Romanian Black Sea Fleet during World War I

Romanian Black Sea Fleet during World War I
	; The minelayer Alexandru cel Bun following behind the protected cruiser Elisabeta
Date	1916–1917
Location	Danube Delta (mainly Sulina)
Result	Romanian victory – Successful defense of Sulina and the Danube Delta throughout the entire Romanian Campaign
Belligerents
Romania	German Empire ; Ottoman Empire ; Austria-Hungary
Strength
1 cruiser; 3 torpedo boats; 1 gunboat; 1 minelayer; 1 brig	1 cruiser; 1 submarine; 1 monitor; Unknown seaplanes; Unknown ground forces
Casualties and losses
1 torpedo boat sunk	1 submarine sunk; 1 monitor sunk; 1 seaplane captured (damaged); Unknown ground casualties

Last updated December 14, 2024

During World War I, the Black Sea Fleet of the Romanian Navy fought against the Central Powers forces of the German Empire, the Ottoman Empire and Austria-Hungary. The Romanian warships succeeded in defending the coast of the Danube Delta, corresponding to an area around the port of Sulina, while also aiding in the Delta's defense from inland Central Powers forces.

History and strength

The Romanian Black Sea Fleet was founded in 1890.^[1] Its main warships amounted to one protected cruiser, Elisabeta , one armed brig, Mircea , and three Smeul -class torpedo boats.^[2] Other important vessels included the sea-going gunboat Grivița ^[3] and the Romanian Navy's sole proper minelayer, Alexandru cel Bun .^[4]

The Black Sea Fleet was neglected for a long-time by the Romanian Command. Its warships were all built between 1880 and 1888, while the Romanian Danube Flotilla was equipped with modern vessels built as late as 1908. The protected cruiser Elisabeta was converted to an anti-aircraft cruiser after the start of the war, her four 120 mm main guns being landed and her four 75 mm secondary guns being modified for anti-aircraft fire. She was also armed with four machine guns and four 356 mm (12 inch) torpedo tubes.^[5] The composite brig Mircea was used as a training ship and as such she was only armed with four machine guns.^[4] The three Smeul-class torpedo boats were initially armed with two fixed, bow-mounted 14-inch torpedo tubes and two 37 mm (1-pounder) revolving guns.^[6] However, during World War I, only Smeul retained her two 37 mm guns. The other two boats in the class, Sborul and Năluca, had their two 37 mm guns replaced by one machine gun during a 1907 refit.^[3] The gunboat Grivița was armed with two 57 mm (6-pounder) guns, two 37 mm guns and two machine guns.^[3] The minelayer Alexandru cel Bun was armed with two 37 mm guns and two machine guns, in addition to her load of mines.^[4]

Number of ships	Total displacement	Artillery pieces (37-75 mm)	Machine guns	Torpedo tubes
7	2,000	12	14	10

Operations

The main Romanian port of Constanța was leased to a Russian naval squadron, headed by the battleship Rostislav .^[7] This, combined with the fall of the port to the Central Powers during the Second Battle of Cobadin, rendered the small Northern port of Sulina as the base for the Romanian Black Sea Fleet.

Against the German empire

Smeul-class torpedo boat Sborul-class.jpg — *Smeul*-class torpedo boat

On 13 November 1916, the German minelaying submarine UC-15 set off to lay mines off Sulina. However, she only managed to lay two of her mines, which were discovered and swept in 1918.^[8] The U-boat was surprised in shallow waters by the Romanian torpedo boat Smeul^[9] and she was subsequently sunk by her own mines.^[10]

In the spring of 1917, Smeul came close to being hit by aircraft bombs dropped by a German seaplane. Romanian anti-aircraft fire struck the aircraft, but the German pilot succeeded in landing it on the water. He was subsequently taken prisoner.^[9]

Against the Ottoman Empire

The Romanian torpedo boat Smeul was highly advantaged by her two 37 mm revolving guns, as opposed to her two sisters which were only armed with one machine gun each. For several times, she sailed inland and raided German and Ottoman troops at Tulcea. "We smoked them", her captain used to say.^[9]

On 16 April 1917, Smeul departed from Chilia for Ismail, carrying materials, correspondence, a few evacuees, and three French officers commanding the infantry troops at Sulina. She capsized and sank in the Stari-Stambul distributary during a storm with the loss of 18 of her crew, including the French officers present on board.^[11]^[12] This incident has been incorrectly attributed to mines laid by the Ottoman cruiser Midilli in several English language sources, possibly as a result of wartime propaganda by the Central Powers.^[13]^[3]

Against Austria-Hungary

Alexandru cel Bun was the only minelayer of the Romanian Navy.^[4] On 22 September 1917, Romania achieved its greatest naval success of the war, when the Austro-Hungarian river monitor SMS Inn struck a Romanian mine and sank near Brăila. She was later salvaged, but was still undergoing repairs when the war ended.^[14]^[15]^[16]

Related Research Articles

A warship or combatant ship is a ship that is used for naval warfare. Usually they belong to the navy branch of the armed forces of a nation, though they have also been operated by individuals, cooperatives and corporations. As well as being armed, warships are designed to withstand damage and are typically faster and more maneuverable than merchant ships. Unlike a merchant ship, which carries cargo, a warship typically carries only weapons, ammunition and supplies for its crew.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sulina</span> Town in Tulcea, Romania

Sulina is a town and free port in Tulcea County, Northern Dobruja, Romania, at the mouth of the Sulina branch of the Danube. It is the easternmost point of Romania.

The Romanian Naval Forces is the principal naval branch of the Romanian Armed Forces and operates in the Black Sea and on the Danube. It traces its history back to 1860.

Naval warfare in World War I was mainly characterised by blockade. The Allied powers, with their larger fleets and surrounding position, largely succeeded in their blockade of Germany and the other Central Powers, whilst the efforts of the Central Powers to break that blockade, or to establish an effective counter blockade with submarines and commerce raiders, were eventually unsuccessful. Major fleet actions were extremely rare and proved less decisive.

The Royal Romanian Navy during World War I (1914–1918) was divided into two fleets and fought against the forces of the Central Powers. When Romania entered the war in August 1916, the Romanian Navy was officially divided as follows :

NMS Elisabeta was a small protected cruiser built for the Romanian Navy during the 1880s by Armstrong in Britain as Romania lacked the ability to build the ship itself. Serving mainly as a training ship, she represented Romania at the opening of the Kiel Canal in 1895. She helped protect Romanian interests in Constantinople during the First Balkan War in 1912–1913, but played no significant part in the Second Balkan War and was partially disarmed during World War I. Employed as a barracks ship after the war, the ship was scrapped in 1926.

The Type 41 3-inch (76 mm) naval gun otherwise known as the 8 cm/40 3rd Year Type naval gun was a Japanese dual-purpose gun introduced before World War I. Although designated as 8 cm (3.15 in), its shells were 76.2 mm (3 in) in diameter.

NMS Amiral Murgescu was a minelayer and convoy escort of the Romanian Navy, the first sea-going warship built in Romania and the largest Romanian-built warship of World War II. She laid numerous minefields, from the Bulgarian port of Burgas to the Crimean port of Sevastopol, which inflicted significant losses to the Soviet Black Sea Fleet. She also carried out numerous convoy escort missions and took part in the Axis evacuation of the Crimea in May 1944. Due to her success in combat, she was decorated twice by May 1944. She was captured by the Soviet Union in September 1944 and served until 1988, when she was scrapped.

The Raid on Constanța was an attack by the Soviet Black Sea Fleet on the Romanian port of Constanța on 26 June 1941, shortly after the beginning of Operation Barbarossa, the Axis invasion of the Soviet Union, and resulted in the only encounter between major warships in the Black Sea during World War II. The attack was intended to be a coordinated effort between the fleet's ships and aircraft to split the attention of the defenders, but the bombers did not attack at the designated times.

Submarine warfare in the Black Sea in World War II during 1941 primarily involved engagements between submarines of the Soviet Black Sea Fleet attacking Axis merchantmen defended by Romanian and Bulgarian warships. These engagements were a part of the naval Black Sea campaigns between Axis and Soviet naval forces.

NMS Grivița was a gunboat of the Romanian Navy, built in 1880. It was the first warship acquired by the Kingdom of Romania after gaining independence in 1878 and the first military ship of the Romanian Black Sea Fleet. Throughout her career, she saw service on both the Black Sea and the Danube during the Second Balkan War and the First World War.

The 102 mm 60 caliber Pattern 1911 was a Russian naval gun developed in the years before World War I that armed a variety of warships of the Imperial Russian Navy during World War I. Pattern 1911 guns found a second life on river gunboats and armored trains during the Russian Civil War and as coastal artillery during World War II. In 1941 it was estimated that 146 guns were in service. Of these, 49 were in the Baltic Fleet, 30 in the Black Sea Fleet, 30 in the Pacific Fleet, 18 in the Northern Fleet, 9 in the Caspian Flotilla and 6 in the Pinsk Flotilla.

The Romanian Navy during World War II was the main Axis naval force in the Black Sea campaigns and fought against the Soviet Union's Black Sea Fleet from 1941 to 1944. Operations consisted mainly of mine warfare, but there were also escort missions and localized naval engagements. The largest naval action fought by the Romanian Navy was the 26 June 1941 Raid on Constanța, and its most extensive operation was the 1944 evacuation of the Crimea.

NMS Smeul was a torpedo boat of the Romanian Navy. She was part of a class of three, built in France for the Romanian Navy in 1888. She and her two sister ships saw service during World War I.

NMS Mihail Kogălniceanu was a Brătianu-class river monitor of the Romanian Navy. She saw service in both world wars, being the most successful vessel in her class of four ships. Like her three sisters, she was initially built as a river monitor, but in early 1918, she was converted to a sea-going monitor. During the Second Balkan War, she supported the Romanian crossing of the Danube into Bulgaria. During World War I, she carried out numerous bombardments against the Central Powers forces advancing along the shore of the Danube and carried out the last action of the Romanian Navy before the 11 November 1918 armistice. She later fought successfully against Bolshevik naval forces during the early months of the Russian Civil War, helping secure the Budjak region.

NMS <i>Mărășești</i> Romanian Navy Vifor-class destroyer

NMS Mărășești was one of four Vifor-class destroyers ordered by Romania shortly before the beginning of the First World War from Italy. All four sister ships were requisitioned when Italy joined the war in 1915. Originally named Vârtej by the Romanians, she was renamed Nibbio and classified as a scout cruiser in Italian service. Not completed until mid-1918, the ship took part in the Adriatic campaign of World War I but engaged Austro-Hungarian Navy ships in the Adriatic Sea only once before the war ended in November 1918. She was renamed Mărășești when she was re-purchased by the Romanians in 1920.

The Romanian Danube Flotilla is the oldest extant naval force on the Danube, dating since 1860, when the Romanian Navy was founded. It saw service during most of the wars involving Romania, and was the most powerful river naval force in the world during the Interwar period.

NMS Mircea was the second ship of the Romanian Navy's Black Sea Fleet, one of the Fleet's six founding warships and the only one of these vessels to remain in service until the Second World War. She was sunk during an air raid in April 1944.

NMS Alexandru cel Bun was the first minelayer of the Romanian Naval Forces. Built by the United Kingdom in 1882, she served in the Romanian Navy for five decades, until being scrapped in the mid-1930s.

NMS Regele Carol I was a passenger ship of the Romanian Maritime Service and later a warship of the Romanian Navy, serving as both minelayer and seaplane tender. She was completed and commissioned in 1898 and sunk in 1941, during World War II.

References

↑ Warship International, Volume 21, International Naval Research Organization, 1984, p. 160
↑ Rumanian Review, Volume 51, Issues 1-9, Europolis Pub., 1996, p. 137
1 2 3 4 Roger Chesneau, N. J. M. Campbell, Conway's All the world Fighting Ships 1906-1921, Mayflower Books, 1979, p. 421
1 2 3 4 John Evelyn Moore, Jane's Fighting Ships of World War I, Military Press, 1990, p. 295
↑ John Evelyn Moore, Jane's Fighting Ships of World War I, Military Press, 1990, p. 294
↑ Roger Chesneau, N. J. M. Campbell, Conway's All the world Fighting Ships 1860-1905, Mayflower Books, 1979, p. 419
↑ R. M. Melnikov, Eskadrenny bronenosets "Rostislav" (1893–1920) (Эскадренный броненосец «Ростислав» (1893–1920)), Saint Petersburg: M. A. Leonov, 2006, p. 38
↑ Robert M. Grant, U-Boats Destroyed: The Effect of Anti-Submarine Warfare 1914-1918, Periscope Publishing Ltd., 2002
1 2 3 Cristian Crăciunoiu, Romanian navy torpedo boats, Modelism, 2003, p. 24
↑ R.H. Gibson, Maurice Prendergast, The German Submarine War 1914-1918, Periscope Publishing Ltd., 2002, p. 135
↑ Constantin Cumpănă, Corina Apostoleanu, Amintiri despre o flotă pierdută, vol. II , Telegraf Advertising, 2011 (in Romanian)
↑ "Torpilorul SMEUL – un simbol al eroismului românilor" (in Romanian). 28 February 2013.
↑ René Greger, Anthony John Watts, The Russian fleet, 1914-1917, Allan, 1972, p. 61
↑ Angus Konstam, Gunboats of World War I, Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015, p. 29
↑ René Greger, Austro-Hungarian warships of World War I, Allan, 1976, p. 142.
↑ Mark Axworthy, Cornel I. Scafeș, Cristian Crăciunoiu, Third Axis, Fourth Ally: Romanian Armed Forces in the European War, 1941-1945, London: Arms and Armour, 1995, p. 327.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[1] Warship International, Volume 21, International Naval Research Organization, 1984, p. 160

[2] Rumanian Review, Volume 51, Issues 1-9, Europolis Pub., 1996, p. 137

[Chesneau_421-3] 1 2 3 4 Roger Chesneau, N. J. M. Campbell, Conway's All the world Fighting Ships 1906-1921, Mayflower Books, 1979, p. 421

[Moore_295-4] 1 2 3 4 John Evelyn Moore, Jane's Fighting Ships of World War I, Military Press, 1990, p. 295

[Moore_294-5] John Evelyn Moore, Jane's Fighting Ships of World War I, Military Press, 1990, p. 294

[Chesneau_419-6] Roger Chesneau, N. J. M. Campbell, Conway's All the world Fighting Ships 1860-1905, Mayflower Books, 1979, p. 419

[7] R. M. Melnikov, Eskadrenny bronenosets "Rostislav" (1893–1920) (Эскадренный броненосец «Ростислав» (1893–1920)), Saint Petersburg: M. A. Leonov, 2006, p. 38

[8] Robert M. Grant, U-Boats Destroyed: The Effect of Anti-Submarine Warfare 1914-1918, Periscope Publishing Ltd., 2002

[Crăciunoiu_24-9] 1 2 3 Cristian Crăciunoiu, Romanian navy torpedo boats, Modelism, 2003, p. 24

[10] R.H. Gibson, Maurice Prendergast, The German Submarine War 1914-1918, Periscope Publishing Ltd., 2002, p. 135

[11] Constantin Cumpănă, Corina Apostoleanu, Amintiri despre o flotă pierdută, vol. II , Telegraf Advertising, 2011 (in Romanian)

[12] "Torpilorul SMEUL – un simbol al eroismului românilor" (in Romanian). 28 February 2013.

[13] René Greger, Anthony John Watts, The Russian fleet, 1914-1917, Allan, 1972, p. 61

[14] Angus Konstam, Gunboats of World War I, Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015, p. 29

[15] René Greger, Austro-Hungarian warships of World War I, Allan, 1976, p. 142.

[16] Mark Axworthy, Cornel I. Scafeș, Cristian Crăciunoiu, Third Axis, Fourth Ally: Romanian Armed Forces in the European War, 1941-1945, London: Arms and Armour, 1995, p. 327.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]