The Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought

Last updated
The Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought
The Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought.jpg
Cover
AuthorGeorge Steinmetz
Original titleThe Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought: French Sociology and the Overseas Empire
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
SeriesPrinceton Modern Knowledge
SubjectColonialism and post-colonialism, sociology, French colonial history
Genre Non-fiction
PublisherPrinceton University Press
Publication date
2023
Pages576
ISBN 9780691237428

The Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought: French Sociology and the Overseas Empire is a book by American sociologist, author and academic George Steinmetz. [1] It was published by Princeton University Press in 2023 and is part of its Princeton Modern Knowledge series. [2] The book is a historical exploration of the development of modern French sociology within the context of the French empire post-World War II. Steinmetz argues, based on a prosopgraphic reconstruction of the postwar French sociology field, that around half of the rise of social sciences was intertwined with imperial efforts to control colonies, particularly between the late 1930s and the 1960s. Steinmetz goes beyond the "decolonial" discourse, aiming to uncover the feedback effects of colonial knowledge on sociology's ordinary production. The book employs a new methodological approach, blending contextual factors, intellectual dynamics within the social sciences, and close readings of sociological texts, to examine the colonial engagement of prominent sociologists like Raymond Aron, Jacques Berque, Georges Balandier, and Pierre Bourdieu. [3]

Contents

Summary

The book provides a comprehensive analysis of the colonial roots of French sociology in the mid-twentieth century. The book expands the scope of French sociology beyond methodological nationalism, encompassing the geographic expanse of 'Greater France.' Steinmetz defines 'colonial sociology' as all forms of sociological writing focused on overseas colonies and imperial phenomena. The book, influenced by a 'neo-Bourdieusian' approach, explores the transnational nature of French sociology within the French empire.[ citation needed ]

Steinmetz argues that around half of the discipline in the period from 1944 to 1965 consisted of colonial specialists. The historical analysis framework allows deeper insights than existing literature on decolonizing sociology. The book challenges conventional historiographies, emphasizing the importance of shifting focus from the metropole to the empire. It divides into five parts, exploring the sociology of colonies, political and intellectual contexts, French colonial sociology from 1918 to the 1960s, and in-depth profiles of four sociologists. Steinmetz highlights how sociology served the French empire post-World War II, particularly in developmentalist initiatives, and emphasizes interdisciplinary connections with other colonial social sciences. He asserts that French colonial sociology made lasting methodological and conceptual contributions, influencing the discipline's trajectory. The book concludes with reflections on the challenges of analyzing the external relationships of a field and the ethical considerations of incorporating colonial sociological works into contemporary curricula. The book's Bourdieusian approach connects colonial situations to the shaping of sociological knowledge, challenging prevailing perspectives on the history of sociology.[ citation needed ]

Reviews

Christian Dayé [lower-alpha 1] praised the book for its detailed depiction of the intertwining of French sociology with colonialism in Africa. Dayé highlighted the author's specific methodological approach, termed "neo-Bourdieuian historical sociology of science," rooted in Bourdieu's understanding of social practice. The review acknowledged Steinmetz's challenge in addressing the history of French colonial sociology, particularly the veil of silence and forgetfulness surrounding these matters. Dayé emphasized the work's readability, detailed exploration of complex connections, and linguistic competence. While suggesting minor improvements, such as a more developed field-theoretical approach and graphical representations, Dayé concluded that these were minor points compared to the overall achievement of the book. [5]

Ali Meghji [lower-alpha 2] praised the book considering it a tour de force in the historical sociology of sociology. Meghji highlighted Steinmetz's thorough analysis of the colonial origins of French sociology, emphasizing its transnational nature across the French empire. He commended Steinmetz's neo-Bourdieusian approach, which goes beyond the use of analytical concepts, allowing for a deeper understanding of mid-twentieth-century French sociology. [7]

Nicholas Hoover Wilson, sociologist and academic at Stony Brook University, commended the book for its thorough relational approach, challenging conventional categories and emphasizing ongoing classification struggles. Wilson lauded the substance of the book, describing it as a revelatory combination of three traditions, including historical sociology of knowledge and detailed studies of anthropologists and sociologists. He acknowledged the book's refusal of a simplistic "colonizing/colonized" dichotomy, appreciating its nuanced exploration of postwar French sociology's grappling with colonialism. While offering substantial praise, Wilson also posed methodological and analytical questions, such as the practicality of a comprehensive reading of all scholars entangled by colonialism and the potential challenges arising from ontological commitments. He questioned the book's focus on "greater France" despite its singular title, and noted its subtle advocacy for the utility of psychoanalysis in the sociology of culture. Wilson highlighted the book's explicit departure from certain efforts to "decolonize" sociology, raising concerns about maintaining the discipline's autonomy. [8]

Austin H. Vo praised the book as a compelling and timely intervention. Vo commended Steinmetz for his meticulous analysis of colonial sociological research, emphasizing the historical and critical emergence of French sociology against the backdrop of colonial conquest, subjugation, and racism. The reviewer highlighted Steinmetz's neo-Bourdieusian perspective and the multiplex analytic strategy employed, shedding light on the often-repressed colonial origins of French sociology. Vo found the analysis of key actors, institutions, and the vibrant colonial sociology during that era to be particularly insightful. Vo saw Steinmetz's work as a generative and vigilant revision of French intellectual history, urging readers to recognize the colonial entanglements that shaped modern frameworks. [9]

Zeke Baker [lower-alpha 3] appreciated the book's use of original archival sources and interviews to explain the relationship between French sociology and colonialism from the 1930s to 60s. Baker acknowledged the theoretical approach rooted in Bourdieu's field theory and praised the book for opening up possibilities for comparative analysis of colonial situations and corresponding knowledge. [11]

Anne Kwaschik [lower-alpha 4] reviewed the book and underscored its significance, praising its comprehensive exploration of sociology's historical ties to colonialism and its impact on academic development. She commended Steinmetz's delving into personal and institutional archives, highlighting its rich source material. Kwaschik observed that the book unveils the evolving landscape of colonial sociology, emphasizing its interdisciplinary and context-sensitive nature.

In his review [lower-alpha 5] published by la vie des idées,Jean-Louis Fabiani valued Steinmetz's ambitious exploration of the "colonial matrix"'s significance in shaping modern world social sciences. The reviewer commended Steinmetz for his historical perspective, emphasizing the importance of anamnesis to bring back cognitive patterns from the colonial period and highlighting the author's meticulous analysis of the gradual autonomy of colonial knowledge institutions. Fabiani acknowledged Steinmetz's merit in shedding light on the intricate connections between colonial sociology and the development of the social sciences in post-war France. [13]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Colonialism</span> Creation and maintenance of colonies by people from another area

Colonialism is the establishment and maintenance of one group of people as superior to other peoples and areas, often for imperialist control and exploitation, and through a range of practices and relations of colonization, installing coloniality and possibly colonies. That said there is no clear definition of colonialism and definitions may vary depending on the use of the term and context.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Imperialism</span> Policy or ideology of extending a nations rule over foreign nations

Imperialism is the practice, theory or attitude of maintaining or extending power over foreign nations, particularly through expansionism, employing both hard power and soft power. Imperialism focuses on establishing or maintaining hegemony and a more or less formal empire. While related to the concepts of colonialism, imperialism is a distinct concept that can apply to other forms of expansion and many forms of government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social science</span> Branch of science that studies society and its relationships

Social science is one of the branches of science, devoted to the study of societies and the relationships among individuals within those societies. The term was formerly used to refer to the field of sociology, the original "science of society", established in the 18th century. In addition to sociology, it now encompasses a wide array of academic disciplines, including anthropology, archaeology, economics, human geography, linguistics, management science, communication science, psychology and political science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sociology of knowledge</span> Field of study

The sociology of knowledge is the study of the relationship between human thought, the social context within which it arises, and the effects that prevailing ideas have on societies. It is not a specialized area of sociology. Instead, it deals with broad fundamental questions about the extent and limits of social influences on individuals' lives and the social-cultural basis of our knowledge about the world. The sociology of knowledge has a subclass and a complement. Its subclass is sociology of scientific knowledge. Its complement is the sociology of ignorance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paul Lazarsfeld</span> Austrian-American sociologist (1901–1976)

Paul Felix Lazarsfeld was an Austrian-American sociologist. The founder of Columbia University's Bureau of Applied Social Research, he exerted influence over the techniques and the organization of social research. "It is not so much that he was an American sociologist," one colleague said of him after his death, "as it was that he determined what American sociology would be." Lazarsfeld said that his goal was "to produce Paul Lazarsfelds". He was a founding figure in 20th-century empirical sociology.

The historiography of science or the historiography of the history of science is the study of the history and methodology of the sub-discipline of history, known as the history of science, including its disciplinary aspects and practices and the study of its own historical development.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economic sociology</span> Branch of sociology

Economic sociology is the study of the social cause and effect of various economic phenomena. The field can be broadly divided into a classical period and a contemporary one, known as "new economic sociology".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sociology of scientific knowledge</span> Study of science as a social activity

The sociology of scientific knowledge (SSK) is the study of science as a social activity, especially dealing with "the social conditions and effects of science, and with the social structures and processes of scientific activity." The sociology of scientific ignorance (SSI) is complementary to the sociology of scientific knowledge. For comparison, the sociology of knowledge studies the impact of human knowledge and the prevailing ideas on societies and relations between knowledge and the social context within which it arises.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barrington Moore Jr.</span> American sociologist (1913–2005)

Barrington Moore Jr. was an American political sociologist, and the son of forester Barrington Moore.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of sociology</span>

Sociology as a scholarly discipline emerged, primarily out of Enlightenment thought, as a positivist science of society shortly after the French Revolution. Its genesis owed to various key movements in the philosophy of science and the philosophy of knowledge, arising in reaction to such issues as modernity, capitalism, urbanization, rationalization, secularization, colonization and imperialism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social movement theory</span> Interdisciplinary social study

Social movement theory is an interdisciplinary study within the social sciences that generally seeks to explain why social mobilization occurs, the forms under which it manifests, as well as potential social, cultural, political, and economic consequences, such as the creation and functioning of social movements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Historical sociology</span> Interdisciplinary field of research

Historical sociology is an interdisciplinary field of research that combines sociological and historical methods to understand the past, how societies have developed over time, and the impact this has on the present. It emphasises a mutual line of inquiry of the past and present to understand how discrete historical events fit into wider societal progress and ongoing dilemmas through complementary comparative analysis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Georges Balandier</span> French sociologist

Georges Balandier was a French sociologist, anthropologist and ethnologist noted for his research in Sub-Saharan Africa. Balandier was born in Aillevillers-et-Lyaumont. He was a professor at the Sorbonne, and is a member of the Center for African Studies, a research center of the École pratique des hautes études. He held for many years the Editorship of Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie and edited the series Sociologie d'Aujourd'hui at Presses Universitaires de France. He was elected to the American Philosophical Society in 1976. He died on 5 October 2016 at the age of 95.

Postcolonialism is the critical academic study of the cultural, political and economic legacy of colonialism and imperialism, focusing on the impact of human control and exploitation of colonized people and their lands. The field started to emerge in the 1960s, as scholars from previously colonized countries began publishing on the lingering effects of colonialism, developing a critical theory analysis of the history, culture, literature, and discourse of imperial power.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sociology</span> Social science that studies human society and its development

Sociology is the study of human society that focuses on society, human social behavior, patterns of social relationships, social interaction, and aspects of culture associated with everyday life. Regarded as a part of both the social sciences and humanities, sociology uses various methods of empirical investigation and critical analysis to develop a body of knowledge about social order and social change. Sociological subject matter ranges from micro-level analyses of individual interaction and agency to macro-level analyses of social systems and social structure. Applied sociological research may be applied directly to social policy and welfare, whereas theoretical approaches may focus on the understanding of social processes and phenomenological method.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Postcolonial international relations</span> Critical theory approach to international relations

Postcolonial international relations is a branch of scholarship that approaches the study of international relations (IR) using the critical lens of postcolonialism. This critique of IR theory suggests that mainstream IR scholarship does not adequately address the impacts of colonialism and imperialism on current day world politics. Despite using the language of post-, scholars of Postcolonial IR argue that the legacies of colonialism are ongoing, and that critiquing International Relations with this lens allows scholars to contextualize global events. By bridging postcolonialism and International Relations, scholars point to the process of globalization as a crucial point in both fields, due to the increases in global interactions and integration. Postcolonial IR focuses on the re-narrativization of global politics to create a balanced transnational understanding of colonial histories, and attempts to tie non-Western sources of thought into political praxis.

Julia Potter Adams is an American sociologist who works in the area of comparative and historical sociology. Julia Adams is a professor of Sociology. She conducts research in the areas of state building, gender and family, social theory and knowledge, early modern European politics, and Colonialism and empire. Her current research focuses on the historical sociology of agency relations and modernity, gender, race, and the representation of academic knowledge on Wikipedia and on other digital platforms. Adams is Professor of Sociology and International & Area Studies and Head of Grace Hopper College, Yale. She also co-directs YaleCHESS and is on the Board of Reed College.

George Steinmetz is the Charles Tilly Collegiate Professor of Sociology and Germanic Languages and Literatures at the University of Michigan. He has taught at the New School for Social Research, the University of Chicago, and the School for Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences. He is a historical sociologist of empires, states, and cities, with a focus on modern Germany, France, and Britain and their colonies. His other main areas of research are social theory and the history and philosophy of the social sciences.

Richard Lachmann was an American sociologist and specialist in comparative historical sociology who was a professor at University at Albany, SUNY.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Decolonization of knowledge</span> Process of undoing colonial influences on knowledge

Decolonization of knowledge is a concept advanced in decolonial scholarship that critiques the perceived hegemony of Western knowledge systems. It seeks to construct and legitimize other knowledge systems by exploring alternative epistemologies, ontologies and methodologies. It is also an intellectual project that aims to "disinfect" academic activities that are believed to have little connection with the objective pursuit of knowledge and truth. The presumption is that if curricula, theories, and knowledge are colonized, it means they have been partly influenced by political, economic, social and cultural considerations. The decolonial knowledge perspective covers a wide variety of subjects including philosophy, science, history of science, and other fundamental categories in social science.

References

Footnotes

  1. From the University of Graz [4]
  2. From the University of Cambridge [6]
  3. Environmental sociologist from Sonoma State University [10]
  4. From the University of Konstanz [12]
  5. In French

Citations

  1. The Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought. 2023-04-18. ISBN   978-0-691-23742-8.
  2. "Princeton Modern Knowledge". press.princeton.edu.
  3. "The Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought: George Steinmetz on French Sociology and the Overseas Empire | Review of Democracy". revdem.ceu.edu. 2023-05-10.
  4. "Wir gratulieren Herrn Christian Daye". soziologie.uni-graz.at.
  5. Dayé, Christian (2023). "Der Nachhall französischer Kolonialsoziologie: Rezension zu "The Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought: French Sociology and the Overseas Empire" von George Steinmetz". Soziopolis: Gesellschaft beobachten (in German).
  6. Amundsen, Rikke (July 9, 2016). "Professor Ali Meghji". research.sociology.cam.ac.uk.
  7. Meghji, Ali (2024-01-12). "Book review: The Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought: French Sociology and the Overseas Empire". European Journal of Social Theory. doi: 10.1177/13684310231225104 . ISSN   1368-4310.
  8. Wilson, Nicholas Hoover (2024-01-05). "Praising and Prodding George Steinmetz's The Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought - George Steinmetz, The Colonial Origins Of Modern Social Thought (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2023, 576 p.)". European Journal of Sociology: 1–5. doi:10.1017/S000397562300053X. ISSN   0003-9756.
  9. Vo, Austin H (2024-01-15). "Review of "The Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought: French Sociology and the Overseas Empire"". Social Forces. 102 (3): e4–e4. doi:10.1093/sf/soad102. ISSN   0037-7732.
  10. "Zeke Baker | Environmental Sociologist". Zeke Baker.
  11. Baker, Zeke (2023-08-03). "The Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought: A Symposium Introduction". Social Science History: 1–2. doi:10.1017/ssh.2023.22. ISSN   0145-5532.
  12. "Prof. Dr. Anne Kwaschik | Team | Chair of the History of Knowledge - Prof. Dr. Anne Kwaschik | Research | History". www.geschichte.uni-konstanz.de. Retrieved 2024-02-05.
  13. Fabiani, Jean-Louis (2023-10-26). "Histoire de la sociologie coloniale". La Vie des idées (in French).