The Scout Mindset

Last updated

The Scout Mindset: Why Some People See Things Clearly and Others Don't
The Scout Mindset cover.jpg
Author Julia Galef
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Subject Cognitive psychology, critical thinking, decision making
Publisher Portfolio (US) [1]
Piatkus (UK) [2]
Publication date
April 13, 2021 [1]
Pages288 [1]
ISBN 9780735217553
OCLC 1164823768
153.4
LC Class BF311.G266 2021

The Scout Mindset: Why Some People See Things Clearly and Others Don't is a 2021 non-fiction book by Julia Galef.

Contents

In the book, Galef argues for what she calls a scout mindset: "the motivation to see things as they are, not as you wish they were". [3] The scout mindset emphasizes curiosity, unbiased truth-seeking, [4] and facing reality, even if that reality is unexpected. [5] [6] Galef contrasts this with a "soldier mindset", which she says is a natural tendency to use motivated reasoning to defend one's existing beliefs instead of being open to changing them. [7]

Background

In 2012, Galef co-founded the Center for Applied Rationality, an organization focused on educating people about rationality and cognitive bias. [2] But in 2016 she left the organization, feeling that her work there was not accomplishing as much as she wanted, and started writing The Scout Mindset. [8] She worked on the book for five years before it was published, because she wanted it to be supported by evidence, and because her views on the topic changed while researching and writing about it. [8] The book was published on April 13, 2021, by Portfolio, a division of Penguin. [1]

Summary

The book is divided into five parts, with an introduction and a conclusion. [9]

Part I, "The Case for Scout Mindset", describes the "scout mindset", a style of thinking that is focused on earnestly seeking the truth, and contrasts it with the "soldier mindset", a style of thinking that is focused on defending one's existing beliefs. Galef lists several benefits of the soldier mindset, but argues that people tend to systematically underestimate the value of the scout mindset. [9]

Part II, "Developing Self-Awareness", discusses ways to examine one's own mindset. Galef gives examples of what does and does not indicate a scout mindset, suggests ways to notice and counteract bias, and outlines strategies for quantifying and labeling levels of confidence. [9]

Part III, "Thriving Without Illusions", argues that the supposed benefits of overconfidence and self-deception are not convincing reasons to shy away from a scout mindset. Galef says that self-deception is sometimes seen as valuable for staying happy, coping with difficult situations, motivating oneself, or influencing others, but she argues that there are effective ways to accomplish these goals without sacrificing good judgement. [9]

In Part IV, "Changing Your Mind", Galef outlines strategies for making it easier to change one's mind. She advises reacting to evidence that one is wrong by updating one's beliefs rather than seeing the incorrect belief as a failure. She recommends paying attention to things that are confusing or don't seem to make sense, as they may be evidence of mistaken assumptions. And she gives suggestions on how to engage productively with differing viewpoints. [9]

Part V, "Rethinking Identity", focuses on how beliefs are related to identity. Galef examines how and why people form identities around their beliefs and says that when a belief is part of someone's identity, it becomes harder for that belief to change. She suggests limiting how much an ideology or movement becomes part of one's identity, and argues that, counterintuitively, "holding your identity lightly" can be helpful for activism. She also gives reasons to adopt the scout mindset itself as part of one's identity. [9]

Examples

The book discusses examples to illustrate the scout mindset, including:

Galef describes the Star Trek character Mr. Spock as a contrast to the scout mindset. According to Galef, Spock is much less rational than he claims to be: he reasons poorly about other people's behavior when he believes their decisions are illogical, and he is bad at forecasting. [11] [12] [13] Based on Galef's exhaustive cataloging, the character's predictions about the future are frequently inaccurate, and the more confidence he expresses, the more likely he is to be wrong. [12] [13]

Psychological basis

The book's conceptual framework has a basis in psychological research. Research indicates that the soldier mindset is the default human mode of reasoning in high-stakes situations, while the scout mindset bears similarities to "actively open-minded thinking" as described by the psychologist Jonathan Baron. [14]

Reception

The book and the mindset it advocates have been praised. [2] Stephen L. Carter of Bloomberg News said the book was "fully deserving of the acclaim it's received", [6] while Tim Harford of the Financial Times mentioned it as one of several good books about disagreement. [15] Ryan Young of the Competitive Enterprise Institute called it "highly readable" and said the best part of its advice was to regularly practice thinking with a scout mindset. [16]

In a review in The Wall Street Journal , Michael Shermer praised the concept of the scout mindset, saying that it is relevant to understanding why people get things wrong and why they fail to change their minds. [17] He called the book "an engaging and enlightening account from which we all can benefit". [17] The Journal included The Scout Mindset on its list of "12 Books to Start a Smart New Year" for 2022. [18]

The political strategist Dominic Cummings praised the book and suggested that the UK government should ask Galef to help with decision-making. Cummings tweeted: "If the 20 most influential people dealing with Covid in UK Government had read/internalised Julia Galef's The Scout Mindset, tens of thousands who died could still be alive." [2]

The philosopher Will MacAskill recommended the book as "a wonderful book for expressing a mode of reasoning that really resonates" with him. Of the mindset the book advocates, MacAskill said, "I don't know if I always achieve that, but it's something I try to aspire towards." [19]

In academia

The book has also been cited in academia. Benjamin J. Lovett, writing in the journal Psychological Injury and Law , said that the scout and soldier mindsets are "a useful framework for thinking about the role of advocacy and objectivity in psychological practice (and elsewhere)". [14] However, Lovett was not convinced by Galef's claim that the scout mindset makes advocates more effective; he wrote that this is true sometimes but not always. [14]

An article in the Journal of Ecumenical Studies cited Galef's work in an account of why political polarization makes people less receptive to proselytism than they might otherwise be. [20]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sociology of religion</span> Branch of sociology

Sociology of religion is the study of the beliefs, practices and organizational forms of religion using the tools and methods of the discipline of sociology. This objective investigation may include the use both of quantitative methods and of qualitative approaches.

Essentialism is the view that objects have a set of attributes that are necessary to their identity. In early Western thought, Plato's idealism held that all things have such an "essence"—an "idea" or "form". In Categories, Aristotle similarly proposed that all objects have a substance that, as George Lakoff put it, "make the thing what it is, and without which it would be not that kind of thing". The contrary view—non-essentialism—denies the need to posit such an "essence'".

Rationality is the quality of being guided by or based on reasons. In this regard, a person acts rationally if they have a good reason for what they do or a belief is rational if it is based on strong evidence. This quality can apply to an ability, as in rational animal, to a psychological process, like reasoning, to mental states, such as beliefs and intentions, or to persons who possess these other forms of rationality. A thing that lacks rationality is either arational, if it is outside the domain of rational evaluation, or irrational, if it belongs to this domain but does not fulfill its standards.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bryan Caplan</span> American behavioral economist and author (born 1971)

Bryan Douglas Caplan is an American economist and author. Caplan is a professor of economics at George Mason University, research fellow at the Mercatus Center, adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute, and former contributor to the Freakonomics blog and EconLog. He currently publishes his own blog, Bet on It. Caplan is a self-described "economic libertarian". The bulk of Caplan's academic work is in behavioral economics and public economics, especially public choice theory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles Stevenson (philosopher)</span> American analytic philosopher (1908-1979)

Charles Leslie Stevenson was an American analytic philosopher best known for his work in ethics and aesthetics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rational emotive behavior therapy</span> Psychotherapy

Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT), previously called rational therapy and rational emotive therapy, is an active-directive, philosophically and empirically based psychotherapy, the aim of which is to resolve emotional and behavioral problems and disturbances and to help people to lead happier and more fulfilling lives.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Massimo Pigliucci</span> Italian–American professor of philosophy (born 1964)

Massimo Pigliucci is Professor of Philosophy at the City College of New York, former co-host of the Rationally Speaking Podcast, and former editor in chief for the online magazine Scientia Salon. He is a critic of pseudoscience and creationism, and an advocate for secularism and science education.

Nancy Julia Chodorow is an American sociologist and professor. She began her career as a professor of Women's studies at Wellesley College in 1973, and from 1974 on taught at the University of California, Santa Cruz, until 1986. She then was a professor in the departments of sociology and clinical psychology at the University of California, Berkeley until she resigned in 1986, after which she taught psychiatry at Harvard Medical School/Cambridge Health Alliance. Chodorow is often described as a leader in feminist thought, especially in the realms of psychoanalysis and psychology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carol Tavris</span> American psychologist (born 1944)

Carol Anne Tavris is an American social psychologist and feminist. She has devoted her career to writing and lecturing about the contributions of psychological science to the beliefs and practices that guide people's lives, and to criticizing "psychobabble," "biobunk," and pseudoscience. Her many writings have dealt with critical thinking, cognitive dissonance, anger, gender, and other topics in psychology.

Bulverism is a type of ad hominem rhetorical fallacy that combines circular reasoning and the genetic fallacy with presumption or condescension. The Bulverist assumes a speaker's argument is invalid or false and then explains why the speaker came to make that mistake or to be so silly by attacking the speaker or the speaker's motive.

Dysrationalia is defined as the inability to think and behave rationally despite adequate intelligence. It is a concept in educational psychology and is not a clinical disorder such as a thought disorder. Dysrationalia can be a resource to help explain why smart people fall for Ponzi schemes and other fraudulent encounters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Socratic questioning</span> Type of question to predict knowledge on topic

Socratic questioning was named after Socrates. He used an educational method that focused on discovering answers by asking questions from his students. According to Plato, who was one of his students, Socrates believed that "the disciplined practice of thoughtful questioning enables the scholar/student to examine ideas and be able to determine the validity of those ideas". Plato described this rigorous method of teaching to explain that the teacher assumes an ignorant mindset in order to compel the student to assume the highest level of knowledge. Thus, a student has the ability to acknowledge contradictions, recreate inaccurate or unfinished ideas and critically determine necessary thought.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carol Dweck</span> American psychologist

Carol Susan Dweck is an American psychologist. She holds the Lewis and Virginia Eaton Professorship of Psychology at Stanford University. Dweck is known for her work on motivation and mindset. She was on the faculty at the University of Illinois's Chicago campus, Harvard, and Columbia before joining the Stanford University faculty in 2004. She was named an Association for Psychological Science (APS) James McKeen Cattell Fellow in 2013, an APS Mentor Awardee in 2019, and an APS William James Fellow in 2020, and has been a member of the National Academy of Sciences since 2012.

The concept known as rational irrationality was popularized by economist Bryan Caplan in 2001 to reconcile the widespread existence of irrational behavior with the assumption of rationality made by mainstream economics and game theory. The theory, along with its implications for democracy, was expanded upon by Caplan in his book The Myth of the Rational Voter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Center for Applied Rationality</span> US-based nonprofit organization

The Center for Applied Rationality (CFAR) is a nonprofit organization based in Berkeley, California, that hosts workshops on rationality and cognitive bias. It was founded in 2012 by Julia Galef, Anna Salamon, Michael Smith and Andrew Critch, to improve participants' rationality using "a set of techniques from math and decision theory for forming your beliefs about the world as accurately as possible". Its president since 2021 is Anna Salamon.

<i>Whipping Girl</i> 2007 book on transgender issues by Julia Serano

Whipping Girl: A Transsexual Woman on Sexism and the Scapegoating of Femininity is a 2007 book by the gender theorist, biologist, and writer Julia Serano. The book is a transfeminist manifesto that makes the case that transphobia is rooted in sexism and that transgender activism is a feminist movement. The second edition of the book was published in March 2016.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Julia Galef</span> American rationality writer and speaker (born 1983)

Julia Galef is an American philosopher of science, writer, speaker and co-founder of the Center for Applied Rationality. She hosts Rationally Speaking, the official podcast of New York City Skeptics, which she has done since its inception in 2010, sharing the show with co-host and philosopher Massimo Pigliucci and produced by Benny Pollak until 2015.

The Northeast Conference on Science and Skepticism is a four-day conference focusing on science and skepticism founded in 2009 and held annually in New York City. NECSS is jointly run by the New York City Skeptics (NYCS) and the New England Skeptical Society (NESS). The Society for Science-Based Medicine joined as a full sponsor of the conference in 2015. As of 2016, attendance was estimated at approximately 500 people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scott Lilienfeld</span> American psychologist (1960–2020)

Scott O. Lilienfeld was a professor of psychology at Emory University and advocate for evidence-based treatments and methods within the field. He is known for his books 50 Great Myths of Popular Psychology, Brainwashed, and others that explore and sometimes debunk psychological claims that appear in the popular press. Along with having his work featured in major U.S. newspapers and journals such as The New York Times, The New Yorker, and Scientific American, Lilienfeld made television appearances on 20/20, CNN and the CBS Evening News.

<i>Doing Good Better</i> 2015 book about effective altruism by William MacAskill

Doing Good Better: Effective Altruism and How You Can Make a Difference is a 2015 book by William MacAskill that serves as a primer on the effective altruism movement that seeks to do the most good. It is published by Random House and was released on July 28, 2015.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 "The Scout Mindset by Julia Galef". PenguinRandomhouse.com. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Connor, Liz (May 26, 2021). "What is the 'scout mindset'? The self-help technique for making better decisions". The Independent. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  3. Khazan, Olga (May 3, 2022). "You Were Right About COVID, and Then You Weren't". The Atlantic . Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  4. Dixon-Luinenburg, Miranda (October 20, 2022). "Julia Galef thinks we should be more like scouts instead of soldiers". Vox. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  5. 1 2 Foley, Walter. "Book Review // The Scout Mindset". Root Quarterly. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  6. 1 2 "The 15 Best Nonfiction Books of 2021". Bloomberg.com. December 18, 2021. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  7. Galef, Julia (2021). "Chapter 2: Two Types of Thinking". The Scout Mindset: Why Some People See Things Clearly and Others Don't. New York, New York: Portfolio. ISBN   9780735217560.
  8. 1 2 Wallace, Benjamin (April 13, 2021). "The Tech Elite's Favorite Pop Intellectual". Intelligencer. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Galef, Julia (2021). The Scout Mindset: Why Some People See Things Clearly and Others Don't. New York, New York: Portfolio. ISBN   9780735217560.
  10. Matthews, Dylan (May 3, 2021). ""The book that changed how I think about thinking"". Vox. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  11. "Expert says Spock is a 'caricature' of rationality, and has data to prove it". SYFY Official Site. April 19, 2021. Retrieved March 4, 2023.
  12. 1 2 "Mr Spock is not as logical as he'd like to think". Financial Times. June 11, 2021. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  13. 1 2 "Turns Out, Spock Is Kinda Bad at Logic". Wired. April 16, 2021. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  14. 1 2 3 Lovett, Benjamin J. (September 1, 2022). "Objectivity or Advocacy? The Ethics of the Scout Mindset in Psychoeducational Assessment". Psychological Injury and Law . 15 (3): 287–294. doi:10.1007/s12207-022-09450-4. ISSN   1938-9728. PMC   8940591 . PMID   35340574.
  15. "Point of order! The use and abuse of debating". Financial Times. April 30, 2021. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  16. "Best Books of 2021: Keith E. Stanovich, The Bias that Divides Us: The Science and Politics of Myside Thinking (MIT Press, 2021)". Competitive Enterprise Institute. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  17. 1 2 Shermer, Michael. "'The Scout Mindset' Review: How to 'Update' Beliefs". WSJ. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  18. WSJ Books Staff. "Reading Resolutions: 12 Books to Start a Smart New Year". WSJ. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  19. "Transcript: Ezra Klein Interviews William MacAskill". The New York Times. August 9, 2022. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  20. Johnson, Russell P. (June 2022). "The Gospel in a Polarized Society: Newbigin and Roberts on Ephesian Protest". Journal of Ecumenical Studies . 57 (3): 330–347. doi:10.1353/ecu.2022.0029. S2CID   251918216.