Rotating-wave approximation

Last updated March 14, 2024

The rotating-wave approximation is an approximation used in atom optics and magnetic resonance. In this approximation, terms in a Hamiltonian that oscillate rapidly are neglected. This is a valid approximation when the applied electromagnetic radiation is near resonance with an atomic transition, and the intensity is low.^[1] Explicitly, terms in the Hamiltonians that oscillate with frequencies $\omega _{L}+\omega _{0}$ are neglected, while terms that oscillate with frequencies $\omega _{L}-\omega _{0}$ are kept, where $\omega _{L}$ is the light frequency, and $\omega _{0}$ is a transition frequency.

The name of the approximation stems from the form of the Hamiltonian in the interaction picture, as shown below. By switching to this picture the evolution of an atom due to the corresponding atomic Hamiltonian is absorbed into the system ket, leaving only the evolution due to the interaction of the atom with the light field to consider. It is in this picture that the rapidly oscillating terms mentioned previously can be neglected. Since in some sense the interaction picture can be thought of as rotating with the system ket only that part of the electromagnetic wave that approximately co-rotates is kept; the counter-rotating component is discarded.

The rotating-wave approximation is closely related to, but different from, the secular approximation.^[2]

Mathematical formulation

For simplicity consider a two-level atomic system with ground and excited states $|{\text{g}}\rangle$ and $|{\text{e}}\rangle$ , respectively (using the Dirac bracket notation). Let the energy difference between the states be $\hbar \omega _{0}$ so that $\omega _{0}$ is the transition frequency of the system. Then the unperturbed Hamiltonian of the atom can be written as

H_{0}={\frac {\hbar \omega _{0}}{2}}|{\text{e}}\rangle \langle {\text{e}}|-{\frac {\hbar \omega _{0}}{2}}|{\text{g}}\rangle \langle {\text{g}}|

.

Suppose the atom experiences an external classical electric field of frequency $\omega _{L}$ , given by ${\vec {E}}(t)={\vec {E}}_{0}e^{-i\omega _{L}t}+{\vec {E}}_{0}^{*}e^{i\omega _{L}t}$ ; e.g., a plane wave propagating in space. Then under the dipole approximation the interaction Hamiltonian between the atom and the electric field can be expressed as

H_{1}=-{\vec {d}}\cdot {\vec {E}}

,

where ${\vec {d}}$ is the dipole moment operator of the atom. The total Hamiltonian for the atom-light system is therefore $H=H_{0}+H_{1}.$ The atom does not have a dipole moment when it is in an energy eigenstate, so $\left\langle {\text{e}}\left|{\vec {d}}\right|{\text{e}}\right\rangle =\left\langle {\text{g}}\left|{\vec {d}}\right|{\text{g}}\right\rangle =0.$ This means that defining ${\vec {d}}_{\text{eg}}\mathrel {:=} \left\langle {\text{e}}\left|{\vec {d}}\right|{\text{g}}\right\rangle$ allows the dipole operator to be written as

{\vec {d}}={\vec {d}}_{\text{eg}}|{\text{e}}\rangle \langle {\text{g}}|+{\vec {d}}_{\text{eg}}^{*}|{\text{g}}\rangle \langle {\text{e}}|

(with $^{*}$ denoting the complex conjugate). The interaction Hamiltonian can then be shown to be

H_{1}=-\hbar \left(\Omega e^{-i\omega _{L}t}+{\tilde {\Omega }}e^{i\omega _{L}t}\right)|{\text{e}}\rangle \langle {\text{g}}|-\hbar \left({\tilde {\Omega }}^{*}e^{-i\omega _{L}t}+\Omega ^{*}e^{i\omega _{L}t}\right)|{\text{g}}\rangle \langle {\text{e}}|

where $\Omega =\hbar ^{-1}{\vec {d}}_{\text{eg}}\cdot {\vec {E}}_{0}$ is the Rabi frequency and ${\tilde {\Omega }}\mathrel {:=} \hbar ^{-1}{\vec {d}}_{\text{eg}}\cdot {\vec {E}}_{0}^{*}$ is the counter-rotating frequency. To see why the ${\tilde {\Omega }}$ terms are called counter-rotating consider a unitary transformation to the interaction or Dirac picture where the transformed Hamiltonian $H_{1,I}$ is given by

H_{1,I}=-\hbar \left(\Omega e^{-i\Delta \omega t}+{\tilde {\Omega }}e^{i(\omega _{L}+\omega _{0})t}\right)|{\text{e}}\rangle \langle {\text{g}}|-\hbar \left({\tilde {\Omega }}^{*}e^{-i(\omega _{L}+\omega _{0})t}+\Omega ^{*}e^{i\Delta \omega t}\right)|{\text{g}}\rangle \langle {\text{e}}|,

where $\Delta \omega \mathrel {:=} \omega _{L}-\omega _{0}$ is the detuning between the light field and the atom.

Making the approximation

Two-level-system on resonance with a driving field with (blue) and without (green) applying the rotating-wave approximation. TLSRWA.gif — Two-level-system on resonance with a driving field with (blue) and without (green) applying the rotating-wave approximation.

This is the point at which the rotating wave approximation is made. The dipole approximation has been assumed, and for this to remain valid the electric field must be near resonance with the atomic transition. This means that $\Delta \omega \ll \omega _{L}+\omega _{0}$ and the complex exponentials multiplying ${\tilde {\Omega }}$ and ${\tilde {\Omega }}^{*}$ can be considered to be rapidly oscillating. Hence on any appreciable time scale, the oscillations will quickly average to 0. The rotating wave approximation is thus the claim that these terms may be neglected and thus the Hamiltonian can be written in the interaction picture as

H_{1,I}^{\text{RWA}}=-\hbar \Omega e^{-i\Delta \omega t}|{\text{e}}\rangle \langle {\text{g}}|-\hbar \Omega ^{*}e^{i\Delta \omega t}|{\text{g}}\rangle \langle {\text{e}}|.

Finally, transforming back into the Schrödinger picture, the Hamiltonian is given by

H^{\text{RWA}}={\frac {\hbar \omega _{0}}{2}}|{\text{e}}\rangle \langle {\text{e}}|-{\frac {\hbar \omega _{0}}{2}}|{\text{g}}\rangle \langle {\text{g}}|-\hbar \Omega e^{-i\omega _{L}t}|{\text{e}}\rangle \langle {\text{g}}|-\hbar \Omega ^{*}e^{i\omega _{L}t}|{\text{g}}\rangle \langle {\text{e}}|.

Another criterion for rotating wave approximation is the weak coupling condition, that is, the Rabi frequency should be much less than the transition frequency.^[1]

At this point the rotating wave approximation is complete. A common first step beyond this is to remove the remaining time dependence in the Hamiltonian via another unitary transformation.

Derivation

Given the above definitions the interaction Hamiltonian is

{\begin{aligned}H_{1}=-{\vec {d}}\cdot {\vec {E}}&=-\left({\vec {d}}_{\text{eg}}|{\text{e}}\rangle \langle {\text{g}}|+{\vec {d}}_{\text{eg}}^{*}|{\text{g}}\rangle \langle {\text{e}}|\right)\cdot \left({\vec {E}}_{0}e^{-i\omega _{L}t}+{\vec {E}}_{0}^{*}e^{i\omega _{L}t}\right)\\&=-\left({\vec {d}}_{\text{eg}}\cdot {\vec {E}}_{0}e^{-i\omega _{L}t}+{\vec {d}}_{\text{eg}}\cdot {\vec {E}}_{0}^{*}e^{i\omega _{L}t}\right)|{\text{e}}\rangle \langle {\text{g}}|-\left({\vec {d}}_{\text{eg}}^{*}\cdot {\vec {E}}_{0}e^{-i\omega _{L}t}+{\vec {d}}_{\text{eg}}^{*}\cdot {\vec {E}}_{0}^{*}e^{i\omega _{L}t}\right)|{\text{g}}\rangle \langle {\text{e}}|\\&=-\hbar \left(\Omega e^{-i\omega _{L}t}+{\tilde {\Omega }}e^{i\omega _{L}t}\right)|{\text{e}}\rangle \langle {\text{g}}|-\hbar \left({\tilde {\Omega }}^{*}e^{-i\omega _{L}t}+\Omega ^{*}e^{i\omega _{L}t}\right)|{\text{g}}\rangle \langle {\text{e}}|,\end{aligned}}

as stated. The next step is to find the Hamiltonian in the interaction picture, $H_{1,I}$ . The required unitary transformation is

{\begin{aligned}U&=e^{iH_{0}t/\hbar }\\&=e^{i\omega _{0}t/2(|{\text{e}}\rangle \langle {\text{e}}|-|{\text{g}}\rangle \langle {\text{g}}|)}\\&=\cos({\frac {\omega _{0}t}{2}})\left(|{\text{e}}\rangle \langle {\text{e}}|+|{\text{g}}\rangle \langle {\text{g}}|\right)+i\sin({\frac {\omega _{0}t}{2}})\left(|{\text{e}}\rangle \langle {\text{e}}|-|{\text{g}}\rangle \langle {\text{g}}|\right)\\&=e^{-i\omega _{0}t/2}|{\text{g}}\rangle \langle {\text{g}}|+e^{i\omega _{0}t/2}|{\text{e}}\rangle \langle {\text{e}}|\\&=e^{-i\omega _{0}t/2}\left(|{\text{g}}\rangle \langle {\text{g}}|+e^{i\omega _{0}t}|{\text{e}}\rangle \langle {\text{e}}|\right)\end{aligned}}

,

where the 3rd step can be proved by using a Taylor series expansion, and using the orthogonality of the states $|{\text{g}}\rangle$ and $|{\text{e}}\rangle$ . Note that a multiplication by an overall phase of $e^{i\omega _{0}t/2}$ on a unitary operator does not affect the underlying physics, so in the further usages of $U$ we will neglect it. Applying $U$ gives:

{\begin{aligned}H_{1,I}&\equiv UH_{1}U^{\dagger }\\&=-\hbar \left(\Omega e^{-i\omega _{L}t}+{\tilde {\Omega }}e^{i\omega _{L}t}\right)e^{i\omega _{0}t}|{\text{e}}\rangle \langle {\text{g}}|-\hbar \left({\tilde {\Omega }}^{*}e^{-i\omega _{L}t}+\Omega ^{*}e^{i\omega _{L}t}\right)|{\text{g}}\rangle \langle {\text{e}}|e^{-i\omega _{0}t}\\&=-\hbar \left(\Omega e^{-i\Delta \omega t}+{\tilde {\Omega }}e^{i(\omega _{L}+\omega _{0})t}\right)|{\text{e}}\rangle \langle {\text{g}}|-\hbar \left({\tilde {\Omega }}^{*}e^{-i(\omega _{L}+\omega _{0})t}+\Omega ^{*}e^{i\Delta \omega t}\right)|{\text{g}}\rangle \langle {\text{e}}|\ .\end{aligned}}

Now we apply the RWA by eliminating the counter-rotating terms as explained in the previous section:

H_{1,I}^{\text{RWA}}=-\hbar \Omega e^{-i\Delta \omega t}|{\text{e}}\rangle \langle {\text{g}}|+-\hbar \Omega ^{*}e^{i\Delta \omega t}|{\text{g}}\rangle \langle {\text{e}}|

Finally, we transform the approximate Hamiltonian $H_{1,I}^{\text{RWA}}$ back to the Schrödinger picture:

{\begin{aligned}H_{1}^{\text{RWA}}&=U^{\dagger }H_{1,I}^{\text{RWA}}U\\&=-\hbar \Omega e^{-i\Delta \omega t}e^{-i\omega _{0}t}|{\text{e}}\rangle \langle {\text{g}}|-\hbar \Omega ^{*}e^{i\Delta \omega t}|{\text{g}}\rangle \langle {\text{e}}|e^{i\omega _{0}t}\\&=-\hbar \Omega e^{-i\omega _{L}t}|{\text{e}}\rangle \langle {\text{g}}|-\hbar \Omega ^{*}e^{i\omega _{L}t}|{\text{g}}\rangle \langle {\text{e}}|.\end{aligned}}

The atomic Hamiltonian was unaffected by the approximation, so the total Hamiltonian in the Schrödinger picture under the rotating wave approximation is

H^{\text{RWA}}=H_{0}+H_{1}^{\text{RWA}}={\frac {\hbar \omega _{0}}{2}}|{\text{e}}\rangle \langle {\text{e}}|-{\frac {\hbar \omega _{0}}{2}}|{\text{g}}\rangle \langle {\text{g}}|-\hbar \Omega e^{-i\omega _{L}t}|{\text{e}}\rangle \langle {\text{g}}|-\hbar \Omega ^{*}e^{i\omega _{L}t}|{\text{g}}\rangle \langle {\text{e}}|.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quantum harmonic oscillator</span> Important, well-understood quantum mechanical model

The quantum harmonic oscillator is the quantum-mechanical analog of the classical harmonic oscillator. Because an arbitrary smooth potential can usually be approximated as a harmonic potential at the vicinity of a stable equilibrium point, it is one of the most important model systems in quantum mechanics. Furthermore, it is one of the few quantum-mechanical systems for which an exact, analytical solution is known.

In thermodynamics, the Helmholtz free energy is a thermodynamic potential that measures the useful work obtainable from a closed thermodynamic system at a constant temperature (isothermal). The change in the Helmholtz energy during a process is equal to the maximum amount of work that the system can perform in a thermodynamic process in which temperature is held constant. At constant temperature, the Helmholtz free energy is minimized at equilibrium.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Path integral formulation</span> Formulation of quantum mechanics

The path integral formulation is a description in quantum mechanics that generalizes the stationary action principle of classical mechanics. It replaces the classical notion of a single, unique classical trajectory for a system with a sum, or functional integral, over an infinity of quantum-mechanically possible trajectories to compute a quantum amplitude.

The fluctuation–dissipation theorem (FDT) or fluctuation–dissipation relation (FDR) is a powerful tool in statistical physics for predicting the behavior of systems that obey detailed balance. Given that a system obeys detailed balance, the theorem is a proof that thermodynamic fluctuations in a physical variable predict the response quantified by the admittance or impedance of the same physical variable, and vice versa. The fluctuation–dissipation theorem applies both to classical and quantum mechanical systems.

In physics, the Rabi cycle is the cyclic behaviour of a two-level quantum system in the presence of an oscillatory driving field. A great variety of physical processes belonging to the areas of quantum computing, condensed matter, atomic and molecular physics, and nuclear and particle physics can be conveniently studied in terms of two-level quantum mechanical systems, and exhibit Rabi flopping when coupled to an optical driving field. The effect is important in quantum optics, magnetic resonance and quantum computing, and is named after Isidor Isaac Rabi.

In quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, the propagator is a function that specifies the probability amplitude for a particle to travel from one place to another in a given period of time, or to travel with a certain energy and momentum. In Feynman diagrams, which serve to calculate the rate of collisions in quantum field theory, virtual particles contribute their propagator to the rate of the scattering event described by the respective diagram. Propagators may also be viewed as the inverse of the wave operator appropriate to the particle, and are, therefore, often called (causal) Green's functions.

In quantum physics, Fermi's golden rule is a formula that describes the transition rate from one energy eigenstate of a quantum system to a group of energy eigenstates in a continuum, as a result of a weak perturbation. This transition rate is effectively independent of time and is proportional to the strength of the coupling between the initial and final states of the system as well as the density of states. It is also applicable when the final state is discrete, i.e. it is not part of a continuum, if there is some decoherence in the process, like relaxation or collision of the atoms, or like noise in the perturbation, in which case the density of states is replaced by the reciprocal of the decoherence bandwidth.

In physics the Lamb shift, named after Willis Lamb, refers to an anomalous difference in energy between two electron orbitals in a hydrogen atom. The difference was not predicted by theory and it cannot be derived from the Dirac equation, which predicts identical energies. Hence the Lamb shift refers to a deviation from theory seen in the differing energies contained by the ²S_1/2 and ²P_1/2 orbitals of the hydrogen atom.

In physics, a free particle is a particle that, in some sense, is not bound by an external force, or equivalently not in a region where its potential energy varies. In classical physics, this means the particle is present in a "field-free" space. In quantum mechanics, it means the particle is in a region of uniform potential, usually set to zero in the region of interest since the potential can be arbitrarily set to zero at any point in space.

In quantum mechanics, a two-state system is a quantum system that can exist in any quantum superposition of two independent quantum states. The Hilbert space describing such a system is two-dimensional. Therefore, a complete basis spanning the space will consist of two independent states. Any two-state system can also be seen as a qubit.

In mathematical physics, some approaches to quantum field theory are more popular than others. For historical reasons, the Schrödinger representation is less favored than Fock space methods. In the early days of quantum field theory, maintaining symmetries such as Lorentz invariance, displaying them manifestly, and proving renormalisation were of paramount importance. The Schrödinger representation is not manifestly Lorentz invariant and its renormalisability was only shown as recently as the 1980s by Kurt Symanzik (1981).

The Rabi frequency is the frequency at which the probability amplitudes of two atomic energy levels fluctuate in an oscillating electromagnetic field. It is proportional to the transition dipole moment of the two levels and to the amplitude of the electromagnetic field. Population transfer between the levels of such a 2-level system illuminated with light exactly resonant with the difference in energy between the two levels will occur at the Rabi frequency; when the incident light is detuned from this energy difference then the population transfer occurs at the generalized Rabi frequency. The Rabi frequency is a semiclassical concept since it treats the atom as an object with quantized energy levels and the electromagnetic field as a continuous wave.

The Jaynes–Cummings model is a theoretical model in quantum optics. It describes the system of a two-level atom interacting with a quantized mode of an optical cavity, with or without the presence of light. It was originally developed to study the interaction of atoms with the quantized electromagnetic field in order to investigate the phenomena of spontaneous emission and absorption of photons in a cavity.

In spectroscopy, the Autler–Townes effect, is a dynamical Stark effect corresponding to the case when an oscillating electric field is tuned in resonance to the transition frequency of a given spectral line, and resulting in a change of the shape of the absorption/emission spectra of that spectral line. The AC Stark effect was discovered in 1955 by American physicists Stanley Autler and Charles Townes.

A vacuum Rabi oscillation is a damped oscillation of an initially excited atom coupled to an electromagnetic resonator or cavity in which the atom alternately emits photon(s) into a single-mode electromagnetic cavity and reabsorbs them. The atom interacts with a single-mode field confined to a limited volume V in an optical cavity. Spontaneous emission is a consequence of coupling between the atom and the vacuum fluctuations of the cavity field.

An electric dipole transition is the dominant effect of an interaction of an electron in an atom with the electromagnetic field.

The Maxwell–Bloch equations, also called the optical Bloch equations describe the dynamics of a two-state quantum system interacting with the electromagnetic mode of an optical resonator. They are analogous to the Bloch equations which describe the motion of the nuclear magnetic moment in an electromagnetic field. The equations can be derived either semiclassically or with the field fully quantized when certain approximations are made.

Stimulated Raman adiabatic passage (STIRAP) is a process that permits transfer of a population between two applicable quantum states via at least two coherent electromagnetic (light) pulses. These light pulses drive the transitions of the three level Ʌ atom or multilevel system. The process is a form of state-to-state coherent control.

In quantum computing, Mølmer–Sørensen gate scheme refers to an implementation procedure for various multi-qubit quantum logic gates used mostly in trapped ion quantum computing. This procedure is based on the original proposition by Klaus Mølmer and Anders Sørensen in 1999-2000.

In quantum mechanics, the Schrödinger equation describes how a system changes with time. It does this by relating changes in the state of the system to the energy in the system. Therefore, once the Hamiltonian is known, the time dynamics are in principle known. All that remains is to plug the Hamiltonian into the Schrödinger equation and solve for the system state as a function of time.

References

1 2 Wu, Ying; Yang, Xiaoxue (2007). "Strong-Coupling Theory of Periodically Driven Two-Level Systems". Physical Review Letters. 98 (1): 013601. Bibcode:2007PhRvL..98a3601W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.013601. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 17358474.
↑ Mäkelä, H.; Möttönen, M. (13 November 2013). "Effects of the rotating-wave and secular approximations on non-Markovianity". Physical Review A. 88 (5): 052111. arXiv: 1306.6301 . doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.88.052111.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[WuYang2007-1] 1 2 Wu, Ying; Yang, Xiaoxue (2007). "Strong-Coupling Theory of Periodically Driven Two-Level Systems". Physical Review Letters. 98 (1): 013601. Bibcode:2007PhRvL..98a3601W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.013601. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 17358474.

[2] Mäkelä, H.; Möttönen, M. (13 November 2013). "Effects of the rotating-wave and secular approximations on non-Markovianity". Physical Review A. 88 (5): 052111. arXiv: 1306.6301 . doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.88.052111.

[1]

[2]