Tornow group

Last updated

Tornow group, also known as Tornow-Klenica and Tornow-Gostyn in Poland, in archaeology refers to the Middle Slavic pottery and related strongholds of "Tornow-type" which were present in the middle of Obra, Oder, Spree but also Elbe and Saale basins from Greater Poland up to Thuringia. [1] [2] It is a derivation of Prague-Korchak (and possibly Sukow-Dziedzice culture in Northeastern part), and dated since late 8th or early 9th century up to late 10th or early 11th century. [3] [4] [5]

Contents

Tornow-type pottery

It is generally named after Lower Lusatian village Tornow (district of Oberspreewald-Lausitz, Brandenburg), [6] which doesn't exist anymore since mid-20th century and where were held extensive archaeological excavations in the 1960s. Unfortunately, the early results have been politically used by Joachim Herrmann to make unsubstantiated claims about the migrations of the Early Slavs to East Germany and their level of cultural and societal complexity in comparison to Germanic peoples. [7] [8] Since 1980s the data was critically evaluated and old model rejected - they are not from 7th century early-Slavic but later middle-Slavic period with Carolingian influence. [9] [10] [11] [12] According to new chronologies, radiocarbon and dendrochonological dates, it appeared at least since the second half of the 9th century until late 10th century. [13] [14] [15] M. Dulinicz also excluded it from Early Slavic pottery but wrongly dated it only since the end of 9th century. [16] Barford considered since the first half of the 9th century with possible 8th century prototypes. [17] Brzostowicz in 2002 since the late 8th century. [18] Based on collected data, Lozny in 2013 dated it since late 8th or early 9th century. [19] A minority of finds survived until the early 11th century. [6]

It is the most know type of pottery with ripped decoration called Rippenschulterware. [15] It had highest concentration in Brandenburg, but it was present from Greater Poland up to Elbe-Saale valley. As the valley mainly was an area of Leipzig group, Tornow-type was widespread on a much larger area than the supposedly related Sorbian-Lusatian tribes of Milzeni & Lusici, Dadosesani among others, thus rejecting simplified theses about links between individual tribes and material cultures. [6] [2] [20] [21] Individual finds were also found in West Pommerania, Central Poland, and Podlachia in Eastern Poland. [6] In some occasions, Feldberg and Menkendorf group pottery were also found in Tornow-type strongholds. [22] [23] Tornow pottery was technologically more advanced from both Feldberg and Menkendorf group, [24] almost resembling Late Slavic tradition. [25] It shares some features with Bohemian-Moravian pottery. [26] Ceramological studies in 2011 and 2012 as well as archaeometric study in 2020 of Tornow-type pottery samples found "no differences in technology of this type of pottery, either in that found in the territory of Western Poland or that found in the territory of Eastern Germany", suggesting both territories were culturally related. [27]

Tornow-type forts

The appearance of Tornow-type forts some date to late 9th and early 10th century, [28] while others "in the late 700s/early 800s and existed until late 800/early 900s". [29] Their highest concentration was in Brandenburg, Schleswig-Holstein, Wendland, also in Pomerania and Greater Poland, but not Mecklenburg. [29] The reason for their building could be several. [30] It is argued to have been seats of local tribal chiefs, [6] and possibly indicate a turbulent period of events when on the territory of Lusatian lands clashed German, Moravian-Bohemian, and Polish military forces in the 10th century. [31] According to Ludomir R. Lozny, the dynamic Slavic social and political events and the Carolingian Empire expansion in North Central European Plains (NCEP) possibly resulted with the wide "Tornow Interaction Sphere" (TIS) of specific forts, villages and mixture of pottery types, but not a "state-level polity". The military construction of forts and found weaponry could also indicate a need of a "buffer zone between the Empire and the Norsemen". [32] TIS fall was soon followed by unification process in Greater Poland leading to the formation of the Duchy of Poland (c. 960–1025). [33]

Notes

  1. Dulinicz, 1994, pp. 47–49
  2. 1 2 Roslund, 2007, p. 160, 169–171, 190, quote: "...has a distribution mainly ranging in the west to the boundary of Slavic culture on the Elbe-Saale, in the north to the Spree-Havel area, in the east into Great Poland, in the south and south-east to the Sudeten and Beskydy. The core area, however, is between the Elbe and the Warta.
  3. Barford, 2001, p. 64–65, 104–105
  4. Roslund, 2007, p. 189
  5. Brather, 2004, p. 320; 2008, p. 199
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Agua et al., 2020, p. 71–72, 81–82
  7. Heather, 2009, p. 409–410, 435–436
  8. Dallmer, 2017, p. 257, 262–265
  9. Dulinicz, 1994, p. 48
  10. Barford, 2001, p. 65, 89, 104–105, 160
  11. Brather, 2004, pp. 315–316, 320; Brather, 2008, p. 58, 104
  12. Biermann, 2011, p. 152
  13. Dulinicz, 1994, p
  14. Henning, 1998, pp. 392–408
  15. 1 2 Brather, 2004, p. 320
  16. Biermann, 2009, p. 331
  17. Barford, 2001, p. 104
  18. Moździoch, 2016, p. 129
  19. Lozny, 2013, pp. 11–12, 17, 20–21, 24–25, 28, 75–78
  20. Dulinicz, 1994, p. 39
  21. Brather, 2004, p. 321
  22. Biermann, 2011, p. 157
  23. Lozny, 2013, pp. 72–78
  24. Lozny, 2013, p. 81
  25. Roslund, 2007, p. 171
  26. Roslund, 2007, p. 160, 171, 189
  27. Agua et al., 2020, p. 81
  28. Barford, 2001, p. 105
  29. 1 2 Lozny, 2013, pp. 38–40, 55–56, 72–73, 79, 91
  30. Barford, 2001, p. 122, 131–132
  31. Dulinicz, 1994, p. 49
  32. Lozny, 2013, pp. 1, 41, 75, 81–82, 88, 91–92
  33. Lozny, 2013, p. 82–83

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sorbian languages</span> West Slavic language group spoken in Lusatia, Europe

The Sorbian languages are the Upper Sorbian language and Lower Sorbian language, two closely related and partially mutually intelligible languages spoken by the Sorbs, a West Slavic ethno-cultural minority in the Lusatia region of Eastern Germany. They are classified under the West Slavic branch of the Indo-European languages and are therefore closely related to the other two West Slavic subgroups: Lechitic and Czech–Slovak. Historically, the languages have also been known as Wendish or Lusatian. Their collective ISO 639-2 code is wen.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sorbs</span> Ethnic group in Germany

Sorbs are an indigenous West Slavic ethnic group predominantly inhabiting the parts of Lusatia located in the German states of Saxony and Brandenburg. Sorbs traditionally speak the Sorbian languages, which are closely related to Czech, Polish, Kashubian, Silesian, and Slovak. Upper Sorbian and Lower Sorbian are officially recognized minority languages in Germany.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lusatian culture</span> Archaeological culture

The Lusatian culture existed in the later Bronze Age and early Iron Age in most of what is now Poland and parts of the Czech Republic, Slovakia, eastern Germany and western Ukraine. It covers the Periods Montelius III to V of the Northern European chronological scheme. It has been associated or closely linked with the Nordic Bronze Age. Hallstatt influences can also be seen particularly in ornaments and weapons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Polabian Slavs</span> Collective term applied to a number of West Slavic tribes

Polabian Slavs, also known as Elbe Slavs and more broadly as Wends, is a collective term applied to a number of Lechitic tribes who lived scattered along the Elbe river in what is today eastern Germany. The approximate territory stretched from the Baltic Sea in the north, the Saale and the Limes Saxoniae in the west, the Ore Mountains and the Western Sudetes in the south, and Poland in the east.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Origin hypotheses of the Serbs</span>

The Serbs trace their history to the 6th and 7th-century Slavic migrations to Southeastern Europe of the Early Slavs. These migrants absorbed the local Byzantines, who were primarily descendants of different paleo-Balkan peoples, and other former Roman citizens, and later established various states throughout the Middle Ages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prehistory and protohistory of Poland</span> Poland before the 10th century AD

The prehistory and protohistory of Poland can be traced from the first appearance of Homo species on the territory of modern-day Poland, to the establishment of the Polish state in the 10th century AD, a span of roughly 500,000 years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reric</span>

Reric or Rerik was one of the Viking Age multi-ethnic Slavic-Scandinavian emporia on the southern coast of the Baltic Sea, located near Wismar in the present-day German state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Reric was established probably in 735 shortly after Slavs of the Obodrite tribe had started to settle the region. At the turn of the 9th century, the citizens of Reric allied with Charlemagne, who used the port as part of a strategic trade route that would avoid areas of Saxon and Danish control. It was destroyed in 808 AD by the Viking (danish) king Gudfred. The destroyed place was rebuilt by the Obodrites and continued to operate for a short until Drasco was murdered in Reric in 810 at the instigation of Gudfred. After that, the tradespeople were reportedly moved by the king to the Viking emporium of Hedeby near modern Schleswig.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Poland in the Early Middle Ages</span> Overview about Poland in the Early Middle Ages

The most important phenomenon that took place within the lands of Poland in the Early Middle Ages, as well as other parts of Central Europe was the arrival and permanent settlement of the West Slavic or Lechitic peoples. The Slavic migrations to the area of contemporary Poland started in the second half of the 5th century AD, about a half century after these territories were vacated by Germanic tribes fleeing from the Huns. The first waves of the incoming Slavs settled the vicinity of the upper Vistula River and elsewhere in the lands of present southeastern Poland and southern Masovia. Coming from the east, from the upper and middle regions of the Dnieper River, the immigrants would have had come primarily from the western branch of the early Slavs known as Sclaveni, and since their arrival are classified as West Slavs and Lechites, who are the closest ancestors of Poles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Early history of Pomerania</span>

After the glaciers of the Ice Age in the Early Stone Age withdrew from the area, which since about 1000 AD is called Pomerania, in what are now northern Germany and Poland, they left a tundra. First humans appeared, hunting reindeer in the summer. A climate change in 8000 BC allowed hunters and foragers of the Ertebølle-Ellerbek culture to continuously inhabit the area. These people became influenced by farmers of the Linear Pottery culture who settled in southern Pomerania. The hunters of the Ertebølle-Ellerbek culture became farmers of the Funnelbeaker culture in 3000 BC. The Havelland culture dominated in the Uckermark from 2500 to 2000 BC. In 2400 BC, the Corded Ware culture reached Pomerania and introduced the domestic horse. Both Linear Pottery and Corded Ware culture have been associated with Indo-Europeans. Except for Western Pomerania, the Funnelbeaker culture was replaced by the Globular Amphora culture a thousand years later.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Early Slavs</span> Group of tribal societies, 5th–10th c.

The early Slavs were an Indo-European peoples who lived during the Migration Period and the Early Middle Ages in Central, Eastern and Southeast Europe and established the foundations for the Slavic nations through the Slavic states of the Early and High Middle Ages. The Slavs' original homeland is still a matter of debate due to a lack of historical records; however, scholars believe that it was in Eastern Europe, with Polesia being the most commonly accepted location.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Germania Slavica</span>

Germania Slavica is a historiographic term used since the 1950s to denote the landscape of the medieval language border zone between Germanic people and Slavs in Central Europe on the one hand and a 20th-century scientific working group to research the conditions in that area during the Early Middle Ages and High Middle Ages on the other.

The Korchak culture is an archaeological culture of the sixth and seventh century East Slavs who settled along the southern tributaries of the Pripyat River and from the Dnieper River to the Southern Bug and Dniester rivers, throughout modern-day northwestern Ukraine and southern Belarus.

<span title="German-language text"><i lang="de">Ostsiedlung</i></span> Early and High Middle Age German migration movement to the East

Ostsiedlung is the term for the Early Medieval and High Medieval migration of ethnic Germans into the territories in the eastern part of Francia, East Francia, and the Holy Roman Empire and beyond; and the consequences for settlement development and social structures in the areas of settlement. Generally sparsely and in some inland areas only relatively recently populated by Slavic, Baltic and Finnic peoples, the most settled area was known as Germania Slavica. Other regions were also settled, though not as heavily. The Ostsiedlung encompassed multiple modern and historical regions such as Germany east of the Saale and Elbe rivers, the states of Lower Austria and Styria in Austria, Livonia, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia, Hungary, and Transylvania in Romania.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sorbs (tribe)</span>

The Sorbs, also known as Serbs or White Serbs in Serbian historiography, were an Early Slavic tribe settled between Saale-Elbe valley up to Lusatian Neisse. They were part of the Polabian Slavs and Wends group of Early Slavs. In the 7th century, the tribe joined Samo's Empire and part of them emigrated from their homeland White Serbia to the Southeast Europe. The tribe is last mentioned in the late 10th century, but its descendants can be found among Germanized people of Saxony and Slavic ethnic group of Sorbs in Lusatia, and Serbs in Southeastern Europe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sukow-Dziedzice group</span>

The Sukow or Sukow-Dziedzice group or Sukow-Dziedzice culture, also known as Szeligi culture, was an archaeological culture attributed to the Early Slavs. Areal of sites lays between Elbe and Vistula rivers in Northeast Germany and North West Poland. The earliest sites usually date to the second half of 7th and mid-8th centuries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sebastian Brather</span> German archaeologist

Sebastian Brather is a German medieval archaeologist and co-editor of Germanische Altertumskunde Online.

Joachim Herrmann was a German historian, archaeologist, scientist, and institutional director. He was a noted scholar in East Germany (GDR) who specialized in Slavic archaeology, but with ambivalent legacy, as his career and research was politically motivated because of which "deliberately distorted the view of history".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Leipzig group</span>

The Leipzig group in archaeology refers to the Slavic pottery from the Early to High Middle Ages in the Elbe-Saale area in today's state of Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt and Thuringia. It has four ceramic sub-groups or phases named after the eponymous sites of Rüssen, Rötha, Groitzsch and Kohren. It derives from Prague-Korchak culture. The group's area is considered to roughly correlate to the area of the Early Slavic tribe of Sorbs situated in Elbe-Mulde-Saale rivers valley.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Johannisberg (Jena-Lobeda)</span> Johannisberg is a prominent ridge of the Wöllmisse

Johannisberg is a prominent ridge of the Wöllmisse, a Muschelkalk plateau east of Jena. The steeply sloping spur of land to the Saale Valley north of the district of Alt-Lobeda bears the remains of two important fortifications from the late Bronze Age and the early Middle Ages. Due to several archaeological excavations and finds recovered since the 1870s, they are among the few investigated fortifications from these periods in Thuringia. Of particular interest in archaeological and historical research is the early medieval castle. Due to its location directly on the eastern bank of the Saale, its dating and interpretation were and are strongly linked to considerations of the political-military eastern border of the Frankish empire. It is disputed whether it was a fortification of independent Slavic rulers or whether it was built under Frankish rule. According to a recent study, it may have been built in the second half of the 9th century in connection with the establishment of the limes sorabicus under Frankish influence.

References