Sebelius v. Cloer

Last updated

Sebelius v. Cloer
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Decided May 20, 2013
Full case nameSebelius v. Cloer
Citations569 U.S. 369 ( more )
Holding
An untimely National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act petition may qualify for an award of attorney’s fees if it is filed in good faith and there is a reasonable basis for its claim.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia  · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas  · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer  · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor  · Elena Kagan
Case opinion
MajoritySotomayor, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act

Sebelius v. Cloer, 569 U.S. 369(2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that an untimely National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act petition may qualify for an award of attorney's fees if it is filed in good faith and there is a reasonable basis for its claim. [1] [2]

Contents

Background

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA) established a no-fault compensation system to stabilize the vaccine market and expedite compensation to injured parties. Under the act, "[a] proceeding for compensation" is "initiated" by "service upon the Secretary" of Health and Human Services and "the filing of a petition containing" specified documentation with the clerk of the Court of Federal Claims, who then "immediately" forwards the petition for assignment to a special master. An attorney may not charge a fee for "services in connection with [such] a petition," but a court may award attorney's fees and costs "incurred [by a claimant] in any proceeding on" an unsuccessful "petition filed under section 300aa–11," if that petition "was brought in good faith and there was a reasonable basis for the claim for which the petition was brought." [1]

In 1997, shortly after receiving her third Hepatitis B vaccine, Cloer began to experience symptoms that eventually led to a multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis in 2003. In 2004, she learned of a link between MS and the Hepatitis B vaccine, and in 2005, she filed a claim for compensation under the NCVIA, alleging that the vaccine caused or exacerbated her MS. After reviewing the petition and its supporting documentation, the Chief Special Master concluded that Cloer's claim was untimely because the Act's 36-month limitations period began to run when she had her first MS symptoms in 1997. The Federal Circuit ultimately agreed that Cloer's petition was untimely. Cloer then sought attorney's fees and costs (collectively, fees). The en banc Federal Circuit found that she was entitled to recover fees on her untimely petition. [1]

Opinion of the court

The Supreme Court issued an opinion on May 20, 2013. [1]

Subsequent developments

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Sebelius v. Cloer, 569 U.S. 369 (2013).
  2. Mann, Ronald (May 21, 2013). "Opinion analysis: Justices affirm broad availability of attorney's fees in vaccine cases". SCOTUSblog. Retrieved September 12, 2025.

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain .