Titus Andronicus (character)

Last updated

Titus Andronicus
Titus Andronicus character
Titus Andronicus (1785) - Noel le Mire - Jean-Michel Moreau.jpg
Jean-Michel Moreau's illustration of Titus Andronicus (right) being told by his son Lucius that the tribunes have left, from Act 3, Scene 1; engraved by N. le Mire (1785)
Created by William Shakespeare
Portrayed by Anthony Hopkins and Trevor Peacock among others
In-universe information
FamilySons: Lucius, Quintus, Martius, Mutius
Daughter: Lavinia
Brother: Marcus Andronicus
Nephew: Publius
Grandson: Young Lucius

Titus Andronicus is the main character in William Shakespeare's revenge tragedy of the same name, Titus Andronicus . [1] Titus is introduced as a Roman nobleman and revered general. Prior to the events of the play, he dedicated ten years of service in the war against the Goths, losing 21 sons in the conflict. In the opening act, Titus orders that the eldest son of Tamora, Queen of the Goths, be sacrificed according to Roman tradition in order to avenge his dead kin. He is also offered the emperorship, but he declines the honor and bestows it upon the late emperor's son, Saturninus. When Saturninus is denied the ability to pick his first choice of empress, Lavinia, he chooses to wed Tamora. Throughout the rest of the play, Titus and Tamora remain locked in a battle of brutal revenge. The play thus descends into moral chaos as characters perpetrate or find themselves victims of various egregious offenses, including rape, mutilation, and murder. [1]

Contents

Comparisons

It has been suggested that Andronicus comes from Andronikos I Komnenos, a 12th-century Byzantine emperor, who shared Titus' proclivity for shooting arrows with messages attached. [2] When Anthony Hopkins played a stylized version of the character in the 1999 film Titus , he described the character as a combination of King Lear and Hannibal Lecter. [3] Although Titus Andronicus is the main character, some productions have adapted the play to be seen through the character of his grandson, Young Lucius. [4]

Summary of role in play

The play begins with Titus returning home after many years at war with the Goths, bringing the remaining four of his twenty-five sons with him. Titus is selected by the people of Rome to be the new emperor, but refuses this offer due to his old age. In his place, he chooses the former emperor's eldest son, Saturninus. Through the ceremonial sacrifice of his most noble captive, Alarbus—the eldest son of Tamora, Queen of the Goths—Titus unknowingly sparks a vicious cycle of revenge. Throughout the play, Titus seeks revenge on Tamora for injustices against his family, while simultaneously being the target of Tamora's own quest for revenge. [1]

Titus murders five people during the play, including one of his sons, Mutius, and his daughter, Lavinia. Displaying strict adherence to Roman law, he murders Mutius for not complying with his order for Lavinia to marry the new emperor, Saturninus. The second act of filicide occurs at the end of the play when Titus murders Lavinia, so that she does not have to live with the shame of having been raped and mutilated by Tamora's sons, Chiron and Demetrius. In Titus' final act of revenge upon Tamora, he kills Chiron and Demetrius and uses their blood and bones as the ingredients of a pie: "Hark, villains, I will grind your bones to dust, / And with your blood and it I’ll make a paste, / And of the paste a coffin I will rear, / And make two pasties of your shameful heads" (5.2.186–189). [1] Titus serves this pie to Tamora before killing her. As is customary in Shakespearean tragedy, Titus also dies in the end, killed by Saturninus. Saturninus is then killed by Titus' last remaining son, Lucius, bringing the cycle of revenge to an end. [1]

Thematic interpretations and scholarship

Heroism

Brown University Professor Coppélia Kahn identified Titus's development throughout the play as one from "Roman hero" to "revenge hero" in her 1997 novel Roman Shakespeare: Warriors, Wounds, and Women, in which she examines the role of gender in various Shakespeare plays through a feminist lens. [5] In further scholarship, the presentation of heroism as a whole in the play has been explored through its inextricable link to violence in adherence to true Roman form. [6]

Interpretation of Khan's two hero labels has incited the proposal of key distinctions between the facets of a "Roman hero" and "revenge hero." [6] Titus as a "Roman hero" is a renowned and venerated war veteran, and he embodies the Roman ideal to such a notable degree that he is offered the greatest honor a Roman citizen can achieve: the emperorship. At the beginning of the play, he tends to prioritize the service of his country as well as the enforcement law and tradition over the protection of his family. Provided examples of this behavior include his sacrifice of many sons to the war effort and his murder of Mutius for the disobedience of his command. On the other hand, this reading highlights how Titus the "revenge hero" does the opposite, prioritizing a pursuit of vengeance on behalf of his family in defiance of law and order and committing crimes against other Roman citizens and the state as a whole. However, this interpretation delineates his development with a caveat, as Titus is never truly able to escape the mold of Roman ideals, committing filicide once again at the end of the play in line with tradition and family order. [6]

Filicide

Titus' acts of filicide, of Mutius and of Lavinia, are contested onstage by characters including Titus' sons Lucius and Marcus and, in reference to Lavinia's death, Saturninus. [7] In doing so, the play raises moral questions surrounding the justification of filicide. In its justification, or, alternately, in the complaints against Titus' behavior, tensions arise between the Roman honor code of law and personal justice. [8] [7] Scholar Emily Detmer-Goebel points out the role of honor, and dishonoring, in Titus' filicides. Titus kills Mutius because he feels "insulted" and "dishonor[ed]" in a way, Detmer-Goebel argues, is tied to his allegiance with Rome; his familial relationship with Mutius has no bearing on the incident. [7] The murder, additionally, can be seen as an expression, and critique, of the power in Roman society of a father over his children. [7]

Titus' killing of Lavinia, on the other hand, is considered (through reference to the mythological filicide of Virginius) by Saturninus as justified through personal or family honor: "Because the girl should not survive her shame, / And by her presence still renew [the father's] sorrows." [9] The familial, emotional response to shame is called on for reasoning here, rather than its threat to Roman honor and order. Titus, through the play, seems to come to regret Mutius' death, and his prioritization of "national justice" for Rome over "personal justice." [7] According to Detmer-Goebel's reading, therefore, Titus' later "blind yet understandable anger" indicates his embrace of that sense of personal vengeance. However, this very vengeance "endangers" his family (through the death of Lavinia). [7]

Patriarchy

In Roman Shakespeare: Warriors, Wounds, and Women, Kahn highlights how Titus's revenge is motivated by the marring of his daughter's virtue rather than any offenses carried out against him directly. [5] She asserts that Titus only transforms into one of the principle actors of revenge in the play due to his sense of ownership over Lavinia's virtue, an ownership that embodies the values of traditional patriarchal structures. Furthermore, she addresses Shakespeare's characterization of Lavinia as an almost excessive paragon of patriarchal womanhood, literally robbed of her voice and compliant as a prop in her father's revenge schemes, but never enacting revenge on her own. Titus eventually makes the choice to kill Lavinia as a show of mercy, motivated by the urge to spare her of living with the shame of having been defiled in such a gruesome manner. In Kahn's reading, this action solidifies Titus's role as a manifestation of patriarchal values, where the state in which his daughter can and should be allowed to exist falls under his own jurisdiction. [5]

Tradition and textual precedent

At the very beginning of the play, Titus orders the ritual sacrifice of Tamora's son, Alarbus, to pay for the loss of his own kin in the war against the Goths. [1] Duquesne University Professor Danielle St. Hilaire viewed this action as a sign of Titus's devotion to honoring the Roman literary tradition and acting according to associated textual precedents. [10] The sacrifice mirrors killings conducted by mythological figures such as Achilles and Aeneas, who both carried out battlefield carnage to avenge a fallen companion in their respective myths. At the end of the Aeneid , Aeneas specifically seeks out the man responsible for murdering Pallas, a son-like figure to the mythological hero. Thus, St. Hilaire asserts that Titus' demand for Alarbus to be sacrificed is a reflection of a larger Roman cultural legacy, one that justifies retributive killing in the name of the dead no matter the level of cruelty it requires. [10]

St. Hilaire also observed that the play's disintegration into chaos, immorality, and incivility develops alongside other characters' inability to live according to these textual and cultural traditions, largely due to misinterpretation or ignorance. [10] This is most evident with the Goths, especially in how Chiron and Demetrius inaccurately quote the character of Phaedra in Seneca's play of the same name, before raping Lavinia. Not only do they misquote the Roman text they cite, but they also reference one that doesn't best fit their scheme. A more correct parallel would be found in Ovid's Metamorpheses in the character of Philomela, whose rape and mutilation mirrors Lavinia's almost identically. St. Hilaire highlights how in contrast, Titus refers to Roman texts and adheres to the precedents within them with great accuracy in various incidents throughout the play. Titus' death not only marks the final manifestation of Roman textual precedent as a retributive killing for the sacrifice of Alarbus, but also the decay of Roman literary tradition and cultural precedent through its improper use. [10]

Related Research Articles

<i>Titus Andronicus</i> Play by Shakespeare

Titus Andronicus is a tragedy by William Shakespeare, believed to have been written between 1588 and 1593. It is thought to be Shakespeare's first tragedy and is often seen as his attempt to emulate the violent and bloody revenge plays of his contemporaries, which were extremely popular with audiences throughout the 16th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tereus</span>

In Greek mythology, Tereus was a Thracian king, the son of Ares and the naiad Bistonis. He was the brother of Dryas. Tereus was the husband of the Athenian princess Procne and the father of Itys.

<i>The Rape of Lucrece</i> Poem by William Shakespeare

The Rape of Lucrece (1594) is a narrative poem by William Shakespeare about the legendary Roman noblewoman Lucretia. In his previous narrative poem, Venus and Adonis (1593), Shakespeare had included a dedicatory letter to his patron, the Earl of Southampton, in which he promised to compose a "graver labour". Accordingly, The Rape of Lucrece has a serious tone throughout.

<i>Titus</i> (film) 1999 film directed by Julie Taymor

Titus is a 1999 epic surrealist historical drama film directed and written by Julie Taymor in her directorial debut. Adapted from William Shakespeare's revenge tragedy Titus Andronicus, the movie stars Anthony Hopkins as the titular Roman general, chronicling his downfall after returning victorious from war. The film was co-produced with Jody Patton and Conchita Airoldi. The film was a co-production of the United States, the United Kingdom, and Italy; produced by Overseas Filmgroup and Clear Blue Sky Productions and released by Fox Searchlight Pictures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Revenge play</span>

The revenge tragedy, or revenge play, is a dramatic genre in which the protagonist seeks revenge for an imagined or actual injury. The term revenge tragedy was first introduced in 1900 by A. H. Thorndike to label a class of plays written in the late Elizabethan and early Jacobean eras.

Revenge tragedy is a theatrical genre, in which the principal theme is revenge and revenge's fatal consequences. Formally established by American educator Ashley H. Thorndike in his 1902 article "The Relations of Hamlet to Contemporary Revenge Plays," a revenge tragedy documents the progress of the protagonist's revenge plot and often leads to the demise of both the murderers and the avenger himself.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edward Ravenscroft</span> English playwright

Edward Ravenscroft was an English dramatist who belonged to an ancient Flintshire family. He was entered at the Middle Temple, but devoted his attention mainly to literature.

Chiron is a centaur from Greek mythology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Daniel Brocklebank</span> British actor

Daniel Brocklebank is a British actor, best known for portraying the roles of Ivan Jones in the ITV soap opera Emmerdale (2005–2006), and Billy Mayhew in ITV's other long-running soap Coronation Street (2014–present). He is also known for his performance in the films Shakespeare in Love (1998), and The Hole (2001).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barbara Jefford</span> British actress (1930–2020)

Barbara Mary Jefford, OBE was a British actress, best known for her theatrical performances with the Royal Shakespeare Company, the Old Vic and the National Theatre and her role as Molly Bloom in the 1967 film of James Joyce's Ulysses.

<i>Titus</i> (soundtrack) 2000 soundtrack album by Elliot Goldenthal

Titus is the original soundtrack to the 1999 motion picture Titus. Elliot Goldenthal wrote the score for the film, an adaptation of Shakespeare's first, and bloodiest, tragedy Titus Andronicus; written and directed by Julie Taymor, Goldenthal's long-time friend and partner. The only non-Goldenthal piece is an old Italian song called "Vivere" performed by Italian singer Carlo Buti.

Lavinia was the daughter of Latinus and Amata in Roman mythology.

Women in Shakespeare is a topic within the especially general discussion of Shakespeare's dramatic and poetic works. Main characters such as Dark Lady of the sonnets have elicited a substantial amount of criticism, which received added impetus during the second-wave feminism of the 1960s. A considerable number of book-length studies and academic articles investigate the topic, and several moons of Uranus are named after women in Shakespeare.

Titus was Roman emperor from 79 to 81.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peacham drawing</span> Contemporary Shakespearean illustration

The Peacham drawing, or 'Longleat manuscript', is the only surviving contemporary Shakespearean illustration, now in the library of the Marquess of Bath at Longleat in Wiltshire. The drawing appears to depict a performance of Titus Andronicus, under which is quoted some dialogue. Eugene M. Waith argues of the illustration that "the gestures and costumes give us a more vivid impression of the visual impact of Elizabethan acting than we get from any other source."

Although traditionally Titus Andronicus has been seen as one of Shakespeare's least respected plays, its fortunes have changed somewhat in the latter half of the twentieth century, with numerous scholars arguing that the play is more significant and effective than has been acknowledged in most criticisms. In particular, scholars have argued that the play is far more thematically complex than has traditionally been thought, and features profound insights into ancient Rome, Elizabethan society, and the human condition. Such scholars tend to argue that these previously unacknowledged insights have only become apparent during the twentieth and twenty-first centuries due to newfound relevance in the play's ultraviolent content. For example, in his 1987 edition of the play for the Contemporary Shakespeare series, A.L. Rowse writes; "in the civilized Victorian age the play could not be performed because it could not be believed. Such is the horror of our own age, with the appalling barbarities of prison camps and resistance movements paralleling the torture and mutilation and feeding on human flesh of the play, that it has ceased to be improbable." Similarly, director Julie Taymor, who staged a production Off-Broadway in 1994 and directed a film version in 1999, says she was drawn to the play because she found it to be the most "relevant of Shakespeare's plays for the modern era." She feels that the play has more relevance for contemporary audiences than it had for the Victorians: "it seems like a play written for today, it reeks of now." Because of these newer appreciations of the play's relevance, previously unrecognized thematic strands have thus come to the forefront.

Flora Spencer-Longhurst is an English actress. She is known for her roles in the CBBC series Leonardo (2011), and the FX series The Bastard Executioner (2015).

"The Lamentable and Tragical History of Titus Andronicus,"also called"Titus Andronicus' Complaint," is a ballad from the 17th century about the fictional Roman general, Titus, and his revenge cycle with the Queen of the Goths. Events in the ballad take place near the end of the Roman Empire, and the narrative of the ballad parallels the plot of William Shakespeare's play Titus Andronicus. Scholarly debate exists as to which text may have existed first, the ballad or the play. The ballad itself was first entered on the Stationers' Register in 1594, the same year the play was entered. Surviving copies of the ballad can be found in the British Library, in the Huntington Library, and at Magdalene College, Cambridge. Online copies of the facsimiles are also available for public consumption at sites such as the English Broadside Ballad Archive.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Shakespeare, William (March 16, 1995). Bate, Jonathan (ed.). Titus Andronicus: Third Series. Bloomsbury Publishing. doi:10.5040/9781408160121.00000031. ISBN   978-1-4081-6012-1.
  2. Stoll, Elmer Edgar, ed. (1922). The Tragedy of Titus Andronicus, Volume 30. The MacMillan Company. p. xvi. Retrieved April 24, 2014.
  3. Holden, Stephen (December 24, 1999). "Titus (1999): Film Review; It's a Sort of Family Dinner, Your Majesty". The New York Times . Retrieved April 24, 2014.
  4. "Titus Andronicus". British Universities Film & Video Council . Retrieved April 25, 2014.
  5. 1 2 3 Kahn, Coppélia (1997). Roman Shakespeare: warriors, wounds, and women. Feminist readings of Shakespeare. London ; New York: Routledge. ISBN   978-0-415-05450-8.
  6. 1 2 3 Hancock, Brecken Rose (2004). "Roman or Revenger? The Definition and Distortion of Masculine Identity in Titus Andronicus". Early Modern Literary Studies. 10 (1): 25 via Gale Literature Resource Center.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Detmer-Goebel, Emily (2015). ""Then let no man but I / Do execution on my flesh and blood": Filicide and Family Bonds in "Titus Andronicus"". Medieval & Renaissance Drama in England. 28: 110–122. ISSN   0731-3403.
  8. Gregg, Steven (2011). "Titus Andronicus and the Nightmares of Violence and Consumption" . Retrieved June 4, 2024.
  9. "Titus Andronicus - Entire Play | Folger Shakespeare Library". www.folger.edu. Retrieved June 4, 2024.
  10. 1 2 3 4 St. Hilaire, Danielle A. (2009). "Allusion and Sacrifice in "Titus Andronicus"". Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900. 49 (2): 311–331. ISSN   0039-3657.