Restore Trust is a British political advocacy group, founded in 2021, which seeks to change policies of the National Trust.[1][2] Restore Trust has made an effort to refocus the charity to carry out what it perceives as "its core purpose".[1] While Restore Trust's organisers have encouraged their supporters to join the National Trust/remain members,[1] they criticise the Trust's work on rewilding and social inclusion which they consider to be "woke".[3] At the time Restore Trust was founded the National Trust experienced a dip in membership which Restore Trust tended to attribute to the charity having lost its way rather than alternative explanations such as the impact of COVID-19.
The Board consists of chairman Cornelia van der Poll, Jack Hayward and Philip Gibbs.
Campaigns
Restore Trust has been seen as part of the backlash against a report commissioned by the National Trust from Corrine Fowler on colonialism and historic slavery.[4][5] The report, which was published in 2020, detailed the connections that 93 historic places in the care of the National Trust have with colonialism and historic slavery. The report took the view that the acknowledgement and interpretation of difficult histories was to be preferred to suppressing them. Some of the properties chosen were contentious, for example Chartwell, the former home of Winston Churchill, which was included in the report because of Churchill’s deep involvement with the British Empire and its colonial policies.[6] Speaking in 2021, National Trust director Hilary McGrady, who received death threats over the report,[7] described the timing of its publication and "allowing it to be conflated" with BLM as having been her "biggest mistake".[8]
Restore Trust has a more conservative approach to presentation of historic buildings, collections, gardens and countryside to the public. Zewditu Gebreyohanes, a former director of Restore Trust, has called the slavery report "a negative and guilt-ridden view of Britain’s past". Restore Trust has opposed the introduction of what it terms "ephemeral trends", "political activism" and "wokeness" to visitor experiences (in particular the presentation of colonialism and slavery);
Restore Trust also focuses on a number of other issues, among them:[9]
The leadership of the National Trust;
Proposed closures of historic properties and conversion to holiday lets;
Issues relating to specific properties, such as the restoration of Clandon Park House.
History
AGM resolutions
From 2021 Restore Trust has brought resolutions to the annual general meeting (AGM) of the National Trust. Only one has ever been adopted, a resolution on senior staff remuneration.
In 2022, Restore Trust attempted to get two members' resolutions passed at the AGM. Firstly, to abolish the chairman's discretionary proxy vote, and secondly to create an independent office of ombudsman 'to ensure the national trust remains accountable to its supporters'.[1] Restore did not gain enough votes to pass its resolutions on the National Trust's governance.[11]
Reform candidates for the National Trust Council
Restore Trust also encouraged its supporters to vote for candidates from its proposed list which included historian Jeremy Black, conservative historian and activist Zareer Masani, and Stephen Green of the Christian Voice advocacy group.[3] In response to the campaign, the National Trust's director of communications, Celia Richardson, said that she found the idea of "paid-for canvassing for places on our council" to be a "new and concerning" development.[12] Restore Trust did not get enough votes at the National Trust's AGM in November 2022 to have its candidates elected.
Past Directors
The group's directors included Zewditu Gebreyohanes, formerly Head of the History Matters unit at Policy Exchange,[13] and Neil Record, the chairman of the Institute of Economic Affairs in the period 2015–2023.[12] Gebreyohanes stepped down from her position as director in November 2023 shortly after no Restore Trust candidates were elected or resolutions passed at the Trust's 2023 AGM (the group's candidates and resolutions had also been rejected at the previous AGM).[14][15] Record stepped down in January 2024.[5]
Quick Vote System
Zewditu Gebreyohanes blamed the poor performance of Restore Trust at the National Trust AGM on the optional "Quick Vote" system, which allowed voters to cast a single vote agreeing with all preferences of the trustees, rather than voting on each issue separately.[11] She felt that the option had been introduced "surreptitiously"[11] and claimed that the Quick Vote results had not been made public, a decision that she felt was "suspicious". The National Trust issued a statement saying that the Quick Vote option was introduced at the advice of an independent election services provider and was considered to be "best practice", used by many other member organisations, and had been explained in voting instructions sent to members in the summer.[12]
Restore Trust candidates, including Lord Sumption, have stood in subsequent elections for the National Trust Council. However, Sumption was reported not to be minded to stand for election again – at least while the trustees can flag their preferred candidates.[16]
Criticisms
Restore Trust has attracted critical commentary in the news media; critics such as the Good Law Project have alleged that Restore Trust is engaged in astroturfing due to hidden connections with political lobbying groups.[12]
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
