Security risk certificate

Last updated

A security risk certificate is part of a New Zealand legal process whereby a person suspected of being a security risk can be incarcerated prior to expulsion from the country.

Contents

The security risk certificate is based on unchallengeable "classified security information". [1] This is information that, in the opinion of the Director of the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service "cannot be divulged to the individual in question or to other persons" [1] for various reasons, including those listed below.

Reasons for non-disclosure

Disclosure may, for example:

Appeals

To the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security

The sole avenue for appeal against a certificate is the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security. [8] It is the role of the Inspector-General to determine whether the certificate was properly issued. This is not, properly speaking, an appeal or rehearing. The Inspector-General has privileged access to classified security information, significant powers, and wide discretion as to how to use them (they are acting, however, in a quasi-judicial capacity [9] ). The position of the Inspector-General was created in conjunction with the 1996 amendment to the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service Act.

The Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security, a retired High Court judge, [10] is required to review the security risk certificate. [11]

Although the Immigration Act allows both the Inspector-General and the minister to consider information other than the classified information signified by the security risk certificate, it does not explicitly provide for the fair and transparent procedures required by international human rights standards.[ citation needed ]

To the Court of Appeal

There is a right of appeal to the Court of Appeal against a decision of the Inspector-General which confirms the certificate, on the ground that the decision is "erroneous in point of law". [12]

Example

Most famously Algerian refugee Ahmed Zaoui was incarcerated in a maximum-security prison in solitary confinement on the strength of a report produced by the threat assessment unit of the police.

On 20 March 2003 a security risk certificate was issued by the Director of Security under Part 4A of the Immigration Act [13] that allows for "persons .... who pose a security risk … where necessary [to] be effectively and quickly detained and removed or deported from New Zealand" [14] on the basis of classified security information provided by the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service.

Designation of an entity

A comparable procedure to the current system for review of a security risk certificate is that provided for the designation of an entity as a terrorist entity or an associated entity of a terrorist by the Prime Minister under the Terrorism Suppression Act 2002. [15]

Under s 38 a marked departure occurs from New Zealand's open justice and adversarial process in procedures relating to such applications to challenge or to appeal such designation.[ citation needed ]

The Chief Justice or nominee, on request by the Attorney-General, if satisfied that it is desirable to do so for the protection of the classified information received or hear the classified security information in the absence of the designated entity, and all barristers and solicitors representing that entity, and all members of the public. [16] A summary of the information, excluding any summary of information that will itself likely to prejudice the interests set out in s 32(3), is then approved by the court. [17] A copy of that would then be given to the entity concerned. [18]

Section 32(3) is denied if the disclosure would be likely:

While the specific offences of terrorist bombing and financing of terrorism offences do not rely on the designation of entities, the other prohibition offences do, unless the prosecution can rely upon knowledge/recklessness of the group carrying out a terrorist act. The other offence (relating to dealings with terrorists) is also affected by extraterritorial jurisdiction either as to the actus reus or to some aspect of connection with the offence or offenders.

Classified information

The procedure for dealing with classified information with respect to the Terrorism Suppression Act 2002 is slightly more open than that which governs security risk certificates under the Immigration Act 1987, in that there is a presumption that a summary of information will be made available to the applicant. The counsel are ordinary defence counsel, and lack access to the classified material.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New Zealand Security Intelligence Service</span> National intelligence agency of New Zealand

The New Zealand Security Intelligence Service is New Zealand's primary national intelligence agency. It is responsible for providing information and advising on matters including national security and foreign intelligence. It is headquartered in Wellington and overseen by a Director-General, the Minister of New Zealand Security Intelligence Service, and the parliamentary intelligence and security committee; independent oversight is provided by the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act</span> 1978 United States federal law

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 is a United States federal law that establishes procedures for the surveillance and collection of foreign intelligence on domestic soil.

Terrorism and mass attacks in Canada includes acts of terrorism, as well as mass shootings, vehicle-ramming attacks, mass stabbings, and other such acts committed in Canada that people may associate with terroristic tactics but have not been classified as terrorism by the Canadian legal system.

Ahmed Zaoui is an Algerian refugee. He arrived in New Zealand on 4 December 2002 where he sought refugee status. Objections from the Security Intelligence Service were withdrawn in September 2007, allowing him to remain in New Zealand. He was granted New Zealand citizenship in 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act</span> Act of Congress

The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (IRTPA) is a 235-page Act of Congress, signed by President George W. Bush, that broadly affects United States federal terrorism laws. The act comprises several separate titles with varying subject issues. It was enacted in response to the terror attacks of September 11, 2001.

The Australian Intelligence Community (AIC) and the National Intelligence Community (NIC) or National Security Community of the Australian Government are the collectives of statutory intelligence agencies, policy departments, and other government agencies concerned with protecting and advancing the national security and national interests of the Commonwealth of Australia. The intelligence and security agencies of the Australian Government have evolved since the Second World War and the Cold War and saw transformation and expansion during the Global War on Terrorism with military deployments in Afghanistan, Iraq and against ISIS in Syria. Key international and national security issues for the Australian Intelligence Community include terrorism and violent extremism, cybersecurity, transnational crime, the rise of China, and Pacific regional security.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NSA warrantless surveillance (2001–2007)</span> Part of Terrorist Surveillance Program

NSA warrantless surveillance — also commonly referred to as "warrantless-wiretapping" or "-wiretaps" — was the surveillance of persons within the United States, including U.S. citizens, during the collection of notionally foreign intelligence by the National Security Agency (NSA) as part of the Terrorist Surveillance Program. In late 2001, the NSA was authorized to monitor, without obtaining a FISA warrant, phone calls, Internet activities, text messages and other forms of communication involving any party believed by the NSA to be outside the U.S., even if the other end of the communication lays within the U.S.

The USA PATRIOT Act was passed by the United States Congress in 2001 as a response to the September 11, 2001 attacks. It has ten titles, each containing numerous sections. Title IV: Protecting the Border aims to prevent terrorism in the USA through immigration regulations. The provisions of the title generally increase the difficulty of entering the country for those known to have, or suspected of having, terrorist intent.

The New Zealand Refugee Status Appeals Authority or RSAA, was an independent authority that heard the appeals of people who had been declined refugee status by the Refugee Status Branch of the New Zealand Immigration Service. It was established in 1991, and was replaced by the Immigration and Protection Tribunal in 2010. New Zealand established the RSAA as part of its responsibility to uphold the right of asylum as a result of being a signatory of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and the 1967 Protocol. The decisions of the RSAA are not binding, but have had a significant impact on refugee jurisprudence.

<i>Suresh v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Suresh v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in the areas of constitutional law and administrative law. The Court held that, under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, in most circumstances the government cannot deport someone to a country where they risk being tortured, but refugee claimants can be deported to their homelands if they are a serious security risk to Canadians.

New Zealand's intelligence agencies and units have existed, with some interruption, since World War II. At present, New Zealand's intelligence community has approximately 550 employees, and has a combined budget of around NZ$145 million.

The counter-terrorism page primarily deals with special police or military organizations that carry out arrest or direct combat with terrorists. This page deals with the other aspects of counter-terrorism:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Terrorism Suppression Act 2002</span> Act of the Parliament of New Zealand

The Terrorism Suppression Act 2002 is New Zealand counter-terrorism legislation passed under the Clark-led Labour government. Enacted following the September 11 attacks in the United States, the Act was designed to better address contemporary terrorism issues, both domestically and abroad. Until May 2019, the Act had not been formally used in a prosecution; however there were several failed attempts by the Crown to do so. Many individuals and organisations have however been designated as "Terrorist entities" under the Act's provisions, in line with UN Security Council designations. The Act was amended in 2007. In May 2019, a charge of engaging in a terrorist act was laid against Brenton Tarrant, the perpetrator of the Christchurch mosque attacks, under section 6A of the Act.

The Immigration and Protection Tribunal is a specialist, independent tribunal established in New Zealand under the Immigration Act 2009 with jurisdiction to hear appeals and applications regarding residence class visas, deportation, and claims to be recognised as a refugee or as a protected person. The Tribunal is administered by the Ministry of Justice and is chaired by a District Court Judge, appointed by the Governor General on the recommendation of the Attorney-General.

A special advocate is a lawyer, usually a barrister or advocate, sometimes a solicitor, who is appointed to represent the interests of a party in closed proceedings, i.e. proceedings from which that party has been excluded.

The Human Rights Foundation of Aotearoa New Zealand is a non-governmental organisation in New Zealand, which seeks "to promote and defend human rights through research based education and advocacy."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014</span> United States Law

The Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 is a U.S. public law that authorizes appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for intelligence activities of the U.S. government. The law authorizes there to be funding for intelligence agencies such as the Central Intelligence Agency or the National Security Agency, but a separate appropriations bill would also have to pass in order for those agencies to receive any money.

<i>Zaoui v Attorney-General</i> (No 2)

Zaoui v Attorney-General was the final judicial decision concerning Algerian refugee Ahmed Zaoui before the objections of the Security Intelligence Service concerning Zaoui's alleged threat to national security were withdrawn in September 2007, allowing him to remain in New Zealand. The judgment of the Supreme Court of New Zealand was concerned with the proper interpretation of article 33 of the United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees 1951 and section 72 of the Immigration Act 1987.

The Independent National Security Legislation Monitor (INSLM) is a statutory independent executive oversight body of the Australian Government responsible for the ongoing review of the operation, effectiveness and implications of Australian counter‑terrorism and national security legislation. The INSLM also considers whether legislation contains appropriate safeguards for protecting the rights of individuals, remains proportionate to any threat of terrorism and or threat to national security, and remains necessary. As such the INSLM is a major part of the oversight regime of the Australian Intelligence Community together with the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security and the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security.

Laurence Murray Greig is a New Zealand lawyer and jurist. He served as Chief Justice of the Cook Islands, a judge of the High Court of New Zealand, and as Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security.

References

  1. 1 2 Immigration Act 1987 s 114B(1)
  2. ↑ Immigration Act 1987 s 114B(1)(a)(i)
  3. ↑ Immigration Act 1987 s 114B(1)(a)(ii)
  4. ↑ Immigration Act 1987 s 114B(1)(a)(iii)
  5. ↑ Immigration Act 1987 s 114B(1)(b)(i)
  6. ↑ Immigration Act 1987 s 72
  7. ↑ Immigration Act 1987 s 114B(1)(b)(ii)
  8. ↑ Immigration Act 1987 s 114I(3)
  9. ↑ Zaoui v Attorney-General, unreported, High Court, Auckland, 19 December 2003, Williams J, CIV-2003-404-5872, para 28
  10. ↑ Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1996, s 5(3)
  11. ↑ Immigration Act 1987 s 114D
  12. ↑ Immigration Act 1987 s 114P(1)
  13. ↑ Zaoui v Attorney-General, unreported, McGrath, Hammond and O’Regan JJ, Court of Appeal, 17 September 2004, CA166/04, paragraph 5
  14. ↑ Immigration Act 1987 s 114A(f)
  15. ↑ Terrorism Suppression Act 2002 ss 20, 22
  16. ↑ Immigration Act 1987 s 38(3)(b)
  17. ↑ Immigration Act 1987 s 38(4)(a)
  18. ↑ Immigration Act 1987 s 38(4)(b)
  19. ↑ Immigration Act 1987 s 32(3)(a)
  20. ↑ Immigration Act 1987 s 32(3)(b)
  21. ↑ Immigration Act 1987 s 32(3)(c)
  22. ↑ Immigration Act 1987 s 32(3)(d)
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.