Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc.

Last updated

Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc.
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Decided June 12, 2017
Full case nameSandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc.
Docket no. 15-1039
Citations582 U.S. 1 ( more )
Holding
Section 262(l)(2)(A) of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 is not enforceable by injunction under federal law. An applicant may provide notice under Section 262(l)(8)(A) prior to obtaining licensure.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Anthony Kennedy  · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg  · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito  · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan  · Neil Gorsuch
Case opinion
MajorityThomas, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009

Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc., 582 U.S. 1(2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that Section 262(l)(2)(A) of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 is not enforceable by injunction under federal law. An applicant may provide notice under Section 262(l)(8)(A) prior to obtaining licensure. [1] [2]

References

  1. Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc., 582 U.S. 1 (2017).
  2. Duffy, John (June 13, 2017). "Opinion analysis: The Supreme Court reverses another Federal Circuit patent case". SCOTUSblog. Retrieved July 16, 2025.

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain .