R. A. W. Rhodes

Last updated
R. A. W. Rhodes
Portrait june 2019 (2).jpg
Rhodes in 2019
Born
Roderick Arthur William Rhodes

(1944-08-15) 15 August 1944 (age 79)
Alma mater University of Essex
Oxford University
Main interests
 Political science, public policy, political institutions, public administration, comparative politics
Notable ideas
Differentiated polity, governance, core executive, policy networks, interpretive political science, decentred theory of governance, political ethnography
Website www.raw-rhodes.co.uk

Roderick Arthur William Rhodes (born 15 August 1944), [1] usually cited as R. A. W. Rhodes, is a British professor of political science.

Contents

Rod Rhodes is professor of government at the University of Southampton (UK) and director of the Centre for Political Ethnography. He is also emeritus professor of politics at the University of Newcastle (UK). Previously, he was: Professor of Government at Griffith University (2012–2015); director of the UK Economic and Social Research Council’s ‘Whitehall Programme’ (1994–1999); distinguished professor of political science at the Australian National University (2006–11); and director of the Research School of Social Sciences at the Australian National University (2007-8). He is a life Vice-President and former Chair and president of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom; a Fellow of both the Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia; and the Academy of Social Sciences (UK). He has also been a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts, editor of 'Public Administration: an international quarterly' from 1986 to 2011, and Treasurer of the Australian Political Studies Association, 2004–2011.

Early life and education

Rhodes was born in Bradford in the West Riding of Yorkshire. He was educated at a Moravian church school before working as a clerk. After studying at night school, he took a bachelor's degree at Bradford University. He also holds a postgraduate BLitt from Oxford University and a doctorate from Essex University. He emigrated from the United Kingdom to Australia in 2003, returning to the UK in 2012.

Research

Rhodes was influential in developing several ideas in present-day political science.

Differentiated polity

The idea that British government should be seen as a fragmented or differentiated polity rather than a unitary state has been hugely influential and widely debated. The idea ‘may be becoming the new orthodoxy’. [2] [3]

Core executive

With Patrick Dunleavy, Rhodes argued the conventional debate about the British executive, with its focus on the relative power of the prime minister and cabinet was too limited. The core functions of the British executive are to pull together and integrate central government policies and to act as final arbiters of conflicts between different elements of the government machine. These functions can be carried out by institutions other than prime minister and cabinet; for example, the Treasury and the Cabinet Office. By defining the core executive in functional terms, the key questions become: ‘who does what?’ and ‘who has what resources?’. [4]

Policy networks

Rhodes pioneered the analysis of policy networks in British government. The term refers to sets of formal and informal institutional linkages between governmental and other actors structured around shared interests in public policymaking and implementation. These institutions are interdependent. Policies emerge from the bargaining between the networks’ members. The other actors commonly include the professions, trade unions and big business. Central departments need their co-operation because British government rarely delivers services itself. It uses other bodies. Also, there are too many groups to consult so government must aggregate interests. It needs the "legitimated" spokespeople for that policy area. The groups need the money and legislative authority that only government can provide. [5]

Governance

The term refers to: a new process of governing; or a changed condition of ordered rule; or the new method by which society is governed. Rhodes applied the idea to public administration and public policy to refer the changing boundaries between public, private and voluntary sectors. For many policy arenas, these sectors are interdependent, so decisions are a product of their game-like interactions, rooted in trust and regulated by rules of the game negotiated and agreed by the participants. Such networks have significant degree of autonomy from the state - they are self-organising - although the state can indirectly and imperfectly steer them. In sum, governance refers to governing with and through networks; to network steering. The arguments that there had been a shift from ‘government to governance’, that it was the mix of bureaucracy, markets and networks that mattered, and a consequent ‘hollowing out of the state’ are now referred to, and debated, as ‘the Anglo-governance school’. [6] Rhodes wrote the foundational texts of this school. [7] [8]

Interpretive political science

Mark Bevir and R. A. W. Rhodes are the authors of Interpreting British Governance (2003) [9] and Governance Stories (2006). [10] They argue that political science must necessarily be an interpretive art. This is because they hold that the starting point of enquiry must be to unpack the meanings, beliefs, and preferences of actors in order to then make sense of understanding actions, practices, and institutions. Political science is therefore an interpretative discipline underpinned by hermeneutic philosophy rather than positivism: there is no ‘science’ of politics, instead all explanations, including those that deploy statistics and models, are best conceived as narratives. Bevir and Rhodes thus provide an elaborate philosophical foundation for a decentred theory of governance woven together by the notions of beliefs, traditions and dilemmas. 'It follows that the role of political scientists is to use (1) ethnography to uncover people's beliefs and preferences, and (2) history to uncover traditions as they develop in response to dilemmas. The product is a story of other people's constructions of what they are doing, which provides actors’ views on changes in government, the economy, and society. So, for example, a political scientist may select a part of the governance process, and then explain it by unpicking various political traditions and how actors within these traditions encounter and act to resolve dilemmas. Governance is thus understood as the contingent and unintended outcome of competing narratives of governance.’ [11]

A decentred theory of governance

For Bevir and Rhodes, decentered theory revolves around the idea of situated agency: institutions, practices or socialisation cannot determine how people behave, so any course of action is a contingent individual choice. People’s actions are explained by their beliefs (or meanings or desires); any one belief is interpreted in the context of the wider web of a person’s beliefs; and these beliefs are explained by traditions and modified by dilemmas. A tradition (or episteme or paradigm) is the set of theories against the background of which a person comes to hold beliefs and perform actions. It is a first influence upon people – a set of beliefs that they inherit and then transform in response to encounters with "dilemmas" (or problems or anomalies). A dilemma arises whenever novel circumstances generate a new belief that forces people to question their previously held beliefs. Change occurs through encountering such dilemmas: while individual responses to dilemmas are grounded in traditions, they then modify just those traditions.' [11]

Political ethnography

Latterly, Rhodes argued that too few political scientists were engaged in observation and founded the Manchester University Press series on "Political and Administrative Ethnography" to encourage fieldwork in political science. In his own work, he used ethnography as a tool for exploring the beliefs and practices of government actors (see Rhodes, 2007, 2011,2014, 2021 and 2024 in Select Bibliography). His current project focuses on the court politics of recent British prime ministers.

Honors and awards

Selected bibliography

Main Books

Debates

The "interpretive turn" to studying British government is discussed in a symposium in: Rhodes, R. A. W.; Dowding, Keith; Bevir, Mark; Finlayson, Alan; Hay, Colin (May 2004). "The interpretive approach in political science: a symposium". The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 6 (2): 129–164. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.t01-6-00131.x. S2CID   146751696.

The following items are all debates between Rhodes and his critics.

Finally, two books explore the strengths and weaknesses of the interpretive approach of Bevir and Rhodes:

See also

Related Research Articles

Political science is the scientific study of politics. It is a social science dealing with systems of governance and power, and the analysis of political activities, political thought, political behavior, and associated constitutions and laws.

Secularism is the principle of being indifferent to or skeptical and/or critical of religious belief.

International relations theory is the study of international relations (IR) from a theoretical perspective. It seeks to explain behaviors and outcomes in international politics. The four most prominent schools of thought are realism, liberalism, constructivism, and rational choice. Whereas realism and liberalism make broad and specific predictions about international relations, constructivism and rational choice are methodological approaches that focus on certain types of social explanation for phenomena.

An epistemic community is a network of knowledge-based experts who help decision-makers to define the problems they face, identify various policy solutions and assess the policy outcomes. The definitive conceptual framework of an epistemic community is widely accepted as that of Peter M. Haas. He describes them as

"...a network of professionals with recognised expertise and competence in a particular domain and an authoritative claim to policy relevant knowledge within that domain or issue-area."

International political economy (IPE) is the study of how politics shapes the global economy and how the global economy shapes politics. A key focus in IPE is on the distributive consequences of global economic exchange. It has been described as the study of "the political battle between the winners and losers of global economic exchange."

Idealism in the foreign policy context holds that a nation-state should make its internal political philosophy the goal of its conduct and rhetoric in international affairs. For example, an idealist might believe that ending poverty at home should be coupled with tackling poverty abroad. Both within and outside of the United States, American president Woodrow Wilson is widely considered an early advocate of idealism and codifier of its practical meaning; specific actions cited include the issuing of the famous "Fourteen Points".

David Jonathan Andrew Held was a British political scientist who specialised in political theory and international relations. He held a joint appointment as Professor of Politics and International Relations, and was Master of University College, at Durham University until his death. He was also a visiting Professor of Political Science at Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli. Previously he was the Graham Wallas chair of Political Science and the co-director of the Centre for the Study of Global Governance at the London School of Economics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Keith Dowding</span> British political scientist

Keith Martin Dowding is Distinguished Professor of Political Science and Political Philosophy, School of Politics and International Relations, Research School of Social Sciences at the Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. He was in the Government Department at the London School of Economics, UK in 2006, and has published widely in the fields of public choice, public administration, public policy, British politics, comparative politics, urban political economy, positive political theory and normative political philosophy. His work is informed by social and rational choice theories. He edited the SAGE Publishing Journal of Theoretical Politics from 1996 to 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Patrick Dunleavy</span>

Patrick John Dunleavy, is Emeritus Professor of Political Science and Public Policy within the Government Department of the London School of Economics (LSE). He was also Co-Director of Democratic Audit and Chair of the LSE Public Policy Group. In addition Dunleavy is an ANZSOG Institute for Governance Centenary Chair at the University of Canberra, Australia.

Mark Bevir is a British philosopher of history. He is a professor of political science and the Director of the Center for British Studies at the University of California, Berkeley, where he currently teaches courses on political theory and philosophy, public policy and organisation, and methodology. He is also a Professor in the Graduate School of Governance, United Nations University (MERIT) and a Distinguished Research Professor in the College of Arts and Humanities, Swansea University.

Colin Hay is Professor of Political Sciences at Sciences Po, Paris and Affiliate Professor of Political Analysis at the University of Sheffield, joint editor-in-chief of the journal Comparative European Politics. and Managing Editor of the journal New Political Economy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alan Finlayson</span> British political scientist

Alan Finlayson is a British political theorist and political scientist. He is Professor of Political and Social Theory at The University of East Anglia in the United Kingdom, having previously taught in the Department of Political and Cultural Studies at Swansea University, and the Department of Politics and International Relations at Queen's University Belfast. He is a leading advocate of rhetorical political analysis and of its importance for the study of British politics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Colin Crouch</span> British sociologist and political scientist (born 1944)

Colin John Crouch, is an English sociologist and political scientist. He coined the post-democracy concept in 2000 in his book Coping with Post-Democracy. Colin Crouch is currently Emeritus Professor at the University of Warwick and an External Scientific Member of the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tanja Börzel</span> German political scientist

Tanja A. Börzel is a German political scientist. Her research and teaching focus on the fields of European Integration, Governance, and Diffusion. She is professor of Political Science at the Otto-Suhr-Institute of Political Science of Freie Universität Berlin, director of the Center for European Integration, and holder of the Jean Monnet Chair for European Integration from 2006 until 2009. Currently, she is department chair of the Otto-Suhr-Institute of Political Science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Raffaele Marchetti</span>

Raffaele Marchetti is an Italian political scientist and editorialist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mark Blyth</span> Scottish-American political scientist

Mark McGann Blyth is a Scottish-American political economist. He is currently the William R. Rhodes Professor of International Economics and Professor of International and Public Affairs at Brown University. At Brown, Blyth additionally directs the William R. Rhodes Center for International Economics and Finance at the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs.

Policy network analysis is a field of research in political science focusing on the links and interdependence between government's sections and other societal actors, aiming to understand the policy-making process and public policy outcomes.

Michael Saward, is an Australian and British professor of politics and international studies at the University of Warwick, He was formerly Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, and Professor and Head of Department in politics and international studies at the Open University.

Rodney Bruce Hall is an American Professor of International Relations and among those scholars known as Second Generation Constructivists. He earned bachelor's and master's degrees in physics and subsequently a master's degree in international relations and a PhD in political science from the University of Pennsylvania under the supervision of Friedrich Kratochwil, one of the founding scholars of constructivism in international relations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Helen Margetts</span> Political scientist, University of Oxford

Helen Zerlina Margetts, is Professor of Internet and Society at the Oxford Internet Institute (OII), University of Oxford and from 2011 to 2018 was Director of the OII. She is currently Director of the Public Policy Programme at The Alan Turing Institute. She is a political scientist specialising in digital era governance and politics, and has published over a hundred books, journal articles and research reports in this field.

References

  1. ↑ "Rhodes, R. A. W." Library of Congress. Retrieved 20 September 2014. (R.A.W. Rhodes, Univ. of Essex) data sheet (b. 8-15-44) ... (Rhodes, Roderick Arthur William)
  2. ↑ Marsh, David (November 2008). "What is at stake? A response to Bevir and Rhodes". The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 10 (4): 738. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2008.00341.x. S2CID   143633617.
  3. ↑ Rhodes, R. A. W. (1988). Beyond Westminster and Whitehall: the sub-central governments of Britain . London Winchester, Massachusetts, USA: Unwin Hyman Allen & Unwin. ISBN   9780043522226.
  4. ↑ Rhodes, R. A. W.; Dunleavy, Patrick (1995). Prime minister, cabinet, and core executive. New York: St. Martin's Press. ISBN   9780333555286.
  5. ↑ Rhodes, R. A. W.; Marsh, David (1992). Policy networks in British government. Oxford Oxford New York: Clarendon Press Oxford University Press. ISBN   9780198278528.
  6. ↑ Marinetto, Mike (October 2003). "Governing beyond the centre: a critique of the Anglo-Governance school". Political Studies. 51 (3): 592–608. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00443. S2CID   144917733.
  7. ↑ Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: policy networks, governance, reflexivity, and accountability. Buckingham Philadelphia: Open University Press. ISBN   9780335197279.
  8. ↑ Rhodes, R. A. W. (August 2007). "Understanding governance: ten years on" (PDF). Organization Studies. 28 (8): 1243–1264. doi:10.1177/0170840607076586. S2CID   145560766.
  9. ↑ Rhodes, R. A. W.; Bevir, Mark (2003). Interpreting British governance. London New York: Routledge. ISBN   9780415304528.
  10. ↑ Rhodes, R. A. W.; Bevir, Mark (2006). Governance Stories. New York/London: Routledge. ISBN   9780415459778.
  11. 1 2 Bevir, Mark (2007). Encyclopedia of governance. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications. pp. 194–195. ISBN   9781412905794.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.