Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care

Last updated

The Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care (PSA) oversees the ten statutory bodies that regulate health professionals in the United Kingdom and social care in England. [1] Where occupations are not subject to statutory regulation, it sets standards for those organisations that hold voluntary registers and accredits those that meet them.

Contents

Until 30 November 2012 it was known as the Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence (CHRE). It is an independent body, which is accountable to the Parliament of the United Kingdom. [2] It assesses the performance of each regulator, conducts audits, scrutinises their decisions and reports to Parliament. It seeks to achieve balance in the oversight of regulation through the application of the concept of right-touch regulation. [3]

History

The Health Act 1999 allowed the UK government to more easily change healthcare regulatory arrangements, through orders of the Privy Council. [4] The Kennedy report into the Bristol heart scandal was published in July 2001 and plans for a body to oversee the regulation of healthcare professionals in the UK quickly followed. [5] The Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence (CHRE) was set up under the National Health Service Reform and Health Care Professions Act 2002. The CHRE was succeeded by the Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care, which was set up under section 222 of the Health and Social Care Act 2012. [6]

Oversight of the regulators

The Authority covers the 10 statutory bodies that regulate health professionals in the UK and social workers in England: [7]

Voluntary registers

The Authority also has a role in encouraging the upkeep of standards in practitioners that are not subject to regulation. [8] Accredited registers are a voluntary scheme where the PSA sets out some standards that are applicable to organisations that deal with occupations that are not statutorily regulated. [9] The PSA accredits organisations that hold voluntary registers, offering a "quality mark" to those that show they have met various standards. [10]

In July 2019 there were 25 organisations with voluntary registers that had been given accreditation. [11]

Accreditation of a voluntary register does not mean that the PSA endorses a particular approach or therapy. [12] The Authority is not concerned whether any of the methodologies used by societies on this scheme have any scientific validity. It regards the question of scientific veracity as a matter of opinion. [13]

Funding

The devolved administrations of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland all fund the authority, with contributions in line with the Barnett formula. [14] [15]

Limits on Powers

The PSA has no powers to investigate individual complaints about the regulators it oversees, nor to compel them to take any specific action. Its website states “We do not investigate individuals’ complaints about regulators or registers and cannot resolve them for you.” [16]

Premises Regulation

The PSA's focus is on the regulation of individuals – and not premises – though it oversees both the General Pharmaceutical Council and the Pharmaceutical Society of Northern Ireland, which both have responsibility for premises regulation. Its website states: “We help to protect the public by improving the regulation and registration of people who work in health and care.” [17] As such, there is a significant gap in the oversight of pharmacy premises regulation in the UK.

The PSA's Standards of Good Regulation are accordingly focused on the regulation of individuals and not premises. Its website claims untruthfully that “The Standards cover all aspects of the regulators’ work including where the regulator has responsibility for businesses and premises as well as individuals.” The standards contain no specific mention of premises; none of the individual standards are focused on premises; they do not invite separation of results where a regulator has responsibility for regulating both individuals and premises and they make no mention of inspection outcomes. Many of the standards are exclusively focused on individuals; for example, they refer to a “registrant”, which by definition is a person who has registered; a set of premises cannot register itself. It is capable of being registered, but incapable of being a registrant. In addition, references to “fitness to practise” in its standards do not apply to premises, since premises cannot themselves “practise”. Such terms are not used in reference to premises regulation. There are no measures relating to the success of any applicable inspection regime (e.g. outcomes by standards type, premises type or stage of sanction) nor of the systemic/environmental effects of standards in premises on patient safety. [18]

Its lack of focus on premises regulation can be seen, for example, in its report on the GPhC for 2018/19, which contains very little mention, focus or insight into premises regulation. [19]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nursing and Midwifery Council</span> British healthcare regulator

The Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) is the regulator for nursing and midwifery professions in the UK. The NMC maintains a register of all nurses, midwives and specialist community public health nurses and nursing associates eligible to practise within the UK. It sets and reviews standards for their education, training, conduct and performance. The NMC also investigates allegations of impaired fitness to practise.

The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS) is the regulatory body for veterinary surgeons in the United Kingdom, established in 1844 by royal charter. It is responsible for monitoring the educational, ethical and clinical standards of the veterinary profession. Anyone wishing to practice as a vet in the United Kingdom must be registered with the RCVS.

The Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC), formerly the Health Professions Council (HPC), is a statutory regulator of over 280,000 professionals from 15 health and care professions in the United Kingdom. The Council reports its main purpose is to protect the public. It does this by setting and maintaining standards of proficiency and conduct for the professions it regulates. Its key functions include approving education and training programmes which health and care professionals must complete before they can register with the HCPC; and maintaining and publishing a Register of health and care providers who meet pre-determined professional requirements and standards of practice.

A regulatory agency or independent agency is a government authority that is responsible for exercising autonomous dominion over some area of human activity in a licensing and regulating capacity.

The General Optical Council (GOC) is an organisation in the United Kingdom which maintains a register of opticians and regulates the services provided by dispensing opticians and optometrists. The stated function of the GOC is "to protect the public and promote high standards of professional conduct and education amongst opticians".

The General Dental Council (GDC) is an organisation which regulates dental professionals in the United Kingdom. It keeps an up-to-date register of all qualified dentists and other dental care professionals such as: dental hygienists, dental therapists, dental nurses, dental technicians and clinical dental technicians. It was established in 1956 to set and maintain standards in UK dentistry, with the aims of protecting the general public from unqualified dental professionals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Medical Council</span> Healthcare regulator for medical profession in the UK

The General Medical Council (GMC) is a public body that maintains the official register of medical practitioners within the United Kingdom. Its chief responsibility is to "protect, promote and maintain the health and safety of the public" by controlling entry to the register, and suspending or removing members when necessary. It also sets the standards for medical schools in the UK. Membership of the register confers substantial privileges under Part VI of the Medical Act 1983. It is a criminal offence to make a false claim of membership. The GMC is supported by fees paid by its members, and it became a registered charity in 2001.

The Pharmaceutical Society of Northern Ireland (PSNI) is the regulatory and professional body for pharmacy in Northern Ireland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Health Sciences Authority</span> Statutory board under the Ministry of Health of the Singapore Government

The Health Sciences Authority (HSA) is a statutory board under the Ministry of Health of the Government of Singapore. It is a multi-disciplinary agency responsible for applying medical, pharmaceutical, and scientific expertise to protect and advance public health and safety.

The General Osteopathic Council (GOsC) is the regulator of the practice of osteopathy in the United Kingdom.

The Complementary and Natural Healthcare Council (CNHC) is a regulatory body in the United Kingdom which provides a voluntary register of complementary, rather than alternative medicine, therapists. The key purpose of CNHC is to act in the public interest and enable proper public accountability of the complementary therapists that it registers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Chiropractic Council</span> United Kingdom chiropractic regulatory body

The General Chiropractic Council (GCC) is an independent statutory body established by Parliament to regulate the chiropractic profession in the United Kingdom. It protects the health and safety of the public by ensuring high standards of practice in the chiropractic profession.

The General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) is the body responsible for the independent regulation of the pharmacy profession within England, Scotland and Wales, responsible for the regulation of pharmacists, pharmacy technicians and pharmacy premises. It was created, along with the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, in September 2010 when the previous body responsible for regulation, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, was split so that representative and regulatory functions of the pharmacy profession could be separated.

The British Acupuncture Council (BAcC) is a self-regulatory body for the practice of traditional acupuncture in the UK.

The Register of Clinical Technologists (RCT) is a voluntary professional register for clinical technologists and practitioners specialising in the practical application of physics, engineering and technology to clinical practice in the UK. Registrants work in NHS hospitals, private health care, academic institutions and the medical device industry.

CEASE therapy is a pseudoscientific practice used by naturopaths who claim that it can treat or even cure people with autism, claims which have been adjudicated by the UK's Advertising Standards Authority as "bogus". It involves a mixture of supplements, high-dose vitamin C, 'orthomolecular support', dietary restrictions, and homeopathy. The therapy was developed by Dutch doctor Tinus Smits, who claimed to have used it to treat over 300 children with autism. It became more notable in 2017/2018 because of regulatory action taken by professional bodies in The Netherlands, UK, and Canada following a series of complaints about unfounded claims.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caroline Corby</span> Chairperson of the Parole Board for England and Wales

Caroline Corby is the Chair of the Parole Board for England and Wales and the Chair of the Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care.

The Society of Homeopaths (SoH) is a British private limited company formed in 1978 by "a small group of homeopaths who were keen to work together for the development of the profession and to ensure high standards in the practice of homeopathy" and at September 2018 had 997 members on the Society's register who can refer to themselves as RSHoms. The SoH's register was first accredited by the Professional Standards Authority (PSA) in September 2014 allowing members to display the Accredited Register's logo at the time. In January 2021 the PSA suspended the society's accreditation for failure to meet standards the PSA had set.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Health Regulatory Authority (Bahrain)</span>

The National Health Regulatory Authority (NHRA) is an independent regulatory body established in 2010, under Law No. 38 of 2009, of the Kingdom of Bahrain.

References

  1. "Overseeing regulators". Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care. Retrieved 2 August 2014.
  2. "Health watchdogs and authorities: About the Professional Standards Authority". NHS choices. 10 July 2013. Retrieved 16 September 2014.
  3. "Right-touch regulation" (PDF). Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence. August 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 September 2015. Retrieved 16 September 2014.
  4. Rowden, Ray (31 May 2000). "Carry on regardless". The Guardian . Retrieved 28 September 2016.
  5. Butler, Patrick (9 August 2001). "National body to oversee healthcare professionals". The Guardian. Retrieved 28 September 2016.
  6. "Health and Social Care Act 2012: Part 7: The Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care". UK Government. Retrieved 2 August 2014.
  7. "Regulators: Statutory Regulators Directory". Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care. Retrieved 16 September 2014.
  8. Rutherford, Fiona (18 September 2014). "It's unscientific for a medical regulatory body to give accreditation to homeopaths". New Statesman. Retrieved 20 July 2017.
  9. "Accredited Voluntary Registers: Standards for organisations holding a voluntary register for health and social care occupations" (PDF). Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 May 2013. Retrieved 16 September 2014.
  10. "Voluntary registers: About accreditation". Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care. Archived from the original on 9 January 2014. Retrieved 16 September 2014.
  11. "Voluntary registers: The Accredited Registers Directory". Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care. Retrieved 9 July 2019.
  12. "Press release: Independent quality mark for homeopaths" (PDF). Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care. 11 September 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 16 September 2014.
  13. "Outcry as register of homeopaths gets official backing".
  14. "Health and Social Care: NHS Workforce: Regulation of Healthcare Professionals". Scottish Government. 10 September 2014. Retrieved 17 November 2015.
  15. "House of Commons Health Committee. Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care. Oral Evidence" (PDF). UK Parliament. 9 July 2013. p. ev15. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  16. The Professional Standards Authority. "Share your experience to help protect the public" . Retrieved 20 February 2020.
  17. The Professional Standards Authority. "What We Do" . Retrieved 20 February 2020.
  18. The Professional Standards Authority. "Standards of Good Regulation (revised) 2019" . Retrieved 20 February 2020.
  19. The Professional Standards Authority. "General Pharmaceutical Council – Annual Review of Performance 2018-19" (PDF). Retrieved 20 February 2020.