Richard Liebowitz

Last updated

Richard P. Liebowitz
Richard Liebowitz OPTIC New York June 2019.jpg
Liebowitz in 2019
Education
Occupation
  • Lawyer
Employer(s)Liebowitz Law Firm, PLLC
Known forCopyright attorney

Richard Liebowitz is an American entrepreneur, Broadway producer, [1] former lawyer [2] [3] and photographer [4] specializing in copyright law. While a lawyer, he was known for filing a high number of lawsuits against media organizations on behalf of photographers who assert that their images have been used without permission, [4] and for receiving multiple disciplinary sanctions culminating in his suspension from practicing law in New York and ultimately in his disbarment. [3]

Contents

Life and career

A Long Island native, he graduated from the University of Pennsylvania. [5] Liebowitz worked as an intern for veteran New York press photographer Bruce Cotler. His experience with Cotler, about which he wrote a book, [6] and as a member of the New York Press Photographers Association motivated Liebowitz to pursue a career in copyright law. [7]

After graduating from Hofstra University Law School, he was admitted to the New York bar in 2015, [8] established his practice in New York and filed his first lawsuit in January 2016. He works on a contingency basis and has filed, on average, about five lawsuits per week. [7] Contrary to other copyright lawyers, his practice is to immediately file suit rather than pursue a settlement, and to claim statutory damages far in excess of the images' ordinary licensing prices. [7]

Assessments

Liebowitz's approach to copyright litigation earned him a reputation as "the scourge of the media industry (...) and the salvation of the underpaid photographer", according to Slate. [7] Media organizations and their lawyers have asserted that Liebowitz is abusing the legal system by overloading the courts with dubious cases in which he attempts to leverage mistakes by overworked editorial staff into financial windfalls. [7]

For his part, Liebowitz has argued that copyright law is the only tool that photographers have to protect their rights and livelihood in a digital media environment in which images are often reused without regard to proper licensing. [7] However, in one case, a client was forced to repay $120,000 in legal bills to several media outlets Liebowitz sued on his behalf. [9]

Disciplinary issues

Courts have repeatedly disapproved of Liebowitz's approach to legal practice and imposed sanctions on him or his clients. [10] In one case, Judge Lewis A. Kaplan ordered Liebowitz's client to pay the defendant's legal fees for what the judge considered "frivolous litigation", [7] and in another, Judge Denise Cote determined that Liebowitz was a "copyright troll", fined him and imposed ethics classes on him. [7] [11]

In 2019 a judge observed that "there is a growing body of law in this District" – the Southern District of New York – "devoted to the question of whether and when to impose sanctions on Mr. Liebowitz". [12] In September 2019, Liebowitz was held in contempt of court by Judge Cathy Seibel [13] for lying about the date of his grandfather's death in an attempt to excuse his failure to attend court. [14] [15]

In June 2020 Judge Jesse Furman concluded in a 61-page opinion and order that Lebowitz "lied about his compliance with a court Order", [16] : 2  "repeated that lie, over and over", [16] : 2  "violated at least six of the Court's Orders", [16] : 26  and wrote that "there may be no sanction short of disbarment that would stop Mr. Liebowitz from further misconduct." [16] : 46  The judge ordered that Liebowitz pay $103,517.49 in sanctions, that Liebowitz give a copy of the opinion to all of his clients, and that Liebowitz file a copy of the opinion in all of his open cases. [16] : 54  In June and July 2021, the Second Circuit affirmed the sanctions on appeal. [17] [18]

Furman also sent the opinion to the Grievance Committee for potential disbarment. [16] : 54  [19] On November 30, 2020, the Grievance Committee of the Southern District of New York suspended Liebowitz from the practice of law in the district, pending the outcome of his disciplinary charges. [20]

On November 3, 2021, Liebowitz was immediately suspended by the New York Appellate Division, Second Department, pending further order of the Court. [21]

Following a hearing, on March 13, 2024, Liebowitz was disbarred by the New York Appellate Division, Second Department. [2]

Related Research Articles

Disbarment, also known as striking off, is the removal of a lawyer from a bar association or the practice of law, thus revoking their law license or admission to practice law. Disbarment is usually a punishment for unethical or criminal conduct but may also be imposed for incompetence or incapacity. Procedures vary depending on the law society; temporary disbarment may be referred to as suspension.

In its most general sense, the practice of law involves giving legal advice to clients, drafting legal documents for clients, and representing clients in legal negotiations and court proceedings such as lawsuits, and is applied to the professional services of a lawyer or attorney at law, barrister, solicitor, or civil law notary. However, there is a substantial amount of overlap between the practice of law and various other professions where clients are represented by agents. These professions include real estate, banking, accounting, and insurance. Moreover, a growing number of legal document assistants (LDAs) are offering services which have traditionally been offered only by lawyers and their employee paralegals. Many documents may now be created by computer-assisted drafting libraries, where the clients are asked a series of questions that are posed by the software in order to construct the legal documents. In addition, regulatory consulting firms also provide advisory services on regulatory compliance that were traditionally provided exclusively by law firms.

The Supreme Court of the State of New York is the trial-level court of general jurisdiction in the New York State Unified Court System. It is vested with unlimited civil and criminal jurisdiction, although in many counties outside New York City it acts primarily as a court of civil jurisdiction, with most criminal matters handled in County Court.

Edward Davis (Ed) Fagan is a former American reparations lawyer who was disbarred for his conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Copyfraud</span> False copyright claims to public-domain content

A copyfraud is a false copyright claim by an individual or institution with respect to content that is in the public domain. Such claims are unlawful, at least under US and Australian copyright law, because material that is not copyrighted is free for all to use, modify and reproduce. Copyfraud also includes overreaching claims by publishers, museums and others, as where a legitimate copyright owner knowingly, or with constructive knowledge, claims rights beyond what the law allows.

Thomas Girardi is a former attorney and co-founder of the now-defunct Girardi & Keese, a downtown Los Angeles law firm. He was disbarred in 2022 after accusations of defrauding clients.

T. John Ward is a retired United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. He is best known for the large number of patent infringement cases brought before his court in Marshall, Texas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">L. Lin Wood</span> American former attorney (born 1952)

Lucian Lincoln Wood Jr. is an American former attorney who made claims about the existence of widespread election fraud during the 2020 US presidential election. He has faced legal sanctions for lawsuits made in furtherance of these claims in the state of Michigan. In July 2023, while facing investigation and possible disciplinary action by the State Bar of Georgia for violating the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, Wood surrendered his law license and asked to retire rather than face disbarment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philip J. Berg</span> American conspiracy theorist

Philip Jay Berg, previously an American attorney, brought a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) lawsuit charging president George W. Bush and 154 others with complicity in the September 11 attacks, and another suit challenging the eligibility of Barack Obama to become President of the United States.

Denise Louise Cote is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lewis A. Kaplan</span> American judge (born 1944)

Lewis A. Kaplan is an American lawyer and jurist who serves as a senior U.S. district judge on the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. He was the presiding judge in a number of cases involving high-profile defendants, including E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump, Virginia Giuffre v. Prince Andrew,United States v. Bankman-Fried, and trials of Al Qaeda terrorists such as Ahmed Ghailani.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Techdirt</span> American Internet blog

Techdirt is an American Internet blog that reports on technology's legal challenges and related business and economic policy issues, in context of the digital revolution. It focuses on intellectual property, patent, information privacy and copyright reform in particular.

Paul Mpande Ngobeni is a South African lawyer who graduated from Hamilton College, New York. He has served on a task team advising the African National Congress on constitutional law matters where he assisted in designing its legal strategy for defending South African President Jacob Zuma against corruption charges. He has also served as a consultant for the South African Ministry of Housing on various legal matters, including transformation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Copyright troll</span> Party that enforces copyrights for purposes of making money through litigation

A copyright troll is a party that enforces copyrights it owns for purposes of making money through strategic litigation, in a manner considered unduly aggressive or opportunistic, sometimes without producing or licensing the works it owns for paid distribution. Critics object to the activity because they believe it does not encourage the production of creative works, but instead makes money through the inequities and unintended consequences of high statutory damages provisions in copyright laws intended to encourage creation of such works.

Righthaven LLC was a copyright enforcement company founded in early 2010. Based in Las Vegas, Nevada, it entered agreements from its partner newspapers after finding that their content had been copied to online sites without permission, in order to engage in litigation against the site owners for copyright infringement. The lawsuits were much criticized by commentators, who describe the activity as copyright trolling and the company as a "lawsuit factory". Righthaven LLC's CEO, Steven Gibson, who is currently a partner at Las Vegas law firm Gibson & True LLP, regularly spoke to the media about Righthaven.

<i>Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground LLC</i> 2011 US copyright infringement case

Righthaven LLC. v. Democratic Underground LLC, 791 F. Supp. 2d 968, was a copyright infringement case which determined that a contract giving a party right to sue on behalf of a copyright holder does not give the party legal standing to file such lawsuits. This case is one of over 200 similar cases filed by Righthaven against media outlets using content from Stephens Media. Judge Roger L. Hunt ruled that Righthaven lacked standing to file a copyright infringement suit and ordered Righthaven to show cause within two weeks why it should not be sanctioned for failure to disclose Stephens Media as an interested party.

Prenda Law, also known as Steele | Hansmeier PLLP and Anti-Piracy Law Group, was a Chicago-based law firm that ostensibly operated by undertaking litigation against copyright infringement. However, it was later characterized by the United States District Court for Central California in a May 2013 ruling as a "porno-trolling collective" whose business model "relie[d] on deception", and which resembled most closely a conspiracy and racketeering enterprise, referring in the judgment to RICO, the U.S. Federal anti-racketeering law. The firm ostensibly dissolved itself in July 2013 shortly after the adverse ruling although onlookers described Alpha Law Firm LLC as its apparent replacement. In 2014, the ABA Journal described the "Prenda Law saga" as having entered "legal folklore".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Monkey selfie copyright dispute</span> Copyright dispute involving Celebes crested macaques

Between 2011 and 2018, a series of disputes took place about the copyright status of selfies taken by Celebes crested macaques using equipment belonging to the British wildlife photographer David J. Slater. The disputes involved Wikimedia Commons and the blog Techdirt, which have hosted the images following their publication in newspapers in July 2011 over Slater's objections that he holds the copyright, and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), who have argued that the copyright should be assigned to the macaque.

Appin was an Indian cyberespionage company started in 2003 and run by brothers Rajat and Anuj Khare. Although it initially started as a cybersecurity training firm, by 2010 the company had begun providing hacking services for governments and corporate clients. In 2013, a report by Shadowserver Foundation pointed to evidence linking Appin to several hacks of high-profile organizations.

References

  1. ↑ Bruner, Raven (22 March 2022). "American Buffalo Begins Broadway Previews March 22". Playbill.com. Retrieved 7 November 2022.
  2. 1 2 "Matter of Liebowitz (2024 NY Slip Op 01309)". nycourts.gov. New York State Law Reporting Bureau. March 13, 2024. Retrieved 2024-03-14.
  3. 1 2 Patrice, Joe (2024-03-14). "New York Disbars Infamous Copyright Troll". Above the Law . Retrieved 2024-03-15.
  4. 1 2 Cullins, Ashley (6 April 2018). "Has This Man Sued You? A "Copyright Troll" Takes on Hollywood". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved 25 May 2018.
  5. ↑ Peters, Justin (24 May 2018). "Why Every Media Company Fears This Guy". Slate Magazine. Retrieved 7 October 2022.
  6. ↑ Liebowitz, Richard P. (2006). Apprentice!: a teen learns lessons on the frontlines of life. New York, NY: New Voices Press. ISBN   978-0974810348.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Peters, Justin (24 May 2018). "Why Every Media Company Fears This Guy". Slate Magazine. Retrieved 25 May 2018.
  8. ↑ "Attorney Online Services - Search Updated".
  9. ↑ Donahue, Bill (October 5, 2017). "Facebook Dad Faces Big Fine Over Failed Copyright Suits". Law360.
  10. ↑ Masnick, Mike (November 25, 2019). "Richard Liebowitz Is Wrong On So Many Levels, And Is In Trouble Yet Again". Tech Dirt. Retrieved June 19, 2020.
  11. ↑ Masnick, Mike (July 26, 2019). "Copyright Troll Richard Liebowitz May Have Cost His Client A Ton Of Money, And Set An Expensive Precedent For Copyright Trolls". Techdirt . Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  12. ↑ Cushing, Tim (October 2, 2019). "Copyright Troll Attorney Again Hit With Sanctions For Being A Shitty Lawyer". Techdirt . Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  13. ↑ Cushing, Tim (2019-11-12). "Copyright Troll Lawyer Serves Up BS 'Dead Grandfather' Excuse For Missing Court; Now Facing Sanctions And Arrest". Techdirt. Retrieved 2019-11-12.
  14. ↑ "Order and Order to Show Cause" (PDF), Jason Berger v. Imagina Consulting (Court Filing), S.D.N.Y., vol. No. 7:18-cv-08956, no. Docket 60, 2019-11-01 – via Recap
  15. ↑ Bastone, William (2019-11-11). "The Lawyer, The Judge & The Dead Grandfather". The Smoking Gun . Retrieved 2019-11-23.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Opinion and Order" (PDF), Usherson v. Bandshell Artist Management (Court Filing), S.D.N.Y., vol. No. 1:19-cv-06368, no. Docket 68, June 26, 2020 – via Recap
  17. ↑ Brittain, Blake (2021-06-25). "2nd Circuit affirms nationwide sanctions against copyright attorney Liebowitz". Reuters. Retrieved 2021-10-25.
  18. ↑ Brittain, Blake (2021-07-23). "2nd Circuit okays all Manhattan court sanctions against Liebowitz". Reuters. Retrieved 2021-10-25.
  19. ↑ Masnick, Mike (June 20, 2020). "Copyright Troll Richard Liebowitz Benchslapped And Sanctioned AGAIN..." Tech Dirt. Retrieved July 2, 2020.
  20. ↑ Masnick, Mike (December 2020). "World's Worst Copyright Troll, Richard Liebowitz, Suspended From Practicing Law". TechDirt. Retrieved December 6, 2020.
  21. ↑ "Matter of Liebowitz (2021 NY Slip Op 05967)". nycourts.gov. New York State Law Reporting Bureau. November 3, 2021. Retrieved 2021-11-05.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.