Sociocultural anthropology

Last updated

Sociocultural anthropology is a term used to refer to social anthropology and cultural anthropology together. It is one of the four main branches of anthropology. Sociocultural anthropologists focus on the study of society and culture, while often interested in cultural diversity and universalism. [1]

Contents

Sociocultural anthropologists recognise a change in the nature of the field and that a previous focus on traditional tribal perspectives has shifted to a contemporary understanding. [2] [3] Methodologies have altered accordingly, and the discipline continues to evolve with that of society. Globalisation has contributed to the changing influence of the state on individuals and their interactions. [3]

Overview

The rubric cultural anthropology is generally applied to ethnographic works that are holistic in approach, are oriented to the ways in which culture affects individual experience, or aim to provide a rounded view of the knowledge, customs, and institutions of a people. Cultural anthropology focuses on how individuals make sense of the world around them using knowledge, beliefs, morals, arts, laws and customs of groups.

Social anthropology is a term applied to ethnographic works that attempt to isolate a particular system of social relations such as those that comprise domestic life, economy, law, politics, or religion, give analytical priority to the organizational bases of social life, and attend to cultural phenomena as somewhat secondary to the main issues of social scientific inquiry. [4]

Sociocultural anthropology, which is understood to include linguistic anthropology, is concerned with the problem of difference and similarity within and between human populations. The discipline arose through the expansion of European colonial empires, and its practices and theories have been questioned and reformulated along with processes of decolonization. Such issues have re-emerged as transnational processes have challenged the centrality of the nation-state to theorizations about culture and power. New challenges have emerged as public debates about multiculturalism and the increasing use of the culture concept outside of the academy and among peoples studied by anthropology. [5]

History

The synergy of sociology and anthropology was initially developed during the early 1920s by European scholars. Both disciplines shared a common search for a science of society. During the 20th century, the disciplines diverged further to as cultural studies were integrated, centralising geographical and methodological features. [6]

1920s-50s

Alfred Radcliffe-Brown Alfred Retklif-Braun.jpeg
Alfred Radcliffe-Brown
Bronislaw Malinowski among Trobriand tribe in 1918 Bronislaw Malinowski among Trobriand tribe.jpg
Bronisław Malinowski among Trobriand tribe in 1918

'Social' and 'cultural' anthropology was developed in the 1920s. It was associated with the social sciences and linguistics rather than the human biology and archaeology studied in anthropology. [6] Specialists in the respective fields of social and cultural anthropology were elemental in the foundations of the later developed synergy. Radcliffe-Brown and Bronislaw Malinowski marked the point of differentiation between social and cultural anthropology in 1930, evident in texts from this period. [7] In the 1930s and 40s, an influx of monographs and comparative studies of 'tribal societies' emerged. [7] Meyer Fortes and Edward Evans Pritchard described and classified African societies in African Political Systems (1940). Their comparative anthology aimed to provide a basis for sociological knowledge by classifying kin-based bans instead of relying on empirical observation. [8]

Claude Lévi-Strauss, used structuralism as a way to analyse cultural systems in terms of their structural relations, including that of kinship. [9] In 1949, he attempted to classify marriage systems from diverse locations. Structuralism was applied to anthropology by Lévi-Strauss to reaffirms the coexistence between the individual and society and categorise information about cultural systems by the formal relationships among their elements. [9] Structuralism remains a central concept involved in the study of sociocultural anthropology.

1960s–90s

Before WWII, 'social' anthropology and 'cultural' anthropology were still separate entities in the field. The war called upon anthropologists from all countries to assist in the war effort. [10] Anthropologists were extensively involved in resettlements in Europe and consulting issues of racial status in occupied areas. Ethical issues surrounding the allies involvement were topical among anthropologists and institutional development and practiced methodologies were altered by programs in 'developing countries'. [11] As developing countries grew independence, they grew a dislike for an apparent imperialistic nature of anthropological studies, declining work in the field. [12] After the war, anthropologists collaborated ideas and methodologies to form the collective 'sociocultural anthropology'. Topical interests included that of religion, kingship, acculturation, function, and community studies. [13]

During the 1970s, public spending was increased in most industrialised counties which expanded social rights, produced dramatic rises in wealth, living standards and overall equity. [14] This neoliberal globalisation movement followed through until the 1990s. Increased spending assisted to provide academic opportunity in anthropology during 1974–1990. [15] After this period, a steady decline in anthropology opportunity is the continued trend. The drastic growth of students in Ph.D. and M.A. programs, decline in university funding, downward shift in birth rates and decreased government funding are contributors to anthropologies current state. [15]

2000s–present

Traditional methodologies used to study sociocultural anthropology have changed with the shift in culture in modernised society. Individuals undergo daily routines differing to that of previous decades. [12] Individuals participate in minority groups within which only certain aspects relate to the broader national culture. [16] Anthropologists are unable to receive a holistic ethnography, as individuals return to the private sphere after interacting within their minority groups. Impacts of globalisation, neoliberalism, and capitalism have contributed to the decline in anthropology field work. [12]

The job market of the 2000s is centralised around those occupations that are income generating, reducing the number of university students in the social science fields. In accordance, universities have reduced funding for many anthropological programs. The 2008 global financial crisis enhanced this effect as universities had to decline spending as income generation was lesser. [12] Decreased spending in the anthropological sector in combination with an increasing trend of anthropology university students has results in decreasing job opportunities. [15]

Sociocultural anthropological study of the 21st century, produces facts created by an intersection of cultural classification systems and heterogenous and dynamic societies. A contributor to this dynamic societal environment is the media. The influence of the media produces accessibility for all to gather experience and evidence, however charged political conditions sway social discourse. [17] Anthropologists use theory such as structuralism to decipher epistemological obstacles. Considering that systems are defined by the laws of their constitutive elements rather than the content alone is a lens through which modern society is studied. [18]

Theoretical foundations

Concepts

Sociocultural anthropology divides into a broader national level and minority of subcultural groups to ethnographically study societies and cultures. The national culture is emitted through formally organised institutions including those of government forms and legal systems, economic institution, religious organisation, educational systems, law enforcement and military organisations. National achievements are influential on sociocultural integration however can be limited to upper class relevance only. Subcultural segments are groups of individuals behaving within the national culture. Subcultural groups are observed through vertical lens, differentiation because of national development, and horizontal lens, class and occupational divisions structured by societal hierarchy. [2]

Human Migration

Human migration is a topic of anthropology which produced a macro and micro impact on society and its culture. [19] Human migration is ‘the movement of persons away from their place of usual residence, either across an international border or within a state’. [19] An interplay of social, political, economic, demographic, cultural and geographical factors remain central to the movement of individuals. [19] Boas (1920) in his article The Methods of Ethnology (1920) states that it is the migration and dissemination of peoples rather than evolution that provides the basis for ethological research. Migration is accepted as the cause for the similarities of languages the dissemination of ideas and inventions across continents. The process of migration is responsible for the carrying of culture whilst the adaptation of culture to societies in different environments. [19]

Linguistics

The discipline of linguistics is interrelated with the study of society and culture. Both fields share a common intellectual origin in 19th Century scholarship as archaeologists and early folklorists looked for origins of culture in folktales and shared memory. [20] These early anthropologists narrowly focused on the influence structural codes had on the distinction between communities. [21] The comparison of societies prompted early linguistic enquiries. In the 20th century, there became a distinction between linguistic anthropology and formal linguistics, with greater focus placed on the cultural and behaviour lens of language. Formal linguistics remains to be studied through a cognitive viewpoint. [22] Linguistic anthropology looks at how language is used in the social and cultural life of people in different societies.Speech is used in societies as a system to indicate the series of certain events and how role relations effect such events. [23]

Sociology

Sociocultural integration studies the interaction of the spheres and draws comparisons with alternate societies and cultures. Sociocultural anthropology is closely aligned with sociology sharing theoretical generalisation for social science and reflection of human lives. [24] The 20th Century saw the separation of the two as differences in research topics, geographic focus and methodological emphasis diverged. Commonly, sociocultural anthropology centralises study of broader political, ethical, and economic subjects within small-scale societies whereas sociology looks at societies as a whole. [25] Sociologically trained ethnographers have less regard for anthropological theory and place greater emphasis on empirical data. [12] Recently, the two have reconverged as globalisation has aligned subject ideas and methodologies. [24]

Methodologies

The traditional anthropological research method is to gather what people say and do through initial observations. [12] Participant observation hinges on a synthesis of subjective insider and outsider elements. Insider elements rely on the fieldworker to learn what behaviour means to the people. Outsider elements are gathered through observations and experiences drawing comparisons with internal cultural customs and behaviours with alternate cultures. [26] These observations are transferred into a monograph of elements sorted by importance and studied in relation to anthropological theories or questions. The process is controlled, and a hypothesis is tested reporting results after every return. Alternatively, the process may be more fortuitous if unique or unexpected events occur, and the writing processes is extended to make sense of elements. [12]

Since the 1960s, anthropologists have recognised the importance of collaboration through reflections on experiences in the field, on relationships with informants and on contexts used to gather material. [26] The reflections provide a better understanding for readers of ethnographic texts and anthropologists in practicing with awareness of their own biases and emotions when writing. [26] This has led to advancements in the field of sociocultural anthropology.

Marxist and structuralist approaches include methods for gathering anthropological information that are challenged. Marxism validates the necessity for conventional field work, exploring the intersection between empirical observation and theoretical frameworks with the aim of improving each. [12] Lévi-Straussian structuralists (Lévi-Strauss 1969) are more concerned with theoretical structures. [12]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anthropology</span> Scientific study of humans, human behavior, and societies

Anthropology is the scientific study of humanity, concerned with human behavior, human biology, cultures, societies, and linguistics, in both the present and past, including archaic humans. Social anthropology studies patterns of behavior, while cultural anthropology studies cultural meaning, including norms and values. The term sociocultural anthropology is commonly used today. Linguistic anthropology studies how language influences social life. Biological or physical anthropology studies the biological development of humans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cultural anthropology</span> Branch of anthropology focused on the study of cultural variation among humans

Cultural anthropology is a branch of anthropology focused on the study of cultural variation among humans. It is in contrast to social anthropology, which perceives cultural variation as a subset of a posited anthropological constant. The term sociocultural anthropology includes both cultural and social anthropology traditions.

Ethnology is an academic field and discipline that compares and analyzes the characteristics of different scenarios peoples and the relationships between them.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Structuralism</span> Intellectual current and methodological approach

Structuralism is an intellectual current and methodological approach, primarily in the social sciences, that interprets elements of human culture by way of their relationship to a broader system. It works to uncover the structural patterns that underlie all the things that humans do, think, perceive, and feel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ethnography</span> Systematic study of people and cultures

Ethnography is a branch of anthropology and the systematic study of individual cultures. Ethnography explores cultural phenomena from the point of view of the subject of the study. Ethnography is also a type of social research that involves examining the behavior of the participants in a given social situation and understanding the group members' own interpretation of such behavior.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kinship</span> Web of human social relationships

In anthropology, kinship is the web of social relationships that form an important part of the lives of all humans in all societies, although its exact meanings even within this discipline are often debated. Anthropologist Robin Fox says that the study of kinship is the study of what humans do with these basic facts of life – mating, gestation, parenthood, socialization, siblingship etc. Human society is unique, he argues, in that we are "working with the same raw material as exists in the animal world, but [we] can conceptualize and categorize it to serve social ends." These social ends include the socialization of children and the formation of basic economic, political and religious groups.

Participant observation is one type of data collection method by practitioner-scholars typically used in qualitative research and ethnography. This type of methodology is employed in many disciplines, particularly anthropology, sociology, communication studies, human geography, and social psychology. Its aim is to gain a close and intimate familiarity with a given group of individuals and their practices through an intensive involvement with people in their cultural environment, usually over an extended period of time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alfred Radcliffe-Brown</span> British social anthropologist (1881–1955)

Alfred Reginald Radcliffe-Brown, FBA was an English social anthropologist who helped further develop the theory of structural functionalism. He conducted fieldwork in the Andaman Islands and Western Australia, which became the basis of his later books. He held academic appointments at universities in Cape Town, Sydney, Chicago, and Oxford, and sought to use model the field of anthopology after the natural sciences.

In the social sciences and related fields, a thick description is a description of human social action that describes not just physical behaviors, but their context as interpreted by the actors as well, so that it can be better understood by an outsider. A thick description typically adds a record of subjective explanations and meanings provided by the people engaged in the behaviors, making the collected data of greater value for studies by other social scientists.

History of anthropology in this article refers primarily to the 18th- and 19th-century precursors of modern anthropology. The term anthropology itself, innovated as a Neo-Latin scientific word during the Renaissance, has always meant "the study of man". The topics to be included and the terminology have varied historically. At present they are more elaborate than they were during the development of anthropology. For a presentation of modern social and cultural anthropology as they have developed in Britain, France, and North America since approximately 1900, see the relevant sections under Anthropology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Field research</span> Collection of information outside a laboratory, library or workplace setting

Field research, field studies, or fieldwork is the collection of raw data outside a laboratory, library, or workplace setting. The approaches and methods used in field research vary across disciplines. For example, biologists who conduct field research may simply observe animals interacting with their environments, whereas social scientists conducting field research may interview or observe people in their natural environments to learn their languages, folklore, and social structures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dan Sperber</span> French academic (born 1942)

Dan Sperber is a French social and cognitive scientist, anthropologist and philosopher. His most influential work has been in the fields of cognitive anthropology, linguistic pragmatics, psychology of reasoning, and philosophy of the social sciences. He has developed: an approach to cultural evolution known as the epidemiology of representations or cultural attraction theory as part of a naturalistic reconceptualization of the social; relevance theory; the argumentative theory of reasoning. Sperber formerly Directeur de Recherche at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique is Professor in the Departments of Cognitive Science and of Philosophy at the Central European University in Budapest.

Sir Edmund Ronald Leach FRAI FBA was a British social anthropologist and academic. He served as provost of King's College, Cambridge from 1966 to 1979. He was also president of the Royal Anthropological Institute from 1971 to 1975.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to anthropology:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Educational anthropology</span>

Educational anthropology, or the anthropology of education, is a sub-field of socio-cultural anthropology that focuses on the role that culture has in education, as well as how social processes and cultural relations are shaped by educational settings. To do so, educational anthropologists focus on education and multiculturalism, educational pluralism, culturally relevant pedagogy and native methods of learning and socializing. Educational anthropologists are also interested in the education of marginal and peripheral communities within large nation states. Overall, educational anthropology tends to be considered as an applied field, as the focus of educational anthropology is on improving teaching learning process within classroom settings.

Ethnoscience has been defined as an attempt "to reconstitute what serves as science for others, their practices of looking after themselves and their bodies, their botanical knowledge, but also their forms of classification, of making connections, etc.".

Social anthropology is the study of patterns of behaviour in human societies and cultures. It is the dominant constituent of anthropology throughout the United Kingdom and much of Europe, where it is distinguished from cultural anthropology. In the United States, social anthropology is commonly subsumed within cultural anthropology or sociocultural anthropology.

This bibliography of anthropology lists some notable publications in the field of anthropology, including its various subfields. It is not comprehensive and continues to be developed. It also includes a number of works that are not by anthropologists but are relevant to the field, such as literary theory, sociology, psychology, and philosophical anthropology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American anthropology</span>

American anthropology has culture as its central and unifying concept. This most commonly refers to the universal human capacity to classify and encode human experiences symbolically, and to communicate symbolically encoded experiences socially. American anthropology is organized into four fields, each of which plays an important role in research on culture:

  1. biological anthropology
  2. linguistic anthropology
  3. cultural anthropology
  4. archaeology

Anthropology is the study of human societal and cultural development in the past, present, and future with a number of facets that are categorized into five different fields. These fields include: biological (physical) anthropology, cultural (socio-cultural) anthropology, linguistic anthropology (linguistics), archaeology, and applied anthropology. Applied anthropology is the analysis of human interaction with the purpose of solving practical problems that affect and arise throughout time between cultures and societies. Applied anthropologists use many different methods to conduct research on agriculture, health and medicine, housing, social services, political-economic development, displacement and resettlement, business and industry, education, nutrition, environment, and aging. Applied anthropology research methods are: policy research, evaluation research, cultural intervention, activist (action) research, participatory action research (PAR).

References

  1. ↑ "Sociocultural Anthropology". explorable.com. Retrieved 2021-10-02.
  2. 1 2 Steward, Julian H. (1986). "Levels of Sociocultural Integration: An Operational Concept". Journal of Anthropological Research. 42 (3): 337–353. doi:10.1086/jar.42.3.3630038. ISSN   0091-7710. JSTOR   3630038. S2CID   224832755.
  3. 1 2 Trouillot, Michel-Rolph (2001-02-01). "The Anthropology of the State in the Age of Globalization: Close Encounters of the Deceptive Kind". Current Anthropology. 42 (1): 125–138. doi:10.1086/318437. ISSN   0011-3204.
  4. ↑ "Anthropology for beginners: Social and cultural anthropology". 11 June 2010. Retrieved 18 March 2014. Academic blog post explaining the similarities/differences between social and cultural anthropology.
  5. ↑ Koleth, Elsa (2010). "Multiculturalism: a review of Australian policy statements and recent debates in Australia and overseas". Research Paper for the Parliament of Australia. 6– via Parliament of Australia.
  6. 1 2 "Anthropology – Social and cultural anthropology | Britannica". britannica.com. Retrieved 2021-11-30.
  7. 1 2 "Sociocultural Anthropology | Encyclopedia.com". www.encyclopedia.com. Retrieved 2022-01-03.
  8. ↑ Forbes, M (1940). African Political Systems. United Kingdom: Read Books Limited. p. 2.
  9. 1 2 "Claude Levi-Strauss | Biography, Structuralism, Books, & Facts | Britannica". britannica.com. Retrieved 2022-01-03.
  10. ↑ Johler, Reinhard; Marchetti, Christian; Scheer, Monique (2014-03-31). Doing Anthropology in Wartime and War Zones: World War I and the Cultural Sciences in Europe. transcript Verlag. ISBN   978-3-8394-1422-4.
  11. ↑ "anthropology – Social and cultural anthropology | Britannica". britannica.com. Retrieved 2022-01-03.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Carrier, James G.; Gewertz, Deborah B. (2020-06-29). The Handbook of Sociocultural Anthropology. Routledge. ISBN   978-1-000-18149-4.
  13. ↑ Weaver, Thomas (2002). The Dynamics of Applied Anthropology in the Twentieth Century: The Malinowski Award Papers. Oklahoma City: Society for Applied Anthropology. pp. 169–171.
  14. ↑ Weaver, Thomas (2002). "The Dynamics of Applied Anthropology in the Twentieth Century: The Malinowski Award Papers" (PDF). Malinowski Award Papers.
  15. 1 2 3 D'Andrade, R. G.; Hammel, E. A.; Adkins, D. L.; McDaniel, C. K. (December 1975). "Academic Opportunity in Anthropology, 1974-90". American Anthropologist. 77 (4): 753–773. doi:10.1525/aa.1975.77.4.02a00020. ISSN   0002-7294.
  16. ↑ Steward, Julian H. (1986). "Levels of Sociocultural Integration: An Operational Concept". Journal of Anthropological Research. 42 (3): 337–353. doi:10.1086/jar.42.3.3630038. ISSN   0091-7710. JSTOR   3630038. S2CID   224832755.
  17. ↑ Cantero, Lucia E. (2017). "Sociocultural Anthropology in 2016: In Dark Times: Hauntologies and Other Ghosts of Production". American Anthropologist (in Spanish). 119 (2): 308–318. doi:10.1111/aman.12882. ISSN   1548-1433.
  18. ↑ BOURDIEU, PIERRE; Zanotti-Karp, Angela (1968). "Structuralism and Theory of Sociological Knowledge". Social Research. 35 (4): 681–706. ISSN   0037-783X. JSTOR   40969937.
  19. 1 2 3 4 Kaur, Kiran Jyoti; Sinha, A. K. (2021). "Trend of Migration Studies in Sociocultural Anthropology: A Critical Analysis". Journal of the Anthropological Survey of India. 70 (2): 240–255. doi:10.1177/2277436x211044055. S2CID   244268627 . Retrieved 2022-01-03.
  20. ↑ Beeman, William (2012). Linguistics and Anthropology. North Holland: Elsevier. pp. 531–532.
  21. ↑ "Anthropology of Language Contact and its Sociocultural Contexts". obo. Retrieved 2022-01-03.
  22. ↑ Beeman, William (2012). Linguistics and Anthropology. North Holland: Elsevier. p. 532.
  23. ↑ Saville-Troike, Muriel (1977). Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
  24. 1 2 "Sociocultural Anthropology | Encyclopedia.com". www.encyclopedia.com. Retrieved 2022-01-10.
  25. ↑ "What is Sociology? | Department of Sociology" . Retrieved 2022-01-10.
  26. 1 2 3 Robben, Antonius; Sulka, Jeffrey (2012). Ethnographic Fieldwork: An Anthropological Reader. West Sussex: Wiley & Sons Ltd. p. 7.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.