Surrogacy in Canada

Last updated

Surrogacy is legal in Canada, provided that it is an altruistic (unpaid) act. In 2004, the federal government of Canada passed the Assisted Human Reproduction Act (AHRA), which criminalized commercial (paid) surrogacy. The validity of surrogacy contracts and the process for establishing the child's parentage is governed by provincial and territorial laws.

Contents

Surrogacy is increasingly becoming more common in Canada due in part to the rise of infertility issues, and International intended parents being attracted by the high-quality universal health care and relatively liberal regulations. However, Canada's surrogacy laws are still subject to criticism, and many have pushed for revision of the law since the Act was passed.

Based on the 1993 report by the Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies, as well as input from experts and individuals directly affected by assisted human reproduction technology, the federal government of Canada passed the Assisted Human Reproduction Act in 2004. [1]  It makes it illegal to pay a surrogate, egg donor, or sperm donor in Canada. It also criminalizes commercial "intermediaries," such as surrogacy agencies, from arranging surrogacy services or matching prospective parents and surrogates. [1] The Act establishes a minimum age of 21 for surrogates. [2]

While monetary or other gain is illegal, the Act allows the intended parent(s) to reimburse a surrogate for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in relation to the surrogacy. Including maternity clothes, medications, and travel. [3] A surrogate may be reimbursed for lost wages; however, a doctor must declare in writing that bed rest is medically necessary for this reimbursement to be legal. Receipts must generally back reimbursements and cannot result in financial gain for the surrogate. [4]

As of 2018, there has only been one conviction under the Act: a 2014 case in which an Ontario company, Canadian Fertility Consultants, was fined $60,000 for purchasing eggs and paying surrogates. [5] [6]

Provincial and territorial laws overview

The federal government determines and maintains surrogacy laws, while provincial and territorial governments oversee surrogacy agreements and parental rights. The intended parent(s) go through the parentage declaration process to be recognized as the child's only legal parent(s). However, this process and the requirements that must be met for the declaration to be approved vary depending on the province/territory, resulting in some cases where the intended parent(s) must adopt the child. [7]

Surrogacy contracts and parental rights laws have been found to use heteronormative assumptive language. Some provinces have addressed this choice of language to be more inclusive. In 2016, Ontario passed the All Families Are Equal Act, which meant that parentage laws had to be reworked for families with only one or more than two intended parent(s) and include inclusive language for same-sex couples. [8]

Alberta

In Alberta, a court order is required for parentage declaration. If there is no genetic link between the child and at least one of the intended parents, parents will have to go through the adoption process. If only one parent has a genetic link, they will appear solely on the birth certificate, and the other parent will have to adopt the child. [9] [7]

British Columbia

Intended parent(s) have two options for establishing parental rights: they can go through the administrative process of a statutory declaration or, if necessary, a court-ordered parentage declaration. No genetic link between the intended parent(s) and the child is required for parent(s) to appear on the birth certificate. Up to 6 parents can be listed on the birth certificate. [7]

Manitoba

While no genetic connection is required, the surrogate's name is initially listed on the birth certificate along with the intended father (if there is one). The surrogate's name will be removed or replaced when a court-ordered declaration of parentage is approved. [9]

New Brunswick

The surrogate's name and the intended father (if there is one) are initially listed on the birth certificate. The surrogate's name will be removed or replaced when a court-ordered declaration of parentage is approved. However, if neither intended parent has a genetic link with the child, they will have to adopt the child. [9]

Newfoundland

Intended parents can apply for interim custody before the birth of the child; however, the surrogate's name will appear on the birth certificate initially. Intended parents will go through the parentage declaration process before appearing on the birth certificate. If there is no genetic link between the child and at least one of the intended parents, parents will have to go through the adoption process. [9] [7]

Northwest Territories

There are no clear laws or guidelines for intended parent(s) and surrogates. While parentage declarations are available, adoption is believed to be the preferred or more commonly used legal process for establishing parentage in the Northwest territories. [7]

Nova Scotia

In Nova Scotia, a court-ordered declaration of parentage is required. Surrogates, alongside intended fathers (if there is one), are named on birth certificates; however, the surrogate’s name will be replaced/removed once a court order is approved. If there is no genetic link between the intended parent(s) and the child, an adoption process will be required. [7]

Ontario

In Ontario, the intended parent(s) can go through the administrative process of a statutory declaration or a court-ordered declaration of parentage. However, if the intended parent(s) choose the statutory declaration process, it can only be signed by the surrogate a week after the birth. Whereas a court-ordered parentage declaration can be processed immediately after birth. Up to 4 parents can be listed on the birth certificate. [9] [7]

Prince Edward Island

As of March 2021, an administrative process rather than a court-ordered process is legal for establishing parentage. However, the surrogate's name will still initially appear on the birth certificate, and a court order is required for the name to be removed from the birth certificate. [9] [7]

Quebec

In Quebec, birth certificates can solely list the surrogate name or the intended father's (if there is one) name. Alternatively, they can list both the surrogate's and the intended father's (if there is one) names. The other intended parent (if there is one) must go through the adoption process to establish parentage. If neither intended parent has a genetic link with the child, parents must go through the adoption process. [9] [7] Until it was repealed on June 6, 2023, Article 541 of the Quebec Civil Code rendered all surrogacy contracts null. [10] [11] In a 2009 case, a Quebec surrogate gave up her legal claim to her baby, having made an arrangement with a couple. The intended father was recognized as a legal parent because his sperm had been used to conceive the child, but the court denied any legal rights to the intended mother, leaving the child with no legal mother. [12] In four subsequent cases, Quebec courts have allowed intended parents to adopt a child born via surrogate. [13]

Saskatchewan

A court-ordered parentage declaration and a pre-existing surrogacy agreement are required. Surrogates are initially listed on the birth certificate alongside the intended parent(s). However, no genetic link is required to establish parental rights in Saskatchewan. [9] [7]

Yukon and Nunavut

In Yukon and Nunavut, no clear information is available on guidelines or laws for how intended parents establish rights; however, parentage declarations are available. [7]

Increase in Canadian surrogacies

Surrogacy in Canada has increased in popularity over the past two decades. [14] Between 2001 and 2012, 803 IVF-conceived births were recorded for gestational surrogates in Canada (statistics on traditional surrogacies - are not available). [15] There are many reasons a person or couple would choose to use a surrogate. [16] Primarily, the rise of infertility (a study found that 1 in 6 Canadians can face fertility issues) [17] and Same-sex couples choosing to have children [16] have been linked with this rise. The increase in surrogacies is also connected to Canada becoming a popular site for international surrogacy. [18]

International surrogacy

The increased demand for surrogates and the limited amount of people willing to be surrogates has led many to seek surrogacy agreements internationally. [19] Canada is one of the few countries which allows international surrogacy and does not discriminate on the basis of marital status or sexual orientation. [18] However, surrogacy agreements and parentage laws differ from those set out for surgery agreements between Canadian intended parent(s) and Canadian surrogates.

International intended parent(s) with a Canadian surrogate overview

Canada has become an attractive location for foreign intended parent(s). This is in part due to its high-quality universal health care and relatively liberal regulations that may be easier to navigate than those in the intended parent(s) home country. [18] While it is illegal under the AHRA for Canadians to pay a surrogate, Canadian surrogates may legally accept payment from the international intended parent(s), provided that the transaction occurs outside Canada.

In 2016 and 2017, 45 of 102 babies born to surrogates in British Columbia had intended parent(s) outside of Canada (nationwide statistics are not collected). [18]

Canadian intended parent(s) with an international surrogate overview

Children born through international surrogacy with at least one intended parent being a permanent Canadian citizen are considered Canadian citizens from birth. Importantly, this parent does not have to be genetically related to the child; however, they do have to have legal documents proving parentage. [20]

Critiques

Criticism of federal surrogacy law

Canada's strict surrogacy laws were partly founded on feminist fears that commercial surrogacy in Canada could result in women being exploited. [21] Despite this rationale, some debate the law and raise concerns that it may be causing more harm than good. While some believe the law needs to be reworked, others argue that commercial surrogacy should be legal altogether. [22]

They argue that while it is illegal for surrogates to profit from their own bodies financially, the ambiguous language behind the law is problematic and can result in exploitation. That is, while surrogates cannot be paid, there are surrogacy agencies that can accept payments. These agencies advertise services that help surrogates and intended parent(s) navigate the complex laws surrounding surrogacy. There are no clear guidelines from the federal, provincial or territorial governments stating how these agencies can be monetarily compensated for their part in the surrogacy process. Therefore, some argue that this allows the agencies to function through the grey areas of law and profit from unpaid surrogates. [22]

Criticism of international surrogacy in Canada

Another leading issue in the Canadian surrogacy law debate centres around international surrogacy. Many argue that babies born in Canada with international intended parents should not automatically have Canadian citizenship. This argument is hotly debated as it does not seem to be founded in genuine cases where Canadian surrogacy was chosen so that the child would have Canadian citizenship. [22]

International surrogacy concerns expand into how it affects Canadian healthcare. While Canadian taxpayers fund Canada's healthcare system in international surrogacy cases, it is accessed and benefits an international audience [23]

Further critics revolve around fears for Canadian surrogates who are left with the child if internationally intended parent(s) back out of the surrogacy agreement. [23]

Notable case

In 2011, Cathleen Hachey, a New Brunswick, agreed to be a surrogate for a British couple; however, three months before the due date of the twins, the intended parents split up and decided to back out of the agreement. While Hachey was legally responsible for the children as she had been the egg donor, she was able to find an adoptive family; this case increased concerns surrounding international surrogacy. [24]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parent</span> Caregiver of offspring in their own species

A parent is either the progenitor of a child or, in humans, it can refer to a caregiver or legal guardian, generally called an adoptive parent or step-parent. The gametes of a parent result in a child, a male through the sperm, and a female through the ovum. Parents who are progenitors are first-degree relatives and have 50% genetic meet. A female can also become a parent through surrogacy. Some parents may be adoptive parents, who nurture and raise an offspring, but are not related to the child. Orphans without adoptive parents can be raised by their grandparents or other family members.

Baby M was the pseudonym used in the case In re Baby M, 537 A.2d 1227, 109 N.J. 396 for the infant whose legal parentage was in question.

DNA paternity testing is the use of DNA profiles to determine whether an individual is the biological parent of another individual. Paternity testing can be especially important when the rights and duties of the father are in issue and a child's paternity is in doubt. Tests can also determine the likelihood of someone being a biological grandparent. Though genetic testing is the most reliable standard, older methods also exist, including ABO blood group typing, analysis of various other proteins and enzymes, or using human leukocyte antigen antigens. The current techniques for paternity testing are using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). Paternity testing can now also be performed while the woman is still pregnant from a blood draw.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Surrogacy</span> Arrangement in which a woman carries and delivers a child for designated parent(s)

Surrogacy is an arrangement, often supported by a legal agreement, whereby a woman agrees to childbirth on behalf of another person(s) who will become the child's parent(s) after birth. People pursue surrogacy for a variety of reasons such as infertility, dangers or undesirable factors of pregnancy, or when pregnancy is a medical impossibility.

Third-party reproduction or donor-assisted reproduction is any human reproduction in which DNA or gestation is provided by a third party or donor other than the one or two parents who will raise the resulting child. This goes beyond the traditional father–mother model, and the third party's involvement is limited to the reproductive process and does not extend into the raising of the child. Third-party reproduction is used by couples unable to reproduce by traditional means, by same-sex couples, and by men and women without a partner. Where donor gametes are provided by a donor, the donor will be a biological parent of the resulting child, but in third party reproduction, he or she will not be the caring parent.

The main family law of Japan is Part IV of Civil Code. The Family Register Act contains provisions relating to the family register and notifications to the public office.

Fertility tourism is the practice of traveling to another country or jurisdiction for fertility treatment, and may be regarded as a form of medical tourism. A person who can become pregnant is considered to have fertility issues if they are unable to have a clinical pregnancy after 12 months of unprotected intercourse. Infertility, or the inability to get pregnant, affects about 8-12% of couples looking to conceive or 186 million people globally. In some places, rates of infertility surpass the global average and can go up to 30% depending on the country. Areas with lack of resources, such as assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), tend to correlate with the highest rates of infertility.

Religious response to assisted reproductive technology deals with the new challenges for traditional social and religious communities raised by modern assisted reproductive technology. Because many religious communities have strong opinions and religious legislation regarding marriage, sex and reproduction, modern fertility technology has forced religions to respond.

Surrogacy in India and Indian surrogates became increasingly popular amongst intended parents in industrialised nations because of the relatively low costs and easy access offered by Indian surrogacy agencies. Clinics charged patients between $10,000 and $28,000 for the complete package, including fertilization, the surrogate's fee, and delivery of the baby at a hospital. Including the costs of flight tickets, medical procedures and hotels, this represented roughly a third of the price of the procedure in the UK and a fifth of that in the US. Surrogate mothers received medical, nutritional and overall health care through surrogacy agreements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Surrogacy laws by country</span>

The legal aspects of surrogacy in any particular jurisdiction tend to hinge on a few central questions:

Law in Australia with regard to children is often based on what is considered to be in the best interest of the child. The traditional and often used assumption is that children need both a mother and a father, which plays an important role in divorce and custodial proceedings, and has carried over into adoption and fertility procedures. As of April 2018 all Australian states and territories allow adoption by same-sex couples.

LGBT parents in Canada have undergone significant progress in terms of both legal and social acceptance. Same-sex couples who wish for parenthood now enjoy equally the possibilities, responsibilities and rights of opposite-sex couples. Following the nationwide legalization of same-sex marriage in 2005, the number of LGBT families in Canada has increased substantially, paving the way for same-sex couples' aspirations of having their own children. Legal methods of assisted reproduction range from insemination via IVF through to surrogacy arrangements.

The Uniform Parentage Act (UPA) is a legislative act originally promulgated in 1973 by the National Conference of Commissioners of Uniform State Laws. The 1973 original version of the act was created to address the need for new state legislation, because at the time the bulk of the law on the subject of children born out of wedlock was unconstitutional or led to doubt. It was amended in 2002 and in 2017. The Act serves to provide a uniform legal framework for establishing paternity of minor children born to married and unmarried couples. It allows more than two people to be legally recognized as parents.

Surrogacy is legal in New Zealand if it is performed altruistically, where the surrogate donates her services selflessly, without any compensation beyond the coverage of expenses. Commercial surrogacy, where the surrogate is paid in addition to the coverage of expenses, is not legal. There is a lack of specific legislation and regulations dealing with surrogacy, though the recent increase in surrogacy cases has led to a number of amendments. New Zealand is party to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, and ratified it in April 1993. The primary principle of this convention is that the best interests of the child are paramount, which must then encompass all surrogacy agreements and regulations. The lack of clear surrogacy legislation in New Zealand has led to many couples engaging in reproductive tourism in order to ensure the surrogacy is successful. This has the potential to significantly impact the human rights of all of the parties involved.

Louisa Maria Ghevaert is a solicitor of the Senior Courts of England and Wales.

Susan GolombokFBA is Professor of Family Research and Director of the Centre for Family Research at the University of Cambridge, and Professorial Fellow at Newnham College, Cambridge. Her research on new family forms has contributed to theoretical understanding of family influences on child development and has addressed social and ethical issues that are of relevance to family life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Use of assisted reproductive technology by LGBT people</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people people wishing to have children may use assisted reproductive technology. In recent decades, developmental biologists have been researching and developing techniques to facilitate same-sex reproduction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Konstantin N. Svitnev</span>

Konstantin N. Svitnev is an international reproductive lawyer of Russian origin. Svitnev was born in 1966 and grew up in Moscow. Svitnev spent much of his legal career as an advocate for gender equality and reproductive rights...

<i>MR and DR v An t-Ard-Chláraitheoir</i> Supreme Court of Ireland case

MR and DR v An t-Ard-Chláraitheoir [2014] IESC 60, [2014] 3 IR 533 is a reported Irish Supreme Court case decision. The Court held that the Civil Registration Act 2004 only allows the birth mother to be on the birth certificate. It was decided that children born through surrogacy will have the name of their birth mother on their birth certificate and not the mother who is going to raise them.

<i>O.R v an Tard Chlairaitheoir</i> Irish Supreme Court case

M.R. and D.R. & ors v An tArd-Chláraitheoir & ors, [2014] IESC 60 is an Irish Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Civil Registration Act 2004 only allows the birth mother to be on the birth certificate. Thus, children born through surrogacy will have the name of their birth mother on their birth certificate and not of the genetic mother, who intends to raise them.

References

  1. 1 2 Canada, Health (2013-07-10). "Prohibitions related to Surrogacy". www.canada.ca. Retrieved 2024-10-27.
  2. ↑ Branch, Legislative Services (June 9, 2019). "Consolidated federal laws of canada, Assisted Human Reproduction Act". laws-lois.justice.gc.ca.
  3. ↑ Canada, Health (2019-10-28). "Guidance document: Reimbursement related to Assisted Human Reproduction Regulations". www.canada.ca. Retrieved 2024-10-27.
  4. ↑ "Surrogacy and IVF in Canada: What you need to know". toronto.citynews.ca. 9 January 2019.
  5. ↑ "What should be done about Canada's assisted reproduction laws?". The Globe and Mail. 13 April 2018.
  6. ↑ Motluk, Alison (February 4, 2014). "First prosecution under Assisted Human Reproduction Act ends in conviction". CMAJ. 186 (2): E75–E76. doi:10.1503/cmaj.109-4687. PMC   3903755 . PMID   24366888.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 "Establishing Parentage for Surrogacy Babies Across Canada". canadafertility.law. Retrieved 2024-10-28.
  8. ↑ "Ontario Newsroom". news.ontario.ca. Retrieved 2024-11-19.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Page, Stephen (2022-04-28). "Quick overview of Canadian surrogacy laws". Page Provan. Retrieved 2024-10-27.
  10. ↑ "Quebec surrogacy contracts may soon be recognized | CBC News".
  11. ↑ "Article 541 - legislative History".
  12. ↑ "Born to surrogate, child has no legal mother, Quebec judge rules | CBC News".
  13. ↑ Morawetz, Colleen (November 20, 2015). "Whose Kid Is It Anyway? Parentage Contracts for Surrogacy in Quebec".
  14. ↑ "International Surrogacy for Canadians". Sprout Family. Retrieved 2024-11-19.
  15. ↑ White, Pamela M. (January 1, 2016). "Hidden from view: Canadian gestational surrogacy practices and outcomes, 2001-2012". Reproductive Health Matters. 24 (47): 205–217. doi: 10.1016/j.rhm.2016.06.006 . PMID   27578354.
  16. 1 2 "10 Reasons People Use a Surrogate Mother". Family Tree Surrogacy. Retrieved 2024-11-19.
  17. ↑ "As more Canadians seek IVF treatment, advocates warn about infertility 'crisis' - National | Globalnews.ca". Global News. Retrieved 2024-10-30.
  18. 1 2 3 4 "How Canada became an international surrogacy destination". The Globe and Mail. 5 October 2018.
  19. ↑ "International Surrogacy for Canadians". Sprout Family. Retrieved 2024-11-19.
  20. ↑ Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (2014-03-26). "Who is a parent for citizenship purposes where assisted human reproduction (AHR), including surrogacy arrangements, are involved". www.canada.ca. Retrieved 2024-10-28.
  21. ↑ Deckha, Maneesha (2015). "Situating Canada's Commercial Surrogacy Ban in a Transnational Context: A Postcolonial Feminist Call for Legalization and Public Funding". McGill Law Journal / Revue de droit de McGill. 61 (1): 31–86. doi:10.7202/1035385ar. ISSN   0024-9041.
  22. 1 2 3 Star, Robert Cribb Foreign, Emma Jarratt Special to the (2016-09-18). "Canada's vague surrogacy laws may be doing more harm than good". Toronto Star. Retrieved 2024-10-28.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  23. 1 2 Parks, Jennifer. "Caution's needed in shaping surrogacy laws". Policy Options. Retrieved 2024-10-29.
  24. ↑ Reporter, Cynthia Vukets Staff (2011-09-09). "Surrogate mother's nightmare". Toronto Star. Retrieved 2024-11-19.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.