Denise Cote

Last updated
  1. 1 2 3 "Cote, Denise - Federal Judicial Center".
  2. Gretchen Morgenson & Ken Belson, The Sisterhood Judging WorldCom, N.Y. TIMES, Jan. 30, 2005.
  3. Mark Hamblett, Southern District Joins Patent Pilot Project, N.Y.L.J., Oct. 17, 2011.
  4. "Court Labels Attorney as "Copyright Troll" and Fines Him $10,000 over Frivolous Case Involving Photograph". 13 March 2018.
  5. "Judge Refuses to Let Notorious Media Foe Redact "Copyright Troll" from Ruling". The Hollywood Reporter . 29 October 2018.
  6. NEUMEISTER, LARRY. "NY judge: Apple statements damage lawsuit position".
  7. Molina, Brett (March 25, 2014). "E-book price fixing settlements rolling out". USA Today. Retrieved 2014-06-01.
  8. Albanese, Andrew (December 2013). "Judge Approves Final E-book Settlements". Publishers Weekly. Retrieved 2014-06-02.
  9. "Court document". ca2.uscourts.gov. Archived from the original on 2023-05-18. Retrieved 2023-05-18.
  10. "United States Court of Appeals" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-05-14. Retrieved 2012-06-23.
  11. "#27 in United States v. Skowron, III (S.D.N.Y., 1:11-cr-00699) – CourtListener.com". CourtListener. Retrieved 18 May 2023.
  12. "Former Hedge Fund Portfolio Manager Joseph "Chip" Skowron Sentenced in Manhattan Federal Court to Five Years in Prison for Insider Trading Scheme". FBI. Retrieved 18 May 2023.
  13. Mullin, Joe (June 1, 2014). "Payback time: First patent troll ordered to pay "extraordinary case" fees". Ars Technica. Retrieved June 4, 2014.
  14. Lumen View Technology, LLC v. Findthebest.com, Inc., no. 13-3599, (S.D.N.Y. May 30, 2014) Opinion and Order. Accessed June 4, 2014.
  15. R.W. (25 September 2017). "Anthony Weiner is sentenced to 21 months in prison". The Economist .

Related Research Articles

In United States federal law, the Daubert standard is a rule of evidence regarding the admissibility of expert witness testimony. A party may raise a Daubert motion, a special motion in limine raised before or during trial, to exclude the presentation of unqualified evidence to the jury. The Daubert trilogy are the three United States Supreme Court cases that articulated the Daubert standard:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shira Scheindlin</span> American judge

Shira Ann Scheindlin is an American attorney and jurist who served as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. She is currently of counsel at Boies Schiller Flexner LLP.

Jed Saul Rakoff is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Harold Baer Jr. was a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard M. Berman</span> American judge (born 1943)

Richard Miles Berman is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Hartman v. Moore, 547 U.S. 250 (2006), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the pleading standard for retaliatory prosecution claims against government officials. After a successful lobbying attempt by the CEO of a manufacturing company against competing devices that the US Postal Service supported, the CEO found himself the target of an investigation by US postal inspectors and a criminal prosecution that was dismissed for lack of evidence. The CEO then filed suit against the inspectors and other government officials for seeking to prosecute him in retaliation for exercising his First Amendment rights to criticize postal policy. The Court ruled 5-2 that to prove that the prosecution was caused by a retaliatory motive, the plaintiff bringing such a claim must allege and prove that the criminal charges were brought without probable cause.

Dennis G. Jacobs is a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Introduction: Issue Preclusion

George Benjamin Daniels is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

<i>Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.</i> U.S. legal case on copyright originality

Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp., 36 F. Supp. 2d 191, was a decision by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, which ruled that exact photographic copies of public domain images could not be protected by copyright in the United States because the copies lack originality. Even though accurate reproductions might require a great deal of skill, experience, and effort, the key element to determine whether a work is copyrightable under US law is originality.

Naomi Lynn Reice Buchwald is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kevin Duffy</span> American judge (1933–2020)

Kevin Thomas Duffy was an American lawyer and United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Consuelo Bland Marshall</span> American judge (born 1936)

Consuelo Bland Marshall is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

A Doe subpoena is a subpoena that seeks the identity of an unknown defendant to a lawsuit. Most jurisdictions permit a plaintiff who does not yet know a defendant's identity to file suit against a placeholder defendant, using the name John Doe or Jane Doe. A plaintiff may then use the tools of the discovery process to seek the defendant's true name and amend the complaint to name the Doe defendant. A Doe subpoena is often served on an online service provider or ISP for the purpose of identifying the author of an anonymous post.

<i>American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression v. Strickland</i> Judgment on Constitutional issue

American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression v. Strickland, 560 F.3d 443, is a decision of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals involving a constitutional challenge—both facially and as-applied to internet communications—to an Ohio statute prohibiting the dissemination or display to juveniles of certain sexually-explicit materials or performances. The Sixth Circuit panel declined to resolve the constitutional issue but, instead, certified two questions to the Ohio Supreme Court regarding the interpretation of the statute. The Ohio Supreme Court answered both questions affirmatively and placed a narrowing construction on the statute. Since the Ohio Supreme Court's decision, the Sixth Circuit has not reheard the case.

<i>Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Pataki</i> American legal case

Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Pataki, 413 F.3d 266, is an important precedent in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the litigation of aboriginal title in the United States. Applying the U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling in City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York (2005), a divided panel held that the equitable doctrine of laches bars all tribal land claims sounding in ejectment or trespass, for both tribal plaintiffs and the federal government as plaintiff-intervenor.

Waesche, Sheinbaum & O'Regan was a New York-based law firm focusing on international litigation and arbitration. It was co-founded in 1979 by Donald M. Waesche, Jr., Louis P. Sheinbaum and Francis M. O'Regan, partners from the Wall Street firm of Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston.

<i>Florence v. Shurtleff</i>

Florence v. Shurtleff, Civil No. 2:05CV000485, was a case in which the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah issued an order stating that individuals could not be prosecuted for posting adult content that was constitutionally protected on general access websites, nor could they be civilly liable for failing to prevent access to adult content, so long as the material is identifiable by filtering software. The order was the result of a 2005 lawsuit, The King's English v. Shurtleff, brought by Utah bookstores, artists, Internet Service Providers and the other organizations challenging the constitutionality of certain portions of a Utah law intended to protect minors from adult content.

<i>Barclays Capital Inc. v. Theflyonthewall.com, Inc.</i> American legal case

Barclays Capital Inc. v. Theflyonthewall.com, Inc., 650 F.3d 876, was a case decided in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit where the Second Circuit, reversing the decision of the US District Court below it, found that the claims of three major financial investment firms against an internet subscription stock news service (theflyonthewall.com) for "Hot-news" Misappropriation under state common law doctrine could not stand, as they were pre-empted by several sections of the Federal Copyright Act.

In United States law, a nationwide injunction is injunctive relief in which a court binds the federal government even in its relations with nonparties. In their prototypical form, nationwide injunctions are used to restrict the federal government from enforcing a statute or regulation.

References

Denise Cote
Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Assumed office
December 15, 2011
Legal offices
Preceded byJudge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
1994–2011
Succeeded by