Protection of State Information Bill

Last updated

Protection of State Information Bill
Coat of arms of South Africa (heraldic).svg
Parliament of South Africa
  • Bill to provide for the protection of sensitive state information; to provide for a system of classification, reclassification and declassification of state information; to provide for the protection of certain valuable state information against alteration, destruction or loss or unlawful disclosure; to regulate the manner in which state information may be protected; to repeal the Protection of Information Act, 1982 (Act No. 84 of 1982); and to provide for matters connected therewith.
Passed by National Assembly
Passed25 April 2013
Enacted22 November 2011
Passed by National Council of Provinces
Passed29 November 2012
First chamber: National Assembly
Bill citation B6D—2010
Summary
Returned by President to National Assembly for reconsideration (September 2013)

The South African Protection of State Information Bill, formerly named the Protection of Information Bill and commonly referred to as the Secrecy Bill, [1] is a highly controversial piece of proposed legislation which aims to regulate the, protection and dissemination of state information, weighing state interests up against transparency and freedom of expression. [2] It will replace the Protection of State Information Act, 1982, which currently regulates these issues.

Contents

While critics of the bill have broadly accepted the need to replace the 1982 Act, they argue that the new Bill does not correctly balance these competing principles, and point to a number of provisions that undermine the right to access information and the rights of whistleblowers and journalists. [3]

The Bill was passed by the National Assembly on 22 November 2011. [4] It was passed with amendments by the National Council of Provinces on 29 November 2012, [5] and the amended bill was approved by the National Assembly on 25 April 2013. [6] In September 2013 President Jacob Zuma refused to sign the Bill into law and instead sent it back to the National Assembly for reconsideration. [7]

New bill

In the mid-2000s, a parliamentary review process to replace apartheid laws included a planned repeal and replacement of the Protection of Information Act 84 of 1982. [8]

Critics of the new bill, most notably led by a civil society coalition called the Right2Know Campaign, have broadly accepted the need to replace the 1982 Act, human rights activists, legal experts, opposition parties and a wide range of civil society bodies argued that the Bill does not correctly balance these competing principles, and point to a number of provisions that undermine the right to access information and the rights of whistleblowers and journalists. [3]

Of particular concern are the severe penalties for leaking documents, which entail jail terms of up to 25 years. They also highlight the need for a "public interest defence" exempting from prosecution individuals in possession of classified documents that reveal state ineptitude or corruption, or could otherwise be said to contain information vital to the interests of the public. Advocates of the bill dispute the need for such a defence, stating that the current draft of the proposed legislation which criminalises classification of documents revealing "corruption, malfeasance or wrongdoing by the State" with jail terms of up to 15 years prevents the need for such a defence as no such information will be classified.

Following the re-introduction of the Bill in 2010, significant concerns were raised by civil society and media organisations about the 'draconian' nature of the new bill. The concerns as submitted in various documents focused on:

Specifically, the definition of 'national interest' as a basis to classify information was considered too broad, including "All matters relating to the advancement of the public good; the pursuit of justice, democracy, economic growth, free trade, a stable monetary system and sound international relations; and security from all forms of crime". Various organisations collectively known as "The Right2Know" Campaign, listed seven major demands for a revised legislation. [9]

Although the two are often conflated in contemporary debates over press freedom in South Africa, the proposed Media Appeals Tribunal is not mentioned in the Protection of State Information Bill.

Principal changes to the working draft

Upon the establishment of an ad hoc committee in 2010 [10] to address the concerns raised by South Africans opposed to the bill, the following major revisions to the bill were enacted:

  1. The chapter providing protection against disclosure and classification of two categories of information- 'sensitive information' and 'commercial information' was deleted.
  2. Removal of this chapter led to exclusion of the possibility of classifying materials in the "national interest", a particularly widely defined and controversial aspect of the bill.
  3. This chapter's removal also entailed narrowing the legislation to official secrets held by the chief state intelligence agencies alone without extending to all organs of the state as was initially proposed.
  4. The threshold for classification has been changed to permit classification based only on demonstrable and not speculative harm to national security. A Classification Review Committee to oversee classification of documents has been proposed.
  5. The legal requirement that requests for declassification be responded to within 14 days of receiving the request (known as the "PAIA over-ride"). [11] [12]

Remaining areas of controversy

  1. Espionage and hostile activity offences which punish the communication of classified information which the person "knows or ought reasonably to have known would directly or indirectly benefit" a foreign state or non-state actor or prejudice national security. These offences are punishable by jail terms ranging from three years to 25 years, and are considered by critics to be so broad that they could apply to legitimate whistleblowers and anyone else exposing classified information in the public domain.
  2. Intentionally accessing classified information may result in a 25-year jail term
  3. Disclosing classified information, unless protected under the Protected Disclosures Act or the Companies Act is punishable by a fine or maximum jail term of five years. However these disclosures are regarded as applying to a limited category of recipients such as the public protector and the Companies tribunal, therefore not extending as a defence to investigative journalists, community leaders, trade unions or NGOs for instance, to publish information to the public at large.
  4. Failing to report possession of and to return to a classified document may result in a fine or maximum five-year prison sentence;
  5. The disclosure and retention of classified information that relates to intelligence agencies is punishable by imprisonment of up to 15 years. [11]

Criticism

Critics of the bill have included a wide range of public organisations including: the Right2Know campaign (a coalition of nearly 400 civil society organisations and community groups); COSATU; opposition political parties of South Africa; SANEF (South Africa National Editors' Forum); the Nelson Mandela Foundation, as well as international advocacy organisations such as Committee for the Protection of Journalists and Human Rights Watch. The critics of the bill joined in a march on parliament on 17 September 2011 prompting the ruling African National Congress party's chief whip to remove the bill from the parliamentary programme on 19 September for "further public consultation". [13] [14] However, no public consultations appear to have taken place the few closed-door roadshows that did take place were roundly criticised. [15] [16] The Senate of the University of the Witwatersrand issued a statement identifying how the bill would pose "deep threats to fundamental principles" enshrined in the constitution, impacting democracy in South Africa by undermining access to information and freedom of speech. [17]

ANC response to continued criticism

The South African ruling party African National Congress (ANC) has dismissed much of the criticism of the revised draft of the bill. It views the legislation as a necessary reform of apartheid era laws governing the protection of information. According to Minister Cwele, the bill introduces protection of valuable information by all organs of state; prevents against the danger of espionage, balances secrecy and openness through a system of declassification of information on a periodic 10 and 20-year basis as well as through the establishment of an independent Classification Review Panel. [18]

ANC ad hoc committee member on the Protection of State Information Bill, Lluwelyn Landers, quoting Professor Kobus van Rooyen SC's 2011 Percy Qhoboza lecture [19] argued against the possibility of the bill's unconstitutionality on account of the lack of a public interest defence. According to Llanders (and van Rooyen), in the absence of a public interest defence, access to a classified document could be expedited under a strengthened "PAIA over-ride" provision that is part of the Bill on the basis of the same public interest. The ANC have further criticised the "vitriol, vilification, name-calling... and blatant lies' regarding the bill" [20] and in a speech to Parliament Minister of State Security Siyabonga Cwele went as far as accusing the Bill's critics of being local proxies for foreign spies. [21] Additionally, the ANC believe that the consequences of disclosing classified information where a 'public interest' fails would leave the state with "no recourse".

Passage by National Assembly and National Council of Provinces, referral back by President

The Bill was passed by the National Assembly on 22 November 2011 by a total of 229 yes votes to 107 no votes and 2 abstentions. [4] [22] All opposition parties urged the ruling ANC to vote against the Bill. Two members of the ANC, Ben Turok and Gloria Borman abstained from voting on the bill urging 'further consideration' before finalising the legislation. [23] The two members have been referred to ANC's disciplinary committee.

The Bill was passed with amendments by the National Council of Provinces [24] on 29 November 2012 by 34 votes to 16, [5] [25] and the amended bill was approved by the National Assembly on 25 April 2013 by 189 votes to 74 with one abstention. [6]

In September 2013 President Jacob Zuma refused to sign the Bill into law and instead sent it back to the National Assembly for reconsideration. [7]

See also

Related Research Articles

The Republic of South Africa is a unitary parliamentary democratic republic. The President of South Africa serves both as head of state and as head of government. The President is elected by the National Assembly and must retain the confidence of the Assembly in order to remain in office. South Africans also elect provincial legislatures which govern each of the country's nine provinces.

Freedom of information laws allow access by the general public to data held by national governments and, where applicable, by state and local governments. The emergence of freedom of information legislation was a response to increasing dissatisfaction with the secrecy surrounding government policy development and decision making. In recent years Access to Information Act has also been used. They establish a "right-to-know" legal process by which requests may be made for government-held information, to be received freely or at minimal cost, barring standard exceptions. Also variously referred to as open records, or sunshine laws, governments are typically bound by a duty to publish and promote openness. In many countries there are constitutional guarantees for the right of access to information, but these are usually unused if specific support legislation does not exist. Additionally, the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 16 has a target to ensure public access to information and the protection of fundamental freedoms as a means to ensure accountable, inclusive and just institutions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Classified information</span> Material that government claims requires confidentiality

Classified information is material that a government body deems to be sensitive information that must be protected. Access is restricted by law or regulation to particular groups of people with the necessary security clearance and need to know, and mishandling of the material can incur criminal penalties.

The National Intelligence Agency (NIA) was the previous name of an intelligence agency of the South African government. Currently it is known as the Domestic Branch of the State Security Agency. It is responsible for domestic and counter-intelligence within the Republic of South Africa. The branch is run by a Director, who reports to the Director-General of the State Security Agency. The Director is also a member of the National Intelligence Co-Ordinating Committee (NICOC).

The United States government classification system is established under Executive Order 13526, the latest in a long series of executive orders on the topic beginning in 1951. Issued by President Barack Obama in 2009, Executive Order 13526 replaced earlier executive orders on the topic and modified the regulations codified to 32 C.F.R. 2001. It lays out the system of classification, declassification, and handling of national security information generated by the U.S. government and its employees and contractors, as well as information received from other governments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Key Points Act, 1980</span>

The National Key Points Act, 1980 is an act of the Parliament of South Africa that provides for the declaration and protection of sites of national strategic importance against sabotage, as determined by the Minister of Police since 2004 and the Minister of Defence before that. The act was designed during apartheid to secretly arrange protection primarily for privately owned strategic sites. It enables the government to compel private owners, as well as state-owned corporations, to safeguard such sites owned by them at their own cost. The act, still in force and unamended since apartheid, came under the spotlight after President Jacob Zuma's Nkandla homestead was declared a National Key Point in 2010 amid controversy over public expenditure on upgrades to the property. As of 2013, the act is officially under review.

Mario Gaspare R. Oriani-Ambrosini was an Italian constitutional lawyer and politician who was a Member of Parliament in South Africa with the Inkatha Freedom Party.

Internet censorship in South Africa is a developing topic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cedric Frolick</span>

Cedric Thomas Frolick, is the current House Chairperson: Committees, Oversight and ICT in the National Assembly of Parliament for the Republic of South Africa. A teacher, politician, anti-apartheid activist. He retired from teaching in 1999 and subsequently became a politician in the National Assembly. On 18 November 2010, the ANC appointed him as the House Chairperson responsible for Committees, ICT and Oversight.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siyabonga Cwele</span> South African doctor and politician

Siyabonga Cyprian Cwele is a South African doctor and politician, a long-serving member of the African National Congress. He has held various ministerial positions and served as the Minister of Home Affairs from 2018 to 2019.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Right2Know</span>

The Right2Know Campaign is a South African non-profit advocacy organisation established in 2010 to reduce state secrecy in the drafting of laws, increase access to information, and protect freedom of expression especially on the internet. As part of this, the campaign monitors and challenges potential legislation that it believes would infringe on personal liberties and transparent government. It is the first such organisation of its kind in post-Apartheid South Africa.

David Douglas van Rooyen is the former Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs and Minister of Finance of the Republic of South Africa. He took office on 13 December 2015 and was dropped from cabinet on 27 February 2018 by President Cyril Ramaphosa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Presidency of Jacob Zuma</span> South African presidential administration from 2009 to 2018

Jacob Zuma's tenure as South Africa's fourth post-apartheid president began on 9 May 2009 and ended on 14 February 2018. He held office under a mandate from the parliamentary caucus of the African National Congress (ANC), which had governed South Africa since 1994 and which won comfortable majorities in the 2009 and 2014 national elections. His presidency was beset by controversy, and he faced, and defeated, an impeachment attempt and a record eight motions of no confidence in the South African Parliament, four of which went to a vote. His party asked him to resign in February 2018, ahead of the constitutional end of his second term.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bongani Bongo</span> South African politician

Bongani Thomas Bongo is a South African politician, whose ANC membership is currently suspended along with the party's secretary-general Ace Magashule. Bongo is the former Minister of State Security, a position to which he was appointed on 17 October 2017 by President Jacob Zuma until he was relieved from the post on 28 February 2018. He was the only appointment that had not been a cabinet minister before. He is also the elected President of the University of Limpopo's Alumni and Convocation Association. As the Minister of State Security, Bongo headed the State Security Agency of South Africa.

Alexandra Jennifer Beukes is a South African politician who has been a Member of Parliament in the National Assembly since 12 June 2019. Prior to serving in the National Assembly, she was a Member of the Northern Cape Provincial Legislature and the mayor of the Khâi-Ma Local Municipality. Beukes is a member of the African National Congress.

Thabo Nelson Mmutle is a South African Member of Parliament for the African National Congress. He first became an MP at the 2019 general election. Mmutle is a former member of the national executive committee (NEC) of the African National Congress Youth League.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Moe Shaik</span> South African spy and diplomat

Moe Shaik, also spelled Mo Shaik, is a South African civil servant, diplomat, businessman, and former intelligence operative who has been the South African High Commissioner to Canada since 2022. He is a former chief of the National Intelligence Co-ordinating Committee and a former director of the foreign intelligence wing of the State Security Agency, at that time still called the South African Secret Service.

Cecil Valentine Burgess is a South African politician and lawyer who served in the National Assembly from 2004 to 2014. He represented the Independent Democrats (ID) until September 2005, when he crossed the floor to the African National Congress (ANC).

Mpho Innocent Scott is a South African businessman and former politician who represented the African National Congress (ANC) in the National Assembly from 1994 to 2003. He chaired the Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs from 2002 until 2003, when he resigned from politics to pursue his business career.

Gloria Mary Borman is a South African retired politician who served as a Member of the National Assembly of South Africa for two nonconsecutive terms from 1999 until 2004 and again from 2009 to 2014. She represented the Democratic Party which later became the Democratic Alliance during her first term in Parliament and represented the African National Congress during her second and final term.

References

  1. ↑ "'Secrecy bill' a step backwards". News24. 17 September 2011. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
  2. ↑ Protection of State Information Bill Archived 28 December 2011 at the Wayback Machine (B6B-2010), as presented by the Ad Hoc Committee on Protection of Information Bill of the National Assembly.
  3. 1 2 "PEN Expresses Concern Over Secrecy Bill Passed in South African National Assembly", PEN South Africa, 23 November 2011. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
  4. 1 2 "MPs vote in favour of info bill". News24. 22 November 2011. Retrieved 22 November 2011.
  5. 1 2 Ferreira, Emsie (29 November 2012). "ANC pushes secrecy Bill through NCOP". Mail & Guardian. South Africa. Retrieved 4 May 2013.
  6. 1 2 Evans, Sarah (25 April 2013). "'Altered' secrecy Bill passed in Parliament". Mail & Guardian. South Africa. Retrieved 4 May 2013.
  7. 1 2 "President refuses to sign draconian bill into law", Reporters Without Borders, 12 September 2013.
  8. ↑ "Content Not Found - Mail & Guardian" (PDF). Mail & Guardian. South Africa. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 October 2013.
  9. ↑ "The Secrecy Bill still fails the Freedom Test!", Right2Know, 29 August 2011. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
  10. ↑ "Election of Chairperson for the Ad Hoc Committee on Protection of State Information Bill", Parliamentary Monitoring Group (PMG), 3 May 2010. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
  11. 1 2 "Information bill needed - just not this one", Dario Milo, Times Live, 27 November 2011. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
  12. ↑ ""Protection of State Information Bill" (B 6B - 2010), Republic of South Africa, 5 September 2011. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
  13. ↑ "Cape Town rallies against secrecy bill", Bianca Capazorio, Warda Meyer, and SAPA, IOL News (Independent Newspapers), 18 September 2011. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
  14. ↑ "ANC sets Secrecy Bill deadline", Andisiwe Makinana, Mail & Guardian, 11 November 2011. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
  15. ↑ "Secrecy Bill returns unchanged", Andisiwe Makinana, Mail & Guardian, 18 November 2011. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
  16. ↑ "R2K: outrage at the ANC’s handling of the Secrecy Bill", Right2Know, 14 November 2011. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
  17. ↑ "WITA University Senate Resolution on the Protection of Information Bill and the Media Tribunal Process". WITS University. 1 October 2010. Retrieved 24 November 2011.
  18. ↑ "Speech by Minister of State Security, Siyabonga Cwekem, during debate on the Protection of State Information Bill", before the National Assembly, Parliament, Cape Town, released by Office of the ANC Chief Whip, published by Politics Web, 16 November 2011. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
  19. ↑ "Media Freedom in South Africa : The High Road", Kobus van Rooyen, Percy Qoboza Memorial Lecture, National Press Club, 19 October 2011. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
  20. ↑ "Extracts from a speech delivered by Luwellyn Landers, MP, during the debate on the Protection of State Information Bill", before the National Assembly, Parliament, Cape Town, released by Office of the ANC Chief Whip, published by Politics Web, 16 November 2011. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
  21. ↑ "Cwele brands bill opponents foreign proxies", Wyndham Hartley, Business Day, 6 August 2012. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
  22. ↑ " 'Secrecy bill' passed in Parliament", Wyndham Hartley, Business Day, 6 August 2012. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
  23. ↑ "Turok facing censure over secrecy bill snub", Gaye Davis and Shanti Aboobaker, The Star, 24 November 2011. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
  24. ↑ "National Council of Provinces" Archived 12 April 2008 at the Wayback Machine , Parliament of the Republic of South Africa. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
  25. ↑ "Info Bill now in hands of rural citizens", Deon de Lange, IOL News (Independent Newspapers), 8 December 2011. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.