Theodore Huckle | |
---|---|
Counsel General for Wales | |
In office 13 May 2011 –27 June 2016 | |
First Minister | Carwyn Jones |
Preceded by | John Griffiths |
Succeeded by | Mick Antoniw |
Personal details | |
Born | Blaenavon,Mon. |
Spouse | Alison |
Children | Manon,Thea,Imogen and Fleur |
Alma mater | Jesus College,Cambridge |
Profession | Barrister |
Website | theohucklekc.com |
Theodore Huckle KC is a Welsh barrister. He served as the first and to date only independent professional Counsel General for Wales,the statutory Law Officer to the Welsh Government,during the governmental term of the 4th Assembly/Senedd. Upon nomination by the First Minister,his appointment was approved by the Senedd and formally made by the Queen on 21 July 2011,although he had been acting Counsel General from his birthday on 27 May 2011.
For further current information since 2016 see theohucklekc.com.
Huckle lives near Cardiff with his family.
Huckle was brought up in Blaenavon by his mother Sylvia (née Lewis) with his brother and two sisters. He was educated at primary and junior schools in Blaenavon and at Jones' West Monmouth Grammar School,Pontypool,before reading Law at Jesus College,Cambridge,where he took B.A.,M.A. and LL.M. (International) degrees. He is a Titular Exhibitioner of Jesus College. He was admitted to Lincoln's Inn as a Hardwick Entrance Scholar and was in 1984 awarded the Megarry Major Scholarship.
Huckle was called to the Bar in 1985. In 2008 he established Civitas Law chambers as the first specialist civil law chambers in Wales. He was appointed Queen's Counsel (QC) in 2011 (converted automatically to King's Counsel (KC) with the accession of King Charles III in 2022). With the agreement of the First Minister of Wales and the National Assembly for Wales Huckle continued in private practice as a QC during his appointment as Counsel General. In May 2015 he joined Doughty Street Chambers in London as a tenant whilst remaining a door tenant of Apex Chambers in Cardiff. From St David's Day 2021 he moved to sole practitioner status,maintaining associate memberships of Doughty Street,Apex Chambers (Cardiff),Cornwall St Chambers (Birmingham/Oxford/Shrewsbury) and No.18 Chambers (Southampton).
In 2012 Huckle was elected a Master of the Bench (Bencher) of Lincoln's Inn. He is the Inn's liaison Bencher for the Wales &Chester Circuit.
In 2016 Huckle was appointed visiting professor of Law the King's College,London and took up the role of General Editor of the Butterworths' Personal Injury Litigation Service.
Huckle's private practice profile includes complex clinical disputes and personal injury,including occupational illness/disease litigation,spinal,head injury and clinical negligence;public law,human rights and commercial matters including employment,fraud and professional negligence. Huckle is accredited as a mediator by ADR Group and QC Mediation,and as an arbitrator as a founder member of PIcARBS.
Huckle appeared for the Claimant Ms Baker in the first case of industrial "deafness" (noise-induced hearing loss) to be considered in the Supreme Court (or its predecessor Judicial Committee of the House of Lords):Baker v Quantum Clothing [2011] UKSC 17;[2011] 1 WLR 1003;[2011] ICR 523;[2011] PIQR P14.
As Counsel General for Wales (see below),he appeared in the 3 UK constitutional devolution references to the Supreme Court,leading respectively Clive Lewis QC (later Lewis LJ),Elizabeth Laing QC (later Laing LJ) and Richard Gordon QC.
Huckle was appointed Counsel General Designate by the First Minister on 27 May 2011. The National Assembly for Wales gave its approval on 8 June 2011 and the appointment as Counsel General was formally made by Her Majesty the Queen on Friday 10 June 2011. [1] [2] The then Presiding Judge of the Wales Circuit,David Lloyd Jones J,undertook the swearing in ceremony on 13 June 2011.
Though not a Minister of the Welsh Government,the Counsel General for Wales is a member of Government under s45 of the Government of Wales Act 2006,senior and authoritative legal advisor to the Government,and its representative in the courts. The Counsel General has certain functions to be exercised independent of the Government,including the ability to refer Bills of the National Assembly to the Supreme Court for a decision on their legislative (constitutional) competence,which power Huckle exercised on one occasion (see below).
The office of Counsel General is at ministerial level and the Counsel General is bound by the Ministerial Code. The Counsel General may not be removed from the position except by resolution of the National Assembly for Wales itself.
Huckle is the first and,to date,only person not an Assembly Member to hold the office of Counsel General to the Welsh Government as a member of the Government and the only practising lawyer to hold this office. There was considerable interest in his appointment from outside Cardiff Bay,which was widely seen as a reflection of the newly enhanced legislative powers of the National Assembly and a desire on the part of the First Minister to bring additional legal rigour to the development and passage of legislation by the Assembly. [3] He attended Cabinet at the invitation of the First Minister of Wales,Carwyn Jones. Huckle left the role in May 2016,at the end of the term of the Third Assembly and upon the formation of a new Welsh Government.
Axa v Lord Advocate [2011] UKSC 46;[2011] 3 W.L.R. 871
In one of his first actions as Counsel General for Wales,Huckle appeared in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in this case,which was an insurers' challenge to the validity of the Scottish Parliament's Act which overturned the ruling in the Pleural Plaques cases (Rothwell etc.) and made pleural plaques a sufficient injury to attract compensation. There were a number of issues considered by the Supreme Court but of particular interest for the Welsh devolution settlement was the fact that the validity of the Scottish Act was questioned on common law grounds:it was argued by the appellants (insurance companies) that Acts of the Scottish Parliament are open to judicial review as an unreasonable,irrational and or arbitrary exercise of the legislative authority conferred by the Scotland Act 1998 on the Scottish Parliament.
If that contention was held to be right,then Acts of the National Assembly for Wales would similarly be open to judicial review on these grounds. Accordingly,the First Minister of Wales intervened in the appeal in the Supreme Court in order to make representations on the scope of common law challenge so far as Acts of the Assembly were concerned. Huckle appeared before the Supreme Court to make oral representations on behalf of the Welsh Government. This was the first time that the Counsel General for Wales (in the Law Officer role created by the Government of Wales Act 2006) has appeared on behalf of the Welsh Government in the highest court in the land. Lord Hope warmly welcomed the Counsel General to the Supreme Court for the first time in his new office. Huckle argued that the National Assembly for Wales was a democratically elected legislature and that the limits of its powers were set out in the Government of Wales Act 2006 which expressly enables the Assembly to make laws in the same way that the Westminster Parliament makes laws,so that the laws of the Assembly are to be viewed as equivalent in status to those of Westminster provided the Assembly is otherwise acting within the scope of its devolved authority. The Courts could not therefore impose additional limitations that fell outside the scope of the Scotland Act 1998 and,by implication,also the Government of Wales Act 2006.
In their judgment,the seven Supreme Court Justices unanimously agreed with the position of the Welsh Government. Their Lordships held that Acts of the Scottish Parliament could not be subject to judicial review at common law on the grounds of irrationality,unreasonableness or arbitrariness. Acts of the Scottish Parliament would only be open to challenge at common law on the grounds that they were not compatible with the rule of law or that they infringed fundamental rights. The Supreme Court confirmed that the same must apply equally to Acts of the National Assembly for Wales. Whilst the case focused on devolved legislation,some of their Lordships restated the possibility that even Acts of Parliament could be challenged where the legislation was such as to undermine the rule of law or fundamental rights (see Lord Steyn's observations in Jackson v AG [2005] UKHL 56),although this remains formally undecided.
Access to and rationalisation of Welsh Law
In his first formal statement to the National Assembly for Wales on 4 October 2011,Huckle announced Welsh Government's project to ensure easy public access to the increasing statutory law emanating from the National Assembly,and a review of methods of rationalisation and consolidation of those laws with existing provisions of the law of England &Wales.
Separate legal jurisdiction
On 27 March 2012,Huckle launched a public debate on whether Wales should be a separate legal jurisdiction by making a formal statement to the National Assembly for Wales and issuing a Welsh Government Consultation. He leads for Welsh Government on this issue in order to promote and facilitate the public debate.
Reference to the Supreme Court of the Local Government Byelaws (Wales) Bill - Attorney General v National Assembly for Wales Commission [2012] UKSC 53;[2013] 1 A.C. 792;[2012] 3 W.L.R. 1294;[2013] 1 All E.R. 1013;Times,December 31,2012
Huckle appeared for the Welsh Government before the UK Supreme Court in response to the first Reference of this type under s112 of the Government of Wales Act ("GOWA") 2006 by the Attorney General for England and Wales of the Local Government Byelaws (Wales) Bill 20,the first of the new Welsh Acts to be passed by the National Assembly (unanimously). The Bill provided for a new mechanism for creation of byelaws but without ministerial approval either in Cardiff or,crucially to the Reference,in Westminster,thus repealing the previous confirmation power of a Minister of the Crown. The Justices unanimously agreed that the Bill was within the competence of the National Assembly because the removal of the Minister of the Crown's function was "incidental to or consequential on" the inception of the new system and the removal of the concurrent function of the Welsh Ministers.
Reference to the Supreme Court of the Agricultural Sector (Wales) Bill - Attorney General for England and Wales v Counsel General for Wales [2014] UKSC 43;[2014] 1 W.L.R. 2622;[2014] 4 All E.R. 789;Times,July 14,2014
The National Assembly passed this Bill to reinstate a form of Agricultural Wages Board (in an expanded functions form) after the abolition of the AWB across England &Wales by the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013,notwithstanding the provisions of the Public Bodies Act 2011 which provided for the abolition of such "quangos" but subject to the consent of devolved legislatures where their legislative competence was engaged. Agriculture is a devolved subject under GOWA 2006,but the coalition government in Westminster contended that abolition (and creation) of an agricultural wages board did not "relate to" agriculture at all so as to engage the Assembly's competence within ss107-8 of GOWA 2006,but rather to "employment" which,it contended,was not a devolved subject,notwithstanding that it is neither described in the competence provisions of Schedule 7 to GOWA 2006 as a subject nor as an express exception to devolved competence,nor in the separate express restrictions on competence. The treatment of employment or employment law rights is thus different in the Welsh settlement to that of the Scottish,where employment law and rights are matters reserved to UK Parliament by the provisions of the Scotland Acts. Huckle again appeared for the Welsh Government to argue that the Assembly does have competence to legislate with respect to employment rights and law provided that the provisions doing so also "relate to" a devolved subject,in this case agriculture. The Supreme Court agreed and the reference was rejected unanimously by the 5-Justice panel.
Reference to the Supreme Court of the Recovery of Medical Costs for Asbestos Diseases (Wales) Bill [2015] UKSC 3;[2015] A.C. 1016;[2015] 2 W.L.R. 481;[2015] 2 All E.R. 899;[2015] H.R.L.R. 9;[2015] Lloyd's Rep. I.R. 474;(2015) 143 B.M.L.R. 1
Huckle referred this Bill for decision,to date the first and only exercise by a devolved law officer of the power to refer a Bill of the devolved legislature for decision. He appeared on the Reference which considered the competence of the National Assembly to pass a Bill providing for the recovery of medical costs from compensators in claims for asbestos injury in the way provided for in accident cases under the Social Security legislation. The insurers challenged the Assembly's legislative competence generally and for breach of ECHR Art 1 Protocol 1 because of the retroactive effect of the legislation upon liabilities under employer's liability insurance contracts entered into in some cases many years ago. The Supreme Court agreed 3-2 that the Assembly did not have competence to enact the Bill at all,as its provisions did not "relate to" the national health service in Wales (a devolved subject area),and that the recovery provisions did (in any event) offend against the insurers' accorded property rights. Powerful dissents from Lord Thomas CJ and Lady Hale held that the Assembly did have legislative competence generally in the area dealt with,but that Art 1 was indeed infringed by these provisions. The Bill accordingly fell. On the minority view it would likely have been possible to amend it in accordance with s114 of GOWA 2006 to make it Art 1 Protocol 1 complaint.
Huckle is the Executive Committee Member for Wales of the Personal Injury Bar Association ("PIBA"). He has been a member of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers ("Apil" - holding the post of Secretary to the Wales section during 2008–11),Action Against Medical Accidents ("AvMA"),the Wales Personal Injury Lawyers' Association,the Human Rights Bar Association,the Wales Public Law &Human Rights Association,the Criminal Bar Association,and the Society of Labour Lawyers.
Huckle is Chair of Welsh Rowing and was Home Nations Director of British Rowing during 2020.
Books and Practitioner reference works
Articles
The Scotland Act 1998(c. 46) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which legislated for the establishment of the devolved Scottish Parliament with tax varying powers and the Scottish Government. It was one of the most significant constitutional pieces of legislation to be passed by the UK Parliament between the passing of the European Communities Act in 1972 and the European Union (Withdrawal) Act in 2018 and is the most significant piece of legislation to affect Scotland since the Acts of Union in 1707 which ratified the Treaty of Union and led to the disbandment of the Parliament of Scotland.
A legislative consent motion is a motion passed by either the Scottish Parliament,Senedd,or Northern Ireland Assembly,in which it consents that the Parliament of the United Kingdom may pass legislation on a devolved issue over which the devolved government has regular legislative authority.
The Welsh Government is the devolved government of Wales. The government consists of ministers and deputy ministers,and also of a counsel general. Ministers only attend the Cabinet Meetings of the Welsh Government. It is led by the first minister,usually the leader of the largest party in the Senedd,who selects ministers and deputy ministers with the approval of the Senedd. The government is responsible for tabling policy in devolved areas for consideration by the Senedd and implementing policy that has been approved by it.
The Law Officers are the senior legal advisors to His Majesty's Government and devolved executives of the United Kingdom. They are variously referred to as the Attorney General,Solicitor General or Advocate General depending on seniority and geography - though other terms are also in use,such as the Counsel General for Wales. Law Officers in these roles are distinguished by being political appointees,while also being bound by the duties of independence,justice and confidentiality among the other typical professional commitments of lawyers. These roles do not have any direct oversight of prosecutions nor do they directly lead or influence criminal investigations. This is a distinguishing factor between Law Officers and the State Attorneys General of the United States or US Attorney General.
In the United Kingdom,devolved matters are the areas of public policy where the Parliament of the United Kingdom has devolved its legislative power to the national assemblies of Scotland,Wales and Northern Ireland,while reserved matters and excepted matters are the areas where the Parliament retains exclusive power to legislate.
The Government of Wales Act 2006 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that reformed the then-National Assembly for Wales and allows further powers to be granted to it more easily. The Act creates a system of government with a separate executive drawn from and accountable to the legislature. It is part of a series of laws legislating Welsh devolution.
The Counsel General for Wales is the Welsh Government's Law Officer,which means the government's chief legal adviser and representative in the courts. In addition to these "lawyer" roles the Counsel General also works to uphold the rule of law and integrity of the legal community in Wales,and has a number of important specific statutory functions,some of which are to be exercised independently of government and in the public interest.
A Measure of the National Assembly for Wales is primary legislation in Wales that is a category lower than an Act of Parliament. In the case of contemporary Welsh law,the difference with Acts is that the competence to pass Measures is subject to 'LCOs' or Legislative Competence Order,which transfers powers to the Assembly by amending Schedule 5 of the Government of Wales Act 2006.
In Wales,a Legislative Competence Order was a piece of constitutional legislation in the form of an Order in Council. It transferred legislative authority from the Parliament of the United Kingdom to the National Assembly for Wales. The LCO had to be approved by the Assembly,the Secretary of State for Wales,both Houses of Parliament,and then the Queen in Council.
An act of parliament in the United Kingdom is primary legislation passed by the UK Parliament in Westminster,London.
The constitution of the United Kingdom or British constitution comprises the written and unwritten arrangements that establish the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as a political body. Unlike in most countries,no attempt has been made to codify such arrangements into a single document,thus it is known as an uncodified constitution. This enables the constitution to be easily changed as no provisions are formally entrenched;the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom recognises that there are constitutional principles,including parliamentary sovereignty,the rule of law,democracy,and upholding international law.
An Act of Senedd Cymru,or informally an Act of the Senedd,is primary legislation that can be made by the Senedd under part 4 of the Government of Wales Act 2006. Prior to 6 May 2020 any legislation was formally known as an Act of the National Assembly for Wales or informally,an Act of the Assembly.
In the United Kingdom,devolution is the Parliament of the United Kingdom's statutory granting of a greater level of self-government to the Scottish Parliament,the Senedd,the Northern Ireland Assembly and the London Assembly and to their associated executive bodies the Scottish Government,the Welsh Government,the Northern Ireland Executive and in England,the Greater London Authority and combined authorities.
The newest of the United Kingdom's legislative drafting offices,the (Welsh) Office of the Legislative Counsel was created in 2007 in anticipation of the coming into force of the Government of Wales Act 2006.
The Wales Act 2017 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It sets out amendments to the Government of Wales Act 2006 and devolves further powers to Wales. The legislation is based on the proposals of the St David's Day Command Paper.
The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that provides both for repeal of the European Communities Act 1972,and for parliamentary approval to be required for any withdrawal agreement negotiated between the Government of the United Kingdom and the European Union. The bill's passage through both Houses of Parliament was completed on 20 June 2018 and it became law by Royal Assent on 26 June.
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union is a United Kingdom constitutional law case decided by the United Kingdom Supreme Court on 24 January 2017,which ruled that the British Government might not initiate withdrawal from the European Union by formal notification to the Council of the European Union as prescribed by Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union without an Act of Parliament giving the government Parliament's permission to do so. Two days later,the government responded by bringing to Parliament the European Union Act 2017 for first reading in the House of Commons on 26 January 2017. The case is informally referred to as "the Miller case" or "Miller I".
The UK Withdrawal from the European Union (Scotland) Bill 2018,colloquially known as Continuity Bill within the Scottish Parliament or the EU Continuity Bill within Scotland,provided for all matters devolved under the Scotland Act 1998 and subsequent legislation that are currently under the control of the European Union,to be repatriated to the Scottish Parliament upon 'exit day'. It was referred to as the Scottish EU Continuity Bill outwith Scotland,was a passed legislative bill by the Scottish Parliament with a stated view to prepare devolved elements of Scots law in view of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union.
Aidan O'Neill,(Scot) KC is a Scottish advocate,barrister,and King's Counsel.
The United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed in December 2020. It is concerned with trade within the UK,as the UK is no longer subject to EU law. The act seeks to prevent internal trade barriers among the four constituent countries of the United Kingdom,and to restrict the way that certain legislative powers of the devolved administrations can operate in practice. It introduces principles of mutual recognition and non-discrimination into UK trade law.