Reasoned action approach

Last updated

The reasoned action approach (RAA) is an integrative framework for the prediction (and change) of human social behavior. The reasoned action approach states that attitudes towards the behavior, perceived norms, and perceived behavioral control determine people's intentions, while people's intentions predict their behaviors. [1]

Contents

History

The reasoned action approach is the latest version of the theoretical ideas of Martin Fishbein and Icek Ajzen, following the earlier theory of reasoned action [2] and the theory of planned behavior. [3] Those theoretical ideas have resulted in over a thousand empirical studies in behavioral science journals. The RAA originally came from Jacqueline Eccels' [4] expectancy-value theory. Later Martin Fishbein and Icek Ajzen [5] extended expectancy-value theory into the theory of reasoned action (TRA) by adding the element of intention. Then, they took the element of intention into account and created the theory of planned behavior. [3] The RAA iteration brings together those earlier versions and provides a more comprehensive view.

Model

Reasoned action approach text as paths.svg

Behavior is determined by the intention and moderated by actual control. Intention is determined by attitude, perceived norm, and perceived behavioral control. Perceived behavioral control influences behavior directly and indirectly through intention. Actual control feeds back to perceived control. Performing the behavior feeds back to the beliefs underlying the three determinants of intention. All possible influences on behavior that are not in the model are treated as background variables and are supposed to be mediated by the determinants in the model.

Concepts

The reasoned action approach uses a number of concepts, each of which is briefly defined here:

Behaviors

Observable events composed of four elements: the action performed, the target at which the action is directed, the context in which it is performed, and the time at which it is performed.

Intentions

The person's estimate of the likelihood or perceived probability of performing a given behavior.

Perceived behavioral control

People's perceptions of the degree to which they are capable of, or have control over, performing a given behavior.

Attitude

A latent disposition or tendency to respond with some degree of favorableness or unfavorableness to a psychological object.

Norm

Perceived social pressure to perform or not to perform a given behavior.

Measures

Concepts in the reasoned-action approach can be measured directly, and indirectly through the underlying beliefs.

Direct measures

These are a number of examples of the ways in which measurement items are constructed to measure the variables specified in the RAA.

Indirect measures

In their 2010 book, Fishbein and Ajzen [1] provide detailed examples of indirect measures in the Appendix, pp. 449–463.

Criticisms

Question of rationality

The reasoned action approach has been criticized for being too rational. Fishbein and Ajzen [1] argue that to be a misunderstanding of the theory. There is nothing in their theory to suggest that people are rational; the theory only assumes that people have behavioral, normative and control beliefs which may be completely irrational but will determine behavior.

Reasoned versus automatic behavior

Another critical comment implies that most behavior is not intentional. Fishbein and Ajzen [1] argue that beliefs and intention can be activated automatically. They also suggest that alternative concepts, such as willingness, [6] are in fact measures of intentions. Implicit associations are often different from explicit attitude measures, but there is little evidence to suggest that they predict behavior more adequately. [7]

Question of sufficient measurements

Sutton [8] pointed out that the reasoned-action model still leaves much of the variance in behavior unexplained. Different measures of effect size might cause huge differences. Sutton listed nine reasons why the reasoned-action model has poor predicting power:

  1. Intentions may change
  2. Intentions may be provisional
  3. Violation of the principle of compatibility
  4. Violation of scale correspondence
  5. Unequal number of response categories for intention and behavior
  6. Random measurement error in the measures of intention, behavior or both
  7. Restriction of range/Variance in intention or behavior
  8. Marginal distributions of the measures do not match
  9. Intention may not be the sufficient cause of behavior [8]

A further criticism on the reasoned action approach concerns the sufficiency assumption, which suggests that the theory captures all relevant determinants of intention. Ajzen [3] stated that the theory is open to the inclusion of additional predictors if it can be shown that they capture a significant proportion of the variance in intention or behavior after the theory's current variables have been taken into account. Several researchers have indeed offered possible extensions, for example self-identity, next to the three current variables claiming these contribute significant additional explained variance in intention and behavior. In the reasoned-action approach, Fishbein and Ajzen [1] have indeed included new variables, but within the current three determinants (p. 282). They formulate strict criteria for a so-called 'fourth' variable and argue that none of the variables proposed fulfill these criteria.

Model cannot be tested

A majority of previous studies reported results that cannot support the expected associations between variables and predicted outcomes. However, because there are too many left out variables, and many other social cognition models might play parts in it, it is unclear whether the data can reject the model. Thus, this model cannot be tested. [9]

However, Ajzen and Fishbein [10] published a comment paper disputed Ogden's critiques. [9]

Creating new cognitions

Ogden [9] also mentioned that the use of questionnaire might create new cognitions or change existing cognitions rather than measuring existing cognitions. Thus, simply completing a questionnaire might also possible cause changes in participant's subsequent behaviors.

Ajzen and Fishbein [10] also provide their explanation for this critique in their comment paper.

Culture.

With respect to social-cognitive theories in general, authors have criticized the 'Western' character of theories and argued that theories are not culture-free. [11] However, finding, in a specific cultural setting, specific beliefs that are not part of a general theory does not in itself invalidate the usefulness of the theory. Fishbein and Ajzen [1] have repeatedly stressed the importance of an open elicitation procedure to identify all relevant underlying beliefs. The theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior have successfully been applied in many different cultural settings.

Applying to changing behavior

In the reasoned-action approach change is seen as a planned process in three phases: elicitation of the relevant beliefs, changing intentions by changing salient beliefs, and changing behavior by changing intentions and increasing skills or decreasing environmental barriers. The basic idea behind selecting any potential change method is that the salient beliefs are to be changed. Fishbein and Ajzen [1] recognize methods such as persuasive communication, use of arguments, framing, active participation, modeling, and group discussion, [12] but indicate that these methods will only have effect when salient behavioral, normative, or control beliefs are changed. Obviously, it is important that the salient beliefs are identified and measured correctly. Witte [13] suggests to first organize the results of the beliefs elicitation in a list of relevant categories (for example, behavioral beliefs, normative beliefs, self-efficacy beliefs, values) and then to decide which beliefs need to be changed, which need to be reinforced, and which need to be introduced.

Applications

The reasoned action approach is applied in many different settings and with many different behaviors, such as: health-related behaviors, sustainable behaviors, traffic behaviors, organizational behaviors, political behaviors, and discriminatory behaviors. [1]

Health behaviors

The reasoned action approach can be applied to predict both protection and risk health behaviors. Past behavior, instrumental attitude, experiential attitude, and descriptive norms are significant positive predictors of intentions for health risk behaviors. [14] [15] Injunctive norms are not significant intentions predictors, and autonomy is a negative predictor only when past behavior was not controlled. [15]

Switching to e-cigarettes

Dobbs, Branscum, Cohn, Tackett, and Comiford [16] studied what factors may have impacts on pregnant smoker's decision-making to switch from cigarettes to e-cigarettes during pregnancy using the RAA framework. The study reported that the intention to switch is positively related to the instrumental belief that switching was good and believing pregnant people are commonly switching to e-cigarettes. The decision to switch is also positively associated to whether this woman had used an e-cigarette in the past 30 days. However, others' perceived judgement might not have influence on the pregnant smoker's intention, showing that injunctive norms are not related to the decision-making.

Condom use

RAA can be applied to predict condom use among at-risk and HIV-seropositive person. For both insertive and receptive anal sex, attitudes and perceived behavioral control are related with use of condoms with a new partner. But perceived behavioral control were only significant direct associate to insertive anal intercourse with individual whose serostatus was unknown by his or her partner. Moreover, subjective norm is not significantly related with intention. [17]

Partner behaviors

RAA can be applied to predict abusive relationship by looking at monitoring/controlling behaviors displayed in the early stage of the relationship. The study showed that normative beliefs of what their friends and parents support or perform have a significant impact on both boys and girls. Friends' norms are important predictors of adolescents' dating violence. Parents also play a vital role, especially with boys, in partner abusive behaviors. Attitudes and social norms are also good predictors. [18]

Gambling behavior

Studies also show how RAA can be used to achieve a change of problem gambling behavior. In the article, Tom St Quinton [19] not only indicated how gambling behavior can be reduced by using RAA, but also discussed how to maintain the new developed behaviors.

Work-to-nonwork integration behavior

Palm, Seubert, and Glaser [20] analysed how motivated employees perform a work role in the nonwork domain, drawing on the RAA. The study examined four factors: individuals’ attitudes toward integration (integration preference), perceived employer expectations (injunctive norms), perceived integration behavior of coworkers (descriptive norms), and perceived control to manage the work–nonwork interface (behavioral control). The result showed that all four factors all can be served as predictors for work-to-nonwork interface.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Technology acceptance model</span> Information systems theory

The technology acceptance model (TAM) is an information systems theory that models how users come to accept and use a technology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Attitude (psychology)</span> Concept linking cognitive processes to behavior

An attitude "is a summary evaluation of an object of thought. An attitude object can be anything a person discriminates or holds in mind." Attitudes include beliefs (cognition), emotional responses (affect) and behavioral tendencies. In the classical definition an attitude is persistent, while in more contemporary conceptualizations, attitudes may vary depending upon situations, context, or moods.

Behavior change, in context of public health, refers to efforts put in place to change people's personal habits and attitudes, to prevent disease. Behavior change in public health can take place at several levels and is known as social and behavior change (SBC). More and more, efforts focus on prevention of disease to save healthcare care costs. This is particularly important in low and middle income countries, where supply side health interventions have come under increased scrutiny because of the cost.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theory of planned behavior</span> Theory that links behavior

The theory of planned behavior (TPB) is a psychological theory that links beliefs to behavior. The theory maintains that three core components, namely, attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control, together shape an individual's behavioral intentions. In turn, a tenet of TPB is that behavioral intention is the most proximal determinant of human social behavior.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theory of reasoned action</span> Psychological theory

The theory of reasoned action aims to explain the relationship between attitudes and behaviors within human action. It is mainly used to predict how individuals will behave based on their pre-existing attitudes and behavioral intentions. An individual's decision to engage in a particular behavior is based on the outcomes the individual expects will come as a result of performing the behavior. Developed by Martin Fishbein and Icek Ajzen in 1967, the theory derived from previous research in social psychology, persuasion models, and attitude theories. Fishbein's theories suggested a relationship between attitude and behaviors. However, critics estimated that attitude theories were not proving to be good indicators of human behavior. The TRA was later revised and expanded by the two theorists in the following decades to overcome any discrepancies in the A–B relationship with the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and reasoned action approach (RAA). The theory is also used in communication discourse as a theory of understanding.

Social cognitive theory (SCT), used in psychology, education, and communication, holds that portions of an individual's knowledge acquisition can be directly related to observing others within the context of social interactions, experiences, and outside media influences. This theory was advanced by Albert Bandura as an extension of his social learning theory. The theory states that when people observe a model performing a behavior and the consequences of that behavior, they remember the sequence of events and use this information to guide subsequent behaviors. Observing a model can also prompt the viewer to engage in behavior they already learned. Depending on whether people are rewarded or punished for their behavior and the outcome of the behavior, the observer may choose to replicate behavior modeled. Media provides models for a vast array of people in many different environmental settings.

Behavioural change theories are attempts to explain why human behaviours change. These theories cite environmental, personal, and behavioural characteristics as the major factors in behavioural determination. In recent years, there has been increased interest in the application of these theories in the areas of health, education, criminology, energy and international development with the hope that understanding behavioural change will improve the services offered in these areas. Some scholars have recently introduced a distinction between models of behavior and theories of change. Whereas models of behavior are more diagnostic and geared towards understanding the psychological factors that explain or predict a specific behavior, theories of change are more process-oriented and generally aimed at changing a given behavior. Thus, from this perspective, understanding and changing behavior are two separate but complementary lines of scientific investigation.

Expectancy–value theory has been developed in many different fields including education, health, communications, marketing and economics. Although the model differs in its meaning and implications for each field, the general idea is that there are expectations as well as values or beliefs that affect subsequent behavior.

The value-action gap is the space that occurs when the values or attitudes of an individual do not correlate to their actions. More generally, it is the difference between what people say and what people do. The phrase is associated with environmental geography, relating to attitudes and behaviors surrounding environmental issues. Numerous studies have reported an increase in global environmental concern, but have shown that environmental engagement is not adjusting in accordance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Health belief model</span> Psychological model

The health belief model (HBM) is a social psychological health behavior change model developed to explain and predict health-related behaviors, particularly in regard to the uptake of health services. The HBM was developed in the 1950s by social psychologists at the U.S. Public Health Service and remains one of the best known and most widely used theories in health behavior research. The HBM suggests that people's beliefs about health problems, perceived benefits of action and barriers to action, and self-efficacy explain engagement in health-promoting behavior. A stimulus, or cue to action, must also be present in order to trigger the health-promoting behavior.

Fear appeal is a term used in psychology, sociology and marketing. It generally describes a strategy for motivating people to take a particular action, endorse a particular policy, or buy a particular product, by arousing fear. A well-known example in television advertising was a commercial employing the musical jingle: "Never pick up a stranger, pick up Prestone anti-freeze." This was accompanied by images of shadowy strangers (hitchhikers) who would presumably do one harm if picked up. The commercial's main appeal was not to the positive features of Prestone anti-freeze, but to the fear of what a "strange" brand might do.

In psychology, the I-change model or the integrated model, for explaining motivational and behavioral change, derives from the Attitude – Social Influence – Self-Efficacy Model, integrates ideas of Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behavior, Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory, Prochaska's Transtheoretical Model, the Health Belief Model, and Goal setting theories. Previous versions of this model have been used to explain a variety of types of health behavior.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Health action process approach</span> Theory of health behavior change

The health action process approach (HAPA) is a psychological theory of health behavior change, developed by Ralf Schwarzer, Professor of Psychology at the Freie University Berlin of Berlin, Germany and SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw, Poland, first published in 1992.

An intention is a mental state in which the agent commits themselves to a course of action. Having the plan to visit the zoo tomorrow is an example of an intention. The action plan is the content of the intention while the commitment is the attitude towards this content. Other mental states can have action plans as their content, as when one admires a plan, but differ from intentions since they do not involve a practical commitment to realizing this plan. Successful intentions bring about the intended course of action while unsuccessful intentions fail to do so. Intentions, like many other mental states, have intentionality: they represent possible states of affairs.

Functional attitude theory (FAT) suggests that beliefs and attitudes are influential to various psychological functions. Attitudes can be influential on many processes such as being utilitarian (useful), social, relating to values, or a reduction of cognitive dissonance. They can be beneficial and help people interact with the world. In the late 1950s when psychoanalysis and behaviorism reigned supreme as the foci of psychological studies, Smith, Bruner, and White (1956) and Katz (1960) separately and independently developed typologies of human attitudes in relation to the functions to which they believed the attitudes served. This theory proposes that attitudes are held by individuals because they are important and integral to psychological functioning. The function of an attitude is more important than whether the attitude is accurate or correct.

Icek Ajzen is a social psychologist and professor emeritus at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. He received his doctorate from the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, and is best known for his work, with Martin Fishbein, on the theory of planned behavior. Ajzen has been ranked the most influential individual scientist within social psychology in terms of cumulative research impact and, in 2013, received the Distinguished Scientist Award from the Society of Experimental Social Psychology. His research has been influential across diverse fields such as advertising, health psychology, and environmental psychology, and has been cited over 280,000 times.

Allen Erwin Liska was an American sociologist and criminologist. He was a full professor at the University at Albany, SUNY from 1982 until his death in 1998, having originally joined the faculty there in 1979. From 1985 to 1988, he was the chair of the Department of Sociology there. He supervised more Ph.D. students than any other faculty member in the University at Albany, SUNY's sociology department. During his career, he also served as chair of the American Sociological Association's Section on Crime, Law, and Deviance. He was named a fellow of the American Society of Criminology in November 1998. In 1999, he was one of four University at Albany, SUNY faculty members to receive the university's Excellence in Research Award.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dolores Albarracín</span> Professor of psychology and business

Dolores Albarracín is a psychologist, author and professor of psychology and business based in Pennsylvania. She is Professor of Communication at the University of Pennsylvania. She is known for her work in the fields of behavior, communication and persuasion. Her contributions have had implications for the scientific understanding of basic social psychological processes and communication policy, especially in the area of health.

The mere-measurement effect is a phenomenon used in behavioural psychology. It explains that merely measuring or questioning an individual's intentions or anticipated regret changes his or her subsequent behavior. The mere-measurement effect has been demonstrated in multiple behavioural contexts both general and specific. But it is most commonly used to explain consumer behaviour. In this context, the effect implies that simply questioning one's intentions behind a purchase influences his or her decision making in the market.

Martin Fishbein was a social psychologist, considered influential, and active AIDS prevention. He had been director of the health communication program at the University of Pennsylvania Public Policy Center of the Annenberg School for Communication.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Taylor & Francis.
  2. Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
  3. 1 2 3 Ajzen, I. (1991). "The theory of planned behavior". Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 50 (2): 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
  4. Eccles, J (1983). Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches. San Francisco, CA: Free man. pp. 75–146.
  5. Martin., Fishbein (1980). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior : an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley. ISBN   0-201-02089-0. OCLC   634101810.
  6. Gibbons, F.X.; Gerrard, M.; Cleveland, M.J.; Wills, T.A. & Brody, G. (2004). "Perceived discrimination and substance use in African American parents and their children: A panel study". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 86 (4): 517–529. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.517. PMID   15053703.
  7. Greenwald, A.G.; Poehlman, T.A.; Uhlmann, E.L. & Banaji, M.R. (2009). "Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 97 (1): 17–41. doi:10.1037/a0015575. PMID   19586237.
  8. 1 2 Sutton, Stephen (1998). "Predicting and Explaining Intentions and Behavior: How Well Are We Doing?". Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 28 (15): 1317–1338. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01679.x. ISSN   1559-1816.
  9. 1 2 3 Ogden, Jane (2003). "Some problems with social cognition models: A pragmatic and conceptual analysis". Health Psychology. 22 (4): 424–428. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.22.4.424. ISSN   1930-7810. PMID   12940399.
  10. 1 2 Ajzen, Icek; Fishbein, Martin (2004). "Questions Raised by a Reasoned Action Approach: Comment on Ogden (2003)". Health Psychology. 23 (4): 431–434. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.4.431. ISSN   1930-7810. PMID   15264981.
  11. Pasick, R. J.; Burke, N. J.; Barker, J. C.; Joseph, G.; Bird, J. A.; Otero-Sabogal, R.; et al. (2009). "Behavioral theory in a diverse society: like a compass on Mars". Health Education and Behavior. 36 (5_suppl): 11S–35S. doi:10.1177/1090198109338917. PMC   2921832 . PMID   19805789.
  12. Bartholomew, L. K.; Parcel, G. S.; Kok, G.; Gottlieb, N. H.; Fernández, M.E. (2011). Planning health promotion programs; an Intervention Mapping approach (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  13. Witte, K. (1995). "Fishing for success: Using the persuasive health message framework to generate effective campaign messages" . In E. Maibach; R. L. Parrott (eds.). Designing health messages: Approaches from communication theory and public health practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp.  145–166. ISBN   978-0803953987.
  14. Hagger, Martin S; Polet, Juho; Lintunen, Taru (2018-07-21). "The reasoned action approach applied to health behavior: Role of past behavior and test of some key moderators using meta-analytic structural equation modeling". doi:10.31234/osf.io/d83s9. S2CID   240363546 . Retrieved 2021-11-01.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  15. 1 2 Conner, Mark; McEachan, Rosemary; Lawton, Rebecca; Gardner, Peter (2017). "Applying the reasoned action approach to understanding health protection and health risk behaviors". Social Science & Medicine. 195: 140–148. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.022. hdl: 10454/17679 . ISSN   0277-9536. PMID   29146068. S2CID   11651823.
  16. Dobbs, Page D.; Branscum, Paul; Cohn, Amy M.; Tackett, Alayna P.; Comiford, Ashley L. (2020). "Pregnant Smokers' Intention to Switch From Cigarettes to E-Cigarettes: A Reasoned Action Approach". Women's Health Issues. 31 (6): 540–549. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2021.07.005. ISSN   1049-3867. PMID   34452825. S2CID   237339884.
  17. Prediction and change of health behavior : applying the reasoned action approach. Martin Fishbein, Icek Ajzen, Dolores Albarracin, Robert C. Hornik. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2007. ISBN   978-0-8058-5926-3. OCLC   124070703.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  18. Nardi-Rodríguez, Ainara; Pastor-Mira, Mª Ángeles; López-Roig, Sofía; Ferrer-Pérez, Victoria (2018-01-05). "Identifying beliefs behind boys' use of mobile phones to monitor girlfriends and girls' acceptance: a reasoned-action approach". Journal of Youth Studies. 21 (7): 922–939. doi:10.1080/13676261.2017.1422600. ISSN   1367-6261. S2CID   149094858.
  19. Hagger, Martin S. (2019-03-27), "The Reasoned Action Approach and the Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior", Psychology, Oxford University Press, doi: 10.1093/obo/9780199828340-0240 , ISBN   978-0-19-982834-0
  20. Palm, Esther; Seubert, Christian; Glaser, Jürgen (2019-08-16). "Understanding Employee Motivation for Work-to-Nonwork Integration Behavior: a Reasoned Action Approach". Journal of Business and Psychology. 35 (5): 683–696. doi: 10.1007/s10869-019-09648-5 . ISSN   0889-3268. S2CID   202267977.