Rights Now

Last updated

Rights Now, sometimes written with an exclamation mark, was a British umbrella group of disabled people's organisations and charities which campaigned for a change in the law to prevent discrimination against disabled people and for a full civil rights law, even though the result was the flawed Disability Discrimination Act 1995. The biggest protest in numbers of people was in July 1994 at Trafalgar Square and Whitehall, London. It was a very broad-based campaign, including trade unions for example. Campaigning to improve the laws for full civil rights continued, but Rights Now as a group ended in 1995.

Contents

Prior to Rights Now

Silver Jubilee Access Committee (SJAC)

The Silver Jubilee Committee on Improving Access for Disabled People was established in 1977 by Alf Morris MP, the Minister for Disabled People, [1] to report on access arrangements regarding the Silver Jubilee celebrations. He appointed Peter Large (Spinal Injuries Association, SIA) as its chair. [2] It produced a report in 1979, Can Disabled People Go Where You Go? [3]

Committee on Restrictions Against Disabled People (CORAD)

In 1979 Alf Morris established the Committee on Restrictions Against Disabled People, CORAD. He again asked Peter Large to be the chair. Colin Barnes identified the creation of CORAD as the start of the UK movement for disabled people's civil rights because CORAD, building on the work of the SJAC, analysed the restrictions against disabled people systematically, including education and employment. [4] [5] Its terms of reference, membership, and some meeting minutes are held in the UK National Archives. [6] Shortly after CORAD was established there was a general election and a Conservative government replaced the Labour government, so the committee reported to the new minister, Hugh Rossi MP, who reportedly ignored their findings. [7] [8] In written evidence submitted to Parliament in 2004, [1] Peter Large recalled the following:

"Lord Morris asked me to chair a successor committee, the Committee on Restrictions Against Disabled People (CORAD) 'to consider the architectural and social barriers which may result in discrimination against disabled people and prevent them from making full use of facilities available to the general public; and to make recommendations.' CORAD reported in February 1982. [9] It recommended anti-discrimination legislation covering employment, education, the provision of goods, facilities and services, insurance, transport, property rights, occupational pension schemes, membership of associations and clubs, and civic duties and functions. CORAD also recommended a regulatory body or Commission with powers to investigate, conciliate and if necessary take legal action on individual complaints." [7]

First of many non-government bills

In 1983 Jack Ashley MP used the ten-minute rule and put forward the Civil Rights (Disabled Persons) Bill which would have established a commission with legal powers of enforcement. The Bill did not have government support and was lost. [10] Various research writings claim or estimate the number of attempts to pass a civil rights bill for disabled people between 1980 and 1995, with numbers varying between nine and sixteen bills. [5] [7]

Voluntary Organisations for Anti-Discrimination Legislation (VOADL)

Around 1985 a group of the large, national charities for disabled people, including RADAR (the Royal Association for Disability and Rehabilitation, as was), the Spastics Society (as was), came together to form a lobby group for anti-discrimination legislation, ADL, also known as civil rights for disabled people. The British Council of Organisations of Disabled People, BCODP (as was), around 1988 agreed to participate in VOADL as an observer organisation. [8]

VOADL established an advisory committee around 1989 which was chaired by Mike Oliver who supported Colin Barnes as the researcher formally linked to BCODP. Research interviews were held at the SIA offices led by Colin Barnes, Stephen Bradshaw, Jane Campbell, and Mike Oliver. In 1991 the results of this research was published as a definitive text on ADL in the UK. [5]

The closest successor organisation to VOADL would probably be the Voluntary Organisations Disability Group (VODG): "a membership body representing organisations within the voluntary sector who work alongside disabled people." [11]

Rights Now, 1992–1995

A Rights Now t-shirt (source: Lorraine Gradwell Collection, Disabled People's Archive, Manchester) Rights Now t-shirt, Manchester edition.jpg
A Rights Now t-shirt (source: Lorraine Gradwell Collection, Disabled People's Archive, Manchester)

The Rights Now group was formed in 1992. [12] Although VOADL had been successful in pulling together a number of the largest disability charities ("organisations for") they had found that disabled people's organisations ("organisations of") were distrustful and reluctant to join and share their knowledge and strategies. This changed when the creation of a new, combined organisation was suggested by the executive committee of BCODP and the charities involved in VOADL agreed to the 'merger'. [8] Rights Now had a reported 83 member organisations, including trade unions as well as disabled people's organisations (DPOs) and disability charities, and a reported 10,000 individual members. Only disabled people who were representing a DPO could be an office-holder of Rights Now. [13]

The first Chair of Rights Now was Stephen Bradshaw, chief executive of the Spinal Injuries Association, followed by Rachel Hurst. [10] The campaign reportedly had strong links with Parliamentarians though the All-Party Disability Group and its researcher Victoria Scott, who worked for RADAR, and the Rights Now Coordinator, Adam Thomas. [10]

In parallel, around the same time many disabled people and their organisations were becoming more vocally critical of charities and fundraising, and in particular, on the biennial Telethons run by ITV. A protest demo of around 200 disabled people outside Telethon 90 was organised by the Campaign to Stop Patronage [5] with Victoria Waddington and Allan Sutherland doing the press liaison. [7]

The 1990 demo created the conditions for a larger-scale protest demo by more than one thousand disabled people outside (and some inside) Telethon 92. The organisational work for these demos had a background in the emerging disability arts scene rather than in elected politics, committees and lobbying, and it led to the creation of the Disabled People's Direct Action Network, DAN, in early 1993. [4] While DAN was more focused on inaccessible transport rather than civil rights laws in Parliament, nevertheless their highly visible protests on the streets across England and Wales caused a "media extravaganza" according to John Evans, saying also that it "no doubt highlighted the profile of the need for civil rights legislation". [12]

1993

A Rights Now flag (source: Rachel Hurst Collection, Disabled People's Archive, Manchester) Rights Now flag - Rachel Hurst Collection.jpg
A Rights Now flag (source: Rachel Hurst Collection, Disabled People's Archive, Manchester)

Although DAN was very focused on street campaigning against inaccessible public transport (mass transit), nevertheless its first major action was during the by-election in Christchurch, Dorset, in 1993 [14] where Rob Hayward, the Conservative candidate, had previously been an MP for another area and had 'talked out' a bill for disabled people's civil rights. He failed to win this safe seat.

In July 1993, Rights Now published What Price Civil Rights?, a report that provided "substantial evidence that the government [had] grossly overestimated the cost of implementing the Civil Rights Bill", the government figure being £ 17 billion. [12] The Rights Now report estimated the cost as no more than £ 5 billion. [7]

1994

In the 1993/1994 parliamentary session Roger Berry MP won a place in the ballot for a private members bill, and for at least the ninth time since Jack Ashley MP, a Civil Rights (Disabled Persons) Bill was put forward to become a law. The wording had evolved over the years, this version having been updated by the disabled lawyers Caroline Gooding [15] and David Ruebain. A national political scandal emerged when it was revealed on 6 May 1994 that the Minister for Disabled People, Nicholas Scott MP (and father of Victoria Scott, who was a strong supporter of Rights Now, causing much press comment), had arranged for over 80 wrecking amendments to be put by five backbench MPs who were hostile to the bill, while he maintained he was "neutral" on the matter; a miss-statement which caused him to have to be replaced soon afterwards by William Hague MP as the Minister for Disabled People. [4] [7] [8] [12]

On 23 May 1994 "a group of disabled activists abandoned their wheelchairs and crawled into the House of Commons in an attempt to lobby their MPs. They were turned away at the normal public entrance - which is inaccessible to wheelchair users - and it took five hours before they were allowed into the parliamentary lobby." [7]

Perhaps the largest attended protest Rights Now organised was on 9 July 1994 in Trafalgar Square and Whitehall, London, with an estimated 2,800 people protesting. [16] DAN took part in the protest with their own action, delivering a giant 'letter' to 10 Downing Street for then-Prime Minister John Major MP. [17]

1995

Following the failure of the Roger Berry bill, the next iteration for civil rights was the Harry Barnes bill. A report by the House of Commons Library on this bill, written by staff with no political axe to grind, stated, "The Bill has the overwhelming support of disability groups, who have been campaigning for 10-15 years to establish some form of anti-discrimination legislation." [18]

In an unusual move in Parliament, the government introduced its own bill - to become the DDA - to be debated in parallel with the Barnes bill. A report by the House of Commons Library on the DDA, while it was still a bill, stated,

"there appears to be unanimous agreement among disability groups on the main ways in which it falls short of the sort of legislation that they desire. There is also general support for the Private Member's Bill introduced by Harry Barnes ... The main objections to the Government's Bill are that:

  • the National Disability Council (NDC) will not be powerful enough;
  • the definition of disability is too narrow;
  • the scope of the Government's Bill is too limited;
  • there are too many "get-out" provisions.

Disability groups object to the fact that the NDC will not have the same sort of enforcement powers that the Commission for Racial Equality or the Equal Opportunities Commission have". [19]

Rights Now is explicitly referenced in this report as one of the 'disability groups' holding these views. [19] [12]

The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 became law; the Barnes Bill failed. [12]

Criticisms and legacy

In the November 1994 edition of the Coalition magazine produced by the Greater Manchester Coalition of Disabled People concentrated on the campaign for civil rights in the wake of the Berry bill. An editorial article by Ian Stanton included the following concerns:

"To many of us in the disabled people's movement, it is galling to hear RADAR making pronouncements upon the importance of civil rights. We remember that less than ten years ago RADAR was echoing the government's line that "education and persuasion" would provide equality for disabled people. ... We now claim to be so close to achieving recognition of our rights; but am I alone in worrying about how easily our issues can be hi-jacked by non-representative groups, and how quickly our voices can be drowned out by those of non-disabled people?  The disabled people's movement has become formidable campaigning machine, but sometimes we can be politically naive, particularly when compared with the slick lobbying skills and access to the 'old boys network' associated with the major charities." [20]

Probably one legacy - other than the new law - was in the changes that took place in some of the major national charities for disabled people (disability organisations) where they started to address the concerns expressed by organisations of disabled people (disabled people's organisations). Examples of these changes included: employing more disabled people on their staff, involving disabled people more in their publicity plans, and by having more disabled people on their governing bodies controlling the charities. Nevertheless, some significant gaps were said to remain, not least in unequal access to funding. [21] Others took a different view, for example Bob Williams Findlay in 2015 wrote,

To fully appreciate our position on the DDA it is necessary to strip away the sugar-coated presentation of this historic piece of legislation in order to reveal how the collective voice of disabled people and their many allies were silenced by acts of betrayal and brute force. The real story isn't really about the twenty years since the passing of this piecemeal, ineffectual and oppressive Act, but rather it is about how the Civil Rights Bill and the ideas contained within it were buried both physically and politically by those who felt threatened by the potential impact it would've had on society. [8]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Disability Discrimination Act 1995</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which has now been repealed and replaced by the Equality Act 2010, except in Northern Ireland where the Act still applies. Formerly, it made it unlawful to discriminate against people in respect of their disabilities in relation to employment, the provision of goods and services, education and transport.

The disability rights movement is a global social movement that seeks to secure equal opportunities and equal rights for all people with disabilities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Community Action Against Homophobia</span>

Community Action Against Homophobia (CAAH) is a community activist organisation based in Sydney, Australia. Since its establishment in 1999, CAAH has aimed to eliminate homophobia and achieve full equality for queer people—defined as "lesbian, gay, bisexual, same sex attracted, transgender, intersex or non-heterosexually identifying" in the CAAH constitution.

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, is American legislation that guarantees certain rights to people with disabilities. It was one of the first U.S. federal civil rights laws offering protection for people with disabilities. It set precedents for subsequent legislation for people with disabilities, including the Virginians with Disabilities Act in 1985 and the Americans with Disabilities Act in 1990.

Disability Rights UK (DR UK) is a UK pan-disability charity which was set up with the aim of representing the needs and expectations of disabled people in the UK. Disability Rights UK was formed as a result of several disability charities merging in 2012.

The Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation (UPIAS) was an early disability rights organisation in the United Kingdom. It established the principles that led to the development of the social model of disability, wherein a sharp distinction is made between impairment and disability. From the organisation's policy statement: "What we are interested in, are ways of changing our conditions of life, and thus overcoming the disabilities which are imposed on top our physical impairments by the way this society is organised to exclude us."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Disabled Motoring UK</span>

Disabled Motoring UK is a non-governmental organization founded in the UK in 1922 and was recently known as Mobilise. It is a campaigning charity for disabled drivers, passengers, and blue badge holders in the United Kingdom. Disabled Motoring UK lobbies the government and businesses to improve parking, access, and refuelling services for disabled people. Disabled Motoring UK does not just campaign for motorists but also supports scooter and wheelchair users, as well as the families and carers of disabled people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Disabled People Against Cuts</span>

Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) is an organisation based in the United Kingdom for disabled people and allies to campaign against the impact of government spending cuts on the lives of disabled people. Formed on 3 October 2010 DPAC promotes full human rights and equality for all disabled people, and operates from the Social Model of Disability.

Four million people in Australia (18.5%) reported having a disability in 2009, according to the results of the Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers. Males and females were similarly affected by disability.

Disability in the United Kingdom covers a wide range of conditions and experiences, deeply impacting the lives of millions of people. Defined by the Equality Act 2010 as a physical or mental impairment with a substantial and long-term adverse effect on a person's ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities, it encompasses various aspects of life, including demographics, legislation, healthcare, employment, and culture. Despite numerous advancements in policy and social attitudes, individuals with disabilities often encounter unique challenges and disparities.

Disability rights are not specifically addressed by legislation in New Zealand. Instead, disability rights are addressed through human rights legislation. Human rights in New Zealand are protected by the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 and the Human Rights Act 1993. New Zealand also signed and ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) in 2008.

Caroline Gillian Gooding was a British solicitor and activist for disabled people. She took up activism after having a stroke while in her early 20s. Gooding directed her efforts to publishing literature advocating a human rights-based approach to disability, advising, assisting and leading governmental disability commissions, and drafting government legislation to improve the status of disabled individuals, such as the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, the Disability Discrimination Act 2005 and the Equality Act 2010. The Caroline Gooding Memorial Lecture is named after the activist.

Rachel Mary Rosalind Hurst CBE is a British activist and former director of Disability Awareness in Action (DAA), an international network working on disability and human rights.

The Disabled People's Direct Action Network (DAN) is a disability rights activist organisation in England and Wales that campaigned for civil rights with high-profile street demonstrations involving civil disobedience, rallies and protests.

The National Centre for Independent Living (NCIL) was a non-profit staffed organisation controlled by and run for disabled people active in social care issues to campaign for and support the independent living of disabled people in the community and using personal assistants, as opposed to living in institutions such as care homes and hospitals. It ceased its work in December 2011.

The British Council of Organisations of Disabled People (BCODP) was a radical national voice of disabled people for legal, social and cultural change in Britain from 1981 to 2017, with a high profile in the 1980s and 1990s.

The Greater Manchester Coalition of Disabled People (GMCDP) was established in 1985, a membership organisation in the UK that is controlled by disabled people. GMCDP is regarded as being influential in the social, cultural, economic, and legal policy debates on a national stage that have impacted on disabled people, grounded in the Social Model of Disability. The GMCDP magazine Coalition was referred to in these debates, its articles being cited in academic textbooks as well as within the community. The history of GMCDP has been a microcosm of the history of the radical disabled people's movement in the UK since the 1980s, with GMCDP members often involved centrally and nationally.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paul Hunt (activist)</span> UK disability rights activist (1937–1979)

Paul Hunt was an early disability rights activist and leader of disabled people's campaigns in the UK against residential institutions and for independent living. He was born on 9 March 1937 in Angmering, Sussex, with an impairment and he died aged 42 years in London, on 12 July 1979. His work and political influence is now cited in academic and political writings.

Then Barbara Met Alan is a 2022 British television drama film about Barbara Lisicki and Alan Holdsworth, the founders of DAN, a disability activism group. It is written by Jack Thorne and Genevieve Barr and stars Ruth Madeley and Arthur Hughes. It broadcast on BBC Two on 21 March 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barbara Lisicki</span> British disability rights activist, comedian, and equality trainer

Barbara Lisicki is a British disability rights activist, comedian, and equality trainer. She is a founder of the Disabled People's Direct Action Network (DAN), an organization that engaged in nonviolent civil disobedience to raise awareness and to advocate for the rights of disabled people. She is a featured subject of the 2022 BBC docudrama Then Barbara Met Alan, and appeared in The Disabled Century on BBC2 in 1999.

References

  1. 1 2 Joint Committee on the Draft Disability Discrimination Bill (February 2004). "Memorandum from Sir Peter Large CBE (DDB 91)". Parliament of the United Kingdom . Retrieved 2023-07-19.
  2. Morris, Alf (2005-01-27). "Sir Peter Large". The Guardian . ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 2023-07-19.
  3. Large, Peter (1979). Can Disabled People Go Where You Go?. London: Silver Jubilee Committee on Improving Access for Disabled People.
  4. 1 2 3 Hunt, Judy (2019). No limits : the disabled people's movement : a radical history. Manchester. ISBN   978-1-913148-02-7. OCLC   1108503896.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  5. 1 2 3 4 Barnes, Colin (1991). Disabled people in Britain and discrimination : a case for anti-discrimination legislation. British Council of Organizations of Disabled People. London: C. Hurst & Co. ISBN   1-85065-128-0. OCLC   26761561.
  6. Committee on Restrictions Against Disabled People (CORAD). The National Archives. January 1, 1978 – December 31, 1979.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Foley, Conor (1994). Access denied : human rights and disabled people. Sue Pratt, Matthew Brown, British Council of Organizations of Disabled People, National Council for Civil Liberties. London. ISBN   0-946088-47-0. OCLC   31782108.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 Williams Findlay, Bob (8 November 2015). "The Falsification of History: the twenty year burial of the civil rights bill". Disabled People Against the Cuts (DPAC) via website.
  9. Report by the Committee on Restrictions Against Disabled People. Peter Large, Great Britain. Committee on Restrictions Against Disabled People. [Great Britain]: [The Committee]. 1982. ISBN   0-902650-65-3. OCLC   16606226.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  10. 1 2 3 Fletcher, Agnes (2008). A Celebration of the Work of the All-Party Parliamentary Disability Group and its Chair Rt Hon Lord Ashley of Stoke CH: four decades of parliamentary work for disabled people's rights 1968-2008. London.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  11. "Homepage". Voluntary Organisations Disability Group . Retrieved 2023-07-19.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Evans, John (1996). The UK Civil Rights Campaign and the Disability Discrimination Act. Vienna: European Network on Independent Living (ENIL) Paper.
  13. "Home". Disabled People's Archive. 2021-01-26. Retrieved 2023-07-19.
  14. Rose, Damon. "The wheelchair warriors: Their rebellious protests to change the law". BBC News . Retrieved 2023-07-19.
  15. Gooding, Caroline (1996). Blackstone's Guide to the Disability Discrimination Act 1995. Blackstone with RADAR.
  16. "1994 Rights Now London". Greater Manchester Coalition of Disabled People. 2017-06-06. Retrieved 2023-07-19.
  17. Parker, Ian (1995-04-08). "Spitting on Charity". The Independent . Retrieved 2022-04-04.
  18. House of Commons Library (6 February 1995). Civil Rights (Disabled Persons) Bill 1994-95; Research Paper 95/18. Hansard.
  19. 1 2 House of Commons Library (19 January 1995). "Disability Discrimination Bill 1994/95, Research Paper 95/9" (PDF). Hansard.
  20. Stanton, Ian (November 1994). "Editorial". Coalition via Greater Manchester Coalition of Disabled People (GMCDP).
  21. Pring, John (1 April 2021). "Government 'treats disabled people with contempt' by handing £2.4 million to charities". Disability News Service. Retrieved 19 March 2022.