Proton spin crisis

Last updated
Unsolved problem in physics:
How do the quarks and gluons carry the spin of protons?
(more unsolved problems in physics)

The proton spin crisis (or proton spin puzzle) is a theoretical crisis precipitated by a 1987 experiment by the European Muon Collaboration (EMC), [1] which tried to determine the distribution of spin within the proton. [2]

Contents

Physicists expected that the quarks carry all a proton's spin. However, not only was the total proton spin carried by quarks far smaller than 100%, these results were consistent with almost zero (4–24% [3] ) proton spin being carried by quarks. This surprising and puzzling result was termed the "proton spin crisis". [4] The problem is considered one of the important unsolved problems in physics. [5]

Background

A key question is how the nucleons' spins are distributed amongst their constituent parts ("partons": quarks and gluons). Components of proton's spin are expectation values of individual sources of angular momentum. These values depend on the renormalization scale, because their operators are not separately conserved. [6] Physicists originally expected that valence quarks would carry all of the nucleon spin.

A proton is built from three valence quarks (two up quarks and one down quark), virtual gluons, and virtual (or sea) quarks and antiquarks (virtual particles do not influence the proton's quantum numbers). The ruling hypothesis was that since the proton is stable, it exists in the lowest possible energy level. Therefore, it was expected that the quark's wave function is the spherically symmetric s-wave with no spatial contribution to angular momentum. The proton is, like each of its quarks, a spin-⁠ 1 /2⁠ particle (a fermion ). Therefore, it was hypothesized that two of the quarks would have their spins parallel and the third quark would have its spin antiparallel to that of the proton.

The experiment

In this EMC experiment, a quark of a polarized proton target was hit by a polarized muon beam, and the quark's instantaneous spin was measured. In a polarized proton target, all the protons' spins take the same direction, and therefore it was expected that the spin of two out of the three quarks cancels out and the spin of the third quark is polarized in the direction of the proton's spin. Thus, the sum of the quarks' spin was expected to be equal to the proton's spin.

Instead, the experiment found that the number of quarks with spin in the proton's spin direction was almost the same as the number of quarks whose spin was in the opposite direction. This is the proton spin crisis. Similar results have been obtained in later experiments. [7]

Subsequent work

A paper published in 2008 showed that more than half of the spin of the proton comes from the spin of its quarks, and that the missing spin is produced by the quarks' orbital angular momentum. [8] This work used relativistic effects together with other quantum chromodynamic properties and explained how they boil down to an overall spatial angular momentum that is consistent with the experimental data. A 2013 paper showed how to calculate the gluon helicity contribution using lattice QCD. [9]

According to physicist Xiangdong Ji in 2017, Lattice QCD shows "the theoretical expectation on the fraction of the nucleon spin carried in quark spin is about 30%. Thus there is no substantial discrepancy between the fundamental theory and data." [10]

Monte Carlo calculations have shown that 50% of the proton spin comes from gluon polarization. [11] Results from the RHIC, published in 2016, indicate that gluons may carry even more of protons' spin than quarks do. [12] However, in 2018 lattice QCD calculations indicated that it is the quark orbital angular momentum that is the dominant contribution to the nucleon spin. [13]

In a 2022 AAPPS Bulletin, Keh-Fei Liu calculated that quark spin contributes about 40% of the angular momentum, quark orbital angular momentum contributes about 15%, and gluon orbital angular momentum contributes about 40%. Given various error bars on both theoretical calculations and on experiments, this too is consistent with the observed experimental quark spin contribution of around 30%. [14]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gluon</span> Elementary particle that mediates the strong force

A gluon is a type of massless elementary particle that mediates the strong interaction between quarks, acting as the exchange particle for the interaction. Gluons are massless vector bosons, thereby having a spin of 1. Through the strong interaction, gluons bind quarks into groups according to quantum chromodynamics (QCD), forming hadrons such as protons and neutrons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nucleon</span> Particle that makes up the atomic nucleus (proton or neutron)

In physics and chemistry, a nucleon is either a proton or a neutron, considered in its role as a component of an atomic nucleus. The number of nucleons in a nucleus defines the atom's mass number.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proton</span> Subatomic particle with positive charge

A proton is a stable subatomic particle, symbol
p
, H+, or 1H+ with a positive electric charge of +1 e (elementary charge). Its mass is slightly less than the mass of a neutron and approximately 1836 times the mass of an electron (the proton-to-electron mass ratio). Protons and neutrons, each with a mass of approximately one atomic mass unit, are jointly referred to as nucleons (particles present in atomic nuclei).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Glueball</span> Hypothetical particle composed of gluons

In particle physics, a glueball is a hypothetical composite particle. It consists solely of gluon particles, without valence quarks. Such a state is possible because gluons carry color charge and experience the strong interaction between themselves. Glueballs are extremely difficult to identify in particle accelerators, because they mix with ordinary meson states. In pure gauge theory, glueballs are the only states of the spectrum and some of them are stable.

Hadronization is the process of the formation of hadrons out of quarks and gluons. There are two main branches of hadronization: quark-gluon plasma (QGP) transformation and colour string decay into hadrons. The transformation of quark-gluon plasma into hadrons is studied in lattice QCD numerical simulations, which are explored in relativistic heavy-ion experiments. Quark-gluon plasma hadronization occurred shortly after the Big Bang when the quark–gluon plasma cooled down to the Hagedorn temperature when free quarks and gluons cannot exist. In string breaking new hadrons are forming out of quarks, antiquarks and sometimes gluons, spontaneously created from the vacuum.

The QCD vacuum is the quantum vacuum state of quantum chromodynamics (QCD). It is an example of a non-perturbative vacuum state, characterized by non-vanishing condensates such as the gluon condensate and the quark condensate in the complete theory which includes quarks. The presence of these condensates characterizes the confined phase of quark matter.

In particle physics, the parton model is a model of hadrons, such as protons and neutrons, proposed by Richard Feynman. It is useful for interpreting the cascades of radiation produced from quantum chromodynamics (QCD) processes and interactions in high-energy particle collisions.

Nucleon spin structure describes the partonic structure of nucleon intrinsic angular momentum (spin). The key question is how the nucleon's spin, whose magnitude is 1/2ħ, is carried by its constituent partons. It was originally expected before the 1980s that quarks carry all of the nucleon spin, but later experiments contradict this expectation. In the late 1980s, the European Muon Collaboration (EMC) conducted experiments that suggested the spin carried by quarks is not sufficient to account for the total spin of the nucleons. This finding astonished particle physicists at that time, and the problem of where the missing spin lies is sometimes referred to as the proton spin crisis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">CDHS experiment</span>

CDHS was a neutrino experiment at CERN taking data from 1976 until 1984. The experiment was officially referred to as WA1. CDHS was a collaboration of groups from CERN, Dortmund, Heidelberg, Saclay and later Warsaw. The collaboration was led by Jack Steinberger. The experiment was designed to study deep inelastic neutrino interactions in iron.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quark–gluon plasma</span> Phase of quantum chromodynamics (QCD)

Quark–gluon plasma is an interacting localized assembly of quarks and gluons at thermal and chemical (abundance) equilibrium. The word plasma signals that free color charges are allowed. In a 1987 summary, Léon Van Hove pointed out the equivalence of the three terms: quark gluon plasma, quark matter and a new state of matter. Since the temperature is above the Hagedorn temperature—and thus above the scale of light u,d-quark mass—the pressure exhibits the relativistic Stefan-Boltzmann format governed by temperature to the fourth power and many practically massless quark and gluon constituents. It can be said that QGP emerges to be the new phase of strongly interacting matter which manifests its physical properties in terms of nearly free dynamics of practically massless gluons and quarks. Both quarks and gluons must be present in conditions near chemical (yield) equilibrium with their colour charge open for a new state of matter to be referred to as QGP.

The EMC effect is the surprising observation that the cross section for deep inelastic scattering from an atomic nucleus is different from that of the same number of free protons and neutrons. From this observation, it can be inferred that the quark momentum distributions in nucleons bound inside nuclei are different from those of free nucleons. This effect was first observed in 1983 at CERN by the European Muon Collaboration, hence the name "EMC effect". It was unexpected, since the average binding energy of protons and neutrons inside nuclei is insignificant when compared to the energy transferred in deep inelastic scattering reactions that probe quark distributions. While over 1000 scientific papers have been written on the topic and numerous hypotheses have been proposed, no definitive explanation for the cause of the effect has been confirmed. Determining the origin of the EMC effect is one of the major unsolved problems in the field of nuclear physics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fermilab E-906/SeaQuest</span> Particle physics experiment

Fermilab E-906/SeaQuest is a particle physics experiment which will use Drell–Yan process to measure the contributions of antiquarks to the structure of the proton or neutron and how this structure is modified when the proton or neutron is included within an atomic nucleus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NA49 experiment</span> Particle physics experiment

The NA49 experiment was a particle physics experiment that investigated the properties of quark–gluon plasma. The experiment's synonym was Ions/TPC-Hadrons. It took place in the North Area of the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) at CERN from 1991-2002.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Light-front quantization applications</span> Quantization procedure in quantum field theory

The light-front quantization of quantum field theories provides a useful alternative to ordinary equal-time quantization. In particular, it can lead to a relativistic description of bound systems in terms of quantum-mechanical wave functions. The quantization is based on the choice of light-front coordinates, where plays the role of time and the corresponding spatial coordinate is . Here, is the ordinary time, is a Cartesian coordinate, and is the speed of light. The other two Cartesian coordinates, and , are untouched and often called transverse or perpendicular, denoted by symbols of the type . The choice of the frame of reference where the time and -axis are defined can be left unspecified in an exactly soluble relativistic theory, but in practical calculations some choices may be more suitable than others. The basic formalism is discussed elsewhere.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephan Narison</span> Malagasy physicist

Stephan Narison is a Malagasy theoretical high-energy physicist specialized in quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the gauge theory of strong interactions. He is the founder of the Series of International Conferences in Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD-Montpellier) and of the Series of International Conferences in High-Energy Physics (HEPMAD-Madagascar).

Xiangdong Ji is a Chinese theoretical nuclear and elementary particle physicist. He is a Distinguished University Professor at the University of Maryland, College Park.

In high energy particle physics, specifically in hadron-beam scattering experiments, transverse momentum distributions (TMDs) are the distributions of the hadron's quark or gluon momenta that are perpendicular to the momentum transfer between the beam and the hadron. Specifically, they are probability distributions to find inside the hadron a parton with a transverse momentum and longitudinal momentum fraction . TMDs provide information on the confined motion of quarks and gluons inside the hadron and complement the information on the hadron structure provided by parton distribution functions (PDFs) and generalized parton distributions (GPDs). In all, TMDs and PDFs provide the information of the momentum distribution of the quarks, and the GPDs, the information on their spatial distribution.

In quantum field theory, a sum rule is a relation between a static quantity and an integral over a dynamical quantity. Therefore, they have a form such as:

The nucleon magnetic moments are the intrinsic magnetic dipole moments of the proton and neutron, symbols μp and μn. The nucleus of an atom comprises protons and neutrons, both nucleons that behave as small magnets. Their magnetic strengths are measured by their magnetic moments. The nucleons interact with normal matter through either the nuclear force or their magnetic moments, with the charged proton also interacting by the Coulomb force.

Color transparency is a phenomenon observed in high-energy particle physics, where hadrons created in a nucleus propagate through that nucleus with less interaction than expected. It suggests that hadrons are first created with a small size in the nucleus, and then grow to their nominal size. Here, color refers to the color charge, the property of quarks and gluons that determines how strongly they interact through the nuclear strong force.

References

  1. ↑ Ashman, J.; Badelek, B.; Baum, G.; Beaufays, J.; Bee, C.P.; Benchouk, C.; et al. (European Muon Collaboration (EMC)) (1988). "A measurement of the spin asymmetry and determination of the structure function g1 in deep inelastic muon-proton scattering". Physics Letters B. 206 (2): 364–370. Bibcode:1988PhLB..206..364A. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)91523-7. ISSN   0370-2693. CERN EP 87-230.
  2. ↑ Ashman, J.; et al. (European Muon Collaboration (EMC)) (1988). "A measurement of the spin asymmetry and determination of the structure function g1 in deep inelastic muon-proton scattering" (PDF). Physics Letters B . 206 (2): 364. Bibcode:1988PhLB..206..364A. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)91523-7.
  3. ↑ "Are scientists finally on the brink of understanding where proton spin comes from?". phys.org. June 2015.
  4. ↑ Londergan, J. T. (2009). "Nucleon resonances and quark structure". International Journal of Modern Physics E . 18 (5–6): 1135–1165. arXiv: 0907.3431 . Bibcode:2009IJMPE..18.1135L. doi:10.1142/S0218301309013415. S2CID   118475917.
  5. ↑ Hansson, Johan (July 2010) [8 March 2010]. "The "proton spin crisis" – a quantum query" (PDF). Progress in Physics. 3: 51–52. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-05-04.
  6. ↑ Ji, Xiangdong; Yuan, Feng; Zhao, Yong (2020-09-02). "Proton spin after 30 years: What we know and what we don't?". arXiv: 2009.01291 [hep-ph].
  7. ↑ Jaffe, R. (1995). "Where does the proton really get its spin?" (PDF). Physics Today . Vol. 48, no. 9. pp. 24–30. Bibcode:1995PhT....48i..24J. doi:10.1063/1.881473. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-04-16. Retrieved 2013-02-11.
  8. ↑ Thomas, A. (2008). "Interplay of spin and orbital angular momentum in the proton". Physical Review Letters . 101 (10): 102003. arXiv: 0803.2775 . Bibcode:2008PhRvL.101j2003T. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.102003. PMID   18851208. S2CID   18761490.
  9. ↑ Ji, Xiangdong; Zhang, Jian-Hui; Zhao, Yong (2013-09-10). "Physics of the gluon-helicity contribution to proton spin". Physical Review Letters. 111 (11): 112002. arXiv: 1304.6708 . Bibcode:2013PhRvL.111k2002J. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.112002. PMID   24074075. S2CID   38560063.
  10. ↑ Ji, Xiangdong (2017). "Proton tomography through deeply virtual Compton scattering". National Science Review. 4 (2): 213–223.
  11. ↑ Bass, Steven D. (2017-03-06). "Spinning gluons in the proton". Viewpoint. Physics. 10: 23. doi: 10.1103/Physics.10.23 .
  12. ↑ Walsh, Karen Mcnulty (2016-02-16). "Physicists zoom in on gluons' contribution to proton spin". Phys.org.
  13. ↑ Deur, A.; Brodsky, S.J.; de Teramond, G.F. (2019). "The Spin Structure of the Nucleon". Reports on Progress in Physics. 82 (76201): 076201. arXiv: 1807.05250 . Bibcode:2019RPPh...82g6201D. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ab0b8f. S2CID   18954455.
  14. ↑ Liu, Keh-Fei (December 2022). "Status on lattice calculations of the proton spin decomposition". AAPPS Bulletin. 32 (1): 8. arXiv: 2112.08416 . doi: 10.1007/s43673-022-00037-4 .
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.