Reproductive Freedom for All v. Board of State Canvassers

Reproductive Freedom for All v. Board of State Canvassers
Reproductive Freedom for All v. Board of State Canvassers
Court	Michigan Supreme Court
Full case name	Reproductive Freedom for All, Peter Bevier, and Jim Lederer v. Board of State Canvassers, Secretary of State, and Director of Elections and Citizens to Support MI Women and Children
Decided	September 8, 2022
Court membership
Judges sitting	Bridget Mary McCormack, Brian K. Zahra, David Viviano, Richard H. Bernstein, Elizabeth T. Clement, Megan Cavanagh, Elizabeth M. Welch
Case opinions
Majority	McCormack, joined by Bernstein, Clement, Cavanagh, and Welch
Concurrence	McCormack, Bernstein
Dissent	Zahra, joined by Viviano
Keywords
	Abortion, Voting rights ;

Last updated June 15, 2023

Reproductive Freedom for All v. Board of State Canvassers was a 2022 decision by the Michigan Supreme Court overturning a decision by the Michigan Board of State Canvassers that had refused to certify a ballot petition concerning abortion rights. In a 5-2 decision, the Court granted a complaint for mandamus relief and ordered the Board to certify the petition and ordered the Michigan Secretary of State to include the ballot proposition on the Fall 2022 ballot.

Background

In January 2022, Reproductive Freedom for All, in partnership with the ACLU of Michigan, Michigan Voices, and Planned Parenthood Advocates of Michigan, filed paperwork with the Board of State Canvassers to begin a ballot petition drive to amend the Constitution of Michigan to provide for a limited right to an abortion. The groups stated that their ballot proposition was driven by the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court was poised to overrule Roe v. Wade and, under pre-Roe state law, abortion would be illegal in Michigan.^[1]^{[Note 1]}

Under Michigan law, proponents of a ballot measure were required to obtain 425,059 signatures from registered Michigan voters. In July 2022, Reproductive Freedom for All submitted 753,759 signatures to the Secretary of State and requested that the ballot measure be added to the Fall 2022 ballot.^[2] However, despite meeting the requisite number of signatures, the Board of State Canvassers refused to certify the ballot proposition for the Fall 2022 ballot, with 2 Democratic members voting in favor of certification and 2 Republican members opposing certification.^[3] The Republican members argued that the proposition should not be on the ballot because the words on the proposition were placed too closely together and lacked a sufficient amount of "space" between words.

Reproductive Freedom for All thereafter filed a complaint for mandamus relief with the Michigan Supreme Court.

Decision

On September 8, 2022, the Michigan Supreme Court issued a 5-2 decision in favor of Reproductive Freedom for All. The Court rejected the Board's argument that insufficient spacing had been used and criticized the Board as failing to perform it's "clear legal duty to certify the petition." The Court thereafter directed the Board to certify the petition within 24 hours and directed the Secretary of State to include the ballot proposition on the Fall 2022 ballot.^[4]

Writing in concurrence, Chief Justice Bridget Mary McCormack noted that the proposition had garnered more signatures than any other ballot measure in Michigan's history and called the Board's refusal to certify the petition a "sad marker of the times." Chief Justice McCormack further wrote that the two Republican members of the Board had acted to "disenfranchise millions of Michiganders not because they believe the many thousands of Michiganders who signed the proposal were confused by it, but because they think they have identified a technicality that allows them to do so" and called their actions a "game of gotcha gone very bad."

Justice Richard H. Bernstein similarly concurred in the judgment and criticized Justice Zahra's dissent, noting that "As a blind person who is also a wordsmith and a member of this Court, I find it unremarkable to note that the lack of visual spacing has never mattered much to me."

Dissenting, Justice Brian K. Zahra criticized the Court's ruling as "ignor[ing] the requirements of the requirements of [Michigan] election law" and argued that the alleged lack of spacing between words violated Michigan's requirement that the "full text" of the proposition be provided to signers of the petition.

Justice David Viviano likewise issued a vigorous dissent. Justice Viviano argued that, while the petition contained "the right words in the right order . . . the lack of critical word spaces renders the remaining text much more difficult to read and comprehend, and therefore something less than the 'full text' required by the Constitution and statutes." Justice Viviano further wrote "In Western scripts, spatial organization is a determinative element in the effect of different transcription systems on the cognitive processes required for lexical access.”^[5]

Subsequent proceedings

Following the Court's decision, the Board of Canvassers certified the petition, allowing it to be included on the Fall 2022 ballot.^[6] Republican member of the Board, Tony Daunt, commented "Ultimately, the system works. It may be put under great stress at times, but it works."^[7]

Reactions

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson released statements praising the Court's ruling.^[8]

Media reaction to the decision was generally positive, with commentators deriding the Board's initial refusal to certify the petition as anti-democratic and a sign of increasing polarization in the U.S. political environment.^[9]

Notes

↑ The U.S. Supreme Court ultimately overruled Roe v. Wade as expected in June 2022 in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization . Enforcement of Michigan's pre-Roe ban on abortion was thereafter enjoined pending litigation over its enforceability.

Related Research Articles

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States generally protects a pregnant individual's liberty to have an abortion. The decision struck down many abortion laws, and caused an ongoing abortion debate in the United States about whether, or to what extent, abortion should be legal, who should decide the legality of abortion, and what the role of moral and religious views in the political sphere should be. The decision also shaped debate concerning which methods the Supreme Court should use in constitutional adjudication.

Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 492 U.S. 490 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court decision on upholding a Missouri law that imposed restrictions on the use of state funds, facilities, and employees in performing, assisting with, or counseling an abortion. The Supreme Court in Webster allowed for states to legislate in an aspect that had previously been thought to be forbidden under Roe v. Wade (1973).

The Michigan Civil Rights Initiative (MCRI), or Proposal 2, was a ballot initiative in the U.S. state of Michigan that passed into Michigan Constitutional law by a 58% to 42% margin on November 7, 2006, according to results officially certified by the Michigan Secretary of State. By Michigan law, the Proposal became law on December 22, 2006. MCRI was a citizen initiative aimed at banning consideration of race, color, sex, or religion in admission to colleges, jobs, and other publicly funded institutions – effectively prohibiting some affirmative action by public institutions based on those factors. The Proposal's constitutionality was challenged in federal court, but its constitutionality was ultimately upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States.

Norman D. "Norm" Shinkle is an American Republican politician from the U.S. state of Michigan and was a member of the Michigan Board of Canvassers.

The legality of abortion in the United States and the various restrictions imposed on the procedure vary significantly depending on the laws of each state or other jurisdiction. Some states prohibit abortion at all stages of pregnancy with few exceptions, others permit it up to a certain point in a woman's pregnancy, while others allow abortion throughout a woman's pregnancy. In states where abortion is legal, several classes of restrictios on the procedure may exist, such as parental consent or notification laws, requirements that patients be shown an ultrasound before obtaining an abortion, mandatory waiting periods, and counselling requirements. Abortion laws tend to be the most strict in the Southern United States and the most lenient in the Northeastern and Western United States.

Brian K. Zahra is a justice of the Michigan Supreme Court. He was appointed to fill a vacancy by Michigan Governor Rick Snyder in 2011. Zahra won his bid for reelection in 2022 to retain his seat for eight more years, per the Michigan Constitution.

David Viviano is a justice of the Michigan Supreme Court, appointed by Governor Rick Snyder on February 28, 2013, to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Justice Diane Hathaway. Prior to his appointment to the Michigan Supreme Court, Justice Viviano was the Chief Judge of the Macomb County Circuit Court.

Abortion in Louisiana was decriminalized in the city of New Orleans as of August 1, 2022.

Abortion in Michigan is legal beyond fetal viability. A state constitutional amendment to explicitly guarantee abortion rights was placed on the ballot in 2022 as Michigan Proposal 22–3; it passed with 57 percent of the vote, adding the right to abortion and contraceptive use to the Michigan Constitution. The amendment largely prevents the regulation of abortion before fetal viability, unless said regulations are to protect the individual seeking an abortion, and it also makes it unconstitutional to make laws restricting abortions which would protect the life and health, physical and/or mental, of the pregnant individual seeking abortion.

Abortion in Mississippi is illegal. The new law took effect on July 7, 2022, after Mississippi State Attorney General Lynn Fitch certified on June 27, the Supreme Court decision on Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization on June 24 of that year.

Abortion in South Dakota is illegal. Anyone who induces an abortion is guilty of a Class 6 felony. An exception is included to "preserve the life of the pregnant female," given appropriate and reasonable medical judgment.

Abortion in the U.S. state of Virginia is legal up to the end of the second trimester of a pregnancy. Abortion was illegal in Virginia by 1900, but by 1950 had a legal therapeutic exception. At the University of Virginia Hospital in 1950, a review board was created to examine and approve all abortion requests that were approved for psychiatric reasons which resulted in a large drop in the number of abortions performed there. In the 1975 Bigelow v. Virginia case the US Supreme Court ruled that state bans on abortion clinics advertising their services were unconstitutional. By 2007, Virginia had an abortion-specific informed consent requirement. The number of abortion clinics in Virginia has fluctuated over the years, with 71 in 1982, 64 in 1992 and eighteen in 2014. There were 20,187 legal abortions in 2014, and 18,663 in 2015. There are active abortion rights and anti-abortion rights activist communities in the states. The state has also seen anti-abortion rights violence, including at least two arson attacks.

Abortion in California is legal up to the point of fetal viability. An abortion ban was in place by 1900, and by 1950, it was a criminal offense for a woman to have an abortion. In 1962, the American Law Institute published their model penal code as it applied to abortions, with three circumstances where they believed a physician could justifiably perform an abortion, and California adopted a version of this code. In 2002, California passed a law guaranteeing women the right to have an abortion "prior to viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the woman." In 2022, California voters overwhelmingly approved Proposition 1, which amended the Constitution of California to explicitly protect the right to abortion and contraception by a margin of 33.76%.

Mazurek v. Armstrong, 520 U.S. 968 (1997), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld a Montana law permitting only licensed physicians to perform abortions. The Court summarily reversed a ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that had held that the law was likely intended to inhibit abortion access. In a per curiam opinion, a majority of the Court found that there was no evidence that the Montana legislature acted with an invalid intent. The Court also reiterated its earlier holding in Planned Parenthood v. Casey that the states have broad flexibility to regulate abortion so long as their regulations do not create an undue burden on a woman's right to choose. Three dissenting justices, in an opinion by Justice John Paul Stevens, wrote that they would have declined to hear the case because proceedings were still pending in the lower courts. The law itself was later struck down by the Montana Supreme Court on state-constitutional grounds, but the U.S. Supreme Court's decision has nonetheless had a significant impact on modern American abortion jurisprudence.

The 2022 California elections took place on November 8, 2022. The statewide direct primary election was held on June 7, 2022.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, No. 19-1392, 597 U.S. ___ (2022), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the court held that the Constitution of the United States does not confer a right to abortion. The court's decision overruled both Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), returning to individual states the power to regulate any aspect of abortion not protected by federal law.

The 2022 Michigan elections were held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022 throughout Michigan. The Democratic Party made historic gains, taking full control of state government for the first time since 1983. Democrats won control of the Michigan House of Representatives for the first time since 2008, and the Michigan Senate for the first time since 1984. Additionally, incumbent Democratic Governor Gretchen Whitmer won reelection by a comfortable margin, with Democrats sweeping every statewide office. Furthermore, the Democrats maintained control of their seven seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, while the Republican Party took a net loss of one seat. The elections in Michigan were widely characterized as a "blue wave".

The 2022 Kansas abortion referendum was a rejected legislatively referred constitutional amendment to the Kansas Constitution that appeared on the ballot on August 2, 2022, alongside primary elections for statewide offices, with early voting from July 13. If enacted, the amendment would have declared that the Kansas Constitution does not guarantee a right to abortion, given the Kansas state government power to prosecute individuals involved in abortions, and further declared that the Kansas government is not required to fund abortions.

Proposition 1, titled Constitutional Right to Reproductive Freedom and initially known as Senate Constitutional Amendment 10 (SCA 10), is a California ballot proposition and state constitutional amendment that was voted upon in the 2022 general election on November 8. Passing with more than two-thirds of the vote, the proposition amended the Constitution of California to explicitly grant the right to an abortion and contraceptives, making California among the first states in the nation to do so with Michigan and Vermont. The decision to propose the codification of abortion rights in the state constitution was precipitated in May 2022 by Politico's publishing of a leaked draft opinion showing the United States Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, reversing judicial precedent that previously held that the United States constitution protected the right to an abortion.

2022 Michigan Proposal 3, the Right to Reproductive Freedom Initiative, also known as Reproductive Freedom for All, was a citizen-initiated proposed constitutional amendment in the state of Michigan, which was voted on as part of the 2022 Michigan elections. The amendment, which passed, codified reproductive rights, including access to abortion, in the Constitution of Michigan.

References

↑ "Ballot Proposal to Protect Reproductive Freedom in Michigan Filed by Reproductive Freedom for All". ACLU of Michigan. 2022-01-06. Retrieved 2022-09-11.
↑ Haddad, Ken (2022-07-11). "Live stream: Reproductive Freedom for All submits 753K signatures in favor of Michigan abortion rights". WDIV. Retrieved 2022-09-11.
↑ Foody, Kathleen (2022-08-31). "EXPLAINER: Abortion proposal returns spotlight to obscure Michigan board". WDIV. Retrieved 2022-09-11.
↑ Smith, Mitch; Bosman, Julie (2022-09-08). "Michigan Voters Will Decide Abortion Rights Question, Court Says". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331 . Retrieved 2022-09-11.
↑ "Analysis | From typography to tumult: Michigan as battleground over democracy". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286 . Retrieved 2022-09-11.
↑ "Board Puts Abortion Rights Question on Michigan Fall Ballot". 9 & 10 News. 2022-09-09. Retrieved 2022-09-11.
↑ Pluta, Rick (2022-09-08). "After months, it's decided: Michiganders will vote on abortion rights in November". Wisconsin Public Radio. Retrieved 2022-09-11.
↑ Gabriel, Trip (2022-09-08). "As Pennsylvania Senate Race Tightens, Oz Sharpens Attacks on Fetterman". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331 . Retrieved 2022-09-11.
↑ The Associated Press (September 7, 2022). "Editorial Roundup: Michigan". U.S. News & World Report . Retrieved September 11, 2022.