The Theory of Good and Evil

Last updated

The Theory of Good and Evil
Hastings Rashdall's The Theory of Good and Evil.jpg
Author Hastings Rashdall
CountryUnited Kingdom
LanguageEnglish
Subject Ethics
PublisherThe Clarendon Press
Publication date
1907
Media typePrint (Hardcover and Paperback)
Pages312 (vol. 1, Elibron edition)
464 (vol. 2, Elibron edition)
ISBN 978-1112155512 (vol. 1)
978-1112155505 (vol. 2)

The Theory of Good and Evil is a 1907 book about ethics by the English philosopher Hastings Rashdall. The book, which has been compared to the philosopher G. E. Moore's Principia Ethica (1903), is Rashdall's best known work, and is considered his most important philosophical work. Some commentators have suggested that, compared to Principia Ethica, it has been unfairly neglected.

Contents

Summary

The Theory of Good and Evil is dedicated to Rashdall's teachers, the philosophers Thomas Hill Green and Henry Sidgwick. In the work, Rashdall discusses ethics; Rashdall states that the work is designed mainly to meet the needs of undergraduate philosophy students. Subjects addressed include utilitarianism, the work of the philosopher G. E. Moore, including Principia Ethica, the work of the philosopher F. H. Bradley, and Christian theology. [1] In his second volume, he deals with potential objections to his views. [2]

Publication history

The Theory of Good and Evil was first published by the Clarendon Press in 1907. In 2004, it was republished by Elibron Classics. [3]

Reception

The Theory of Good and Evil is Rashdall's best known work, [4] and is considered his most important philosophical work. [5] [6] The philosopher Richard Wollheim described the book as "a compendious work marred by priggishness". [7] The philosopher Alan Stout argued that while it "made no distinctively original contribution to ethics", it was one of the best general introductions to the subject written before the development of meta-ethics and the application of philosophical analysis to ethics. He praised Rashdall's "through and comprehensive" treatment of ethics, and his use of "illuminating expositions and criticisms of theories of classical moral philosophers". [5]

The philosophers John Rawls and Thomas Hurka have compared Rashdall's ethical views to those of Moore; [8] [9] the philosopher R. S. Downie maintained that Rashdall had been "unfairly eclipsed as a moral philosopher" by Moore. [10] Hurka suggested that because The Theory of Good and Evil was published four years after Principia Ethica, it was unfairly neglected, despite presenting a more extensive treatment of some subjects. He considered Rashdall's most important contribution to be "to show how virtue can be valued intrinsically within a consequentialist framework". [9] The philosopher Daniel Shannon criticized Rashdall's evaluation of Christian theology in The Theory of Good and Evil. [4]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Casuistry</span> Reasoning by extrapolation

In ethics, casuistry is a process of reasoning that seeks to resolve moral problems by extracting or extending abstract rules from a particular case, and reapplying those rules to new instances. This method occurs in applied ethics and jurisprudence. The term is also commonly used as a pejorative to criticise the use of clever but unsound reasoning, especially in relation to moral questions. It is the "[s]tudy of cases of conscience and a method of solving conflicts of obligations by applying general principles of ethics, religion, and moral theology to particular and concrete cases of human conduct. This frequently demands an extensive knowledge of natural law and equity, civil law, ecclesiastical precepts, and an exceptional skill in interpreting these various norms of conduct." It remains a common tool for applied ethics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">G. E. Moore</span> English philosopher, 1873–1958

George Edward Moore was an English philosopher, who with Bertrand Russell, Ludwig Wittgenstein and earlier Gottlob Frege was among the initiators of analytic philosophy. He and Russell began deemphasizing the idealism which was then prevalent among British philosophers and became known for advocating common-sense concepts and contributing to ethics, epistemology and metaphysics. He was said to have an "exceptional personality and moral character". Ray Monk later dubbed him "the most revered philosopher of his era".

In philosophical ethics, the naturalistic fallacy is the claim that it is possible to give a reductive explanation of good, in terms of natural properties such as pleasant or desirable. The term was introduced by British philosopher G. E. Moore in his 1903 book Principia Ethica.

Moral realism is the position that ethical sentences express propositions that refer to objective features of the world, some of which may be true to the extent that they report those features accurately. This makes moral realism a non-nihilist form of ethical cognitivism with an ontological orientation, standing in opposition to all forms of moral anti-realism and moral skepticism, including ethical subjectivism, error theory ; and non-cognitivism. Within moral realism, the two main subdivisions are ethical naturalism and ethical non-naturalism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Analytic philosophy</span> 20th-century tradition of Western philosophy

Analytic philosophy is a branch and tradition of philosophy using analysis, popular in the Western world and particularly the Anglosphere, which began around the turn of the 20th century in the contemporary era in the United Kingdom, United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Scandinavia, and continues today. Analytic philosophy is often contrasted with continental philosophy, coined as a catch-all term for other methods, prominent in Europe.

In most contexts, the concept of good denotes the conduct that should be preferred when posed with a choice between possible actions. Good is generally considered to be the opposite of evil and is of ethics, morality, philosophy, and religion. The specific meaning and etymology of the term and its associated translations among ancient and contemporary languages show substantial variation in its inflection and meaning, depending on circumstances of place and history, or of philosophical or religious context.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British idealism</span> Philosophical movement

A subset of absolute idealism, British idealism was a philosophical movement that was influential in Britain from the mid-nineteenth century to the early twentieth century. The leading figures in the movement were T. H. Green (1836–1882), F. H. Bradley (1846–1924), and Bernard Bosanquet (1848–1923). They were succeeded by the second generation of J. H. Muirhead (1855–1940), J. M. E. McTaggart (1866–1925), H. H. Joachim (1868–1938), A. E. Taylor (1869–1945), and R. G. Collingwood (1889–1943). The last major figure in the tradition was G. R. G. Mure (1893–1979). Doctrines of early British idealism so provoked the young Cambridge philosophers G. E. Moore and Bertrand Russell that they began a new philosophical tradition, analytic philosophy.

Ethical intuitionism is a view or family of views in moral epistemology. It is foundationalism applied to moral knowledge, the thesis that some moral truths can be known non-inferentially. Such an epistemological view is by definition committed to the existence of knowledge of moral truths; therefore, ethical intuitionism implies cognitivism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tom Regan</span> Philosopher and animal rights scholar

Tom Regan was an American philosopher who specialized in animal rights theory. He was professor emeritus of philosophy at North Carolina State University, where he had taught from 1967 until his retirement in 2001.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hastings Rashdall</span> British philosopher, theologian, historian and Anglican priest (1858-1924)

Hastings Rashdall was an English philosopher, theologian, historian, and Anglican priest. He expounded a theory known as ideal utilitarianism, and he was a major historian of the universities of the Middle Ages.

<i>Principia Ethica</i> 1903 book by G. E. Moore

Principia Ethica is a book written in 1903 by British philosopher, G. E. Moore. Moore questions a fundamental pillar of ethics, specifically what the definition of "good" is. He concludes that "good" is indefinable because any attempts to do so commit the naturalistic fallacy. Principia Ethica was influential, with Moore's arguments being considered ground-breaking advances in the field of moral philosophy.

The Aristotelian Society for the Systematic Study of Philosophy, more generally known as the Aristotelian Society, is a philosophical society in London.

The axiom of equity was proposed by Samuel Clarke, an English philosopher, in the spirit of the ethic of reciprocity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British philosophy</span> Philosophical tradition of the British people

British philosophy refers to the philosophical tradition of the British people. "The native characteristics of British philosophy are these: common sense, dislike of complication, a strong preference for the concrete over the abstract and a certain awkward honesty of method in which an occasional pearl of poetry is embedded".

This is a list of articles in contemporary philosophy.

This is a list of articles in analytic philosophy.

Higher good is a "good" that is shared and beneficial for all members of a given community. An example might be an art collector donating their collections to a public museum so all could enjoy the artwork rather than just those privileged enough to see it in private. This is also how the higher good is broadly defined in philosophy, ethics, and political science.

1907 in philosophy

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hasna Begum</span> Bangladeshi philosopher and feminist (1935–2020)

Hasna Begum was a Bangladeshi philosopher and feminist, and a professor of philosophy at the University of Dhaka until her retirement in December 2000.

Ethics is a book about ethics by G. E. Moore first published in 1912. It endorses a version of consequentialism.

References

  1. Rashdall 2004a, pp. v–vii.
  2. Rashdall 2004b, pp. iii, 1, 83, 287, 311.
  3. Rashdall 2004a, p. ii.
  4. 1 2 Shannon 2009, pp. 1–19.
  5. 1 2 Stout 1972, p. 68.
  6. Hurka 2017, pp. 901.
  7. Wollheim 1969, p. 271.
  8. Rawls 1999, p. 287.
  9. 1 2 Hurka 2017, pp. 901–902.
  10. Downie 2005, p. 782.

Bibliography

Books
Journals
  • Shannon, Daniel (2009). "Justifying Atonement: An Anselmian Response to Modern Critics". Saint Anselm Journal. 6 (2).  via  EBSCO's Academic Search Complete (subscription required)