The Death of Dido

Last updated
The Death of Dido (1631) by Guercino Guercino Morte di Didone.jpg
The Death of Dido (1631) by Guercino

The Death of Dido is a 1631 oil-on-canvas painting by the Italian Baroque painter Guercino, commissioned by Cardinal Bernardino Spada for Maria de' Medici. It now hangs in the Galleria Spada in Rome.

Contents

History

Whilst Spada observed the painting of Guido Reni's The Abduction of Helen in Bologna in 1628–1629, Maria de' Medici made contact with Spada (who had previously been papal legate in France) to get Reni to come to France and paint for her there, particularly hoping he would complete a cycle of paintings on her husband Henry IV of France which Rubens had left unfinished due to the worsening French political crises regarding the queen mother.

However, though he did produce a 1629 Annunciation for her, Reni declined the invitation to France, leading Spada to suggest Guercino to the queen as a replacement. She replied that she did not know the painter (who was then less well-known than Reni) and wanted a display of his talents before she accepted the suggestion. She left the subject for that test piece up to Spada – he chose the death of Dido. [1] However, thanks to Maria de' Medici's definitive fall from grace and exile soon afterwards, that deal and Guercino's proposed trip to Paris both also fell through, with Spada also unable to sell the completed painting, hence its presence in the Palazzo Spada to this day. [1]

Allegory

Giacinto Campana (after Guido Reni), Abduction of Helen, c.1631, Galleria Spada, Rome. Ratto di Elena - Campana.jpg
Giacinto Campana (after Guido Reni), Abduction of Helen, c.1631, Galleria Spada, Rome.

Anthony Colantuono [2] and some other art historians argue that Guercino's painting was intended as a pendant to Reni's work, linking their allegories. This would make Abduction a warning to Philip IV, repeated by Urban VIII, about the possible consequences of Spanish expansionism in Italy during the Thirty Years' War, alluding to the Valtellina War and the War of the Mantuan Succession, local conflicts arising from the wider pan-European conflict in Germany and the Netherlands. More specifically, in this interpretation, just as Paris' abduction of Helen caused the Trojan War and the destruction of Paris' fatherland, over-ambitious Spanish aims in Italy could also bring about disaster, making Philip IV not Paris but rather Aeneas, the male figure at the far right pointing towards the sea – Philip was said to be descended both from that mythological character and from Hercules (the pointing figure has an intaglio on his cap showing the Farnese Hercules). [2] This would have made Guercino's work complete Reni's anti-Spanish message, theoretically (had the plan come to fruition) warning Maria de' Medici herself – she was a known appeaser of Madrid, setting her against the policies of her son Louis XIII and his minister Cardinal Richelieu and leading to her downfall, imprisonment in Compiègne and finally to exile. Spada's message from the pope invited her to reflect of the error of trusting in Philip IV's loyalty and that it might lead her into ruin just as Aeneas' betrayal had led to Dido's downfall. [2]

More recent studies have reconsidered the question and come to different conclusions about the two paintings and questioned whether Spada intended to send Maria de' Medici a message. [3] Spada not only ended up keeping Guercino's work but also had a copy made of Reni's work by his pupil Giacinto Campana, which Reni himself then personally re-finished (also still in the Galleria Spada). That copy and Guercino's work were displayed together in a 1632 exhibition at chiesa di Santa Maria di Costantinopoli in Rome, which also included the paintings confiscated from the Sicilian nobleman Fabrizio Valguarnera, who had bought them with the proceeds from a diamond theft, a scandal which was featured in contemporary works by Poussin, Pietro da Cortona and other painters. Some accounts state that the exhibition also included the original version of Reni's Abduction before it was sent to France, though there are doubts on this – the exhibition aimed at selling the works (with Spada's two works this proved unsuccessful) but Reni's Abduction was already spoken for by Maria de' Medici) and those accounts probably confuse Campana's copy with Reni's original.

Pietro da Cortona, Caesar Giving Cleopatra the Throne of Egypt, 1637-1643, Musee des beaux-arts (Lyon). Caesar giving Cleopatra the Throne of Egypt-Pietro de Cortone-MBA Lyon A53-IMG 0355.jpg
Pietro da Cortona, Caesar Giving Cleopatra the Throne of Egypt, 1637–1643, Musée des beaux-arts (Lyon).
Guercino, Study of 'Abduction of Helen' by Guido Reni, c.1630, Staatliche Graphische Sammlung, Munich Ratto di Elena - Guercino.jpg
Guercino, Study of 'Abduction of Helen' by Guido Reni, c.1630, Staatliche Graphische Sammlung, Munich
The drawing by Annibale Carracci Studio per un martirio di santo Stefano - Annibale Carracci.jpg
The drawing by Annibale Carracci

According to this alternative account, the idea that both the original and copy of Abduction and Guercino's work were pendants to each other and sending messages to Maria de' Medici only originated later, probably after her death in 1642. [3] and Spada's choice of the death of Dido did not have any deeper meaning or allusion but was simply a motif fashionable at the time (in Bologna alone Annibale Carracci was already painting a work on the subject in Palazzo Zambeccari and students of his school another in Palazzo Fava). At most, it was a motif feaaturing a queen chosen for a work for a queen. In this scheme Helen – carried far from Sparta – alluded to Maria's exile, whilst Dido's suicide referred to Maria's fall and (after 1642) to her death. [3]

Further proof of this transformation (or rather assumption) of significance may be found in the new pendant painted for Reni's original Abduction. When the latter work reached France but could not be collected by Maria, it was instead taken on by marquess Louis Phélypeaux de La Vrillière, who put it in his now-lost gallery in Paris and commissioned a pendant by Pietro da Cortona showing Caesar Giving Cleopatra the Throne of Egypt. [3] That work shows a deposed queen placed back upon her throne, not as a polemic against Louis and Richelieu but as a prediction of national unity, hoping for a similar rehabilitation for Maria who – for better or worse – had been a major figure in recent French history. [3]

Description and style

Guercino, Study for the Death of Dido, c.1630, Mahon Collection, London Suicidio di Didone - Guercino.png
Guercino, Study for the Death of Dido, c.1630, Mahon Collection, London

Whether or not Guercino's work was a formal pendant to Reni's Abduction, it was certainly influenced by it. The first of two preparatory drawings for it, in the former collection of Denis Mahon, shows Guercino's first idea, very different from his final one, with Dido standing on the funeral pyre about to stab herself with Aeneas' sword, with the Trojans standing ready to embark in the background [3] This leads to the theory that when Guercino learned how closely his work was to be shown with Reni's Abduction he heavily modified his treatment to make the two works more congruent, as shown in the second of his preparatory sketches (Staatliche Graphische Sammlung in Munich), which carefully studied Reni's work to create a horizontal multi-figure composition in the foreground, place the marine background in the right and add a putto above (all features of Reni's Abduction). [3] Even so, others point out that there are even clearer similarities than those between Abduction and Dido, namely between Dido and a study by Annibale Carracci for a Martyrdom of Saint Stephen, particularly in the disposition of the bystanders in both. [4]

Guercino chooses the moment of tragedy in the account in Aeneid Book IV where Dido's sister Anna (in red and blue to the left) returns from Aeneas with his final refusal to stay. [4] As yet unaware of Dido's intent to kill herself, Anna turns to her sister and completes the drama with her realisation that Dido has already thrust Aeneas' sword through herself, leaning down to lament with Dido. [4] This is framed by the two groups of Carthagininan soldiers and maidservants to left and right, with Cupid's wings at top right all in black. [4]

The bystanders acting as a chorus, the dramatic dialogue between the sisters and the pathos of the overall work all suggest Guercino is alluding to a play or opera about the queen's tragic death. [4] That impression is underlined by the uninvolved man on the far right who looks towards the viwer, seemingly in the role of the festaiuolo or reveller in Renaissance theatre, a character who stood in a scene without being involved in it and acted as a 'trait d'union' or point of contact between actors and audience. [5]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marie de' Medici</span> Queen of France from 1600 to 1610

Marie de' Medici was Queen of France and Navarre as the second wife of King Henry IV. Marie served as regent of France between 1610 and 1617 during the minority of her son Louis XIII. Her mandate as regent legally expired in 1614, when her son reached the age of majority, but she refused to resign and continued as regent until she was removed by a coup in 1617.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Guercino</span> 17th-century painter of the Italian Seicento

Giovanni Francesco Barbieri, better known as (il) Guercino, was an Italian Baroque painter and draftsman from Cento in the Emilia region, who was active in Rome and Bologna. The vigorous naturalism of his early manner contrasts with the classical equilibrium of his later works. His many drawings are noted for their luminosity and lively style.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Guido Bentivoglio</span> Italian cardinal and statesman

Guido Bentivoglio d'Aragona was an Italian cardinal, statesman and historian.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Guido Reni</span> Bolognese painter (1575–1642)

Guido Reni was an Italian painter of the Baroque period, although his works showed a classical manner, similar to Simon Vouet, Nicolas Poussin, and Philippe de Champaigne. He painted primarily religious works, but also mythological and allegorical subjects. Active in Rome, Naples, and his native Bologna, he became the dominant figure in the Bolognese School that emerged under the influence of the Carracci.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Domenichino</span> Italian painter (1581–1641)

Domenico Zampieri, known by the diminutive Domenichino after his shortness, was an Italian Baroque painter of the Bolognese School of painters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Francesco Albani</span> Italian Baroque painter (1578–1660)

Francesco Albani or Albano was an Italian Baroque painter who was active in Bologna (1591–1600), Rome (1600–1609), Bologna (1609), Viterbo (1609–1610), Bologna (1610), Rome (1610–1617), Bologna (1618–1660), Mantova (1621–1622), Roma (1623–1625) and Florence (1633).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Giovanni Lanfranco</span> Italian painter (1582–1647)

Giovanni Lanfranco was an Italian painter of the Baroque period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Palazzo Spada</span> Building in Rome, Italy

The Palazzo Spada is a palace located on Piazza di Capo Ferro #13 in the rione Regola of Rome, Italy. Standing very close to the Palazzo Farnese, it has a garden facing towards the Tiber river.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bolognese School</span> Art movement in early-modern Italy

The Bolognese School of painting, also known as the School of Bologna, flourished between the 16th and 17th centuries in Bologna, which rivalled Florence and Rome as the center of painting in Italy. Its most important representatives include the Carracci family, including Ludovico Carracci and his two cousins, the brothers Agostino and Annibale Carracci. Later, it included other Baroque painters: Domenichino and Lanfranco, active mostly in Rome, eventually Guercino and Guido Reni, and Accademia degli Incamminati in Bologna, which was run by Lodovico Carracci. Certain artistic conventions, which over time became traditionalist, had been developed in Rome during the first decades of the 16th century. As time passed, some artists sought new approaches to their work that no longer reflected only the Roman manner. The Carracci studio sought innovation or invention, seeking new ways to break away from traditional modes of painting while continuing to look for inspiration from their literary contemporaries; the studio formulated a style that was distinguished from the recognized manners of art in their time. This style was seen as both systematic and imitative, borrowing particular motifs from the past Roman schools of art and innovating a modernistic approach.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Palazzo Pallavicini-Rospigliosi</span> Building in Rome, Italy

The Palazzo Pallavicini-Rospigliosi is a palace in Rome, Italy. It was built by the Borghese family on the Quirinal Hill; its footprint occupies the site where the ruins of the baths of Constantine stood, whose remains still are part of the basement of the main building, the Casino dell'Aurora. Its first inhabitant was the famed art collector Cardinal Scipione Borghese, the nephew of Pope Paul V, who wanted to be housed near the large papal Palazzo Quirinale. The palace and garden of the Pallavicini-Rospigliosi were the product of the accumulated sites and were designed by Giovanni Vasanzio and Carlo Maderno in 1611–16. Scipione owned this site for less than a decade, 1610–16, and commissioned the construction and decoration of the casino and pergolata, facing the garden of Montecavallo. The Roman palace of this name should not be mistaken for the panoramic Villa Pallavicino on the shores of Lake Como in Lombardy. The Palace has also been the scene of important cultural and religious events. On June 6, 1977 Princess Elvina Pallavicini invited in Palazzo Pallavicini Rospigliosi the archbishop monsignor Marcel Lefebvre for a conference on the Second Vatican Council and for the celebration of a Traditiona Mass, under the careful direction of the marquis Roberto Malvezzi, and Frigate Captain marquis Luigi Coda Nunziante di San Ferdinando. Many members of Alleanza Cattolica, the baron Roberto de Mattei, the pharmacologist Giulio Soldani, the sociologist Massimo Introvigne, the psychiatrist Mario Di Fiorino and Attilio Tamburrini and his brother Renato Tamburrini took part to the event.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Giovanni Domenico Cerrini</span> Italian painter

Giovanni Domenico Cerrini (1609–1681), also called Gian Domenico Cerrini or il Cavalier Perugino, was a painter of the Baroque period, born in Perugia and active mainly in Rome and influenced in large part by painters of the Bolognese School.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Palazzo Rosso</span> Historical palace of Genoa, Italy

The Palazzo Brignole Sale or Palazzo Rosso is a house museum located in Via Garibaldi, in the historical center of Genoa, in Northwestern Italy. The palace is part of the UNESCO World Heritage Site Genoa: Le Strade Nuove and the system of the Palazzi dei Rolli. The rich art collection inside, along with the galleries of Palazzo Bianco and Palazzo Doria Tursi, is part of the Musei di Strada Nuova and consists of the works of artists of the caliber of Antoon van Dyck, Guido Reni, Paolo Veronese, Guercino, Gregorio De Ferrari, Albrecht Dürer, Bernardo Strozzi and Mattia Preti.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Galleria Estense</span> Art museum, Historic site in Modena, Italy

The Galleria Estense is an art gallery in the heart of Modena, centred around the collection of the d’Este family: rulers of Modena, Reggio and Ferrara from 1289 to 1796. Located on the top floor of the Palazzo dei Musei, on the St. Augustine square, the museum showcases a vast array of works ranging from fresco and oil painting to marble, polychrome and terracotta sculpture; musical instruments; numismatics; curios and decorative antiques.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Galleria Spada</span> Museum in Rome, Italy

The Galleria Spada is a museum in Rome, which is housed in the Palazzo Spada on Piazza Capo di Ferro. The palazzo is also famous for its façade and for the forced perspective gallery by Francesco Borromini.

Palazzo Spalletti-Trivelli is a palace located at Via Emilia A San Pietro #2, corner with Via San Nicolò, in the center of the city of Reggio Emilia, region of Emilia Romagna, Italy. The building now belongs to the Credito Emiliano (Credem) bank, and owns the art collection now in the palace.

<i>The Suicide of Cato</i> 1641 oil on canvas painting by Guercino

The Suicide of Cato is a 1641 oil on canvas painting, now in the Palazzo Rosso in Genoa.

<i>The Abduction of Helen</i> (Reni) Painting by Guido Reni

The Abduction of Helen is a 1628-1629 oil on canvas painting by Guido Reni, now in the Louvre Museum in Paris.

<i>Saint Sebastian</i> (Reni, Rome) Painting by Guido Reni

Saint Sebastian is a c. 1615 oil on canvas painting by Guido Reni, now in the Capitoline Museums in Rome. It is one of three similar treatments of the subject produced by the artist - the others are now in the Palazzo Rosso in Genoa (c.1615) and another in the Rhode Island School of Design Museum in Providence.

References

  1. 1 2 (in Italian) Maria Lucrezia Vicini, in Rossella Vodret and Fausto Gozzi (curators), Guercino 1591-1666 Capolavori da Cento e da Roma (Catalogo della Mostra Roma, Palazzo Barberini, 16 dicembre 2011-29 aprile 2012), Firenze, 2011, pp. 168-169.
  2. 1 2 3 Anthony Colantuono, Guido Reni's Abduction of Helen. The Politics and Rhetoric of Painting in Seventeenth-Century Europe, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1997
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 (in Italian) Stefano Pierguidi, Il Ratto di Elena di Reni e il Suicidio di Didone di Guercino come metafora di Maria de' Medici, femme forte dall'esilio alla morte, in Studi Seicenteschi, Anno 2012, N. 53, pp. 91-109.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 (in Italian) Maria Lucrezia Vicini, Guido Reni e il Guercino alla Galleria Spada. Due artisti, due opere. Dalla corte della regina di Francia al palazzo del cardinale Bernardino, Roma, 2002, pp. 31-44.
  5. Shilpa Prasad, Guercino's «Theatricality» between Italy and Spain, an essay in José Luis Colomer (ed.), Arte y diplomacia de la monarquía hispánica en el siglo XVII, Madrid, 2003, p. 397.