Steve Blinkhorn

Last updated

Stephen F. Blinkhorn, CPsychol, FBPsS (born 1949) is a British occupational psychologist and psychometrician (based in Hertfordshire), who continues to contribute to psychology and psychometric testing.

Contents

Blinkhorn is known for publishing a number of papers, many of which have taken the form of book reviews for Nature magazine, including: 'Willow, Titwillow, Titwillow' [1] (a review of Herrnstein and Murray's The Bell Curve ); 'What skulduggery?' [2] (a review of Stephen Jay Gould's 'The Mismeasure of Man'); and 'A gender bender' [3] (a critique on Paul Irwing and Richard Lynn's paper on sex and intelligence). Other papers have argued about the inappropriate use of the Rasch model, [4] and the misuse of personality tests. [5] [6]

Life and career

After attending grammar school, Blinkhorn attended St Edmund Hall, Oxford.

Academia

From 1973 to 1987, he developed and ran one of the first postgraduate studies in Occupational Psychology (in Britain) at what was then Hatfield Polytechnic, now the University of Hertfordshire. During this time, he also spent a year as a visiting professor in the neurological laboratory at Stanford University, California (1981–1982).

On his return from Stanford, Blinkhorn was approached by nferNelson (NFER's publishing arm) to design new ranges of tests for occupational selection. This led to the formation of the Psychometric Research Unit at Hatfield, which in turn was privatised by Dr. Blinkhorn in 1985.

Psychology and psychometrics

Blinkhorn has been responsible for some of the most widely used ability and aptitude tests for recruitment and selection.[ citation needed ] He is also known as a critic of bad testing practice, in particular the abuse of personality tests (see papers). At the age of 37, he became one of the then youngest fellows of the British Psychological Society. He has been a member of the BPS's Test Standards Committee, and served on the Society's Fellowships Committee. He is one of three consulting editors for Selection & Development Review (SDR) [7] (published by the BPS) alongside Victor Dulewicz and Neil Anderson.

Blinkhorn was also a member of the panel formed by the BPS to investigate the polygraph and contributed a chapter to the book The Polygraph Test (1988), which resulted from the investigation. [8]

As an expert witness, he has acted on behalf of the Commission for Racial Equality in several industrial tribunals. [9] [10]

He has worked with Harvey Goldstein (on the inappropriate implementation of the Rasch model in education), and was involved with the development of National Vocational Qualifications. [11]

Blinkhorn also contributed a chapter in Cyril Burt: Fraud or Framed? [12] [13] and 'Was Burt stitched up?' in Nature magazine. [14] More recently followed by 'There's no-one quite like Grandad' [15] (Blinkhorn's speech at the Lighthill institute of mathematical sciences, Dec 2006) on newly rediscovered evidence which cast 'fresh light on early developments of mathematics applied to psychology' including references to Charles Spearman's original work on general intelligence, and also to J.C. Maxwell Garnett, Cyril Burt, Godfrey Thomson, and Louis Thurstone.

Nature articles

Since 1980, Blinkhorn has been writing for Nature , starting with a book review of Arthur Jensen's Bias in Mental Testing. [16] Steve Blinkhorn has written a number of articles, a few of which have been on controversial issues, such as: Gender and IQ ('Gender Bender'), Vitamin Pills and IQ ('A dose of Vitamins and a Pinch of salt'), [17] Mice and IQ ('Mice and Mentality'), [18] 'Exponent of the exponential' [19] (a review of Thomas Blass' The man who shocked the world: the life and legacy of Stanley Milgram ). Other articles such as 'Yes, but what's it for?' [20] discusses how 'the current state of language' makes it difficult to discuss evolution accurately.

In 2003, Blinkhorn was listed among Nature's 'magnificent seven' (writers commended for writing outstanding articles, illustrating 'the great job that scientists can do in communicating and commenting on new research' Others included David Wark, Philip N Benfey, S. Blair Hedges, John Harte, Toren Finzel and Len A.Fisk. [21]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arthur Jensen</span> Professor of educational psychology (1923–2012)

Arthur Robert Jensen was an American psychologist and writer. He was a professor of educational psychology at the University of California, Berkeley. Jensen was known for his work in psychometrics and differential psychology, the study of how and why individuals differ behaviorally from one another.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intelligence quotient</span> Score from a test designed to assess intelligence

An intelligence quotient (IQ) is a total score derived from a set of standardised tests or subtests designed to assess human intelligence. The abbreviation "IQ" was coined by the psychologist William Stern for the German term Intelligenzquotient, his term for a scoring method for intelligence tests at University of Breslau he advocated in a 1912 book.

Psychometrics is a field of study within psychology concerned with the theory and technique of measurement. Psychometrics generally covers specialized fields within psychology and education devoted to testing, measurement, assessment, and related activities. Psychometrics is concerned with the objective measurement of latent constructs that cannot be directly observed. Examples of latent constructs include intelligence, introversion, mental disorders, and educational achievement. The levels of individuals on nonobservable latent variables are inferred through mathematical modeling based on what is observed from individuals' responses to items on tests and scales.

<i>The Mismeasure of Man</i> 1981 book by Stephen Jay Gould

The Mismeasure of Man is a 1981 book by paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould. The book is both a history and critique of the statistical methods and cultural motivations underlying biological determinism, the belief that "the social and economic differences between human groups—primarily races, classes, and sexes—arise from inherited, inborn distinctions and that society, in this sense, is an accurate reflection of biology".

Human intelligence is the intellectual capability of humans, which is marked by complex cognitive feats and high levels of motivation and self-awareness. Using their intelligence, humans are able to learn, form concepts, understand, and apply logic and reason. Human intelligence is also thought to encompass our capacities to recognize patterns, plan, innovate, solve problems, make decisions, retain information, and use language to communicate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cyril Burt</span> Discredited English educational psychologist

Sir Cyril Lodowic Burt, FBA was an English educational psychologist and geneticist who also made contributions to statistics. He is known for his studies on the heritability of IQ.

Psychological testing refers to the administration of psychological tests. Psychological tests are administered or scored by trained evaluators. A person's responses are evaluated according to carefully prescribed guidelines. Scores are thought to reflect individual or group differences in the construct the test purports to measure. The science behind psychological testing is psychometrics.

The g factor is a construct developed in psychometric investigations of cognitive abilities and human intelligence. It is a variable that summarizes positive correlations among different cognitive tasks, reflecting the fact that an individual's performance on one type of cognitive task tends to be comparable to that person's performance on other kinds of cognitive tasks. The g factor typically accounts for 40 to 50 percent of the between-individual performance differences on a given cognitive test, and composite scores based on many tests are frequently regarded as estimates of individuals' standing on the g factor. The terms IQ, general intelligence, general cognitive ability, general mental ability, and simply intelligence are often used interchangeably to refer to this common core shared by cognitive tests. However, the g factor itself is a mathematical construct indicating the level of observed correlation between cognitive tasks. The measured value of this construct depends on the cognitive tasks that are used, and little is known about the underlying causes of the observed correlations.

Louis Leon Thurstone was an American pioneer in the fields of psychometrics and psychophysics. He conceived the approach to measurement known as the law of comparative judgment, and is well known for his contributions to factor analysis. A Review of General Psychology survey, published in 2002, ranked Thurstone as the 88th most cited psychologist of the 20th century, tied with John Garcia, James J. Gibson, David Rumelhart, Margaret Floy Washburn, and Robert S. Woodworth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Personality test</span> Method of assessing human personality constructs

A personality test is a method of assessing human personality constructs. Most personality assessment instruments are in fact introspective self-report questionnaire measures or reports from life records (L-data) such as rating scales. Attempts to construct actual performance tests of personality have been very limited even though Raymond Cattell with his colleague Frank Warburton compiled a list of over 2000 separate objective tests that could be used in constructing objective personality tests. One exception however, was the Objective-Analytic Test Battery, a performance test designed to quantitatively measure 10 factor-analytically discerned personality trait dimensions. A major problem with both L-data and Q-data methods is that because of item transparency, rating scales and self-report questionnaires are highly susceptible to motivational and response distortion ranging all the way from lack of adequate self-insight to downright dissimulation depending on the reason/motivation for the assessment being undertaken.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard Lynn</span> British psychologist noted for his views on race and intelligence (1930–2023)

Richard Lynn was a controversial English psychologist and self-described "scientific racist" who advocated for a genetic relationship between race and intelligence. He was a professor emeritus of psychology at Ulster University, but had the title withdrawn by the university in 2018. He was the editor-in-chief of Mankind Quarterly, which is commonly described as a white supremacist journal. Lynn was lecturer in psychology at the University of Exeter and professor of psychology at the Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, and at the University of Ulster at Coleraine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Leon Kamin</span> American psychologist

Leon J. Kamin was an American psychologist known for his contributions to learning theory and his critique of estimates of the heritability of IQ. He studied under Richard Solomon at Harvard and contributed several important ideas about conditioning, including the "blocking effect".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peter Saville (psychologist)</span> British psychologist (1946–2022)

Peter Francis Saville was a British chartered occupational psychologist specialising in psychometrics, personality and talent management.

Psychology encompasses a vast domain, and includes many different approaches to the study of mental processes and behavior. Below are the major areas of inquiry that taken together constitute psychology. A comprehensive list of the sub-fields and areas within psychology can be found at the list of psychology topics and list of psychology disciplines.

The history of the race and intelligence controversy concerns the historical development of a debate about possible explanations of group differences encountered in the study of race and intelligence. Since the beginning of IQ testing around the time of World War I, there have been observed differences between the average scores of different population groups, and there have been debates over whether this is mainly due to environmental and cultural factors, or mainly due to some as yet undiscovered genetic factor, or whether such a dichotomy between environmental and genetic factors is the appropriate framing of the debate. Today, the scientific consensus is that genetics does not explain differences in IQ test performance between racial groups.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anton Formann</span>

Anton K. Formann was an Austrian research psychologist, statistician, and psychometrician. He is renowned for his contributions to item response theory, latent class analysis, the measurement of change, mixture models, categorical data analysis, and quantitative methods for research synthesis (meta-analysis).

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to human intelligence:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Klaus Kubinger</span>

Klaus D. Kubinger, is a psychologist as well as a statistician, professor for psychological assessment at the University of Vienna, Faculty of Psychology. His main research work focuses on fundamental research of assessment processes and on application and advancement of Item response theory models. He is also known as a textbook author of psychological assessment on the one hand and on statistics on the other hand.

<i>The Science and Politics of I.Q.</i>

The Science and Politics of I.Q. is a book by the psychologist Leon Kamin, originally published by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates in 1974. In the book, Kamin examines empirical evidence regarding IQ, a common measure of human intelligence, and concludes that there is no evidence that it is significantly heritable. As part of the book's broader critique of hereditarianism and psychometrics, Kamin also became the first to accuse Cyril Burt of scientific misconduct in his twin research. In the book, Kamin states one of its principal conclusions thus: "There exist no data which should lead a prudent man to accept the hypothesis that IQ test scores are in any degree heritable."

Adrian Frank Furnham is a South African-born British BPS chartered occupational psychologist and chartered health psychologist. He is currently an adjunct professor at BI Norwegian Business School and professor at University College London. Throughout his career, he has lectured in the following post-secondary institutions: Pembroke College, Oxford, University of New South Wales, University of West Indies, Hong Kong University Business School, and the Henley Management College.

References

  1. ↑ Blinkhorn, S. 1994. 'Willow, titwillow, titwillow!' Nature372 (1 Dec.): 417–419.
  2. ↑ Blinkhorn, S. 1982. Nature296 (8 April): 506.
  3. ↑ Blinkhorn, S. 2005. 'A Gender Bender' Nature438 (3 Nov.): 31–32.
  4. ↑ Goldstein H., and S. Blinkhorn. 1977. 'Monitoring Educational Standards: an inappropriate model' Bull. Br. Psychol. Soc. 30: 309–311.
  5. ↑ Blinkhorn, S., C. Johnson, and R. Wood. 1988. 'Spuriouser and spuriouser: The use of ipsative personality tests.' Journal of Occupational Psychology61 (June): 153–162.
  6. ↑ Blinkhorn, S., and C. Johnson. 1990. 'The insignificance of personality testing' Nature348: 671–672.
  7. ↑ Selection & Development Review. Vol 23. No.4, 2007. ISSN 0963-2638
  8. ↑ Blinkhorn, S. (1988) 'Lie Detection as a psychometric procedure' In Anthony Gale, ed. The Polygraph Test: Lies, Truth and Science. London: Sage Publications, pp. 29–39.
  9. ↑ Jootley et al. v British Railways Board, which became known as the 'Paddington Guards' case.
  10. ↑ Amos et al. v London Underground Ltd.
  11. ↑ Wood, R., C. Johnson, S. Blinkhorn, and J. Hall. 1989. Boning, Blanching and Backtacking: Assessing Performance in the Workplace. Research and Development Series 46. Sheffield: Training Agency
  12. ↑ Mackintosh, N. J. (ed.) 1995. Cyril Burt: Fraud or Framed? Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 156.
  13. ↑ Goodhart, C. B. 'Cyril Burt: Fraud or Framed?' Archived 31 October 2010 at the Wayback Machine Galton Institute Newsletter Sep. 1996.
  14. ↑ Blinkhorn, S. 1989. 'Was Burt stitched up?' Nature340 (10 Aug): 439–440.
  15. ↑ London Mathematical Society Newsetter 9 February 2007.
  16. ↑ Blinkhorn, Steve (1980) 'Most orthodox heresy: Jensen on IQ myths', Nature 286, 743 – 744 (14 Aug 1980) Book Review
  17. ↑ Blinkhorn, S. 1991. 'A dose of vitamins and a pinch of salt' Nature350 (7 March): 13.
  18. ↑ Blinkhorn, S. 2003. 'Neuroscience: Mice and Mentality' Nature424 (28 Aug.): 1004–1005.
  19. ↑ Blinkhorn, S. 2004. 'Exponent of the exponential' Nature429 (13 May): 132-132.
  20. ↑ Blinkhorn, S. 2001. 'Yes, but what's it for?' Nature412 (23 Aug.): 771.
  21. ↑ Nature. 2003. 'News and Views' 426 (18 Dec.): 773-773.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.