The Science of Desire

Last updated
The Science of Desire: The Search for the Gay Gene and the Biology of Behavior
The Science of Desire.jpg
Cover of the first edition
Authors Dean Hamer
Peter Copeland
Cover artistJulie Metz
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Subject Homosexuality
Publisher Simon & Schuster
Publication date
1994
Media typePrint (Hardcover and Paperback)
Pages272
ISBN 0-671-88724-6

The Science of Desire: The Search for the Gay Gene and the Biology of Behavior is a 1994 book by the geneticist Dean Hamer and the journalist Peter Copeland, in which the authors discuss Hamer's research into the genetics of homosexuality.

Contents

The book received both positive and mixed reviews. It was praised as a well-written discussion of science that properly acknowledged the limitations of genetic research on homosexuality, usefully explored its ethical implications, and drew on a wide range of sources and publications. However, reviewers were unconvinced by Hamer's suggestions about the possible evolutionary basis of homosexuality, and argued that some of his claims were incorrect, that more work needed to be done to confirm or refute his genetic findings, and that his use of the term "gay gene" was misleading. Hamer's treatment of psychology and psychiatry was also criticized as biased.

Summary

Hamer argues that human sexuality can and should be studied scientifically and discusses his findings about Xq28, a region of the X chromosome. According to Hamer, he shifted his area of research from metallothionein to the genetics of homosexuality after reading the naturalist Charles Darwin's The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (1871) and the evolutionary geneticist Richard Lewontin, the neurobiologist Steven Rose and the psychologist Leon Kamin's Not in Our Genes (1984). Hamer writes that Darwin's book surprised him because of the amount of space it devotes to discussing sexual selection. He describes Lewontin et al.′s work as "a political rather than a scientific book" and expresses his disagreement with its politics. However, he comments that it taught him that the genetics of behavior is an emotionally and politically charged topic, especially where it concerns sexuality. He criticizes Alfred Kinsey, as well as Sigmund Freud and his views on homosexuality. [1]

Publication history

The Science of Desire was first published in 1994 by Simon & Schuster. [2]

Reception

The Science of Desire received positive reviews from Genevieve Stuttaford in Publishers Weekly , [3] Constance Rinaldo in Library Journal , [4] the science journalist Natalie Angier in The New York Times Book Review , [5] Martin Johnson in New Scientist , [6] the psychiatrist Susan Bradley in The New England Journal of Medicine , [7] the science writer Jonathan Weiner in The New Republic , [8] and the biologist Paul R. Gross in National Review . [9] The book received mixed reviews from W. Lener in Choice, [10] the journalist Richard Horton in The New York Review of Books , [11] and the psychologist John C. Gonsiorek in the Journal of Sex Research . [12] The book was also reviewed by the journalist Steven Petrow in The Advocate , [13] Deborah Franklin in The Washington Post , [14] the historian of science Daniel Kevles in The New Yorker , [15] Nancy Ordover in Socialist Review, [16] and by New York Native and Lambda Book Report, [17] [18] and discussed in The Lancet . [19]

Stuttaford described the book as "admirably lucid and surprisingly lively". She credited Hamer with carefully pointing out the limitations of genetic research on sexual orientation, simplifying complex ideas for general readers, and exploring the ethical implications of a "gay gene" with "laudable compassion and common sense." [3] Rinaldo described the book as an engaging and personalized account of scientific investigation, and recommended it for both lay readers and specialists. [4] Angier described the book as "a surprising delight to read", writing that Hamer did not overstate his case for the innateness of sexual orientation and "has the welcome habit of sticking to the facts." However, she wrote that the last sections, in which Hamer discussed "still-floundering searches for the genes behind alcoholism, manic depression, shyness, aggression and the like" were less satisfactory. [5]

Johnson believed that Hamer's work made clear the difficulties involved in studying sexuality. He considered its title misleading, as no "gay gene" has been "proven or identified", and criticized Hamer for confusing "sexuality and sex" and for implying that "AIDS (rather than HIV) is sexually transmitted". He also questioned why Hamer needed a co-author, and why a scientist as busy as Hamer claimed to be would find writing a book "describing the background to a single, as yet unconfirmed, unextended and far from concluded, study" a high priority. However, the book convinced him that "the more cynical answers to this question" were mistaken. He found the book well-written, writing that it "conveys something of the serendipity of scientific advance", gave insightful descriptions of scientists, and outlined "the problems of determining whether there are genetic bases for complex behaviours" and suggested a way of overcoming them that made clear that this methodology relies on "redefining a complex characteristic in very limited terms". He concluded that it was "probably the best attempt at a genetic analysis of human sexuality that we have so far, which indicates just how far we have to go" and predicted that it would "fuel the moral debate about what any genetic component to sexuality might mean for ethics and the law." He wrote that Hamer should be "congratulated and encouraged" for contributing to the debate. [6]

Bradley described the book as a well-written account of the process of science. She commented that more work needed to be done to replicate Hamer's research and identify the relevant gene, but credited Hamer with being "cautious in extrapolating his findings to larger issues" and acknowledging the limitations of the research. However, she wrote that despite his caution, Hamer used the term "gay gene" in a misleading fashion, since "the term implies more than Hamer's work establishes." She also commented that, "the least well thought out and presented part of this book is the section on psychological theories", which she considered understandable given that Hamer is "not trained in psychology or psychiatry". In her view, "even its subtitle, “Sissies, Freud, and Sex Acts,” suggests a hasty dismissal of the importance of psychological theories." She concluded that the book, "makes enjoyable reading, particularly for anyone interested in the making of science as it relates to human behavior or sexuality." [7]

Weiner described the book as a calm and modestly written account of Hamer's research. He credited Hamer with avoiding over-stating the importance of his work or sensationalizing his results, writing that he had produced a "clear and capable book about a difficult subject." [8] Gross wrote that the book deserved to be widely read. [9] Lener wrote that parts of the book were "diary-like", and gave Hamer's "descriptions of methods used" and "life histories of gay men who participated in the study" as examples. He also wrote that some of Hamer's statements, such as that nobody has studied the number of gay men in the United States since Kinsey's research, were incorrect, but nevertheless considered the book generally "very accurate" and credited Hamer with drawing on "recent, important publications." He concluded that, "General readers as well as professionals and practitioners in sex education/therapy will find much of interest and value." [10]

Gonsiorek considered the book a competent and engaging discussion of Hamer's scientific work, but one that showed the "tension and unease" inherent in popularizing science. He questioned Hamer's description of how he shifted "from an obscure to a high-profile area of genetics", writing that it strained credibility. He called Hamer's discussion of the development of his research protocol "gossipy" and wrote that it contained "many tidbits, some less than kind, and many less than relevant" about the people involved. He praised Hamer's "ability to synthesize information from diverse sources and apply it creatively", his discussions of possible biological mechanisms for the heritability of male homosexuality and the public policy implications of his scientific research, and his criticism of social constructionism. However, he found Hamer's attempt to synthesize his ideas with "psychological concepts" unsuccessful and his evolutionary ideas intriguing but insufficiently developed. He wrote that Hamer tried to connect his ideas to "issues from handedness to Alzheimer's, usually coming off sounding like he has not sufficiently mastered the specific areas", and failed in his discussion of the "behavioral and social science literature", for example by mistakenly identifying social constructionism as a form of behaviorism. He also considered the book as a whole "marred" by Hamer's persistent hostility towards psychiatry. [12]

Horton described the book as a "popular account" of Hamer's research and credited Hamer, along with other researchers, with helping to make a "forceful but by no means definitive case for the view that biological and genetic influences have an important--perhaps even decisive--part in determining sexual preference among males." Though noting that Hamer acknowledged the limitations of his research, he criticized Hamer for having an unsubtle view of the meaning of "biological influence" on sexual orientation that ignores the question of how genes produce an "unpredictable interplay of behavioral impulses", and engaging in "overstretched speculations" about "why a gene for homosexuality still exists when it apparently has little apparent survival value in evolutionary terms." He concluded that while Hamer's work "presents technical and conceptual difficulties" and his "preliminary findings obviously need replication or refutation" it "represents a genuine epistemological break away from the past's rigid and withered conceptions of sexual preference." [11]

The Lancet endorsed Hamer's proposal for "the creation of a US centre--a National Institute for Sexual Health--to coordinate federal funding for research into sexuality", agreeing with Hamer that "the place of sexuality in human life" is "sufficiently important to merit specific and rigorous scientific study." [19]

The Science of Desire was criticized by the philosopher Timothy F. Murphy and the gay activist Dennis Altman. [20] [21] Murphy noted that while Hamer's research, if valid, establishes evidence of a generic influence on sexual orientation, the nature of that influence remains to be specified. He noted that Hamer's research, like similar studies, has been criticized on the grounds of its small sample size, as well as on other grounds specific to it, and that other researchers have reported difficulty in replicating Hamer's findings. He concluded that much more work had to be done before it could be accepted that genes at Xq28 determine the sexual orientation of some males, despite Hamer's conducting a follow-up study. Murphy argued that while Hamer believed that the study of animal sexual behavior will help make society more tolerant of homosexuality, it was uncertain that it would and if it did, this "should not be because descriptions of the behavior of animals have normative force in regard to the behavior of human beings." [20] Altman described Hamer's suggestion that homosexuality has a genetic basis as dubious. He noted that it conflicted with "the theories and discoveries of both Freud and Kinsey". [21]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biology and sexual orientation</span> Field of sexual orientation research

The relationship between biology and sexual orientation is a subject of research. While scientists do not know the exact cause of sexual orientation, they theorize that it is caused by a complex interplay of genetic, hormonal, and environmental influences. Hypotheses for the impact of the post-natal social environment on sexual orientation, however, are weak, especially for males.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dean Hamer</span> American geneticist (born 1951)

Dean Hamer is an American geneticist. He is known for his research on the role of genetics in sexual orientation and for a series of popular books and documentaries that have changed the understanding and perceptions of human sexuality and gender identity.

<i>Not in Our Genes</i> 1984 book by Richard Lewontin, Steven Rose, and Leon Kamin

Not in Our Genes: Biology, Ideology and Human Nature is a 1984 book by the evolutionary geneticist Richard Lewontin, the neurobiologist Steven Rose, and the psychologist Leon Kamin, in which the authors criticize sociobiology and genetic determinism and advocate a socialist society. Its themes include the relationship between biology and society, the nature versus nurture debate, and the intersection of science and ideology.

Xq28 is a chromosome band and genetic marker situated at the tip of the X chromosome which has been studied since at least 1980. The band contains three distinct regions, totaling about 8 Mbp of genetic information. The marker came to the public eye in 1993 when studies by Dean Hamer and others indicated a link between the Xq28 marker and male sexual orientation.

<i>Gay Science</i> 1997 book by Timothy F. Murphy

Gay Science: The Ethics of Sexual Orientation Research is a 1997 book by the philosopher Timothy F. Murphy about scientific research on sexual orientation.

<i>Virtually Normal</i> 1995 book by Andrew Sullivan

Virtually Normal: An Argument About Homosexuality is a book about the politics of homosexuality by the political commentator Andrew Sullivan, in which the author criticizes four different perspectives on gay rights in American society, which he calls the "Prohibitionist", "Liberationist", "Conservative", and "Liberal" views, seeking to expose internal inconsistencies within each of them. He also criticizes the philosopher Michel Foucault and gay rights activists he considers influenced by Foucault, and argues in favor of same-sex marriage and an end to the don't ask, don't tell policy, which banned service by openly gay people in the US military. However, he makes a case against legislation aimed at preventing private discrimination against gay people.

<i>Sexual Preference</i> (book) 1981 book

Sexual Preference: Its Development in Men and Women (1981) is a book about the development of sexual orientation by the psychologist Alan P. Bell and the sociologists Martin S. Weinberg and Sue Kiefer Hammersmith, in which the authors reevaluate what were at the time of its publication widely held ideas about the origins of heterosexuality and homosexuality, sometimes rejecting entirely the factors proposed as causes, and in other cases concluding that their importance had been exaggerated. Produced with the help of the American National Institute of Mental Health, the study was a publication of the Institute for Sex Research. Together with its Statistical Appendix, Sexual Preference was the conclusion of a series of books including Homosexuality: An Annotated Bibliography (1972) and Homosexualities: A Study of Diversity Among Men and Women (1978), both co-authored by Bell and Weinberg.

<i>Virtual Equality</i> 1995 book by Urvashi Vaid

Virtual Equality: The Mainstreaming of Gay and Lesbian Liberation is a 1995 book about gay rights by lawyer and civil rights activist Urvashi Vaid, in which the author argues that LGBT movements in the United States have been only partially successful in achieving their goals, and that gay and lesbian Americans continue to suffer from discrimination and other problems. Vaid maintains that the American gay rights movement must reconsider its tactics and move from advocacy of civil equality to aiming at social change.

<i>The Evolution of Human Sexuality</i> 1979 book by Donald Symons

The Evolution of Human Sexuality is a 1979 book about human sexuality by the anthropologist Donald Symons, in which the author discusses topics such as human sexual anatomy, ovulation, orgasm, homosexuality, sexual promiscuity, and rape, attempting to show how evolutionary concepts can be applied to humans. Symons argues that the female orgasm is not an adaptive trait and that women have the capacity for it only because orgasm is adaptive for men, and that differences between the sexual behavior of male and female homosexuals help to show underlying differences between male and female sexuality. In his view, homosexual men tend to be sexually promiscuous because of the tendency of men in general to desire sex with a large number of partners, a tendency that in heterosexual men is usually restrained by women's typical lack of interest in promiscuous sex. Symons also argues that rape can be explained in evolutionary terms and feminist claims that it is not sexually motivated are incorrect.

<i>One Hundred Years of Homosexuality</i> 1990 book by David M. Halperin

One Hundred Years of Homosexuality: and other essays on Greek love is a 1990 book about homosexuality in ancient Greece by the classicist David M. Halperin, in which the author supports the social constructionist school of thought associated with the French philosopher Michel Foucault. The work has been praised by several scholars, but criticized by others, some of whom have attributed to Halperin the view that the coining of the word "homosexuality" in the nineteenth century brought homosexuality into existence. The book was often reviewed alongside John J. Winkler's The Constraints of Desire (1990).

<i>A Separate Creation</i> 1996 book by Chandler Burr

A Separate Creation: The Search for the Biological Origins of Sexual Orientation, also published with the subtitle How Biology Makes Us Gay, is a 1996 book about the development of sexual orientation by the journalist Chandler Burr. It received mainly positive reviews, commending it as a useful discussion of scientific research on sexual orientation and the politics surrounding the issue.

<i>Homosexuality: A Philosophical Inquiry</i> 1988 book by Michael Ruse

Homosexuality: A Philosophical Inquiry is a 1988 book by the philosopher Michael Ruse, in which the author discusses different theories of homosexuality, evaluates the moral status of homosexual behavior, and argues in favor of gay rights.

<i>Lesbian/Woman</i> 1972 book by Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon

Lesbian/Woman is a work by the feminist and gay rights activists Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon, in which the authors discuss what it means to be a lesbian. The book was influential and is considered a foundational text of lesbian feminism. Reviewers believed that it benefited from its authors' personal experience as lesbians, and endorsed its criticisms of the treatment of lesbians by religious and professional organizations.

<i>The Homosexual Matrix</i> 1975 book by Clarence Arthur Tripp

The Homosexual Matrix is a book by American psychologist Clarence Arthur Tripp, in which the author discusses the biological and sociological implications of homosexuality, and also attempts to explain heterosexuality and bisexuality. The book was first published in 1975 by McGraw-Hill Book Company; it was republished in a revised edition in 1987. Based on his review of the evidence, Tripp argues that people do not become homosexual due to factors such as hormone levels, fear of the opposite sex, or the influence of dominant and close-binding mothers, and that the amount of attention fathers give to their sons has no effect on the development of homosexuality. He criticizes Sigmund Freud and argues that psychoanalytic theories of the development of homosexuality are untenable and based on false assumptions. He maintains that sexual orientation is not innate and depends on learning, that early puberty and early masturbation are important factors in the development of male homosexuality, and that a majority of adults are heterosexual because their socialization has made them want to be heterosexual. He criticizes psychotherapeutic attempts to convert homosexuals to heterosexuality and argues in favor of social tolerance of homosexuality and non-conformist behavior in general.

<i>Gay, Straight, and the Reason Why</i> 2011 book by Simon LeVay

Gay, Straight, and the Reason Why: The Science of Sexual Orientation is a book by the neuroscientist Simon LeVay and published by Oxford University Press. The book received mainly positive reviews, praising it for LeVay's wide-ranging overview of scientific research on sexual orientation. In 2012, it received the Bullough Book Award for the most distinguished book written for the professional sexological community published in a given year.

<i>The Sexual Brain</i> 1993 book by Simon LeVay

The Sexual Brain is a 1993 book about brain mechanisms involved in sexual behavior and feelings, and related topics such as sexual orientation, by the neuroscientist Simon LeVay. The book was praised as a well-written work on science. However, some reviewers pointed out factual errors, and noted that LeVay failed to prove that homosexuality has a biological basis.

<i>Sexuality and Its Discontents</i> 1985 book by Jeffrey Weeks

Sexuality and Its Discontents: Meanings, Myths, and Modern Sexualities is a 1985 book about the politics and philosophy of sex by the sociologist Jeffrey Weeks. The book received positive reviews, crediting Weeks with explaining the theories of sexologists and usefully discussing controversial sexual issues. However, Weeks was criticised for his treatment of feminism and sado-masochism.

<i>Sex and Reason</i> 1992 book by Richard Posner

Sex and Reason is a 1992 book about human sexuality by the economist and federal judge Richard Posner, in which the author attempts to explain sexual behavior in economic terms and discusses a range of controversial subjects related to sex, proposing reforms in American laws.

<i>What Wild Ecstasy</i> 1997 book by John Heidenry

What Wild Ecstasy: The Rise and Fall of the Sexual Revolution is a 1997 book about the sexual revolution by John Heidenry. The book received mixed reviews. It was described as interesting and Heidenry was complimented for his discussions of figures such as Bob Guccione, Hugh Hefner, Larry Flynt, and Reuben Sturman. However, he was criticized for his research methods. He was accused of plagiarism because of the use he made of material by other writers, receiving criticism in particular from the journalist Philip Nobile. Critics also wrote that he focused disproportionately on pornography and gave insufficient attention to feminism and women's issues.

<i>Sambia Sexual Culture</i> 1999 book by Gilbert Herdt

Sambia Sexual Culture: Essays from the Field is a 1999 book about the Simbari people and their sexual practices by the anthropologist Gilbert Herdt. The book received negative reviews, accusing Herdt of being biased in his approach and his conclusions. In the book the Simbari people are called Sambia people

References

  1. ↑ Hamer & Copeland 1994, pp. 14, 21, 25–26, 58, 173–175.
  2. ↑ Hamer & Copeland 1994, p. 4.
  3. 1 2 Stuttaford 1994, p. 81.
  4. 1 2 Rinaldo 1994, p. 88.
  5. 1 2 Angier 1994, pp. 9–10.
  6. 1 2 Johnson 1994, pp. 45–46.
  7. 1 2 Bradley 1995, pp. 1311–1312.
  8. 1 2 Weiner 1995, pp. 35–38.
  9. 1 2 Gross 1995, p. 69.
  10. 1 2 Lener 1995, p. 1215.
  11. 1 2 Horton 1995, pp. 36–40.
  12. 1 2 Gonsiorek 1995, pp. 262–263.
  13. ↑ Petrow 1994, pp. 76–77.
  14. ↑ Franklin 1995, p. 5.
  15. ↑ Kevles 1995, p. 85.
  16. ↑ Ordover 1996, p. 125.
  17. ↑ New York Native 1994, p. 34.
  18. ↑ Lambda Book Report 1995, p. 44.
  19. 1 2 The Lancet 1995, p. 1309.
  20. 1 2 Murphy 1997, pp. 34–35, 168, 251.
  21. 1 2 Altman 2013, pp. 34, 222.

Bibliography

Books
Journals
  • Angier, Natalie (1994). "The homosexual pedigree". The New York Times Book Review (October 16, 1994).
  • Bradley, Susan J. (1995). "The Science of Desire: The search for the gay gene and the biology of behavior". The New England Journal of Medicine . 332 (19). doi:10.1056/NEJM199505113321919.
  • Franklin, Deborah (1995). "At the root of the erotic". The Washington Post . Vol. 118, no. 27. – via  EBSCO's Academic Search Complete (subscription required)
  • Gonsiorek, John C. (1995). "Science and Media: Queer Bedfellows and Troubled Sleep". Journal of Sex Research . 32 (3). – via  EBSCO's Academic Search Complete (subscription required)
  • Gross, Paul R. (1995). "The Science of Desire: The Search for the Gay Gene and the Biology of Behavior". National Review . 47 (6). – via  EBSCO's Academic Search Complete (subscription required)
  • Horton, Richard (1995). "Is Homosexuality Inherited?". The New York Review of Books . 42 (12).
  • Johnson, Martin (1994). "Sexual innocents and serendipity". New Scientist . 144 (1951).
  • Kevles, Daniel J. (1995). "The sexual brain (Book Review); The science of desire (Book Review)". The New Yorker . Vol. 71. – via  EBSCO's Academic Search Complete (subscription required)
  • Lener, W. (1995). "The science of desire (Book Review)". Choice. 32. – via  EBSCO's Academic Search Complete (subscription required)
  • Ordover, Nancy (1996). "Eugenics, the gay gene, and the science of backlash". Socialist Review . 26 (1/2). – via  EBSCO's Academic Search Complete (subscription required)
  • Petrow, Steven (1994). "The nonplayer". The Advocate (666). – via  EBSCO's Academic Search Complete (subscription required)
  • Rinaldo, Constance (1994). "Book reviews: Science & technology". Library Journal . 119 (15). – via  EBSCO's Academic Search Complete (subscription required)
  • Stuttaford, Genevieve (1994). "Forecasts: Nonfiction". Publishers Weekly . 241 (32).
  • Weiner, Jonathan (1995). "The Gay Science". The New Republic . Vol. 212, no. 1. – via  EBSCO's Academic Search Complete (subscription required)
  • "Gay/lesbian studies". Lambda Book Report. 4 (8). 1995. – via  EBSCO's Academic Search Complete (subscription required)
  • "The Science of Desire: The Search for the Gay Gene and the Biology of Behavior (Book)". New York Native (600). 1994. – via  EBSCO's Academic Search Complete (subscription required)
  • "Inquiring into sex". The Lancet. 346 (8986): 1309. 1995. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92335-7. S2CID   42971546. – via  EBSCO's Academic Search Complete (subscription required)
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.