Stroop effect

Last updated
Naming the displayed color of a printed word is an easier and quicker task if the word matches the color (top) than if it does not (bottom). Stroop comparison.png
Naming the displayed color of a printed word is an easier and quicker task if the word matches the color (top) than if it does not (bottom).

In psychology, the Stroop effect is the delay in reaction time between congruent and incongruent stimuli.

Contents

The effect has been used to create a psychological test (the Stroop test) that is widely used in clinical practice and investigation. [1]

A basic task that demonstrates this effect occurs when there is a mismatch between the name of a color (e.g., "blue", "green", or "red") and the color it is printed in (i.e., the word "red" printed in blue ink instead of red ink). When asked to name the color of the word it takes longer and is more prone to errors when the color of the ink does not match the name of the color.

The effect is named after John Ridley Stroop, who first published the effect in English in 1935. [2] The effect had previously been published in Germany in 1929 by other authors. [3] [4] [5] The original paper by Stroop has been one of the most cited papers in the history of experimental psychology, leading to more than 700 Stroop-related articles in literature. [5]

Original experiment

Examples of the three stimuli and colors used for each of the activities of the original Stroop article: color words in black text color words in incongruent colors colored squares Stroop stimuli.png
Examples of the three stimuli and colors used for each of the activities of the original Stroop article:
  1. color words in black text
  2. color words in incongruent colors
  3. colored squares
Figure 1 from Experiment 2 of the original description of the Stroop Effect (1935). 1 is the time that it takes to name the color of the dots while 2 is the time that it takes to say the color when there is a conflict with the written word. Stroop-fig1-exp2.jpg
Figure 1 from Experiment 2 of the original description of the Stroop Effect (1935). 1 is the time that it takes to name the color of the dots while 2 is the time that it takes to say the color when there is a conflict with the written word.

The effect was named after John Ridley Stroop, who published the effect in English in 1935 in an article in the Journal of Experimental Psychology entitled "Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions" that includes three different experiments. [2] However, the effect was first published in 1929 in Germany by Erich Rudolf Jaensch, [3] and its roots can be followed back to works of James McKeen Cattell and Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt in the nineteenth century. [4] [5]

In his experiments, Stroop administered several variations of the same test for which three different kinds of stimuli were created: Names of colors appeared in black ink; Names of colors in a different ink than the color named; and Squares of a given color. [2]

In the first experiment, words and conflict-words were used. The task required the participants to read the written color names of the words independently of the color of the ink (for example, they would have to read "purple" no matter what the color of the font). In experiment 2, stimulus conflict-words and color patches were used, and participants were required to say the ink-color of the letters independently of the written word with the second kind of stimulus and also name the color of the patches. If the word "purple" was written in red font, they would have to say "red", rather than "purple". When the squares were shown, the participant spoke the name of the color. Stroop, in the third experiment, tested his participants at different stages of practice at the tasks and stimuli used in the first and second experiments, examining learning effects. [2]

Unlike researchers now using the test for psychological evaluation, [6] Stroop used only the three basic scores, rather than more complex derivative scoring procedures. Stroop noted that participants took significantly longer to complete the color reading in the second task than they had taken to name the colors of the squares in Experiment 2. This delay had not appeared in the first experiment. Such interference were explained by the automation of reading, where the mind automatically determines the semantic meaning of the word (it reads the word "red" and thinks of the color "red"), and then must intentionally check itself and identify instead the color of the word (the ink is a color other than red), a process that is not automated. [2]

Experimental findings

Stimuli in Stroop paradigms can be divided into three groups: neutral, congruent and incongruent. Neutral stimuli are those stimuli in which only the text (similarly to stimuli 1 of Stroop's experiment), or color (similarly to stimuli 3 of Stroop's experiment) are displayed. [7] Congruent stimuli are those in which the ink color and the word refer to the same color (for example the word "pink" written in pink). Incongruent stimuli are those in which ink color and word differ. [7] Three experimental findings are recurrently found in Stroop experiments. [7] A first finding is semantic interference, which states that naming the ink color of neutral stimuli (e.g. when the ink color and word do not interfere with each other) is faster than in incongruent conditions. It is called semantic interference since it is usually accepted that the relationship in meaning between ink color and word is at the root of the interference. [7] The second finding, semantic facilitation, explains the finding that naming the ink of congruent stimuli is faster (e.g. when the ink color and the word match) than when neutral stimuli are present (e.g. stimulus 3; when only a colored square is shown). The third finding is that both semantic interference and facilitation disappear when the task consists of reading the word instead of naming the ink color. It has been sometimes called Stroop asynchrony, and has been explained by a reduced automatization when naming colors compared to reading words. [7]

In the study of interference theory, the most commonly used procedure has been similar to Stroop's second experiment, in which subjects were tested on naming colors of incompatible words and of control patches. The first experiment in Stroop's study (reading words in black versus incongruent colors) has been discussed less. In both cases, the interference score is expressed as the difference between the times needed to read each of the two types of cards. [5] Instead of naming stimuli, subjects have also been asked to sort stimuli into categories. [5] Different characteristics of the stimulus such as ink colors or direction of words have also been systematically varied. [5] None of all these modifications eliminates the effect of interference. [5]

Neuroanatomy

The anterior cingulate gyrus shows increased activity when viewing conflicting stimulus. MRI anterior cingulate.png
The anterior cingulate gyrus shows increased activity when viewing conflicting stimulus.

Brain imaging techniques including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) have shown that there are two main areas in the brain that are involved in the processing of the Stroop task. [9] [10] They are the anterior cingulate cortex, and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. [11] More specifically, while both are activated when resolving conflicts and catching errors, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex assists in memory and other executive functions, while the anterior cingulate cortex is used to select an appropriate response and allocate attentional resources. [12]

The posterior dorsolateral prefrontal cortex creates the appropriate rules for the brain to accomplish the current goal. [12] For the Stroop effect, this involves activating the areas of the brain involved in color perception, but not those involved in word encoding. [13] It counteracts biases and irrelevant information, for instance, the fact that the semantic perception of the word is more striking than the color in which it is printed. Next, the mid-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex selects the representation that will fulfill the goal. The relevant information must be separated from irrelevant information in the task; thus, the focus is placed on the ink color and not the word. [12] Furthermore, research has suggested that left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activation during a Stroop task is related to an individual's’ expectation regarding the conflicting nature of the upcoming trial, and not so much on the conflict itself. Conversely, the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex aims to reduce the attentional conflict and is activated after the conflict is over. [11]

Moreover, the posterior dorsal anterior cingulate cortex is responsible for what decision is made (i.e. whether someone will say the written word or the ink color). [11] Following the response, the anterior dorsal anterior cingulate cortex is involved in response evaluation—deciding whether the answer is correct or incorrect. Activity in this region increases when the probability of an error is higher. [14]

Theories

There are several theories used to explain the Stroop effect, which are commonly known as "race models". This is based on the underlying notion that both relevant and irrelevant information are processed in parallel, but that they "race" to enter the single central processor during response selection. [15] They are:

Processing speed

This theory, also called Relative Speed of Processing Theory, suggests there is a lag in the brain's ability to recognize the color of the word since the brain reads words faster than it recognizes colors. [16] This is based on the idea that word processing is significantly faster than color processing. In a condition where there is a conflict regarding words and colors (e.g., Stroop test), if the task is to report the color, the word information arrives at the decision-making stage before the color information which presents processing confusion. Conversely, if the task is to report the word, because color information lags after word information, a decision can be made ahead of the conflicting information. [17]

Selective attention

The Selective Attention Theory suggests that color recognition, as opposed to reading a word, requires more attention. The brain needs to use more attention to recognize a color than to encode a word, so it takes a little longer. [18] The responses lend much to the interference noted in the Stroop task. This may be a result of either an allocation of attention to the responses or to a greater inhibition of distractors that are not appropriate responses.[ citation needed ]

Automaticity

This theory is the most common theory of the Stroop effect. [18] [ failed verification ] It suggests that since recognizing colors is not an "automatic process" there is hesitancy to respond, whereas, in contrast, the brain automatically understands the meanings of words as a result of habitual reading. This idea is based on the premise that automatic reading does not need controlled attention, but still uses enough attentional resources to reduce the amount of attention accessible for color information processing. [19] Stirling (1979) introduced the concept of response automaticity. He demonstrated that changing the responses from colored words to letters that were not part of the colored words increased reaction time while reducing Stroop interference. [20]

Parallel distributed processing

This theory suggests that as the brain analyzes information, different and specific pathways are developed for different tasks. [21] Some pathways, such as reading, are stronger than others, therefore, it is the strength of the pathway and not the speed of the pathway that is important. [18] In addition, automaticity is a function of the strength of each pathway, hence, when two pathways are activated simultaneously in the Stroop effect, interference occurs between the stronger (word reading) path and the weaker (color naming) path, more specifically when the pathway that leads to the response is the weaker pathway. [21]

Cognitive development

In the neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development, several variations of the Stroop task have been used to study the relations between speed of processing and executive functions with working memory and cognitive development in various domains. This research shows that reaction time to Stroop tasks decreases systematically from early childhood through early adulthood. These changes suggest that speed of processing increases with age and that cognitive control becomes increasingly efficient. Moreover, this research strongly suggests that changes in these processes with age are very closely associated with development in working memory and various aspects of thought. [22] [23] The stroop task also shows the ability to control behavior. If asked to state the color of the ink rather than the word, the participant must overcome the initial and stronger stimuli to read the word. These inhibitions show the ability for the brain to regulate behavior. [24]

Uses

The Stroop effect has been widely used in psychology. Among the most important uses is the creation of validated psychological tests based on the Stroop effect permit to measure a person's selective attention capacity and skills, as well as their processing speed ability. [25] It is also used in conjunction with other neuropsychological assessments to examine a person's executive processing abilities, [18] and can help in the diagnosis and characterization of different psychiatric and neurological disorders.

Researchers also use the Stroop effect during brain imaging studies to investigate regions of the brain that are involved in planning, decision-making, and managing real-world interference (e.g., texting and driving). [26]

Stroop test

Stroop effect
MeSH D057190

The Stroop effect has been used to investigate a person's psychological capacities; since its discovery during the twentieth century, it has become a popular neuropsychological test. [27]

There are different test variants commonly used in clinical settings, with differences between them in the number of subtasks, type and number of stimuli, times for the task, or scoring procedures. [27] [28] All versions have at least two numbers of subtasks. In the first trial, the written color name differs from the color ink it is printed in, and the participant must say the written word. In the second trial, the participant must name the ink color instead. However, there can be up to four different subtasks, adding in some cases stimuli consisting of groups of letters "X" or dots printed in a given color with the participant having to say the color of the ink; or names of colors printed in black ink that have to be read. [27] The number of stimuli varies between fewer than twenty items to more than 150, being closely related to the scoring system used. While in some test variants the score is the number of items from a subtask read in a given time, in others it is the time that it took to complete each of the trials. [27] The number of errors and different derived punctuations are also taken into account in some versions. [27]

This test is considered to measure selective attention, cognitive flexibility and processing speed, and it is used as a tool in the evaluation of executive functions. [27] [28] An increased interference effect is found in disorders such as brain damage, dementias and other neurodegenerative diseases, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, or a variety of mental disorders such as schizophrenia, addictions, and depression. [27] [29] [30] Ergonomists could even show a relationship between the ergonomic characteristics of the educational furniture and the number of cognitive errors based on Stroop test. They found that an error percentage reduction using separated chair and desk against arm table student chair. [31]

Variations

The Stroop test has additionally been modified to include other sensory modalities and variables, [32] to study the effect of bilingualism, [33] or to investigate the effect of emotions on interference. [34] [35] [36]

Warped words

For example, the warped words Stroop effect produces the same findings similar to the original Stroop effect. Much like the Stroop task, the printed word's color is different from the ink color of the word; however, the words are printed in such a way that it is more difficult to read (typically curved-shaped). [37] The idea here is the way the words are printed slows down both the brain's reaction and processing time, making it harder to complete the task.

Emotional

The emotional Stroop effect serves as an information processing approach to emotions. In an emotional Stroop task, an individual is given negative emotional words like "grief", "violence", and "pain" mixed in with more neutral words like "clock", "door", and "shoe". [37] Just like in the original Stroop task, the words are colored and the individual is supposed to name the color. Research has revealed that individuals that are depressed are more likely to say the color of a negative word slower than the color of a neutral word. [38] While both the emotional Stroop and the classic Stroop involve the need to suppress irrelevant or distracting information, there are differences between the two. The emotional Stroop effect emphasizes the conflict between the emotional relevance to the individual and the word; whereas, the classic Stroop effect examines the conflict between the incongruent color and word. [37] The emotional Stroop effect has been used in psychology to test implicit biases such as racial bias via an implicit-association test. [39] A notable study of this is Project Implicit from Harvard University which administered a test associating negative or positive emotions with pictures of race and measured the reaction time to determine racial preference. [40]

Spatial

The spatial Stroop effect demonstrates interference between the stimulus location with the location in the stimuli. [41] In one version of the spatial Stroop task, an up or down-pointing arrow appears randomly above or below a central point. Despite being asked to discriminate the direction of the arrow while ignoring its location, individuals typically make faster and more accurate responses to congruent stimuli (i.e., a down-pointing arrow located below the fixation sign) than to incongruent ones (i.e., an up-pointing arrow located below the fixation sign). [41] A similar effect, the Simon effect, uses non-spatial stimuli. [15]

Numerical

The Numerical Stroop effect demonstrates the close relationship between numerical values and physical sizes. Digits symbolize numerical values but they also have physical sizes. A digit can be presented as big or small (e.g., 5 vs. 5), irrespective of its numerical value. Comparing digits in incongruent trials (e.g., 3 5) is slower than comparing digits in congruent trials (e.g., 5 3) and the difference in reaction time is termed the numerical Stroop effect. The effect of irrelevant numerical values on physical comparisons (similar to the effect of irrelevant color words on responding to colors) suggests that numerical values are processed automatically (i.e., even when they are irrelevant to the task). [42]

Reverse

Another variant of the classic Stroop effect is the reverse Stroop effect. It occurs during a pointing task. In a reverse Stroop task, individuals are shown a page with a black square with an incongruent colored word in the middle—for instance, the word "red" written in the color green—with four smaller colored squares in the corners. [43] One square would be colored green, one square would be red, and the two remaining squares would be other colors. Studies show that if the individual is asked to point to the color square of the written color (in this case, red) they would present a delay. [43] Thus, incongruently-colored words significantly interfere with pointing to the appropriate square. However, some research has shown there is very little interference from incongruent color words when the objective is to match the color of the word. [18]

The Brain Age: Train Your Brain in Minutes a Day! software program, produced by Ryūta Kawashima for the Nintendo DS portable video game system, contains an automated Stroop test administrator module translated into game form. [44]

MythBusters used the Stroop effect test to see if males and females are cognitively impaired by having an attractive person of the opposite sex in the room. The "myth" (that is, hypothesis) was disproved. [45] A Nova episode used the Stroop Effect to illustrate the subtle changes of the mental flexibility of Mount Everest climbers in relation to altitude. [46]

In industry

British automotive marque MINI released a vehicle with the turn signal indicator designed as arrows that are pointing the opposite way than the indicated turn signal is blinking. [47]

Related Research Articles

Working memory is a cognitive system with a limited capacity that can hold information temporarily. It is important for reasoning and the guidance of decision-making and behavior. Working memory is often used synonymously with short-term memory, but some theorists consider the two forms of memory distinct, assuming that working memory allows for the manipulation of stored information, whereas short-term memory only refers to the short-term storage of information. Working memory is a theoretical concept central to cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and neuroscience.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Attention</span> Psychological process of selectively perceiving and prioritising discrete aspects of information

Attention or focus, is the concentration of awareness on some phenomenon to the exclusion of other stimuli. It is a process of selectively concentrating on a discrete aspect of information, whether considered subjective or objective. William James (1890) wrote that "Attention is the taking possession by the mind, in clear and vivid form, of one out of what seem several simultaneously possible objects or trains of thought. Focalization, concentration, of consciousness are of its essence." Attention has also been described as the allocation of limited cognitive processing resources. Attention is manifested by an attentional bottleneck, in terms of the amount of data the brain can process each second; for example, in human vision, only less than 1% of the visual input data can enter the bottleneck, leading to inattentional blindness.

Source amnesia is the inability to remember where, when or how previously learned information has been acquired, while retaining the factual knowledge. This branch of amnesia is associated with the malfunctioning of one's explicit memory. It is likely that the disconnect between having the knowledge and remembering the context in which the knowledge was acquired is due to a dissociation between semantic and episodic memory – an individual retains the semantic knowledge, but lacks the episodic knowledge to indicate the context in which the knowledge was gained.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anterior cingulate cortex</span> Brain region

In the human brain, the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is the frontal part of the cingulate cortex that resembles a "collar" surrounding the frontal part of the corpus callosum. It consists of Brodmann areas 24, 32, and 33.

The interference theory is a theory regarding human memory. Interference occurs in learning. The notion is that memories encoded in long-term memory (LTM) are forgotten and cannot be retrieved into short-term memory (STM) because either memory could interfere with the other. There is an immense number of encoded memories within the storage of LTM. The challenge for memory retrieval is recalling the specific memory and working in the temporary workspace provided in STM. Retaining information regarding the relevant time of encoding memories into LTM influences interference strength. There are two types of interference effects: proactive and retroactive interference.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Visual memory</span> Ability to process visual and spatial information

Visual memory describes the relationship between perceptual processing and the encoding, storage and retrieval of the resulting neural representations. Visual memory occurs over a broad time range spanning from eye movements to years in order to visually navigate to a previously visited location. Visual memory is a form of memory which preserves some characteristics of our senses pertaining to visual experience. We are able to place in memory visual information which resembles objects, places, animals or people in a mental image. The experience of visual memory is also referred to as the mind's eye through which we can retrieve from our memory a mental image of original objects, places, animals or people. Visual memory is one of several cognitive systems, which are all interconnected parts that combine to form the human memory. Types of palinopsia, the persistence or recurrence of a visual image after the stimulus has been removed, is a dysfunction of visual memory.

The Levels of Processing model, created by Fergus I. M. Craik and Robert S. Lockhart in 1972, describes memory recall of stimuli as a function of the depth of mental processing. More analysis produce more elaborate and stronger memory than lower levels of processing. Depth of processing falls on a shallow to deep continuum. Shallow processing leads to a fragile memory trace that is susceptible to rapid decay. Conversely, deep processing results in a more durable memory trace. There are three levels of processing in this model. Structural processing, or visual, is when we remember only the physical quality of the word E.g how the word is spelled and how letters look. Phonemic processing includes remembering the word by the way it sounds. E.G the word tall rhymes with fall. Lastly, we have semantic processing in which we encode the meaning of the word with another word that is similar or has similar meaning. Once the word is perceived, the brain allows for a deeper processing.

The Simon effect is the difference in accuracy or reaction time between trials in which stimulus and response are on the same side and trials in which they are on opposite sides, with responses being generally slower and less accurate when the stimulus and response are on opposite sides. The task is similar in concept to the Stroop Effect. The Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT) can be used to assess the ability to inhibit cognitive interference that occurs when the processing of a specific stimulus feature impedes the simultaneous processing of a second stimulus attribute. The Simon effect is an extension of this effect, but the interference in this task is generated by spatial features rather than features of the stimuli themselves.

Affective neuroscience is the study of how the brain processes emotions. This field combines neuroscience with the psychological study of personality, emotion, and mood. The basis of emotions and what emotions are remains an issue of debate within the field of affective neuroscience.

In psychology, the emotional Stroop task is used as an information-processing approach to assessing emotions. Like the standard Stroop effect, the emotional Stroop test works by examining the response time of the participant to name colors of words presented to them. Unlike the traditional Stroop effect, the words presented either relate to specific emotional states or disorders, or they are neutral. For example, depressed participants will be slower to say the color of depressing words rather than non-depressing words. Non-clinical subjects have also been shown to name the color of an emotional word slower than naming the color of a neutral word. Negative words selected for the emotional Stroop task can be either preselected by researchers or taken from the lived experiences of participants completing the task. Typically, when asked to identify the color of the words presented to them, participants reaction times for negative emotional words is slower than the identification of the color of neutral words. While it has been shown that those in negative moods tend to take longer to respond when presented with negative word stimuli, this is not always the case when participants are presented with words that are positive or more neutral in tone.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Executive functions</span> Cognitive processes necessary for control of behavior

In cognitive science and neuropsychology, executive functions are a set of cognitive processes that are necessary for the cognitive control of behavior: selecting and successfully monitoring behaviors that facilitate the attainment of chosen goals. Executive functions include basic cognitive processes such as attentional control, cognitive inhibition, inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility. Higher-order executive functions require the simultaneous use of multiple basic executive functions and include planning and fluid intelligence.

Attentional bias refers to how a person's perception is affected by selective factors in their attention. Attentional biases may explain an individual's failure to consider alternative possibilities when occupied with an existing train of thought. For example, cigarette smokers have been shown to possess an attentional bias for smoking-related cues around them, due to their brain's altered reward sensitivity. Attentional bias has also been associated with clinically relevant symptoms such as anxiety and depression.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Negative priming</span> Initial stimulus inhibits response to subsequent stimulus

Negative priming is an implicit memory effect in which prior exposure to a stimulus unfavorably influences the response to the same stimulus. It falls under the category of priming, which refers to the change in the response towards a stimulus due to a subconscious memory effect. Negative priming describes the slow and error-prone reaction to a stimulus that is previously ignored. For example, a subject may be imagined trying to pick a red pen from a pen holder. The red pen becomes the target of attention, so the subject responds by moving their hand towards it. At this time, they mentally block out all other pens as distractors to aid in closing in on just the red pen. After repeatedly picking the red pen over the others, switching to the blue pen results in a momentary delay picking the pen out. The slow reaction due to the change of the distractor stimulus to target stimulus is called the negative priming effect.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex</span> Area of the prefrontal cortex of primates

The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is an area in the prefrontal cortex of the primate brain. It is one of the most recently derived parts of the human brain. It undergoes a prolonged period of maturation which lasts into adulthood. The DLPFC is not an anatomical structure, but rather a functional one. It lies in the middle frontal gyrus of humans. In macaque monkeys, it is around the principal sulcus. Other sources consider that DLPFC is attributed anatomically to BA 9 and 46 and BA 8, 9 and 10.

In cognitive psychology, the Eriksen flanker task is a set of response inhibition tests used to assess the ability to suppress responses that are inappropriate in a particular context. The target is flanked by non-target stimuli which correspond either to the same directional response as the target, to the opposite response, or to neither. The task is named for American psychologists Barbara. A. Eriksen & Charles W. Eriksen, who first published the task in 1974, and for the flanker stimuli that surround the target. In the tests, a directional response is assigned to a central target stimulus. Various forms of the task are used to measure information processing and selective attention.

In psychology and neuroscience, executive dysfunction, or executive function deficit, is a disruption to the efficacy of the executive functions, which is a group of cognitive processes that regulate, control, and manage other cognitive processes. Executive dysfunction can refer to both neurocognitive deficits and behavioural symptoms. It is implicated in numerous psychopathologies and mental disorders, as well as short-term and long-term changes in non-clinical executive control. Executive dysfunction is the mechanism underlying ADHD Paralysis, and in a broader context, it can encompass other cognitive difficulties like planning, organizing, initiating tasks and regulating emotions. It is a core characteristic of ADHD and can elucidate numerous other recognized symptoms.

The effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance encompass a broad range of impairments in various cognitive functions resulting from inadequate or insufficient sleep, impacting areas such as attention, memory, decision-making, and reaction time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inhibitory control</span> Cognitive process

Inhibitory control, also known as response inhibition, is a cognitive process – and, more specifically, an executive function – that permits an individual to inhibit their impulses and natural, habitual, or dominant behavioral responses to stimuli in order to select a more appropriate behavior that is consistent with completing their goals. Self-control is an important aspect of inhibitory control. For example, successfully suppressing the natural behavioral response to eat cake when one is craving it while dieting requires the use of inhibitory control.

Cognitive flexibility is an intrinsic property of a cognitive system often associated with the mental ability to adjust its activity and content, switch between different task rules and corresponding behavioral responses, maintain multiple concepts simultaneously and shift internal attention between them. The term cognitive flexibility is traditionally used to refer to one of the executive functions. In this sense, it can be seen as neural underpinnings of adaptive and flexible behavior. Most flexibility tests were developed under this assumption several decades ago. Nowadays, cognitive flexibility can also be referred to as a set of properties of the brain that facilitate flexible yet relevant switching between functional brain states.

In psychology, the numerical Stroop effect demonstrates the relationship between numerical values and physical sizes. When digits are presented visually, they can be physically large or small, irrespective of their actual values. Congruent pairs occur when size and value correspond while incongruent pairs occur when size and value are incompatible. It was found that when people are asked to compare digits, their reaction time tends to be slower in the case of incongruent pairs. This reaction time difference between congruent and incongruent pairs is termed the numerical Stroop effect

References

  1. ↑ Scarpina; Tagini (2017-04-12). "The Stroop Color and Word Test". Frontiers in Psychology. 8: 557. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00557 . PMC   5388755 . PMID   28446889.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Stroop, John Ridley (1935). "Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions". Journal of Experimental Psychology. 18 (6): 643–662. doi:10.1037/h0054651. hdl: 11858/00-001M-0000-002C-5ADB-7 . Retrieved 2008-10-08.
  3. 1 2 Jaensch, E.R (1929). Grundformen menschlichen Seins. Berlin: Otto Elsner.
  4. 1 2 Jensen AR, Rohwer WD (1966). "The Stroop color-word test: a review". Acta Psychologica. 25 (1): 36–93. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(66)90004-7. PMID   5328883.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MacLeod CM (March 1991). "Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review". Psychological Bulletin. 109 (2): 163–203. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.475.2563 . doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163. hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-002C-5646-A. PMID   2034749.(registration required)
  6. ↑ Golden, CJ (1978). Stroop Color and Word Test: A Manual for Clinical and Experimental Uses. Chicago, Illinois: Skoelting. pp. 1–32.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 van Maanen L, van Rijn H, Borst JP (December 2009). "Stroop and picture-word interference are two sides of the same coin". Psychon Bull Rev. 16 (6): 987–99. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.6.987 . PMID   19966248.
  8. ↑ Purves, Dale; LaBar, Kevin S.; Platt, Michael L.; Woldorff, Marty; Cabeza, Roberto; Huettel, Scott A. (1 November 2012). Principles of cognitive neuroscience (Second ed.). Sinauer Associates Inc. of Oxford University Press Publishers. ISBN   9780878935734. OCLC   795553755.
  9. ↑ Pardo, Jose V; Pardo, Patricia J; Janer, Kevin W; Raichle, Marcus E (1 January 1990). "The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 87 (1): 256–259. Bibcode:1990PNAS...87..256P. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.1.256 . PMC   53241 . PMID   2296583.
  10. ↑ Taylor, S (1997). "Isolation Of Specific Interference Processing In The Stroop Task: PET Activation Studies". NeuroImage. 6 (2): 81–92. doi:10.1006/nimg.1997.0285. PMID   9299382. S2CID   21776880.
  11. 1 2 3 Milham, M (2003). "Practice-related Effects Demonstrate Complementary Roles Of Anterior Cingulate And Prefrontal Cortices In Attentional Control". NeuroImage. 18 (2): 483–493. doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(02)00050-2. PMID   12595201.
  12. 1 2 3 Banich, M; et al. (2000). "fMRI Studies of Stroop Tasks Reveal Unique Roles of Anterior and Posterior Brain Systems in Attentional Selection". Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 12 (6): 988–1000. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.544.5571 . doi:10.1162/08989290051137521. PMID   11177419. S2CID   10145375.
  13. ↑ Bush, G; et al. (1998). "The Counting Stroop: An Interference Task Specialized For Functional Neuroimaging Validation Study With Functional MRI". Human Brain Mapping. 6 (4): 270–288. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.501.6259 . doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1998)6:4<270::aid-hbm6>3.3.co;2-h. PMC   6873370 . PMID   9704265.
  14. ↑ Gruber, S; et al. (2002). "Stroop Performance in Normal Control Subjects: An fMRI Study". NeuroImage. 16 (2): 349–360. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1089. PMID   12030821. S2CID   14424164.
  15. 1 2 Johnson, A (2004). Attention: theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
  16. ↑ McMahon, M. "What Is the Stroop Effec" . Retrieved November 11, 2013.
  17. ↑ Lamers, M.J.; et al. (2010). "Selective Attention And Response Set In The Stroop Task". Memory & Cognition. 38 (7): 893–904. doi: 10.3758/mc.38.7.893 . hdl: 2066/90123 . PMID   20921102.
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 McMahon, M. "What Is the Stroop Effect?" . Retrieved November 11, 2013.
  19. ↑ Monahan, J.S (2001). "Coloring single Stroop elements: Reducing automaticity or slowing color processing". Journal of General Psychology. 128 (1): 98–112. doi:10.1080/00221300109598901. PMID   11277451. S2CID   1208183.
  20. ↑ Stirling, N (1979). "Stroop interference: An input and an output phenomenon". Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 31: 121–132. doi:10.1080/14640747908400712. S2CID   144956732.
  21. 1 2 Cohen, J.D.; et al. (1990). "On The Control Of Automatic Processes: A Parallel Distributed Processing Account Of The Stroop Effect". Psychological Review. 97 (3): 332–361. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.321.3453 . doi:10.1037/0033-295x.97.3.332. PMID   2200075.
  22. ↑ Demetriou, A., Christou, C., Spanoudis, G., & Platsidou, M. (2002). The development of mental processing: Efficiency, working memory, and thinking. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67, Serial Number 268.
  23. ↑ Demetriou, A., Efklides, A., & Platsidou, M. (1993). The architecture and dynamics of developing mind: Experien¬tial structuralism as a frame for unifying cognitive developmental theories. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, Serial Number 234.
  24. ↑ Kellogg, Ronald T. (2013). The making of the mind : the neuroscience of human nature. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books. p. 49. ISBN   978-1-61614-733-4.
  25. ↑ Lamers, M.J. (2010). "Selective Attention And Response Set In The Stroop Task". Memory & Cognition. 38 (7): 893–904. doi: 10.3758/mc.38.7.893 . hdl: 2066/90123 . PMID   20921102.
  26. ↑ Root-Bernstein, R (2007). "Brain Aging: Models, Methods, And Mechanisms". The Journal of the American Medical Association. 298 (23): 2798–2799. doi:10.1001/jama.298.23.2798.
  27. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Howieson, Diane Black; Lezak, Muriel Deutsch; Loring, David W. (2004). "Orientation and attention". Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Oxford University Press. pp. 365–367. ISBN   978-0-19-511121-7 . Retrieved 2009-03-06.
  28. 1 2 Strauss, Esther; Sherman, Elizabeth M.S.; Spreen, Otfried (2006). A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary. Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Oxford University Press. pp. 477–499. ISBN   978-0-19-515957-8 . Retrieved 2009-03-06.
  29. ↑ Lansbergen MM, Kenemans JL, van Engeland H (March 2007). "Stroop interference and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a review and meta-analysis". Neuropsychology. 21 (2): 251–62. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.576.8104 . doi:10.1037/0894-4105.21.2.251. PMID   17402825.
  30. ↑ Barch DM, Braver TS, Carter CS, Poldrack RA, Robbins TW (January 2009). "CNTRICS final task selection: executive control". Schizophr Bull. 35 (1): 115–35. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbn154. PMC   2643948 . PMID   19011235.
  31. ↑ Jafari A, Arghami S, Kamali K, Zenozian S. Relationship Between Educational Furniture Design and Cognitive Error. InCongress of the International Ergonomics Association 2018 Aug 26 (pp. 649-656). Springer, Cham.
  32. ↑ Roberts KL, Hall DA (June 2008). "Examining a supramodal network for conflict processing: a systematic review and novel functional magnetic resonance imaging data for related visual and auditory stroop tasks". Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 20 (6): 1063–78. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20074. PMID   18211237. S2CID   1078936.
  33. ↑ Rosselli M, Ardila A, Santisi MN, et al. (September 2002). "Stroop effect in Spanish-English bilinguals". Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 8 (6): 819–27. doi:10.1017/S1355617702860106. PMID   12240746. S2CID   14224848.
  34. ↑ Williams JM, Mathews A, MacLeod C (July 1996). "The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology". Psychol Bull. 120 (1): 3–24. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.321.1053 . doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.1.3. PMID   8711015.
  35. ↑ Kimble MO, Frueh BC, Marks L (June 2009). "Does the modified Stroop effect exist in PTSD? Evidence from dissertation abstracts and the peer reviewed literature". J Anxiety Disord. 23 (5): 650–5. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.02.002. PMC   2844871 . PMID   19272751.
  36. ↑ Waters AJ, Sayette MA, Franken IH, Schwartz JE (June 2005). "Generalizability of carry-over effects in the emotional Stroop task". Behav Res Ther. 43 (6): 715–32. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.06.003. PMID   15890165.
  37. 1 2 3 "The Stroop Effect". Brainstorm Psychology. Retrieved November 11, 2013.
  38. ↑ Frings, C; et al. (2010). "Decomposing the emotional Stroop effect". Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1 (1): 42–49. doi:10.1080/17470210903156594. PMID   19691003. S2CID   23725232.
  39. ↑ Greenwald, Anthony; Nosek, Brian; Xu, Kaiyuan (2014-03-18). "Psychology data from the Race Implicit Association Test on the Project Implicit Demo website". Journal of Open Psychology Data. 2 (1): e3. doi: 10.5334/jopd.ac . ISSN   2050-9863.
  40. ↑ "Project Implicit". implicit.harvard.edu. Retrieved 2019-08-01.
  41. 1 2 Wuhr, P (2007). "A Stroop Effect For Spatial Orientation". The Journal of General Psychology. 134 (3): 285–294. doi:10.3200/genp.134.3.285-294. PMID   17824399. S2CID   2872079.
  42. ↑ Henik, A; Tzelgov, J (1982). "Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks". Memory & Cognition. 10 (4): 389–395. doi: 10.3758/BF03202431 . PMID   7132716.
  43. 1 2 Durgin, F (2000). "The Reverse Stroop Effect". Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 7 (1): 121–125. doi: 10.3758/bf03210730 . PMID   10780025.
  44. ↑ "Get the Scoop on Stroop" . Retrieved 2009-03-03.
  45. ↑ List of MythBusters episodes#cite note-2014eps-36
  46. ↑ Gail Rosenbaum (November 2000). "NOVA Online – Everest – Test Your Brain". PBS . Retrieved 2008-10-14.
  47. ↑ "Congratulations, Mini, You Made The Stupidest Turn Signals Ever". Jalopnik. 23 September 2021. Retrieved 2021-09-26.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.