Story
The play shows the interplay between a Man and Woman.
Through their dialogue they speak with poetic intensity and describe being involved in highly imaginative and improbable situations, such as leading armies of monkeys, fighting a sea serpent and being abducted by aliens.
They both speak romantically to each other - describing with passion how they find each other beautiful - as well as violently - such as performing sexual acts on each other with weaponry.
Throughout the majority of the play the audience is unaware as to what is fantasy and what is reality, with the narrative frequently shifting within the interplay of the Man and Woman.
Critical reception
Reviews
The play's original production was met with mostly positive reviews, with praise going to the performances of Jack Gordon and Vinette Robinson, the direction of David Mercatali, as well as Ridley's writing for its use of imagination, poetic language and ambition.
Lyn Gardner for The Guardian awarded the play 4 stars, praising the direction and performances: “It is simply and sensationally staged by David Mercatali, and performed as if its two actors feel every word simultaneously like a caress along the spine and a fist in the face.” She also wrote in admiration of the script, stating that “Ridley's play is completely and dizzyingly of itself. The writing seethes and burns. It goes not just into the bedroom, but into the mind, the secret places that we hide from everyone except lovers. Seldom has sexual love been explored on stage with such ferocious honesty, brutality and melting tenderness.” [7] Susannah Clapp for The Observer praised the production for its acting, writing that “Jack Gordon and Vinette Robinson should make their names in this. They perform both dance and dialogue magnificently. They swirl around each other as if the stage were a jacuzzi.” She also praised Ridley's use of dialogue for imaginatively “paint[ing] pictures of passion… It is wild, obvious, flailing, babyish, luscious” [8] Neil Dowden of Exeunt Magazine praised the production for the performances – “there is real chemistry in the acting” – along with the writing: “Tender Napalm shows Ridley at his most poetic, concocting a fractured, shimmering sequence of video-game-style images to illuminate the primal feelings between a man and a woman struggling together in love.” [9] Aleks Sierz for The Arts Desk wrote a glowing review, declaring that “[Ridley’s] first new play in three years, which opened last night, breaks fresh ground and represents an imaginative leap of the gleaming dark of his wild, wild imagination… As the pounding music sets the scene, and both actors start to flex their muscles, you immediately feel the beads of sweat gathering on your brow. A quiet voice deep inside tells you that this is going to be a good one. And it is!... this is a fabulous piece of imaginative writing. Long live Ridley!” [10]
However, not all reviews were completely positive. Though still awarding the play 4 stars, Michael Coveney of WhatsOnStage.com found fault in the last 15 minutes for being “perhaps… over-freighted with Shoreditch and Essex detail, and the missing father figure on both sides doesn’t play with much dramatic significance.” He however still praised the production effusively for being “a rough, raucous, verbally extravagant and sometimes shocking theatrical firecracker, [that] makes you realise how pallid most theatre writing – and acting – can be when everyone’s on their best behaviour.” [11] Philip Fisher of British Theatre Guide wrote in admiration for the boldness of Ridley's writing, saying that “Ridley might be the last bastion of In-Yer-Face Theatre. Where others have mellowed and generate plays like anyone else of their now middle-aged generation, he still gleefully pushes the boundaries of form and taste. Whether that is a good thing could be open to debate.” He however did question as to what the meaning was behind the play: “Quite what message it wishes to convey is not entirely clear, possibly that love conquers all, at least for a period, since death is an inevitability” but noted that “In any event, the two actors give their all and sensible audience members will enjoy the acting and wallow in the exotic poetry and imagery, rather than wondering why they are there.” [12] Time Out London awarded the play 3 stars. While writing that it was “ferociously well acted” and that the play was “evocative, hallucinatory stuff” the publication criticised the script, stating that “I’m not sure Ridley has got the balance of tenderness and napalm quite right. The underlying warmth takes the danger out of the pair’s flights of fancy, but their words and actions remain too opaque to let you in emotionally.” However, the magazine still wrote that despite its flaws the production was “an unforgettable 80 minutes.” [13] Dominic Cavendish of The Daily Telegraph however awarded the play only two stars. While lauding Ridley's ambition – “I won’t deny that this is a tricksy, inventive, risk-taking piece - Ridley is a clever man, and he likes to play with theatrical fire” – he criticised the writing for being overblown: “For all its conceptual neatness, though, there’s a slapdash, jejune and over-ripe texture to the script… a rampaging, hormonal quality may be part of the point… yet all the hyperactive fabulation shreds our capacity to care.” [14]
Either way the play was a success and was nominated for a variety of awards and featured on a number of 'best theatre of the year' lists, Including for Time Out London, [15] The Observer [16] and The Guardian [17]
In July 2011 acclaimed actor Ben Daniels wrote an article for The Guardian describing Jack Gordon's and Vinette Robinson's acting as “the best performance I’ve ever seen” saying that “the actors only had each other, and the way they worked together was glorious. Not once did you wish there was a set. And because it was in traverse you could see other people watching it with you, watching you have this visceral response. It's very rare to actually see people having a similar response to you. It was a unique feeling, and afterwards I felt jittery, like the carpet had been pulled from under my feet. Performances like theirs make you want to be better.” [18]
Awards
- London Fringe Best Play Award - Nominated [19] [20]
- Off West End Award for Best Female Performance for Vinette Robinson - Won [21]
- Off West End Award for Best Producer for Will Young and Ben Monks of Supporting Wall - Shortlisted [22]
- Off West End Award for Best Director for David Mercatali - Longlisted [23]
- Evening Standard Theatre Award for Best Newcomer for David Mercatali - Longlisted [24]
