Tax Freedom Day is a concept developed and trademarked by American businessman Dallas Hostetler, which aims to calculate the first day of the year on which a nation as a whole has theoretically earned enough income to pay its taxes. Every dollar that is officially considered income by the government is counted, and every payment to the government that is officially considered a tax is counted. Taxes at all levels of government – local, state and federal – are included.
The concept of Tax Freedom Day was developed in 1948 by Florida businessman Dallas Hostetler, who trademarked the phrase "Tax Freedom Day" and calculated it each year for the next two decades. [1] In 1971, Hostetler retired and transferred the trademark to the Tax Foundation. [2] [ better source needed ]
In the United States, the "Tax Freedom Day" is annually calculated by the Tax Foundation, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank. Their results are as follows:
Year | Tax Freedom Day | Tax Burden |
---|---|---|
1900 | January 22 | 5.9% |
1910 | January 19 | 5.0% |
1920 | February 13 | 12.0% |
1930 | February 12 | 11.7% |
1940 | March 7 | 17.9% |
1950 | March 31 | 24.6% |
1960 | April 11 | 27.7% |
1970 | April 19 | 29.6% |
1980 | April 21 | 30.4% |
1990 | April 21 | 30.4% |
2000 | May 1 | 33.0% |
2010 | April 9 | 26.9% |
2011 | April 12 | 27.7% |
2012 | April 13 | 29.2% |
2013 | April 18 | 29.4% |
2014 | April 21 | 30.2% |
2015 | April 24 | 31.2% |
2016 | April 22 | 30.9% |
2017 | April 23 | 30.9% |
2018 | April 19 | 29.7% |
2019 | April 16 | 29.0% |
Many other companies and organizations in countries throughout the world now produce their own "Tax Freedom Day" analysis. According to the Tax Foundation, Tax Freedom Day reports are currently being published in eight countries. Due to the different ways that nations collect and categorize public finance data, however, Tax Freedom Days are not necessarily directly comparable from one country to another.
Country | Day of year | % burden | Date of year | Updated | Source | Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland | 121 | 33% | May 1 | 2015 | Deloitte | [5] |
India | 74 | 20% | March 14 | 2000 | Centre for Civil Society | [6] |
Australia | 110 | 29% | April 20 | 2024 | Centre for Independent Studies | [7] [8] |
United States | 114 | 31% | April 24 | 2015 | Tax Foundation | [9] |
Estonia | 114 | 31% | April 24 | 2007 | Eesti Maksumaksjate Liit (Estonian Taxpayers Association) | [10] |
Lithuania | 128 | 35% | May 15 | 2015 | Lithuanian Free Market Institute | [11] |
Spain | 181 | 50% | June 30 | 2016 | Foundation for the Advancement of Liberty and Spanish Taxpayers' Union | [12] |
Uruguay | 133 | 39% | May 13 | 2010 | CPA Ferrere | [13] |
Hungary | 140 | 38%* | May 20 | 2008 | Hungarian Central Statistic Institute | [14] |
New Zealand | 127 | 35%* | May 7 | 2018 | Staples Rodway | [15] [16] |
South Africa | 141 | 39% | May 22 | 2014 | Free Market Foundation | [17] |
Bulgaria | 124 | 36% | May 4 | 2018 | Radio Bulgaria | [18] |
United Kingdom | 161 | 41% | June 10 | 2024 | Adam Smith Institute | [19] [20] |
Brazil | 153 | 41% | May 31 | 2014 | Instituto Brasileiro de Planejamento Tributario | [21] |
Slovakia | 155 | 42% | June 5 | 2017 | Nadácia F.A.Hayeka | [22] |
Canada | 164 | 45% | June 14 | 2019 | Fraser Institute | [23] |
Belarus | 135 | 37% | May 15 | 2016 | The Public Association «Discussion and Analytical Society Liberal Club» | [24] |
Croatia | 161 | 44% | June 10 | 2010 | Adriatic Institute for Public Policy | [25] |
Czech Republic | 149 | 41% | May 29 | 2017 | Liberální institut | [26] |
Slovenia | 164 | 37% | June 13 | 2015 | Svetilnik | [27] |
Belgium | 218 | 54% | August 6 | 2018 | Institut économique Molinari (IEM) | [28] |
Greece | 169 | 46% | June 19 | 2012 | Φορολογικό Παρατηρητήριο, Κέντρο Φιλελεύθερων Μελετών – Μάρκος Δραγούμης | [29] |
Poland | 156 | 43% | June 6 | 2018 | Centrum im. Adama Smitha | [30] |
Germany | 192 | 52% | July 11 | 2015 | Bund der Steuerzahler | [31] |
Israel | 197 | 54% | July 14 | 2013 | Jerusalem Institute for Market Studies | [32] |
Turkey | 194 | 53% | July 14 | 2012 | Liberal Democratic Party | [33] |
Norway | 210 | 57% | July 29 | 2007 | Skattebetalerforeningen | [34] |
France | 208 | 57% | July 27 | 2018 | Institut économique Molinari (IEM) | [35] |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 161 | 44% | June 10 | 2017 | Centre for Policy and Governance «Centar za politike i upravljanje» | [36] |
Austria | 216 | 59% | August 5 | 2019 | Austrian Economics Center | [37] |
Italy | 153 | 42% | June 2 | 2018 | CGIA | [38] |
Mexico | 177 | 48.6% | June 25 | 2024 | Caminos de la Libertad | [39] |
A 2010 study published in L'Anglophone, [40] a Brussels newspaper, compared the tax burdens of "Average Joes" in each of the 27 EU member states and projected the Tax Freedom Day for workers earning a typical wage. Income taxes, social security contributions (by the employee and the employer) and projected VAT contributions were included in the calculations.
Regarding the discrepancy between their calculation of August 3 as the typical Belgian worker's Tax Freedom Day and that of PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PWC), L'Anglophone's authors wrote: [41]
[PWC's] figures count revenue from all taxes (including those on corporate profits, petrol, cigarettes, &c.) and thus present a more complete picture of the country’s total tax burden," adding that it is "an average applied to all Belgians – not all Belgian workers; in 2008, less than half of Belgium’s population (4.99 million working out of 10.67 million citizens) was legally working. Consequently, a huge share of Belgium’s tax burden is borne by the working population.
Country | Day of year | % burden | Date of year |
---|---|---|---|
Austria | 191 | 52% | July 10 |
Belgium | 215 | 59% | August 3 |
Bulgaria | 145 | 40% | May 25 |
Cyprus | 72 | 19% | March 13 |
Czech Rep. | 165 | 45% | June 14 |
Denmark | 168 | 46% | June 17 |
Estonia | 150 | 41% | May 30 |
Finland | 166 | 45% | June 15 |
France | 207 | 56% | July 26 |
Germany | 200 | 55% | July 19 |
Greece | 164 | 45% | June 13 |
Hungary | 218 | 59% | August 6 |
Ireland | 117 | 32% | April 27 |
Italy | 169 | 46% | June 18 |
Latvia | 161 | 44% | June 10 |
Lithuania | 167 | 45% | May 20 |
Luxembourg | 135 | 37% | May 15 |
Malta | 99 | 27% | April 9 |
Netherlands | 184 | 50% | July 3 |
Poland | 160 | 44% | June 9 |
Portugal | 150 | 41% | May 30 |
Romania | 178 | 49% | June 27 |
Slovakia | 167 | 46% | June 16 |
Slovenia | 164 | 45% | June 13 |
Spain | 136 | 37% | May 16 |
Sweden | 181 | 49% | June 30 |
United Kingdom | 134 | 36% | May 13 |
In the book Filthy Lucre: Economics for People Who Hate Capitalism , philosopher Joseph Heath criticizes the idea that tax-paying is inherently different from consumption:
It would make just as much sense to declare an annual "mortgage freedom day", in order to let mortgage owners know what day they "stop working for the bank and start working for themselves". ...But who cares? Homeowners are not really "working for the bank"; they're merely financing their own consumption. After all, they're the ones living in the house, not the bank manager. [42]
For Canada, the Fraser Institute also includes a "Personal Tax Freedom Day Calculator" that estimates a customized Tax Freedom Day based on additional variables such as age of household head, sex of household head, marital status and number of children. However, the Fraser Institute's figures have been disputed. For example, a 2005 study by Osgoode Hall Law Professor Neil Brooks [43] argued that the Fraser Institute's Tax Freedom Day analysis includes flawed accounting, including the exclusion of several important forms of income and overstating tax figures, moving the date nearly two months later. [44]
In America, while Tax Freedom Day presents an "average American" tax burden, it is not a tax burden typical for an American. That is, the tax burdens of most Americans are substantially overstated by Tax Freedom Day. The larger tax bills associated with higher incomes increases the average tax burden above that of most Americans.
The Tax Foundation defends its methodology by pointing out that Tax Freedom Day is the U.S. economy's overall average tax burden—not the tax burden of the "average" American, which is how it is often misinterpreted by members of the media. [45] Tax Foundation materials do not use the phrase "tax burden of the average American", although members of the media often make this mistake. [46]
Another criticism is that the calculation includes capital gains taxes but not capital gains income, thus overstating the tax burden. For example, in the late 1990s the US Tax Freedom Day moved later, reaching its latest date ever in 2000, but this was largely due to capital gains taxes on the bull market of that era rather than an increase in tax rates. In other words, variations in capital gains income and their associated taxes cause changes in the amount of taxes, but not in the income used in the calculation of Tax Freedom Day.
The Tax Foundation argues that the Tax Freedom Day calculation does not include capital gains as income because it uses income and tax data directly from the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). BEA has never counted capital gains as income since they don't represent current production available to pay taxes, and so the Tax Foundation excludes them as well. Additionally, the Tax Foundation argues that the exclusion of capital gains income is irrelevant in most years since including capital gains would only shift Tax Freedom Day by 1 percent in either direction in most years. [47] A 1 percent change would represent 3.65 days. From 1968 to 2019 the date has never left the 21-day range of April 13 to May 3.
A dividend tax is a tax imposed by a jurisdiction on dividends paid by a corporation to its shareholders (stockholders). The primary tax liability is that of the shareholder, though a tax obligation may also be imposed on the corporation in the form of a withholding tax. In some cases the withholding tax may be the extent of the tax liability in relation to the dividend. A dividend tax is in addition to any tax imposed directly on the corporation on its profits. Some jurisdictions do not tax dividends.
Capital gain is an economic concept defined as the profit earned on the sale of an asset which has increased in value over the holding period. An asset may include tangible property, a car, a business, or intangible property such as shares.
Americans for Tax Reform (ATR) is a politically conservative U.S. advocacy group whose stated goal is "a system in which taxes are simpler, flatter, more visible, and lower than they are today." According to ATR, "The government's power to control one's life derives from its power to tax. We believe that power should be minimized." The organization is known for its "Taxpayer Protection Pledge", which asks candidates for federal and state office to commit themselves in writing to oppose all tax increases. The founder and president of ATR is Grover Norquist, a conservative tax activist.
The Index of Economic Freedom is an annual index and ranking created in 1995 by The Heritage Foundation and The Wall Street Journal to measure the degree of economic freedom in the world's nations. The creators of the index assert that they take an approach inspired by Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations, that "basic institutions that protect the liberty of individuals to pursue their own economic interests result in greater prosperity for the larger society".
A capital gains tax (CGT) is the tax on profits realized on the sale of a non-inventory asset. The most common capital gains are realized from the sale of stocks, bonds, precious metals, real estate, and property.
An indirect tax is a tax that is levied upon goods and services before they reach the customer who ultimately pays the indirect tax as a part of market price of the good or service purchased. Alternatively, if the entity who pays taxes to the tax collecting authority does not suffer a corresponding reduction in income, i.e., the effect and tax incidence are not on the same entity meaning that tax can be shifted or passed on, then the tax is indirect.
A consumption tax is a tax levied on consumption spending on goods and services. The tax base of such a tax is the money spent on consumption. Consumption taxes are usually indirect, such as a sales tax or a value-added tax. However, a consumption tax can also be structured as a form of direct, personal taxation, such as the Hall–Rabushka flat tax.
A proportional tax is a tax imposed so that the tax rate is fixed, with no change as the taxable base amount increases or decreases. The amount of the tax is in proportion to the amount subject to taxation. "Proportional" describes a distribution effect on income or expenditure, referring to the way the rate remains consistent, where the marginal tax rate is equal to the average tax rate.
Arnold Carl Harberger is an American economist. His approach to the teaching and practice of economics is to emphasize the use of analytical tools that are directly applicable to real-world issues. His influence on academic economics is reflected in part by the widespread use of the term "Harberger triangle" to refer to the standard graphical depiction of the efficiency cost of distortions of competitive equilibrium.
A tax incentive is an aspect of a government's taxation policy designed to incentivize or encourage a particular economic activity by reducing tax payments.
International tax law distinguishes between an estate tax and an inheritance tax. An inheritance tax is a tax paid by a person who inherits money or property of a person who has died, whereas an estate tax is a levy on the estate of a person who has died. However, this distinction is not always observed; for example, the UK's "inheritance tax" is a tax on the assets of the deceased, and strictly speaking is therefore an estate tax. Inheritance taxes vary widely between countries.
Taxation in Greece is based on the direct and indirect systems. The total tax revenue in 2017 was €47.56 billion from which €20.62 billion came from direct taxes and €26.94 billion from indirect taxes. The total tax revenue represented 39.4% of GDP in 2017. Taxes in Greece are collected by the Independent Authority for Public Revenue.
This is a list of the maximum potential tax rates around Europe for certain income brackets. It is focused on three types of taxes: corporate, individual, and value added taxes (VAT). It is not intended to represent the true tax burden to either the corporation or the individual in the listed country.
The Fair Tax Act is a bill in the United States Congress for changing tax laws to replace the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and all federal income taxes, payroll taxes, corporate taxes, capital gains taxes, gift taxes, and estate taxes with a national retail sales tax, to be levied once at the point of purchase on all new goods and services. The proposal also calls for a monthly payment to households of citizens and legal resident aliens as an advance rebate of tax on purchases up to the poverty level.
The alternative minimum tax (AMT) is a tax imposed by the United States federal government in addition to the regular income tax for certain individuals, estates, and trusts. As of tax year 2018, the AMT raises about $5.2 billion, or 0.4% of all federal income tax revenue, affecting 0.1% of taxpayers, mostly in the upper income ranges.
This article covers the best practices and needs for reform in entrepreneurship policies in Egypt.
Taxes in Germany are levied at various government levels: the federal government, the 16 states (Länder), and numerous municipalities (Städte/Gemeinden). The structured tax system has evolved significantly, since the reunification of Germany in 1990 and the integration within the European Union, which has influenced tax policies. Today, income tax and Value-Added Tax (VAT) are the primary sources of tax revenue. These taxes reflect Germany's commitment to a balanced approach between direct and indirect taxation, essential for funding extensive social welfare programs and public infrastructure. The modern German tax system accentuate on fairness and efficiency, adapting to global economic trends and domestic fiscal needs.
In general, the United States federal income tax is progressive, as rates of tax generally increase as taxable income increases, at least with respect to individuals that earn wage income. As a group, the lowest earning workers, especially those with dependents, pay no income taxes and may actually receive a small subsidy from the federal government.
Tax policy and economic inequality in the United States discusses how tax policy affects the distribution of income and wealth in the United States. Income inequality can be measured before- and after-tax; this article focuses on the after-tax aspects. Income tax rates applied to various income levels and tax expenditures primarily drive how market results are redistributed to impact the after-tax inequality. After-tax inequality has risen in the United States markedly since 1980, following a more egalitarian period following World War II.