Smart gun

Last updated

A smart gun, also called a smart-gun, or smartgun, is a firearm that can detect its authorized user(s) or something that is normally only possessed by its authorized user(s). The term is also used in science fiction to refer to various types of semi-automatic firearms.

Contents

Smart guns have one or more systems that allow them to fire only when activated by an authorized user. Those systems typically employ RFID chips or other proximity tokens, fingerprint recognition, magnetic rings, or mechanical locks. [1] They can thereby prevent accidental shootings, gun thefts, and criminal usage by persons not authorized to use the guns.

Related to smart guns are other smart firearms safety devices such as biometric or RFID activated accessories and safes. [2]

Commercial availability

No smart gun has ever been sold on the commercial market in the United States. [3] The Armatix iP1, a .22 caliber handgun with an active RFID watch used to unlock it, is the most mature smart gun developed. It was briefly planned to be offered at a few retailers before being quickly withdrawn due to pressure from gun-rights advocates concerned that it would trigger the New Jersey Childproof Handgun Law. [4]

As of 2019, a number of startups and companies including Armatix, Biofire, LodeStar Firearms, and Swiss company SAAR are purportedly developing various smart handguns and rifles, but none have brought the technology to market. [5]

Reception

Reception to the concept of smart gun technology has been mixed. There have been public calls to develop the technology, most notably from President Obama. [6] Gun-rights groups including the National Rifle Association of America have expressed concerns that the technology could be mandated, [7] and some firearms enthusiasts are concerned that the technology wouldn't be reliable enough to trust. [8]

National Rifle Association

The NRA and its membership boycotted Smith & Wesson after it was revealed in 1999 that the company was developing a smart gun for the U.S. government. [9] [10]

More recently, the official policy of the NRA-ILA, the lobbying arm of the NRA, with regards to smart guns, is as follows: "The NRA doesn't oppose the development of 'smart' guns, nor the ability of Americans to voluntarily acquire them. However, NRA opposes any law prohibiting Americans from acquiring or possessing firearms that don't possess "smart" gun technology." [7]

Law enforcement

Some smart gun proponents have called for federal, state, and local police organizations to take the lead on adopting smart gun technology, either voluntarily or via purchasing mandate. [11] There has been scattered support for voluntary test programs from some law enforcement leaders, including San Francisco Police Chief Greg Suhr, who has said, "Officer safety is huge, so you wouldn't want to compel that upon officers. But we have so many officers who are so into technology, I am all but certain there are officers that would be willing to do such a pilot.". [12]

Richard Beary, president of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, said there would be "plenty of agencies interested in beta testing the technology" and that "[a smart gun] can't be 99 percent accurate, it has to be 100 percent accurate. It has to work every single time." [13] James Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police, which represents 325,000 officers nationwide, has stated, "Police officers in general, federal officers in particular, shouldn't be asked to be the guinea pigs in evaluating a firearm that nobody's even seen yet. We have some very, very serious questions." [14] [ failed verification – see discussion ]

New Jersey mandate

In the United States, New Jersey passed the Childproof Handgun Bill into state law on December 23, 2002, which would have required that all guns sold in the state of New Jersey have a mechanism to prevent unauthorized users from firing it, taking effect three years after such a smart gun is approved by the state. [15] Weapons used by law enforcement officers would be exempt from the smart gun requirement. [9] [10] [16] In July 2019, Governor Phil Murphy signed into law a bill [17] which repealed substantially all of the original Childproof Handgun Law and replaced it with a requirement that after the state Attorney General approves a production model each firearms retailer in the state would be required to carry and display at least one smart gun on their shelves with "a sign... disclosing the features of personalized handguns that are not offered by traditional handguns". [17] [18]

The potential effects of New Jersey's smart gun law has also influenced opposition to the technology in the United States; two attempts to sell the Armatix iP1 smart gun in California and Maryland were met with opposition from gun rights groups, who argued that allowing the gun to be sold in the United States would trigger the law. [9] In December 2014, the Attorney General of New Jersey determined that the Armatix iP1 would not meet the legal criteria sufficient to trigger the mandate. [19]

Reliability concerns

Many firearm enthusiasts object to smart guns on a philosophical and regulatory basis. Gun ownership advocate Kenneth W. Royce, writing under the pen name of "Boston T. Party", wrote that "no defensive firearm should ever rely upon any technology more advanced than Newtonian physics. That includes batteries, radio links, encryption, scanning devices and microcomputers." [20]

TechCrunch technology and outdoors journalist Jon Stokes summarizes the reliability concerns with smart guns stating, [8]

"First, no electronic technology is 100% reliable, and very few people will trust a gun that can be turned into a brick by a failure of some on-board circuitry. Second, whenever you attach software to some new category of things — especially software that has any kind of connection to the outside world, whether via RFID or an actual network — then in addition to whatever problems that thing had before, you've introduced a whole host of brand new security and identity problems that are new to that thing and that must be discovered and patched, and then the patches will have problems that must be discovered and patched, and on it goes."

Potential advantages

Gun owners

Smart firearms safety technology is intended to prevent the accidental use and misuse of firearms by children and teens, as well as reducing accidental discharges or the use of a firearm against its owner if the firearm is stolen or taken away. [21] Smart guns may also reduce incidents of suicide by unauthorized users of a firearm. [22]

Law enforcement

Law enforcement applications also hold promise; San Francisco Police Chief Greg Suhr went on record supporting smart guns [23] for their potential to reduce the risk of having a law enforcement officer's gun used against him or her, and for rendering stolen guns unfireable. Richard Beary, president of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, was quoted in the Washington Post [24] as saying there would be "plenty of agencies interested in beta testing the [smart gun] technology."

In October 2013 the European Commission published a document by commissioner Cecilia Malmström, stating that "the Commission will work with the firearms industry to explore technological solutions, such as biometric sensors where personal data is stored in the firearm, for ensuring that purchased firearms may only be used by their legal owner. It will carry out a detailed cost-benefit analysis on the question of making such 'smart gun' security features mandatory for firearms lawfully sold in the EU." [25]

Potential disadvantages

Joseph Steinberg writes that "biometrics take time to process and are often inaccurate – especially when a user is under duress – as is likely going to be the case in any situation in which he needs to brandish a gun.... it is not ideal to add a requirement for power to devices utilized in cases of emergency that did not need electricity previously. How many fire codes allow fire extinguishers that require a battery to operate?" Steinberg further writes that "smartguns might be hackable" or "susceptible to government tracking or jamming...Firearms must be able to be disassembled in order to be cleaned and maintained. One of the principles of information security is that someone who has physical access to a machine can undermine its security." [26] In a follow-up piece published in January 2016, Steinberg noted that smartguns that utilize wireless communications to detect that the shooter is wearing a watch, bracelet, or other device may "allow criminals (and police) to identify who is carrying a weapon" undermining "one of the reasons that some states require people to carry their weapons concealed; if all civilian-carried guns are concealed, criminals do not know who is carrying and who is not, so they have to fear mugging everyone, which protects the unarmed as well as the armed." [27]

According to an article on an NRA website, other concerns are that smart guns may make a firearm more likely to fail when needed for self-defense. "Batteries go dead, temperature or moisture can harm electronics and many 'smart gun' designs, such as Armatix's iP1, require that a person wear a watch, bracelet, or other device." Smart guns may also take considerable time to be ready for firing from a "cold start." [28]

In science fiction

Smart guns are commonly used in science fiction, where they may not only have biometric identification, but also have auto-aiming capabilities or smart bullets. A prominent example is the Lawgiver used by Judge Dredd, which is linked to his DNA. [29] Another is the M56 Smart Gun from Aliens, which is carried via a waist-mounted robotic arm. The concept was later used in a U.S. Army prototype, although engineers moved the mount from the waist to the back, due to ergonomic issues. [30]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gun safety</span> Study and practice of safe operation of firearms

Gun safety is the study and practice of using, transporting, storing and disposing of firearms and ammunition, including the training of gun users, the design of weapons, and formal and informal regulation of gun production, distribution, and usage, for the purpose of avoiding unintentional injury, illness, or death. This includes mishaps like accidental discharge, negligent discharge, and firearm malfunctions, as well as secondary risks like hearing loss, lead poisoning from bullets, and pollution from other hazardous materials in propellants and cartridges. There were 47,000 unintentional firearm deaths worldwide in 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act</span> Mandate for background checks on firearm purchasers in the U.S.

The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, often referred to as the Brady Act, the Brady Bill, or the Brady Handgun Bill is an Act of the United States Congress that mandated federal background checks on firearm purchasers in the United States. It also imposed a five-day waiting period on purchases until the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) was implemented in 1998. Introduced by U.S. representative Chuck Schumer of New York, the Brady Act was a landmark legislative enactment during the Clinton administration. The act was appended to the end of Section 922 of title 18, United States Code. The intention of the act was to prevent persons with previous serious convictions from purchasing firearms.

Concealed carry, or carrying a concealed weapon (CCW), is the practice of carrying a weapon in public in a concealed manner, either on one's person or in close proximity. CCW is often practiced as a means of self-defense. Following the Supreme Court's NYSRPA v. Bruen (2022) decision, all states in the United States were required to allow for concealed carry of a handgun either permitlessly or with a permit, although the difficulty in obtaining a permit varies per jurisdiction.

Gun laws in the United States regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition. State laws vary considerably, and are independent of existing federal firearms laws, although they are sometimes broader or more limited in scope than the federal laws.

District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. It ruled that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms—unconnected with service in a militia—for traditionally lawful purposes such as self-defense within the home, and that the District of Columbia's handgun ban and requirement that lawfully owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee. It also stated that the right to bear arms is not unlimited and that certain restrictions on guns and gun ownership were permissible. It was the first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense or whether the right was only intended for state militias.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gun laws in California</span> Californias gun law

Gun laws in California regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition in the state of California in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gun laws in New York</span>

Gun laws in New York regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition in the U.S. state of New York, outside of New York City which has separate licensing regulations. These regulations are very strict in comparison to the rest of the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gun laws in Oklahoma</span> Oklahomas gun law

Gun laws in Oklahoma regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition in the state of Oklahoma in the United States.

In the United States, the term constitutional carry, also called permitless carry, unrestricted carry, or Vermont carry, refers to the legal public carrying of a handgun, either openly or concealed, without a license or permit. The phrase does not typically refer to the unrestricted carrying of a long gun, a knife, or other weapons. The scope and applicability of constitutional carry may vary by state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gun laws in Delaware</span> Delawares gun laws

Gun laws in Delaware regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition in the U.S. state of Delaware.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gun laws in Illinois</span>

Gun laws in Illinois regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition in the state of Illinois in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gun laws in Indiana</span> Indianas gun law

Gun laws in Indiana regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition in the U.S. state of Indiana. Laws and regulations are subject to change.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gun laws in Maryland</span> Marylands gun law

Gun laws in Maryland regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition in the U.S. state of Maryland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gun laws in Nevada</span> Nevadas gun law

Gun laws in Nevada regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition in the state of Nevada in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gun laws in New Jersey</span> New Jerseys gun law

Gun laws in New Jersey regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition in the U.S. state of New Jersey. New Jersey's firearms laws are among the most restrictive in the country.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gun laws in Ohio</span> Ohios gun law

Gun laws in Ohio regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition in the U.S. state of Ohio.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gun laws in Pennsylvania</span> Pennsylvanias gun law

Gun laws in Pennsylvania regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gun laws in Washington (state)</span> Washington states gun law

Gun laws in Washington regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition in the state of Washington in the United States.

The Armatix iP1 is a magazine-fed, semi-automatic pistol which uses smart gun technology. The pistol is chambered for the .22 Long Rifle rimfire cartridge. It is designed and manufactured by the German company Armatix. The iP1 is marketed as a James Bond-style handgun that can only be fired by an authorized user.

The New Jersey Childproof Handgun Law, also known as P.L.2002, c.130, was a now-repealed law that would restrict the sale of handguns in New Jersey to smart guns that "can only be fired by an authorized or recognized user" and would take effect three years after the technology is available for retail purposes. It has been a controversial issue for the National Rifle Association of America and many gun owners because of its restrictions and the unusual move that "legislates a product that does not exist".

References

  1. ↑ WIRED Staff (2004-04-14). "No Chip in Arm, No Shot From Gun". Wired. ISSN   1059-1028 . Retrieved 2019-09-20.
  2. ↑ "James Bond "Skyfall": In tüftliger Mission | FTD.de". 2013-05-01. Archived from the original on 2013-05-01. Retrieved 2023-08-15.
  3. ↑ Lytwynec, Christine. "Elusive 'smart gun' keeps missing the target". telegram.com. Retrieved 2019-09-20.
  4. ↑ Rosenwald, Michael S. (1 May 2014). "Maryland dealer, under pressure from gun-rights activists, drops plan to sell smart gun". The Washington Post. Retrieved 8 May 2014.
  5. ↑ "A New Generation of Entrepreneurs Thinks It Can Revive the Smart Gun". The Trace. 2019-01-21. Retrieved 2019-09-20.
  6. ↑ Shear, Michael D.; Lichtblau, Eric (2016-04-29). "Obama Puts His Weight Behind Smart-Gun Technology". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2019-09-20.
  7. 1 2 NRA-ILA Issues. "'Smart' Guns/Personalized Firearms" Archived 2016-03-20 at the Wayback Machine . NRA-ILA. Retrieved April 28, 2016.
  8. 1 2 Jon Stokes. "Why Obama's Smart Gun Push Will Misfire". TechCrunch. Retrieved April 28, 2016.
  9. 1 2 3 "Gun control: the NRA wants to take America's smart guns away". The Verge. 5 May 2014. Retrieved 5 May 2014.
  10. 1 2 Nix, Naomi (October 14, 2013). "Could 'smart-guns' finally hit New Jersey stores?". NJ.com.
  11. ↑ 5 NBC Chicago. "Demonstrations Continue Outside Police Chiefs Conference in Chicago". 5 NBC News Chicago. Retrieved April 28, 2016.
  12. ↑ BENNY EVANGELISTA. "San Francisco Police Chief Offers to Pilot Smart Gun Tech". GT: Government Technology. Retrieved April 28, 2016.
  13. ↑ Rosenwald, Michael (October 22, 2015). "Renewed push for smart guns could trigger a new furor over the technology". The Washington Post.
  14. ↑ Schapiro, Rich (April 28, 2016). "President Obama's smart gun enthusiasm has some police officials recoiling". New York Daily News.
  15. ↑ ASSEMBLY LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE STATEMENT TO ASSEMBLY, No. 700 with committee amendments [ permanent dead link ]
  16. ↑ Pearce, Jeremy (January 12, 2003). "Smart Guns, A Clever Bit of Legislating". The New York Times . Retrieved 1 December 2003.
  17. 1 2 "An Act concerning personalized handguns and revising various parts of the statutory law". Act No. P.L.2019, c.164 of July 16, 2019.
  18. ↑ Eger, Chris (2019-07-17). "NJ Dealers Must Carry 'Smart Guns' Under New Law". Guns.com. Archived from the original on 2019-07-17. Retrieved 2020-01-25. New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy Tuesday signed a law requiring gun dealers in the state carry so-called "smart guns" in what some say is an effort to create a market for the technology. ... New Jersey has had a smart gun law in place since 2002, requiring licensed dealers to only sell handguns with user recognition technology, but it has been in suspension as there are no such firearms on the consumer market. The bill signed this week by Murphy, a Democrat, replaces the dormant law with one that requires gun dealers to carry at least one model in their stores should they become available in the future. ... The bill, sent to Murphy by the Democrat-controlled state legislature last month, scraps most of New Jersey's 2002 smart gun law and replaces it with a requirement that the state Attorney General continue to report to the governor and legislature every six months on the commercial availability of the devices in the country. Once the AG approves a production model, every firearms wholesaler and retailer in the state would be obligated to carry at least one example for sale in their inventory within 60 days and have it on display in their salesroom, with visible signage referencing its features.
  19. ↑ "NOT SO SMART: New Jersey AG Rejects Brady Attempt to Trigger "Smart Gun" Law - Bearing Arms - new jersey, Smart Guns". Bearing Arms. Archived from the original on 2015-10-30. Retrieved 2015-10-25.
  20. ↑ Party, Boston T. (2000). Boston's Gun Bible. Javelin Press. p. 35. ISBN   978-1-888766-06-6.
  21. ↑ "'Smart' Guns Backgrounder" (PDF). Violence Policy Center. Retrieved April 17, 2015.
  22. ↑ "Smart Firearms Safety Technology Can Prevent Suicides". Smart Tech Challenges Foundation. 23 September 2015. Retrieved 2016-01-12.
  23. ↑ "Can tech innovation curb gun violence? Smart Tech poses 4 million-dollar challenges to find out". VentureBeat. 28 January 2014. Retrieved 2015-09-16.
  24. ↑ Rosenwald, Michael S. (2015-10-21). "Renewed push for smart guns could trigger a new furor over the technology". The Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2015-10-25.
  25. ↑ European Commission: Firearms and the internal security of the EU: protecting citizens and disrupting illegal trafficking, published October 10, 2013
  26. ↑ Steinberg Joseph (May 4, 2014). "Forbes: Why You Should Be Concerned About The New 'Smart Guns' (Whether You Love Or Hate Guns)". Forbes .
  27. ↑ Joseph Steinberg (January 11, 2016). "Smartguns: Why Police Don't Want Them and Neither Should You". Inc. Retrieved January 11, 2016.
  28. ↑ Miniter, Frank. Smoking Gun. America's First Freedom, December 2015.
  29. ↑ Miniter, Frank (2014). The Future of the Gun. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing. p. 227. ISBN   978-1-62157-244-2. OCLC   886107435.
  30. ↑ Mizokami, Kyle (2018-03-07). "The U.S. Army Wants Soldiers to Carry Guns "Aliens" Style". Popular Mechanics. Retrieved 2019-11-21.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.