The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism

Last updated
The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism
The Half Has Never Been Told Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism.jpg
Author Edward E. Baptist
LanguageEnglish
SubjectUnited States History
Publisher Basic Books
Publication date
2014
Publication placeUnited States
Pages498
Awards2015 Hillman Prize
2015 Avery O. Craven Award
ISBN 978-046500296-2

The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism is a book by Edward E. Baptist published in 2014 by Basic Books. Baptist makes the argument that slavery played an essential role in the development of American capitalism, and that enslavers and slave traders were entrepreneurs in a capitalist context. They used enslaved people not just as the economic engine for the production of cotton, the dominant global commodity of the time, but also as collateral to finance the economic development of the nation.

Contents

Among the themes explored in the book are the expansion and practices of chattel slavery, illustrated with both stories of individual enslaved people, based on personal histories such as the autobiography of Charles Ball, and composite stories constructed from a variety of sources in the style of evocative history, [1] as well as statistics and maps showing changes across time; how letters of credit and banks fueled land speculation and the westward expansion of slavery in the Old Southwest; and the roles of New Orleans and the Haitian Revolution in these changes. Historical figures with roles in Baptist's examination of this history include Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Nicholas Biddle, John C. Calhoun, Henry Clay, and Abraham Lincoln.

Awards

For this book Baptist received the 2015 Hillman Prize, which gave this description of his work:

Told through intimate slave narratives, plantation records, newspapers, and the words of politicians, entrepreneurs, and escaped slaves, The Half Has Never Been Told offers a radical new interpretation of American history. It forces readers to reckon with the violence at the root of American supremacy, but also with the survival and resistance that brought about slavery’s end—and created a culture that sustains America’s deepest dreams of freedom. [2]

He also received the Organization of American Historians' 2015 Avery O. Craven Award, [3] which was renamed the Civil War and Reconstruction Book Award in July 2020. [4]

Reception

Reviews

Writing in The New York Times Book Review Eric Foner concluded the book's underlying argument was persuasive even though some of its elements were "not entirely pulled together," [5] and Kirkus Reviews found it to be a "dense, myth-busting work" that presents "a complicated story involving staggering scholarship that adds greatly to our understanding of the history of the United States. [6] T. W. Walker's review in Monthly Review offered a labor-history perspective on the book, [7] while Paul Harvey in The Christian Century found the book to be "one of the richest and most provocative accounts of American slavery I have ever read." [8] In The American Interest Paul DeRosa described the book as "a prodigious work that stacks up a mountain of documentary evidence." [9] Essence named this book its choice for the Best Book of 2014 for History. [10]

The many reviews published in academic and historical society journals offered a range of opinions. Matthew Pratt Guterl, writing in the Journal of Southern History, stated that the book "should be read and debated by anyone who writes about the South, or about American capitalism, or about African American culture," [11] while Mark Wilson writing in the North Carolina Historical Review expressed his view that the book "aspires to greatness but falls short of the mark," [12] and in The Historian Matthew Crocker wrote, "Baptist has written an important book that is also indicative of a current trend in historiography that takes a highly critical view of the development of modern capitalism." [13] Additional perspectives were expressed by reviews in The Chronicle of Higher Education by Marc Parry, [14] The American Historical Review by George William Van Cleve, [15] the Virginia Magazine of History and Biography by R. B. Bernstein, [16] The Journal of American History by Diana Ramey Berry, [17] The History Teacher by Timothy Buchner, [18] and The Chronicle of Higher Education by Marc Parry. [19]

Derek Sanderson, writing in Library Journal , declared that "professional historians and lay readers will pore over this book for years to come. Essential for all readers interested in American history and the history of slavery." [20] Reviews in the library and publishing industry press also appeared in Publishers Weekly [21] and Booklist [22]

Controversy over review in The Economist

On 4 September 2014 The Economist published a review of The Half Has Not Been Told on its website that elicited so much public criticism that the magazine pulled the review from its website the next day, [23] although the original review remained accessible elsewhere on the site. [24] The withdrawn review also appeared in the 6 Sep 2014 print edition of The Economist. [25]

Reports on criticism of the initial review appeared on Vox [26] and the websites of The Atlantic [27] and The Washington Post . [28] An extended discussion of the matter by Ari Kelman was published in an article in The Times Literary Supplement . [29] A response by the author to the withdrawn review was published in Politico . [30]

Controversy among historians

The research methods and the approach to writing history used by Baptist and some other historians have faced criticism from economists and economic historians, as discussed in articles referencing this book published in The Chronicle of Higher Education , [31] Catalyst: A Journal of Theory & Strategy , [32] Explorations in Economic History . [33] and The American Interest , [34]

Footnotes

  1. Baptist 2014, p. 428 (note 1)
  2. "2015 Hillman Prize for a book". 18 April 2015.
  3. "Civil War and Reconstruction Book Award Winners".
  4. "A question of honor makes history". Colorado Arts and Sciences Magazine. 2021-01-14. Archived from the original on 2021-05-17. Retrieved 2022-03-16.
  5. Foner, Eric (5 Oct 2014). "A Brutal Process". New York Times Book Review : 21.
  6. "Book Review". Kirkus Reviews . 82 (13): 171. 1 July 2014.
  7. Walker, T. W. (Nov 2015). ""A Torture Machine" The Violent Story of Slavery and the Beginning of American Capitalism". Monthly Review . 67 (6): 58–61. doi:10.14452/MR-067-06-2015-10_7.
  8. Harvey, Paul (21 Jan 2015). "The world slavery made". The Christian Century . 132 (2): 34–35.
  9. DeRosa, Paul (May–Jun 2016). "Was America Built by Slaves?". The American Interest . 11 (5): 88–92.
  10. Bass, Patrik Henry (Dec 2014). "The Best Books of 2014". Essence . 45 (8): 66.
  11. Pratt Guterl, Matthew (May 2015). "Slavery and Capitalism: A Review Essay". Journal of Southern History. 81 (2). Southern Historical Association: 405–420.
  12. Wilson, Mark R. (Oct 2015). "Book Review". North Carolina Historical Review. 92 (4). North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources: 433–435.
  13. Crocker, Matthew H. (Fall 2016). "Book Review". The Historian . 78 (3): 511–512. doi:10.1111/hisn.12252. S2CID   151924987.
  14. Parry, Marc (16 Dec 2016). "Shackles and Dollars". The Chronicle of Higher Education . 63 (17): 86–89.
  15. Van Cleve, George William (Oct 2015). "Book Review". American Historical Review . 120 (4): 1434–1436.
  16. Bernstein, R. B. (2015). "Book Review". Virginia Magazine of History and Biography. 123 (3). Virginia Historical Society: 274–276.
  17. Berry, Daina Ramey (Dec 2016). "Book Review". Journal of American History . 103 (3): 718–719.
  18. Buckner, Timothy R. (May 2016). "Book Review". The History Teacher . 49 (3): 465–466.
  19. Parry, Marc (16 Dec 2016). "Shackles and Dollars". The Chronicle of Higher Education . 63 (17): 86–89.
  20. Sanderson, Derek (1 Aug 2014). "Book Review". Library Journal . 139 (13).
  21. "Book Review". Publishers Weekly . 261 (26): 53. 30 June 2014.
  22. Bush, Vanessa (15 Sep 2014). "Book Review". Booklist . 111 (2): 6.
  23. Zack Shonfeld (5 Sep 2014). "The Economist Retracts a Book Review Complaining That a Historical Account of Slavery Depicted Slaves as 'Victims'". Newsweek . Retrieved 1 July 2022.
  24. "Our withdrawn review "Blood cotton"". The Economist. 5 Sep 2014. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
  25. "Blood cotton; American slavery". The Economist . Vol. 412, no. 8903. 6 Sep 2014. p. 86.
  26. German Lopez (4 Sep 2014). "The Economist just defended slave owners". Vox . Retrieved 1 July 2022.
  27. Arit John (4 Sep 2014). "The Economist Is Sorry About Its 'Not All Slave Masters' Book Review". The Atlantic . Retrieved 1 July 2022.
  28. Fred Barbash (8 Sep 2014). "'Slavery wasn't all that bad' book review spawns #economistbookreviews satire". The Washington Post . Retrieved 1 July 2022.
  29. Kelman, Ari (3 April 2015). "Slaving for profits". The Times Literary Supplement (5844): 7–8.
  30. Edward Baptist (7 Sep 2014). "What the Economist Doesn't Get About Slavery—And My Book". Politico . Retrieved 1 July 2022.
  31. Parry, Marc (16 Dec 2016). "Shackles and Dollars". The Chronicle of Higher Education . 63 (17): 86–89.
  32. Post, Charles (Spring 2017). "Slavery and the New History of Capitalism". Catalyst: A Journal of Theory & Strategy . 1 (1): 173–192.
  33. Olmstead, Alan L.; Rhode, Paul W. (Jan 2018). "Cotton, slavery, and the new history of capitalism". Explorations in Economic History . 67: 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.eeh.2017.12.002.
  34. DeRosa, Paul (May–June 2016). "Was America Built by Slaves?". The American Interest . 11 (5): 88–92.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economic history</span>

Economic history is the study of history using methodological tools from economics or with a special attention to economic phenomena. Research is conducted using a combination of historical methods, statistical methods and the application of economic theory to historical situations and institutions. The field can encompass a wide variety of topics, including equality, finance, technology, labour, and business. It emphasizes historicizing the economy itself, analyzing it as a dynamic entity and attempting to provide insights into the way it is structured and conceived.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Slavery in the United States</span>

The legal institution of human chattel slavery, comprising the enslavement primarily of Africans and African Americans, was prevalent in the United States of America from its founding in 1776 until 1865, predominantly in the South. Slavery was established throughout European colonization in the Americas. From 1526, during the early colonial period, it was practiced in what became Britain's colonies, including the Thirteen Colonies that formed the United States. Under the law, an enslaved person was treated as property that could be bought, sold, or given away. Slavery lasted in about half of U.S. states until abolition in 1865, and issues concerning slavery seeped into every aspect of national politics, economics, and social custom. In the decades after the end of Reconstruction in 1877, many of slavery's economic and social functions were continued through segregation, sharecropping, and convict leasing.

Market fundamentalism, also known as free-market fundamentalism, is a term applied to a strong belief in the ability of unregulated laissez-faire or free-market capitalist policies to solve most economic and social problems. It is often used as pejorative by critics of said beliefs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Baptist War</span> 1831 failed slave rebellion in British-ruled Jamaica

The Baptist War, also known as the Sam Sharp Rebellion, the Christmas Rebellion, the Christmas Uprising and the Great Jamaican Slave Revolt of 1831–32, was an eleven-day rebellion that started on 25 December 1831 and involved up to 60,000 of the 300,000 slaves in the Colony of Jamaica. The uprising was led by a black Baptist deacon, Samuel Sharpe, and waged largely by his followers. The revolt, though militarily unsuccessful, played a major part in the abolition of slavery throughout the British Empire.

Eugene Dominic Genovese was an American historian of the American South and American slavery. He was noted for bringing a Marxist perspective to the study of power, class and relations between planters and slaves in the South. His book Roll, Jordan, Roll: The World the Slaves Made won the Bancroft Prize. He later abandoned the left and Marxism and embraced traditionalist conservatism. He wrote during the Cold War and his political beliefs were viewed by some as highly controversial at the time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Slave trade in the United States</span>

The internal slave trade in the United States, also known as the domestic slave trade, the Second Middle Passage and the interregional slave trade, was the mercantile trade of enslaved people within the United States. It was most significant after 1808, when the importation of slaves from Africa was prohibited by federal law. Historians estimate that upwards of one million slaves were forcibly relocated from the Upper South, places like Maryland, Virginia, Kentucky, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Missouri, to the territories and then-new states of the Deep South, especially Georgia, Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Arkansas.

Time on the Cross: The Economics of American Negro Slavery (1974) is a book by the economists Robert Fogel and Stanley L. Engerman. Fogel and Engerman argued that slavery was an economically rational institution and that the economic exploitation of slaves was not as catastrophic as presumed, because there were financial incentives for slaveholders to maintain a basic level of material support for those they held as property. The book was reprinted in 1995 at its twentieth anniversary. The book contradicts the long-standing notion that slavery was economically backwards, underdeveloped the South, and was on the path to extinction before the Civil War broke out. It attracted widespread attention in the media and generated heated controversy and criticism for its methodology and conclusions.

<i>The Slave Community</i> 1972 book by John W. Blassingame

The Slave Community: Plantation Life in the Antebellum South is a book written by American historian John W. Blassingame. Published in 1972, it is one of the first historical studies of slavery in the United States to be presented from the perspective of the enslaved. The Slave Community contradicted those historians who had interpreted history to suggest that African-American slaves were docile and submissive "Sambos" who enjoyed the benefits of a paternalistic master–slave relationship on southern plantations. Using psychology, Blassingame analyzes fugitive slave narratives published in the 19th century to conclude that an independent culture developed among the enslaved and that there were a variety of personality types exhibited by slaves.

Slavery in Britain Slavery in Great Britain

Slavery in Britain existed before the Roman occupation and until the 11th century, when the Norman conquest of England resulted in the gradual merger of the pre-conquest institution of slavery into serfdom, and all slaves were no longer recognised separately in English law or custom. By the middle of the 12th century, the institution of slavery as it had existed prior to the Norman conquest had fully disappeared, but other forms of unfree servitude continued for some centuries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sven Beckert</span> American historian

Sven Beckert is Laird Bell Professor of American History at Harvard University, where he teaches the history of the United States in the nineteenth century, and global history. With Christine A. Desan, he is the co-director of the Program on the Study of Capitalism at Harvard University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Walter Johnson (historian)</span> American historian

Walter Johnson is an American historian, and a professor of History and of African and African-American Studies at Harvard University, where he previously (2014-2020) directed the Charles Warren Center for Studies in American History.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Slave breeding in the United States</span> Former prevalent economic practice in the US, especially after import of slaves was made illegal

Slave breeding was the practice in slave states of the United States of slave owners systematically forcing slaves to have children to increase their wealth. It included coerced sexual relations between enslaved men and women or girls, forced pregnancies of enslaved women and girls, and favoring enslaved females who could produce a relatively large number of children. The objective was for enslavers to increase the number of people they enslaved without incurring the cost of purchase, and to fill labor shortages caused by the abolition of the Atlantic slave trade.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Treatment of slaves in the United States</span> Treatment endured by enslaved people in the US

The treatment of slaves in the United States often included sexual abuse and rape, the denial of education, and punishments like whippings. Families were often split up by the sale of one or more members, usually never to see or hear of each other again.

Joseph Calder Miller was an American historian and academic. He served at the University of Virginia from 1972 to 2014 as T. Cary Johnson Jr. professor of history, and was a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. As a historian, Joseph wrote extensively on the early history of Africa, especially Angola, the Atlantic slave trade, women and slavery, child slavery, Atlantic history, and world history.

Matthew Pratt Guterl is the L. Herbert Ballou University Professor of Africana Studies and American Studies at Brown University. Before his arrival at Brown University, Guterl was the James Rudy Professor of American Studies and History at Indiana University and chair of the department of American Studies. He is the author of five books and the co-author of another, and has written for The Guardian, The New Republic, The Chronicle of Higher Education, and Inside Higher Education. Guterl appeared in the documentary Race: the Power of an Illusion.

Edward E. Baptist is an American academic and writer. He is a professor of history at Cornell University, located in Ithaca, New York, where he specializes in the history of the 19th-century United States, particularly the South. Thematically, he has been interested in the history of capitalism and has also been interested in digital humanities methodologies. He is the author of numerous books.

Tera Hunter is an American scholar of African-American history and gender. She holds the Edwards Professor of American History Endowed Chair at Princeton University. She specializes in the study of gender, race, and labor in the history of the Southern United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Black Belt in the American South</span> Black Belt in the American South

The Black Belt in the American South refers to the social history, especially concerning slavery and black workers, of the geological region known as the Black Belt. The geology emphasizes the highly fertile black soil. Historically, the black belt economy was based on cotton plantations – along with some tobacco plantation areas along the Virginia-North Carolina border. The valuable land was largely controlled by rich whites, and worked by very poor, primarily black slaves who in many counties constituted a majority of the population. Generally the term is applied to a larger region than that defined by its geology.

Capitalism and Slavery is the published version of the doctoral dissertation of Eric Williams, who was the first Prime Minister of Trinidad and Tobago in 1962. It advances a number of theses on the impact of economic factors on the decline of slavery, specifically the Atlantic slave trade and slavery in the British West Indies, from the second half of the 18th century. It also makes criticisms of the historiography of the British Empire of the period: in particular on the use of the Slavery Abolition Act of 1833 as a sort of moral pivot; but also directed against a historical school that saw the imperial constitutional history as a constant advance through legislation. It uses polemical asides for some personal attacks, notably on the Oxford historian Reginald Coupland. Seymour Drescher, a prominent critic among historians of some of the theses put forward in Capitalism and Slavery by Williams, wrote in 1987: "If one criterion of a classic is its ability to reorient our most basic way of viewing an object or a concept, Eric Williams's study supremely passes that test."

Joshua Daniel Rothman is an American historian. He is a professor and chair for the department of history at the University of Alabama.

References