Sexual misconduct in the British military

Last updated

Army Foundation College, Harrogate, site of 22 recorded sexual offences against teenage recruits in 2021. Harrogate, Army Foundation College (3) - geograph.org.uk - 2566106.jpg
Army Foundation College, Harrogate, site of 22 recorded sexual offences against teenage recruits in 2021.

Sexual misconduct in the British military is unwanted sexual behaviour occurring in military organisations of the United Kingdom, including verbal and physical harassment, assault, and rape.

Contents

As of 2021, official surveys indicate that between 15% and 25% of British armed forces personnel experience sexual harassment at least once per year. [1] [2] [3]

The experience of 'particularly upsetting' incidents is more common among women, particularly in the army, where 35% of female soldiers said in 2021 they had had such an experience in the previous 12 months. [1]

Women targeted tend to be young and of low rank. [1] [4] [5] In 2021, 22 trainees at the Army Foundation College for recruits aged 16–17 were victims of recorded sexual offences. [6] In the same year, 37 girls aged under 18 across the armed forces were victims of sexual offences. [6]

Other groups at high risk include members of local cadet forces, [7] the intimate partners of personnel, [8] and wartime detainees. [9] The large majority of perpetrators are men. [1] [2] [3]

Risk factors typical of military settings include the young age of personnel, the minority status of women, hierarchical power relationships, the predominance of traditionally masculine values and behaviours, and a heavy drinking culture. [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]

Prevalent harassment in the UK armed forces specifically has been associated with a culture that demeans women and other marginalised social groups, [15] and with senior leaders who engage in misconduct themselves or fail to challenge it in others. [16]

The rates of formal complaint are low, largely due to distrust in the chain of command. [1] [2] [3] The conviction rate for serious sexual offences in the military justice system is also markedly lower than that in the civilian system. [5] [17]

Traumatic sexual misconduct has been found to increase the risk of stress-related mental health problems including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). [11] [18]

Context

Sexual misconduct, including harassment and assault, is a pervasive problem in militaries worldwide. It affects women disproportionately, [19] [20] [21] [22] [16] [23] particularly younger women and girls. [20] [24] [15] [25] [26] [27] Other groups at high risk include partners of personnel, child cadets, and military detainees.

While prevalence varies by country, military branch, and other factors, official statistics and peer-reviewed studies from Canada, France, the UK, and the US indicate that between a quarter and a third of military women in these countries are sexually harassed at work at least once each year. [1] [28] [29] [30]

Military training settings are characterised by a particularly high level of sexual harassment and assault relative to both the civilian population and other military settings. [15] [31] [32] [33] [34] Research further shows an increase in perpetration during and after deployment on military operations. [35] [8] [36]

Definitions

Following the Equality Act 2010, sexual harassment is defined by the British armed forces as 'unwanted conduct of a sexual nature that has the purpose or effect of violating someone's dignity, or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for them'. [1]

Such misconduct includes generalised, untargeted behaviours, such as jokes about rape, as well as behaviours focused on individuals, such as unwanted touching, sexual coercion, assault, and rape. [1]

Examples

‘A friend was out on an exercise when a group of men ducked her head in a bucket of water and each time she came up for breath she had to repeat “I am useless and I am a female”. She told the story and said it was a joke but I could see she was upset.’ [37] Female soldier, 2006.

'The lads just get drunk and go down the corridors trying to open any doors that are unlocked. The Chain of Command blame it on the individual saying they should just lock their door.' Female soldier, 2020. [1]

'I have experienced an overwhelming culture of covering up/denying incidents of harassment... Many of the women I have served with have opted to leave/become medically downgraded as a consequence of their treatment.' Female submariner, 2021 [16]

'K reported a rape... Her assailant was charged. She described being ostracised and bullied within her unit following her formal report. Her chain of command made her the subject of an individual order restricting her ability to socialise with males (as far as she knows, no similar orders were made against males in her unit). She was in due course severely punished for a brief breach of the order.' Case description, 2021. [38]

British army base at Sennelager, Germany, where Cpl Anne-Marie Ellement reported that two of her colleagues had raped her in 2009. Barker Barracks, Sennelager, Paderborn, Germany MOD 45156616.jpg
British army base at Sennelager, Germany, where Cpl Anne-Marie Ellement reported that two of her colleagues had raped her in 2009.

After army Corporal Anne-Marie Ellement reported that she had been raped by two colleagues at her base in Germany in 2009, the coroner found that the bullying she received afterwards materially contributed to her decision to end her life two years later. [39] [40] As reported in The Guardian, the coroner concluded that the rape and the army's subsequent inaction had 'deeply and permanently affected' Ellement, and that the bullying she experienced afterwards was a factor in her decision to end her life. [40]

Impact

The experience of being targeted by sexual misconduct is typically traumatic. Canadian and US research has found that it increases the risk of stress-related mental illness, [11] particularly post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). [18]

Research in the US found that when sexual abuse of female military personnel was psychiatrically traumatic, the odds of suffering from PTSD after deployment on operations increased by a factor of nine. [41]

US research also found that personnel affected by sexual harassment were somewhat less likely to develop depression or PTSD if a formal report led to effective action to address the issue. [42]

Risk factors

Risk factors typical of military settings include the young average age of personnel, isolated workplaces, the minority status of women, hierarchical power relationships, a culture of conformity, the predominance of traditionally masculine values and behaviours, and a heavy drinking culture. [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]

Sexual misconduct is typically accompanied by a wider culture that demeans women and other marginalised social groups in the military, such as LGBTQ+ people and people of colour, as inferior to white heterosexual men. The first systematic survey of sexual harassment in the British armed forces, in 2006, found that a male-dominated culture both sexualised women and undervalued their military competence. [43] Among the comments made to researchers by male personnel about their female counterparts were: ‘Ok there are a few exceptions but on the whole they [women] shouldn’t be here.’; 'They're all lesbians or sluts.'; and 'They are emotionally unstable.' [43]

Prevalence

All personnel

Since 2006, periodic, anonymised surveys have been published by each military branch. In 2021, the survey found that the following proportions of personnel, irrespective of age and gender, had had a 'particularly upsetting' experience of sexual harassment in the previous 12 months:

Female personnel

While men are victimised by sexual misconduct, women are much more frequently targeted. [1] Since 2009, official surveys have found the proportion of women affected has been rising, as indicated in the following table.

Proportion of British army women targeted by sexual harassment in previous 12 months (2009-2021, by year) Note: Categories are not mutually exclusive.
'Particularly upsetting' experience of sexual harassmentAttempted or actual serious sexual assaultRape
2009 [44] 8%3%Not asked
2015 [44] 13%2%Not asked
2018 [4] 15%2%1%
2021 [1] 35%5%1.8%

Younger women and girls

The official surveys reveal that women of low rank, who also tend to be younger than other personnel and more recently recruited, are disproportionately targeted for harassment, particularly in the army. In 2018, for example, 5% of low-ranking women in the army said they had been treated badly for refusing to have sex with someone, versus 1% of senior female officers. [4] In 2021, half of recorded rape offences (22 of 44) were in the army and just under two-thirds (27) concerned personnel at the lowest rank of Private or equivalent. [5]

The risk faced by girls aged under 18 is particularly high. In 2021, girls were ten times as likely as adult female personnel to be the victim of a sexual offence. [45] In the same year, 37 girls across the British armed forces (from a total population at the time of 290) were victims of a sexual offence; in four cases the offence was rape. [6] [5] 22 new recruits at the training centre for the youngest soldier trainees, the Army Foundation College were victims of sexual offences that year; [6] three of the accused were members of staff. [46]

Cadets

Between 2012 and 2017, the Ministry of Defence recorded 363 allegations of sexual abuse of members of local youth cadet forces. Wiltshire Army Cadet Force Annual Camp 2005. MOD 45144907.jpg
Between 2012 and 2017, the Ministry of Defence recorded 363 allegations of sexual abuse of members of local youth cadet forces.

Cadet forces are military youth organisations for younger teens in communities and schools. In 2017, a BBC Panorama documentary found multiple cases of the sexual abuse of cadets from age 11 during the 1980s. [7] It reported that the victims and their parents were discouraged from making a formal complaint or contacting the police. In 2012 and 2013, the Ministry of Defence (MOD) paid £2 million to settle the allegations out of court. [44] Between 2012 and 2017, the MOD recorded a further 363 allegations, of which 282 were referred to the police. [47]

Intimate partners

In 2022, research by King's College London found that experience of intimate partner violence (IPV), a category that includes sexual abuse, was three times more prevalent among partners of military personnel than among partners of civilians. [8] 10% of male and 7% of female personnel told the researchers they had abused their partner in the previous 12 months. The study found that physical and sexual abuse of partners was particularly common where personnel had traumatic experiences of war.

Detainees

During the 2003 invasion of Iraq, two Iraqi sailors working on a merchant ship were arrested and taken on board a Coalition warship and made to strip naked, after which they were sexually humiliated. In a subsequent court case brought by Leigh Day against the Ministry of Defence, a judge noted that the nationality of the warship in question (i.e., whether it was British or American) was unable to be determined. [9]

Perpetrators

Perpetrators of sexual misconduct are overwhelmingly male colleagues, typically those of the same or higher rank than the women they victimise. [1] [2] [3]

Of the suspects in nine sexual offence cases affecting 22 junior recruits at the Army Foundation College in 2021, [6] three of the accused were members of staff. [46]

Institutional responses

Following concerns expressed in 2004 by the Equal Opportunities Commission (now the Equality and Human Rights Commission) about persistent sexual harassment in the British armed forces, [48] the armed forces began to conduct surveys of their personnel's experience of sexual harassment. [48]

In 2016, the head of the army noted that soldier culture remained ‘overly sexualised’ and committed to reducing the extent of sexual misconduct. [49]

In 2017, the Lyons Review into the service justice system recommended referring all serious offences in the armed forces, including those of a sexual nature, to the civilian police, [50] a proposal the government rejected.

In 2019, the Wigston Review into inappropriate behaviours in the armed forces acknowledged that such behaviours were at an 'unacceptable level'. It recommended that responsibility for 'serious behavioural complaints' be transferred from the chain of command to a new 'Defence Authority', separate from the three military branches (i.e. army, air force, navy). [14]

In 2021, a major report by the House of Commons Defence Committee, the Atherton Report, declared the committee 'alarmed and appalled' at the extent of sexual harassment and assault in the military. [16] The Committee recommended the MOD 'remove the chain of command entirely from complaints of a sexual nature', which the government again rejected.

Barriers to prevention and redress

Military structure and culture

The 2019 Wigston Review reported that several essential characteristics of military organisations contributed to an ongoing elevated rates of misconduct: 'tight-knit units that perceive themselves as "elite"; masculine cultures with low gender diversity; rank gradients; age gradients; weak or absent controls, especially after extensive operational periods; and alcohol.' [51]

In 2021, the Commons Defence Committee added that while the military chain of command had determined to tackle the problem, senior officers were often part of it, noting evidence of

'...senior individuals engaging in unacceptable behaviour themselves (including criminal sexual offences), failing to challenge these behaviours (for example, watching without commenting or breaching the confidentiality of those seeking advice) or interfering negatively in how a complaint is handled [...] The stories that we heard are truly shocking and they gravely concern us... In particular, we are disturbed by repeated examples of senior ranks failing those they command...' [16]

The Committee took evidence from over 4,000 women, who frequently 'advocated more effective education of male and female personnel about what sexual harassment is and how to deal with it effectively (without focusing on women "avoiding" sexual harassment and assault). They also wanted more action to enable all personnel to speak out if they witnessed derogatory treatment. A few stated that more should be done to ensure that women feel safe...'

Complaints

According to the army's 2021 sexual harassment survey, four-fifths of women who had had a particularly upsetting experience of sexual harassment did not report it to the chain of command or the service police. [1] Similarly low rates of complaint were found in the navy and air force. [2] [3] The most common reasons included low confidence in the chain of command and concerns that complaint could bring repercussions for the person concerned; [1] many women said they preferred to deal with the problem themselves.

Convictions

The number of investigations by the military justice system for serious sexual offences is low and convictions are rare. In 2021, 0.9% of soldiers said they had been raped, [1] equivalent to 740 individuals in the army. [52] In the same year, 28 rape cases were investigated by the Royal Military Police, of which five went to trial and two led to conviction.

The table below includes data from other recent years.

Rape in the British army: Personnel alleging rape in official surveys versus cases investigated by the Royal Military Police, defendants tried at court martial, and convictions (2018–2021)
YearIndividuals alleging rape (% [n]) [4] [1] [52] Cases investigated (n) [53] [5] Defendants tried (n) [53] [5] Convictions (n) [53] [5]
2018'<1%' [sic] [c. 0–811 individuals among 81,120 personnel]2041
2019n/a1981
2020n/a1552
20210.9% [c. 740 individuals among 82,230 personnel]2852

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Children in the military</span> The conscription and use of adolescents in warfare

Children in the military, including state armed forces, non-state armed groups, and other military organizations, may be trained for combat, assigned to support roles, such as cooks, porters/couriers, or messengers, or used for tactical advantage such as for human shields, or for political advantage in propaganda. Children have been recruited for participation in military operations and campaigns throughout history and in many cultures.

Sexual assault is an act in which one intentionally sexually touches another person without that person's consent, or coerces or physically forces a person to engage in a sexual act against their will. It is a form of sexual violence that includes child sexual abuse, groping, rape, drug facilitated sexual assault, and the torture of the person in a sexual manner.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual harassment</span> Unwanted sexual attention or advances

Sexual harassment is a type of harassment involving the use of explicit or implicit sexual overtones, including the unwelcome and inappropriate promises of rewards in exchange for sexual favors. Sexual harassment can be physical and/or a demand or request for sexual favors, making sexually coloured remarks, showing pornography, and any other unwelcome physical, verbal, or non-verbal conduct of a sexual nature, verbal. Sexual harassment includes a range of actions from verbal transgressions to sexual abuse or assault. Harassment can occur in many different social settings such as the workplace, the home, school, or religious institutions. Harassers or victims can be of any gender.

Abuse is the improper usage or treatment of a thing, often to unfairly or improperly gain benefit. Abuse can come in many forms, such as: physical or verbal maltreatment, injury, assault, violation, rape, unjust practices, crimes, or other types of aggression. To these descriptions, one can also add the Kantian notion of the wrongness of using another human being as means to an end rather than as ends in themselves. Some sources describe abuse as "socially constructed", which means there may be more or less recognition of the suffering of a victim at different times and societies.

Sexual misconduct is misconduct of a sexual nature which exists on a spectrum that may include a broad range of sexual behaviors considered unwelcome. This includes conduct considered inappropriate on an individual or societal basis of morality, sexual harassment and/or criminal sexual assault.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual assault in the United States military</span> Sexual violence and harassment

Sexual assault in the United States armed forces is an ongoing issue which has received extensive media coverage in the past. A 2012 Pentagon survey found that approximately 26,000 women and men were sexually assaulted that year; of those, only 3,374 cases were reported. In 2013, a new Pentagon report found that 5,061 troops reported cases of assault. Of the reported cases, only 484 cases went to trial; 376 resulted in convictions. Another investigation found that one in five women in the United States Air Force who were sexually assaulted by service members reported it, for one in 15 men.

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) personnel are able to serve in the armed forces of some countries around the world: the vast majority of industrialized, Western countries including some South American countries such as Argentina and Chile in addition to South Africa, and Israel. The rights concerning intersex people are more vague.

Counter-recruitment refers to activity opposing military recruitment, in some or all of its forms. Among the methods used are research, consciousness-raising, political advocacy and direct action. Most such activity is a response to recruitment by state armed forces, but may also target intelligence agencies, private military companies, and non-state armed groups.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Military recruitment</span> Recruitment for military positions

Military recruitment refers to the activity of attracting people to, and selecting them for, military training and employment.

Statistics on rape and other sexual assaults are commonly available in industrialized countries, and have become better documented throughout the world. Inconsistent definitions of rape, different rates of reporting, recording, prosecution and conviction for rape can create controversial statistical disparities, and lead to accusations that many rape statistics are unreliable or misleading.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Army Foundation College</span> British Army training unit in Yorkshire, England

The Army Foundation College (AFC) in Harrogate, England, is the sole initial military training unit for British Army recruits who enlist aged between 16 and 17.5 years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Child sexual abuse in the United Kingdom</span> Overview about child sexual abuse in the United Kingdom

Child sexual abuse in the United Kingdom has been reported in the country throughout its history. In about 90% of cases the abuser is a person known to the child. However, cases during the second half of the twentieth century, involving religious institutions, schools, popular entertainers, politicians, military personnel, and other officials, have been revealed and widely publicised since the beginning of the twenty-first century. Child sexual abuse rings in numerous towns and cities across the UK have also drawn considerable attention.

Sexual assault in the Canadian Armed Forces has been a pervasive issue affecting women, youth, and men in the Canadian Forces and Canadian Cadet Organizations. Canadian Forces sexual assault cases have been extensively reported in national Canadian news media. The scope and depth of the sexual assault problem first came to light in 1998, when Maclean's magazine broke the story. Individual cases continued to be reported. The issue became a national focus again when MacLean's magazine published another exposé exploring the extent of rape culture in Canada's military.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MeToo movement</span> Social movement against sexual abuse and harassment

#MeToo is a social movement and awareness campaign against sexual abuse, sexual harassment, and rape culture, in which people publicize their experiences of sexual abuse or sexual harassment. The phrase "Me Too" was initially used in this context on social media in 2006, on Myspace, by sexual assault survivor and activist Tarana Burke. The hashtag #MeToo was used starting in 2017 as a way to draw attention to the magnitude of the problem.

The Weinstein effect is a global trend in which allegations of sexual misconduct by famous or powerful figures are disclosed. The first of a worldwide wave of allegations were made in the United States in October 2017, when media outlets reported on the allegations made against film producer Harvey Weinstein. They were described as a "tipping point" or "watershed moment" and precipitated an "international reckoning" against sexual harassment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual Harassment/Assault Response & Prevention</span> US Army program dealing with sexual harassment

SHARP is a proactive U.S. Army program which aims to end sexual harassment and assault in the service. Sexual harassment is a crime in the armed forces, under the UCMJ Article 134 by executive order on 26 January 2022. Those accused of a crime such as sexual harassment,or assault are subject to the UCMJ. Victims of such crimes are protected from disciplinary action, or prosecution by Army Directive as of 2022. A Special Trial Counsel, part of the Judge Advocate General's Corps has been established to combat harmful behaviors, in order to conduct independent prosecutions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual harassment in the military</span> Sexual misconduct in the armed forces

Sexual harassment in the military is unwanted sexual behaviour experienced as threatening, offensive, or otherwise upsetting, which occurs in a military setting.

This overview shows the regulations regarding military service of non-heterosexuals around the world.

The #MeToo movementin Pakistan is modeled after the international #MeToo movement and began in late 2018 in Pakistani society. It has been used as a springboard to stimulate a more inclusive, organic movement, adapted to local settings, and has aimed to reach all sectors, including the lowest rungs of society.

The Defence Serious Crime Unit (DSCU), is a military unit within the Defence Crime Command which investigates alleged crimes and criminal activity involving personnel subject to Service law in the United Kingdom, or those in the UK military serving abroad. The unit replaces the three Special Investigation Branches of the UK armed services.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 British army (2021). "Sexual harassment 2021 report" (PDF). gov.uk. Retrieved 16 August 2022.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ministry of Defence (31 March 2022). "Royal Navy and Royal Marines sexual harassment survey 2021". gov.uk. Retrieved 17 August 2021.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Royal Air Force (December 2021). "2021 RAF sexual harassment survey full report". gov.uk. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
  4. 1 2 3 4 British army (2018). "Sexual harassment report 2018" (PDF). gov.uk. Retrieved 16 August 2022.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "Murder, Manslaughter and Sexual Offences in the Service Justice System: 2021 (Tables 1, 3, and 6)". GOV.UK. Retrieved 24 August 2022.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Ministry of Defence (14 April 2022). "Armed Forces: Offences against Children". parliament.uk. Retrieved 16 August 2022.
  7. 1 2 Razzall, Katie; MacSorley, Jane (4 July 2017). "Sex abuse against cadets 'covered up'". BBC News. Retrieved 9 March 2018.
  8. 1 2 3 MacManus, Deirdre; Short, Roxanna; Lane, Rebecca; Jones, Margaret; Hull, Lisa; Howard, Louise M.; Fear, Nicola T. (1 September 2022). "Intimate partner violence and abuse experience and perpetration in UK military personnel compared to a general population cohort: A cross-sectional study". The Lancet Regional Health – Europe. 20: 100448. doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100448. ISSN   2666-7762. PMC   9256655 . PMID   35813966.
  9. 1 2 Leigh Day (14 December 2017). "High Court finds MoD breached the Geneva Conventions during the Iraq War" . Retrieved 14 March 2018.
  10. 1 2 Deschamps, Marie (2015). "External Review into Sexual Misconduct and Sexual Harassment in the Canadian Armed Forces" (PDF). forces.gc.ca. Retrieved 8 March 2018.
  11. 1 2 3 4 Watkins, Kimberley; Bennett, Rachel; Richer, Isabelle; Zamorski, Mark. "Sexual Assault in the Canadian Armed Forces: Prevalence, Circumstances, Correlates, and Mental Health Associations" (PDF). Retrieved 8 March 2018.
  12. 1 2 Parrott, Dominic J.; Zeichner, Amos (2003). "Effects of hypermasculinity oh physical aggression against women". Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 4 (1): 70–78. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.70.
  13. 1 2 Baugher, Amy R.; Gazmararian, Julie A. (2015). "Masculine gender role stress and violence: A literature review and future directions". Aggression and Violent Behavior. 24: 107–112. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2015.04.002.
  14. 1 2 3 Wigston, M (2019). "Report on inappropriate behaviours" (PDF). Ministry of Defence. Retrieved 4 November 2021.
  15. 1 2 3 Rutherford, Sarah; Schneider, Robin; Walmsley, Alexis (2006). "Quantitative & qualitative research into sexual harassment in the armed forces" (PDF). Archived from the original on 18 October 2012. Retrieved 8 March 2018.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 House of Commons Defence Committee (12 July 2021). "Protecting those who protect us: Women in the Armed Forces from Recruitment to Civilian Life (the Atherton Review)". Parliament.uk. Retrieved 4 November 2021.
  17. Crown Prosecution Service (21 April 2022). "CPS publishes latest statistics on all crime types showing steady increase in rape convictions". www.cps.gov.uk. Retrieved 24 August 2022.
  18. 1 2 Anderson, E H; Suris, A (2013). "Military sexual trauma". In Moore, Brett A; Barnett, Jeffrey E (eds.). Military psychologists' desk reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 264–269. ISBN   978-0-19-992826-2. OCLC   828143812.
  19. British army (2015). "Sexual harassment report 2015" (PDF). gov.uk. Retrieved 8 March 2018.
  20. 1 2 Deschamps, Marie (2015). "External Review into Sexual Misconduct and Sexual Harassment in the Canadian Armed Forces" (PDF). forces.gc.ca. Retrieved 8 March 2018.
  21. Leila, Miñano; Pascual, Julia (2014). La guerre invisible: révélations sur les violences sexuelles dans l'armée française (in French). Paris: Les Arènes. ISBN   978-2352043027. OCLC   871236655.
  22. US, Department of Defense (2017). "Department of Defense Annual Report on Sexual Assault in the Military: Fiscal Year 2016" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 May 2019. Retrieved 9 March 2018.
  23. Watkins, Kimberley; Bennett, Rachel; Richer, Isabelle; Zamorski, Mark. "Sexual Assault in the Canadian Armed Forces: Prevalence, Circumstances, Correlates, and Mental Health Associations" (PDF). Retrieved 8 March 2018.
  24. American Public Health Association (30 October 2013). "Cessation of Military Recruiting in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools". www.apha.org. Retrieved 8 March 2018.
  25. Lichfield, John (20 April 2014). "France battles sexual abuse in the military". Independent. Retrieved 8 March 2018.
  26. Cooper, Charlotte (July 2022). "British army: Welfare concerns at the Army Foundation College, Harrogate" (PDF). Child Rights International Network. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
  27. Whyte, Lara. "Tenfold rise in rapes and sexual assaults on girls in military". The Times . ISSN   0140-0460 . Retrieved 4 November 2021.
  28. Moreau, Caroline; Bedretdinova, Dina; Duron, Sandrine; Bohet, Aline; Panjo, Henri; Bajos, Nathalie; Meynard, Jean Baptiste (17 November 2021). "From sexual harassment to sexual assault: Prevalence and correlates of sexual trauma in the French military". PLOS ONE. 16 (11): e0259182. Bibcode:2021PLoSO..1659182M. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259182 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   8598035 . PMID   34788297.
  29. Government of Canada, Statistics Canada (22 May 2019). "Sexual misconduct in the Canadian Armed Forces Regular Force, 2018". www150.statcan.gc.ca. Retrieved 20 August 2022.
  30. Acosta, Joie D.; Chinman, Matthew; Shearer, Amy L. (19 July 2021). "Countering Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment in the U.S. Military: Lessons from RAND Research": 4.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  31. Defence, National (10 June 2022). "Part I – Sexual Misconduct". www.canada.ca. Retrieved 20 August 2022.
  32. Ministry of Defence (14 April 2022). "Armed Forces: Offences against Children". parliament.uk. Retrieved 16 August 2022.
  33. Ministry of Defence (16 May 2022). "Armed Forces: Offences against Children". parliament.uk. Retrieved 16 August 2022.
  34. "Air Force relieves commander over sex scandal". The Seattle Times. 10 August 2012. Retrieved 22 August 2022.
  35. Watkins, Kimberley; Bennett, Rachel; Richer, Isabelle; Zamorski, Mark. "Sexual Assault in the Canadian Armed Forces: Prevalence, Circumstances, Correlates, and Mental Health Associations" (PDF). Retrieved 8 March 2018.
  36. Department of Defense Task Force on Sexual Violence. (2004). "Sexual Harassment Survey of Reserve Component Members" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 August 2022. Retrieved 24 August 2022.
  37. Rutherford, Sarah; Schneider, Robin; Walmsley, Alexis (2006). "Quantitative & qualitative research into sexual harassment in the armed forces" (PDF). Archived from the original on 18 October 2012. Retrieved 8 March 2018.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  38. Centre for Military Justice (2021). "Submission to the Defence Committee inquiry into women in the armed forces: From recruitment to civilian life" (PDF). parliament.uk.
  39. Morris, Steven (20 April 2016). "Anne-Marie Ellement case puts spotlight on sexualised army culture". the Guardian. Retrieved 24 August 2022.
  40. 1 2 Walker, Peter (3 March 2014). "Anne-Marie Ellement: MoD urged to review care of vulnerable soldiers". the Guardian. Retrieved 24 August 2022.
  41. Anderson, E H; Suris, A (2013). "Military sexual trauma". In Moore, Brett A; Barnett, Jeffrey E (eds.). Military psychologists' desk reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 264–269. ISBN   978-0-19-992826-2. OCLC   828143812.
  42. Bell, Margret E.; Street, Amy E.; Stafford, Jane (2014). "Victims' psychosocial well-being after reporting sexual harassment in the military". Journal of Trauma & Dissociation. 15 (2): 133–152. doi:10.1080/15299732.2014.867563. ISSN   1529-9740. PMID   24410254. S2CID   36336443.
  43. 1 2 Rutherford, Sarah; Schneider, Robin; Walmsley, Alexis (2006). "Quantitative & qualitative research into sexual harassment in the armed forces" (PDF). Archived from the original on 18 October 2012. Retrieved 8 March 2018.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  44. 1 2 3 British army (2015). "Sexual harassment report 2015" (PDF). gov.uk. Retrieved 8 March 2018.
  45. Cooper, Charlotte (July 2022). "British army: Welfare concerns at the Army Foundation College, Harrogate" (PDF). Child Rights International Network. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
  46. 1 2 Ministry of Defence (16 May 2022). "Armed Forces: Offences against Children". parliament.uk. Retrieved 16 August 2022.
  47. Rawlinson, Kevin (4 July 2017). "MoD admits over 350 sexual abuse complaints have been made by cadets". Guardian. Retrieved 9 March 2018.
  48. 1 2 Rutherford, Sarah; Schneider, Robin; Walmsley, Alexis (2006). "Quantitative & qualitative research into sexual harassment in the armed forces" (PDF). Archived from the original on 18 October 2012. Retrieved 8 March 2018.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  49. Farmer, Ben (14 June 2016). "Army has 'overly-sexualised' heavy drinking culture, Chief of General Staff admits". The Telegraph. ISSN   0307-1235 . Retrieved 8 March 2018.
  50. Lyons, Shaun (27 February 2020). "Service Justice System review". GOV.UK. Retrieved 23 August 2022.
  51. Wigston, M (2019). "Report on inappropriate behaviours" (PDF). Ministry of Defence. Retrieved 4 November 2021.
  52. 1 2 "UK armed forces biannual diversity statistics: April 2021 (Table 1)". GOV.UK. Retrieved 24 August 2022.
  53. 1 2 3 "Sexual offences in the Service Justice System: 2018 (Tables 1 and 6)". GOV.UK. Retrieved 24 August 2022.

Official surveys

Testimony and recent reportage