School disturbance laws

Last updated

School disturbance laws, also known as school disruption laws, are a series of state laws within the United States that prohibit and instill penalties for those found guilty of disturbing the operations of a school. In some states, merely "disturbing school" is a crime, with the law giving no further definition or guidance to those charged with enforcing the law. [1] Enacted by states in the early 20th century to protect students from outside adults, since the Civil Rights Era they began to be used against students within the schools. As of 2017, there are over 20 states with these laws still in place, although they remain actively enforced by only some. It is reported that nationally, 10,000 juveniles are charged with "disturbing school" each year, in addition to those who are charged as adults. [2] The application of these laws, including arrest, expulsion, and incarceration, are in many states part of the "school to prison pipeline," the channeling of students of all ages into the criminal justice program. This frequently has adverse effects on students' academic performance, ability to remain in the educational system, likelihood of adult incarceration, and their future success in society. [3]

Contents

Criticism of the laws is widespread and has been so since as early as 1970. [2] This includes concerns that the laws' vagueness gives enforcement officials too much discretion in interpretation which criminalizes classroom misbehavior that previously would have been handled through school discipline; [4] they are applied unevenly, depending on the biases of those enforcing them; [1] [2] they are enforced disproportionately against students of color, with disabilities, and/or those identifying as LGBT; [5] and they are a main tool of in-school police officers, many of whom are armed and whose training and attitudes – geared for adult law enforcement situations – have been found to be no more effective than non-criminal justice methods in ensuring safety in schools. [3] A 2017 lawsuit claims one state's law "creates an impossible standard for school children to follow and for police to enforce with consistency and fairness". [6] [7]

Several incidents in the media recent years have highlighted the use of law enforcement in schools and the underlying disturbance laws. These include videos of a School Resource Officer in South Carolina high school dragging a student across the classroom for refusing to stop using her mobile phone, then arresting her and a fellow student for recording the incident; and an autistic 11-year-old student tackled to the ground by school security, then charged with felony assault for resisting. [3] Numerous articles about these incidents have raised awareness of the school disturbance laws and their problems, including their broad interpretation and application, such as South Carolina's law which makes it a crime to "disturb school" or to "act in an obnoxious manner." [3]

Studies in the early 21st century have questioned the effectiveness and fairness of the laws and their application. Several states revised their school disturbance laws to lessen the impact of the criminal justice system on students within schools. [7] [8]

History

School Disturbance Laws have been in existence since at least as early as 1919, when a law was proposed in South Carolina, to address concerns of men flirting with students at an all-white women's college. The law prohibited any "obnoxious" behavior or "loiter[ing]" at any girls' school or college, with a penalty of up to a $100 fine or 30 days in jail. [2] Similar laws appeared in many states along with laws to protect worship services or public meetings. In some states, they were written to ensure they applied only to non-students. [9]

During the 1960s the laws began to evolve into their current form of applying to all schools. In 1967 after African American students protested against segregation in Orangeburg, South Carolina, it was proposed to change the law to prohibit obnoxious behavior at all schools in order to "keep(ing) outside agitators off campus," according to the bill's sponsor. Subsequent protests, including what became known as the Orangeburg Massacre where police shot 30 unarmed students and killed 3 African American teenagers, the law was signed into law. [2] The President's Commission on Campus Unrest reported in 1970 that "more than 30 states had passed nearly 80 laws to counter student unrest". [2] The law has since been used to permit the arrest of thousands of mostly African-American students who breach the law. [10]

In 1969 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that students had a right to protest peacefully on school grounds, as long as they did so without "materially and substantially" disturbing class. [2] Until the 1970s, it had been a common practice for "problem youth" to be "pushed out" of the educational system. By the decade of the 1970s, court decisions began to stress that all had the right to an education within the educational system. It therefore resulted in students who had been found to be delinquent "could no longer legally be dismissed from school on the recommendation of a teacher or an administrator". School counselors were then tasked with working with behavioral and emotional problems with students who previously would have been expelled or sent to reform schools. (Cox & Conrad, 1978)" [11]

School disturbance laws started to become integral to school discipline in the 1990s, in response to rising fears of school violence, high-profile shootings in schools (such as the Columbine High School massacre), and passage of "zero-tolerance laws" such as the Gun-Free Schools Act of 1994, following which many more police were installed in schools across the US. [2] From the mid-1970s to 2008, the number of schools with police stationed on campus rose from approximately 1 percent to 40 percent." [12]

In the early 21st century concerns about the laws and their application began to be addressed in some states. A 2011 study of nearly 1 million Texas students found that nearly 60% of students were suspended or expelled at least once between grades 7 and 12." [2] In 2012, Texas changed the law such that students could no longer be charged with "disrupting class" and no student younger than 12 years could be charged with a "low-level misdemeanor at school". Additional steps requiring obtaining witness statements and writing formal complaints by officers were implemented. [2]

In 2017 a law was proposed in South Carolina to urge educators and school administrators "to exhaust all avenues of behavioral discipline in accordance with the school's code of conduct prior to requesting the involvement of law enforcement officials." [8] The law was passed and signed into law on May 17, 2018.

By state

At least 21 states and dozens of cities and towns currently outlaw school disturbances in one way or another. Below is a partial list of states and districts with school disturbance laws and some of their details. [2] [13]

In 2012, Texas curtailed their school disturbance law to no longer apply to students in their own schools, and to exclude students under the age of 12 from being charged with low-level misdemeanors. [14] In May 2018, South Carolina's school-disturbance law was amended to apply only to former students who harm or threaten students or teachers in schools or colleges. [15] [16]

Criticism of the laws

Vagueness and broad-scope

In several states, the school disturbance laws are not specific in defining what behavior or actions are covered, instead using far-reaching language such as "disorderly conduct", "disturbing a public assembly", or "act in an obnoxious behavior". [9] [17] [10] [18] In Maryland, lawmakers stated that their state's law "could be applied to a kindergarten pupil throwing a temper tantrum." [2]

Concerns over the broad application of some school disturbance laws have led to calls for changes around the country for over four decades. [19] In September 1970, the President's Commission on Campus Unrest warned of "antistudent and antiuniversity laws that range from the unnecessary and ill-directed to the purely vindictive." [2]

Criminalization of behavior

The laws' application has led to a perception that normal adolescent misbehavior is being subjected to punishment by the criminal justice system instead of through traditional school disciplinary channels, that in some instances has rendered "all manner of common misbehavior illegal". [2] A 2012 report on the criminalization of school discipline in Massachusetts noted that the state's "disturbing a lawful assembly" law has repeatedly been used to arrest students who act out, for bringing phones to school, swearing at school resource officers, and failing to identify themselves. [18]

The increased application of the school disturbance laws have parallel the use of law enforcement officials as school resource officers based in schools. According to a 2017 analysis of 2,650 schools published in the Washington University Law Review, students at schools with police officers were significantly more likely to be reported to law enforcement for low-level offenses than students at schools without police, even after controlling for the neighborhood crime rate, the demographics of the schools, and a host of other variables. [2] Most law-enforcement officials are trained to address adult criminal behavior, to assert authority, and to take control of a situation. That often have limited training or understanding of issues of child development and psychology. As a result, the way they address student behavioral issues can have a detrimental effect on the student population and school as a whole." [17] [2]

Some notable recent examples:

Some law enforcement officials have criticized this approach. South Carolina's Richland County Sheriff Leon Lott stated: "Too often, these teachers in these schools are calling on the cops because they have a disruptive student in the classroom." "This is not a cop's job." "We don't need to arrest these students." "We need to keep them in schools." [18]

Disparities in enforcement

Studies dating back to the 1980s have shown that students of color and those with learning disabilities are disproportionately affected by school policing policies and practices than are Caucasian or fully able-bodied students, even after accounting for socioeconomic conditions that may affect behavior; they are more frequently disciplined for minor public order offenses. According to a University of Chicago analysis, African-American students are less likely to commit offenses worthy of expulsion or arrest. [23] [17] A 2011 study by the New York Civil Liberties Union shows that youth with disabilities are four times as likely to be suspended as their peers without disabilities. A 2011 report by the Justice Policy Institute outlined multiple factors contributing to this disparity, including a reliance on law enforcement to enforce school discipline. [17]

Concerns over racially based application of these laws have fueled the push for changes around the country from government officials in the Nixon and Obama administrations." [19] [24] In 1970 the President's Commission on Campus Unrest report warned that "legislators in a majority of states have passed antistudent and antiuniversity laws that range from the unnecessary and ill-directed to the purely vindictive." [2]

The laws and their current enforcement have been criticized as being a response to integration in schools. Public calls for "segregation forever" were replaced with calls for "law and order", as documented by Michelle Alexander, author of The New Jim Crow. [2] A 2015 study by a Pennsylvania State researcher found that nationally, for the same offenses, white students are referred for treatment or counseling while African American students are sent into the criminal justice system. "White kids tend to get viewed as having ADHD, or having some sort of behavioral problem, while black kids are viewed as being unruly and unwilling to learn." [25] [26]

Diverting resources

Some groups have expressed concern that the hiring of law enforcement officials to enforce routine discipline has taken resources away from student support services such as counselors, social workers, and others who are better equipped to address some of the behavioral issues before they escalate to needing police intervention. [13]

Effectiveness of the laws

Recent studies and developments have concluded that the presence in schools of law enforcement officers, in particular those ones who use arrest to address issues of student discipline, do not make schools safer. [23] A 2011 report by the Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago, found that school safety is promoted more by the kind of relationships police forge with teachers and students than the number of arrests they make." [17] [27] In 2012, after Texas changed its school disturbance law, the number of charges filed for minor offenses such as disrupting class dropped 61 percent, or 40,000. The number of juveniles arrested for violent crimes, the number of expulsion, and serious disciplinary actions in schools, continued to fall." [2]

Military weapons

Civil rights groups have expressed concern about providing military-grade weapons to law enforcement officials in school who are perceived to be inappropriately using their authority granted by school disturbance laws. "Arming school police with military-grade weapons and gear creates the potential to contribute to climates that students of color already experience as hostile, and contributes to the normalization of the criminalization of these youth, worsening educational outcomes, and producing no public safety benefits." [28] The U.S. Department of Defense's 1033 surplus equipment program has since 1997 donated local and school police with over $5 billion surplus equipment, including armored vehicles, M-14 and M-16 semiautomatic rifles, extended magazines, automatic pistols, tactical vests, SWAT gear, Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles, and grenade launchers (used for launching tear gas). [28] School police in at least 22 districts have received such weapons in eight states: California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Michigan, Nevada, Texas, and Utah. [28] The Defense Department stated that these school districts would likely only use this equipment in cooperation with other law-enforcement agencies. [28] This program was suspended by the Obama administration in 2014 after the Ferguson unrest and restored in 2017 under the Trump administration. [29]

See also

Related Research Articles

A search warrant is a court order that a magistrate or judge issues to authorize law enforcement officers to conduct a search of a person, location, or vehicle for evidence of a crime and to confiscate any evidence they find. In most countries, a search warrant cannot be issued in aid of civil process.

Military justice is the body of laws and procedures governing members of the armed forces. Many nation-states have separate and distinct bodies of law that govern the conduct of members of their armed forces. Some states use special judicial and other arrangements to enforce those laws, while others use civilian judicial systems. Legal issues unique to military justice include the preservation of good order and discipline, the legality of orders, and appropriate conduct for members of the military. Some states enable their military justice systems to deal with civil offenses committed by their armed forces in some circumstances.

A citizen's arrest is an arrest made by a private citizen – that is, a person who is not acting as a sworn law-enforcement official. In common law jurisdictions, the practice dates back to medieval England and the English common law, in which sheriffs encouraged ordinary citizens to help apprehend law breakers.

Truancy is any intentional, unjustified, unauthorized, or illegal absence from compulsory education. It is a deliberate absence by a student's own free will and usually does not refer to legitimate excused absences, such as ones related to medical conditions. Truancy is usually explicitly defined in the school's handbook of policies and procedures. Attending school but not going to class is called internal truancy. Some children whose parents claim to homeschool have also been found truant in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Juvenile delinquency</span> Illegal behavior by minors

Juvenile delinquency, also known as juvenile offending, is the act of participating in unlawful behavior as a minor or individual younger than the statutory age of majority. The term delinquent usually refers to juvenile delinquency, and is also generalised to refer to a young person who behaves an unacceptable way.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">School discipline</span> Types of disciplinary actions used by schools against students

School discipline relates to actions taken by teachers or school organizations toward students when their behavior disrupts the ongoing educational activity or breaks a rule created by the school. Discipline can guide the children's behavior or set limits to help them learn to take better care of themselves, other people and the world around them.

The legal term peace, sometimes king's peace or queen's peace, is the common-law concept of the maintenance of public order.

Special police usually describes a police force or unit within a police force whose duties and responsibilities are significantly different from other forces in the same country or from other police in the same force, although there is no consistent international definition. A special constable, in most cases, is not a member of a special police force (SPF); in countries in the Commonwealth of Nations and often elsewhere, a special constable is a voluntary or part-time member of a national or local police force or a person involved in law enforcement who is not a police officer but has some of the powers of a police officer.

Breach of the peace or disturbing the peace, is a legal term used in constitutional law in English-speaking countries and in a public order sense in the several jurisdictions of the United Kingdom. It is a form of disorderly conduct.

The Behavioral Analysis Unit (BAU) is a department of the Federal Bureau of Investigation's National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime (NCAVC) that uses behavioral analysts to assist in criminal investigations. The mission of the NCAVC and the BAU is to provide behavioral based investigative and/or operational support by applying case experience, research, and training to complex and time-sensitive crimes, typically involving acts or threats of violence.

Resisting arrest, or simply resisting, is an illegal act of a suspected criminal either fleeing, threatening, assaulting, or providing a fake ID to a police officer during arrest. In most cases, the person responsible for resisting arrest is criminally charged or taken to court.

A zero-tolerance policy in schools is a policy of strict enforcement of school rules against behaviors or the possession of items deemed undesirable. In schools, common zero-tolerance policies concern physical altercations, as well as the possession or use of illicit drugs or weapons. Students, and sometimes staff, parents, and other visitors, who possess a banned item for any reason are always punished. Public criticism against such policies has arisen because of the punishments the schools mete out when students break the rules in ignorance, by accident, or under extenuating circumstances. The policies have also been criticized for their connection to educational inequality in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gaston County Police Department</span>

The Gaston County Police Department is a law enforcement agency of Gaston County, North Carolina, United States. It is 1 of only two county police agencies within the State of North Carolina(.)

"Contempt of cop" is law enforcement jargon in the United States for behavior by people toward law enforcement officers that the officers perceive as disrespectful or insufficiently deferential to their authority. It is a play on the phrase contempt of court, and is not an actual offense. The phrase is associated with unlawful arbitrary arrest and detention of individuals, often for expressing or exercising rights guaranteed to them by the United States Constitution. Contempt of cop is often discussed in connection to police misconduct such as use of excessive force or even police brutality as a reaction to perceived disrespectful behavior rather than for any legitimate law enforcement purpose.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bureau of Indian Affairs Police</span>

The Bureau of Indian Affairs Police, Office of Justice Services, also known as BIA Police, is the law enforcement arm of the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs. The BIA's official mission is to "uphold the constitutional sovereignty of the Federally recognized Tribes and preserve peace within Indian country". It provides police, investigative, corrections, technical assistance, and court services across the over 567 registered Indian tribes and reservations, especially those lacking their own police force; additionally, it oversees tribal police organizations. BIA services are provided through the Office of Justice Services Division of Law Enforcement.

In the United States, the school-to-prison pipeline (SPP), also known as the school-to-prison link, school–prison nexus, or schoolhouse-to-jailhouse track, is the disproportionate tendency of minors and young adults from disadvantaged backgrounds to become incarcerated because of increasingly harsh school and municipal policies. Additionally, this is due to educational inequality in the United States. Many experts have credited factors such as school disturbance laws, zero-tolerance policies and practices, and an increase in police in schools in creating the "pipeline". This has become a hot topic of debate in discussions surrounding educational disciplinary policies as media coverage of youth violence and mass incarceration has grown during the early 21st century.

Expungement in the United States is a process which varies across jurisdictions. Many states allow for criminal records to be sealed or expunged, although laws vary by state. Some states do not permit expungement, or allow expungement under very limited circumstances. In general, once sealed or expunged, all records of an arrest and of any subsequent court proceedings are removed from the public record, and the individual may legally deny or fail to acknowledge ever having been arrested for or charged with any crime which has been expunged.

The United States Department of Justice defines school resource officers (SRO) as "sworn law enforcement officers responsible for the safety and crime prevention in schools". They are employed by a local police or sheriff's department and work closely with administrators in an effort to create a safer environment for both students and staff. The powers and responsibilities are similar to those of regular police officers, as they make arrests, respond to calls for service and document incidents.

Refusing to assist a police officer, peace officer or other law enforcement officer is an offence in various jurisdictions around the world. Some jurisdictions use the terminology '"refusing to aid a police officer" or "failure to aid a police officer".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Youth control complex</span>

The youth control complex is a theory developed by Chicano scholar Victor M. Rios to describe what he refers to as the overwhelming system of criminalization that is shaped by the systematic punishment that is applied by institutions of social control against boys of color in the United States. Rios articulates that there are many components of this complex which are enacted upon youth throughout their daily lives. For example, "while being called a 'thug' by a random adult may seem trivial to some people, when a young person is called a 'thug' by a random adult, told by a teacher that they will never amount to anything, and frisked by a police officer, all in the same day, this combination becomes greater than the sum of its parts." Scholars trace the origins of the youth control complex back to the mid-1970s. In addition, the criminalization and surveillance of Black and Latino bodies increased in the post-9/11 era.

References

  1. 1 2 Locked Up for the Crime of ‘Disturbing School’, The Daily Beast. May 9, 2017. Retrieved 2017-12-10.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 How America Outlawed Adolescence, The Atlantic. November 2016. Retrieved 2017-12-07.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 ACLU Washington, Students Not Suspects: The Need to Reform School Policing in Washington State, April 18, 2017. Retrieved 2017-12-08.
  4. ↑ Lawmaker wants better tracking of disturbing-school offenses, Greenville News, November 28, 2015. Retrieved 2017-12-09.
  5. ↑ Indiana Public Media, Study: LGBT Youth Left Out Of Suspension, Expulsion Reduction Efforts. March 28, 2016. Retrieved 2017-12-08
  6. ↑ Suit takes on disturbing-schools law ACLU: Way S.C. statute is interpreted ‘is criminalizing being a teenager’, Post and Courier. August 10, 2016. Retrieved 2017-12-09.
  7. 1 2 ACLU sues over school shackling, Education Weekly, August 17, 2015. Retrieved 2017-12-08.
  8. 1 2 South Carolina General Assembly Bill S.131, text. Amended on April 5, 2017. Retrieved 2017-12-09.
  9. 1 2 3 This Is The Law Officers Use To Arrest Students For "Disturbing School", Buzzfeed. October 28, 2015. Retrieved 2017-12-08.
  10. 1 2 ‘Disturbing Schools’ Law and School Resource Officers Criminalize Teens, Juvenile Justice Information Exchange. October 29, 2015. Retrieved 2017-12-08.
  11. ↑ Gordon Crews: A Study of School Disturbance in the United States: A Twentieth Century Perspective, Part Two. 1996. Marshall University – Marshall Digital Scholar Retrieved 2017-12-08.
  12. ↑ Criminalizing Children at School, The New York Times.
  13. 1 2 Does Your School Arrest Students?, National Public Radio, January 27, 2017. Retrieved 2017-12-08.
  14. ↑ "How America Outlawed Adolescence". 9 October 2016.
  15. ↑ "SC Lawmakers Change Broad School Disturbance Law".
  16. ↑ "South Carolina Legislature Repeals Racist 'Disturbing School' Law for Students".
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 Robin L. Dahlberg: Arrested Development – The Criminalization of School Discipline in Massachusetts’ Three Largest School Districts. Spring 2012. ACLU, CFJJ. Retrieved 2017-12-08.
  18. 1 2 3 Go Directly to Jail: Typical Teens Face Police Instead of Principals, Takeapart. October 28, 2015. Retrieved 2017-12-08.
  19. 1 2 Education Week. Retrieved 2017-12-08.
  20. ↑ Burping student gets no legal relief from appeals court, Albuquerque Journal. July 30, 2016. Retrieved 2017-12-09.
  21. ↑ How kicking a trash can became criminal for a 6th grader, The Center for Public Integrity in the Public Radio International webpage. September 3, 2015. Retrieved 2017-12-09.
  22. ↑ 11-year-old arrested after refusing to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance., New York Post. February 17, 2019. Retrieved 2019-2-19.
  23. 1 2 School Discipline at a Crossroads: From Zero Tolerance to Early Response, Exceptional Children, Vol.66, No.3, pp335-347. 2000. Retrieved 2017-12-09.
  24. ↑ Statement from U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan on School Discipline and Civil Rights, US Department of Education, October 30, 2015. Retrieved 2017-12-05.
  25. ↑ Black Students In The U.S. Get Criminalized While White Students Get Treatment, New York Times. April 19, 2014., Retrieved 2017-12-08.
  26. ↑ Schools with higher black, minority populations call cops, not docs, Eureka Alert. July 22, 2015. Retrieved 2017-12-08.
  27. ↑ Student and Teacher Safety in Chicago Public School, Steinberg, Allensworth, Johnson. Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago. May 2011. Retrieved 2017-12-09.
  28. 1 2 3 4 Military Surplus Program Provides Weapons to School Police, Education Week. September 30, 2014. Retrieved 2017-12-08.
  29. ↑ Trump restores program sending surplus military weapons to police, Washington Post. August 27, 2017. Retrieved 2017-12-09.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.