. This has caused scandals both in the House of Commons and the Senate, such as in 2012 in the case of Senator Duffy and in 2016 for Chief of Staff, Katie Telford and Principal Secretary Gerald Butts. [14] Both scandals involved a case where money was not disclosed for an amount that was seen as too expensive, where neither party was required to disclose details of their expense.

Open government and proactive disclosure in Canada is currently under review following recommendations by the Information Commissioner of Canada. [15]

India

In India, the Right to Information Act, has a clause seeking that governments and public institutions should suo moto or pro-actively share information with the public. The act visions that this pro-active disclosure clause should be implemented fully, such that citizens do not have a need to seek information by filing requests under this act. The use of internet, through the institution's web-sites for disseminating information is seen as a method of fulfilling this requirement.

Large organizations and private companies

For large organizations or private companies, transparency and proactive data are often linked as this term indicates the way in which they must be proactive rather than reactive in the spreading of information. Proactive disclosure is also seen as when an organization such as a transnational corporation releases information before it is released by a third party such as the media, which takes away some of the third party's power. [2] This practice has also often been linked to transparency within an organization. In some cases, organizations have been seen as avoiding disclosing information in this way due to negative coverage or to cover up information. [2]

Private companies and large organizations are often held accountable through audits.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Secrecy</span> Practice of hiding information to certain individual or group for personal or interpersonal reason

Secrecy is the practice of hiding information from certain individuals or groups who do not have the "need to know", perhaps while sharing it with other individuals. That which is kept hidden is known as the secret.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Communications Security Establishment</span> Canadian cryptologic agency

The Communications Security Establishment, formerly called the Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSEC), is the Government of Canada's national cryptologic agency. It is responsible for foreign signals intelligence (SIGINT) and communications security (COMSEC), protecting federal government electronic information and communication networks, and is the technical authority for cyber security and information assurance.

As an ethic that spans science, engineering, business, and the humanities, transparency is operating in such a way that it is easy for others to see what actions are performed. Transparency implies openness, communication, and accountability.

The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat is the administrative branch of the Treasury Board of Canada and a central agency of the Government of Canada. The role of the Secretariat is to support the Treasury Board and to provide advice to Treasury Board members in the management and administration of the government.

<i>Access to Information Act</i> Canadian freedom of information act

The Access to Information Act or Information Act is a Canadian Act providing the right of access to information under the control of a federal government institution. As of 2020, the Act allowed "people who pay $5 to request an array of federal files". Paragraph 2. (1) of the Act ("Purpose") declares that government information should be available to the public, but with necessary exceptions to the right of access that should be limited and specific, and that decisions on the disclosure of government information should be reviewed independently of government. Later paragraphs assign responsibility for this review to an Information Commissioner, who reports directly to parliament rather than the government in power. However, the Act provides the commissioner the power only to recommend rather than compel the release of requested information that the commissioner judges to be not subject to any exception specified in the Act.

The Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada is the national financial intelligence agency of Canada. FINTRAC was established in 2000 under the Proceeds of Crime Act to facilitate detection and investigation of money laundering, FINTRAC's mandate was expanded in December 2001 following amendments to the Proceeds of Crime Act to also disclose financial intelligence to other Canadian intelligence and law enforcement agencies with respect to suspected terrorist financing. FINTRAC's mandate was further expanded in 2006 under Bill C-25 to enhance the client identification, record-keeping and reporting measures, established a registration regime for money services businesses and foreign exchange dealers, and created new offences for not registering.

The Security of Information Act, formerly known as the Official Secrets Act, is an Act of the Parliament of Canada that addresses national security concerns, including threats of espionage by foreign powers and terrorist groups, and the intimidation or coercion of ethnocultural communities in and against Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canadian privacy law</span> Privacy law in Canada

Canadian privacy law is derived from the common law, statutes of the Parliament of Canada and the various provincial legislatures, and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Perhaps ironically, Canada's legal conceptualization of privacy, along with most modern legal Western conceptions of privacy, can be traced back to Warren and Brandeis’s "The Right to Privacy" published in the Harvard Law Review in 1890, Holvast states "Almost all authors on privacy start the discussion with the famous article 'The Right to Privacy' of Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis".

Christiane Ouimet was the first Public Sector Integrity Commissioner of Canada. She retired on October 18, 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parliamentary Budget Officer</span> Canadian government accountability agency

The Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer is an office of the Parliament of Canada which provides independent, authoritative and non-partisan financial and economic analysis. The office is led by the Parliamentary Budget Officer, an independent officer who supports parliamentarians in carrying out their constitutional roles of scrutinizing the raising and spending of public monies and generally overseeing the government's activities.

Open data in Canada describes the capacity for the Canadian Federal Government and other levels of government in Canada to provide online access to data collected and created by governments in a standards-compliant Web 2.0 way. Open data requires that machine-readable should be made openly available, simple to access, and convenient to reuse. As of 2016, Canada was ranked 2nd in the world for publishing open data by the World Wide Web Foundation's Open Data Barometer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Canada</span> Institutional corruption in the country of Canada

Corruption is an increasing issue across Canada. On Transparency International's 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index, Canada scored 76 on a scale from 0 to 100. When ranked by score, Canada ranked 12th among the 180 countries in the Index, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. For comparison with worldwide scores, the best score was 90, the average score was 43, and the worst score was 11. For comparison with regional scores, Canada's score of 76 was the highest score among the countries of the Americas. Regionally, the average score was 43 and the lowest score was 13.

Freedom of information in Canada describes the capacity for the Canadian Government to provide timely and accurate access to internal data concerning government services. Each province and territory in Canada has its own access to freedom of information legislation.

The Canadian Senate expenses scandal, also known as Duffygate, was a political scandal concerning the expense claims of certain Canadian senators which began in late 2012. Senators Patrick Brazeau, Mike Duffy, Mac Harb, and Pamela Wallin claimed travel and living allowance expenses from the Senate for which they were not eligible. Deloitte LLP was retained to provide the Senate with an independent examination of the expense claims. Duffy, Harb, and Wallin repaid ineligible amounts. Harb retired a few months into the scandal, and in November 2013, Brazeau, Duffy, and Wallin were suspended from the Senate without pay. Brazeau, Duffy, and Harb were criminally charged. On April 21, 2016, Duffy was acquitted on all charges. Charges against Harb were withdrawn and no charges were to be laid against Wallin. The scandal attracted much public attention, with as many as 73% of Canadians following it closely. Many said that the scandal impacted the 2015 Canadian general election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital Accountability and Transparency Act of 2014</span>

The Digital Accountability and Transparency Act of 2014 is a law that aims to make information on federal expenditures more easily accessible and transparent. The law requires the U.S. Department of the Treasury to establish common standards for financial data provided by all government agencies and to expand the amount of data that agencies must provide to the government website, USASpending. The goal of the law is to improve the ability of Americans to track and understand how the government is spending their tax dollars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Institute for Development of Freedom of Information</span> Non-governmental organization in Georgia

The Institute for Development of Freedom of Information (IDFI) - is a Georgian non-governmental organization which tends to support the development of an informed and empowered society for democratic governance. IDFI promotes human rights and good governance by raising civic awareness through sound informational reports, research and recommendations; Advocates for initiating & implementing reforms of policies, laws and practices to enhance democratic governance.

The National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians is a body composed of members of the House of Commons and Senate which reviews the activities of the Government of Canada's national security and intelligence agencies. The committee also performs strategic and systematic reviews of the legislative, regulatory, policy, expenditure and administrative frameworks under which national security activities are conducted.

Access to public information and freedom of information (FOI) refer to the right of access to information held by public bodies also known as "right to know". Access to public information is considered of fundamental importance for the effective functioning of democratic systems, as it enhances governments' and public officials' accountability, boosting people participation and allowing their informed participation into public life. The fundamental premise of the right of access to public information is that the information held by governmental institutions is in principle public and may be concealed only on the basis of legitimate reasons which should be detailed in the law.

Open by Default, as widely used in the contexts of Open Government and Open Data, is the principle in which government makes its data accessible to the public by default, unless there is a sufficient justification to explain that greater public interest may be at stake, as a result of disclosure. Since the principle empowers the public's right to know and capacity to oversee government activities, it is closely associated with government transparency, civic engagement, and e-governance in organizing public life. In many cases, the principle is accompanied with the technological commitment to create "metadata standardization for all datasets, publication of a machine-readable data catalogue or inventory of both released and to-be released datasets ... (and) use of open licenses."

The Vulnerabilities Equities Process (VEP) is a process used by the U.S. federal government to determine on a case-by-case basis how it should treat zero-day computer security vulnerabilities: whether to disclose them to the public to help improve general computer security, or to keep them secret for offensive use against the government's adversaries.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Darbishire, Helen. "Proactive Transparency: The future of the right to information?" (PDF). Access to Information Program.
  2. 1 2 3 Arpan, Laura M.; Roskos-Ewoldsen, David R. "Stealing thunder: Analysis of the effects of proactive disclosure of crisis information". Public Relations Review. 31.
  3. ↑ Office of the Information Commissioner of Canada. "Proactive Disclosure". Office of the Information Commissioner of Canada. Retrieved 19 October 2016.
  4. ↑ Brownlee, Jamie; Walby, Kevin (2015). Access to information and social justice : critical research strategies for journalists, scholars, and activists. Winnipeg, Manitoba: ARP Books.
  5. 1 2 3 4 "Current Publications: Information and communications: Government 2.0 and Access to Information: 1. Recent Developments in Proactive Disclosure and Open Data in Canada (2010-14-E)". www.lop.parl.gc.ca. Retrieved 2016-10-19.
  6. 1 2 3 Branch, Government of Canada, Citizenship and Immigration Canada, Communications (29 October 2004). "Disclosure of Position Reclassifications". www.cic.gc.ca. Retrieved 2016-10-20.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  7. 1 2 3 "Third Biennial Plan to the Open Government Partnership (2016-2018)" (PDF). Third Biennial Plan to the Open Government Partnership (2016-2018).
  8. 1 2 3 "Current Publications: Information and communications: Government 2.0 and Access to Information: 1. Recent Developments in Proactive Disclosure and Open Data in Canada (2010-14-E)". www.lop.parl.gc.ca. Retrieved 2016-11-28.
  9. ↑ Canada, Polar Knowledge (20 May 2015). "Proactive Disclosure - Canada.ca". www.canada.ca. Retrieved 2016-11-28.
  10. ↑ Disclosure, Government of Canada, Treasury Board of Canada, Secretariat, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, Proactive (29 October 2004). "Disclosure of Travel and Hospitality Expenses". www.tbs-sct.gc.ca. Retrieved 2016-10-20.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  11. ↑ Council, Government of Canada, National Joint. "Travel Directive". www.njc-cnm.gc.ca. Retrieved 2016-10-20.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  12. ↑ Disclosure, Government of Canada, Treasury Board of Canada, Secretariat, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, Proactive. "Disclosure of Contracts Over $10,000 - Overview". www.tbs-sct.gc.ca. Retrieved 2016-10-20.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  13. ↑ Secretariat, Treasury Board of Canada (2008-12-16). "Contracting Policy" . Retrieved 2016-10-20.
  14. ↑ "Top Trudeau aides Butts, Telford expensed over $200,000 for moving homes". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 2016-11-29.
  15. ↑ "Appearance: Proactive Disclosure". www.oic-ci.gc.ca. Retrieved 2016-11-29.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.