Turn state's evidence

Last updated

A criminal turns state's evidence by admitting guilt and testifying as a witness for the state against their associate(s) or accomplice(s), [1] often in exchange for leniency in sentencing or immunity from prosecution. [2] The testimony of a witness who testifies against co-conspirator(s) may be important evidence. [2]

Contents

According to a 2008 United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime document, persons who turn state's evidence "are known by a variety of names, including cooperating witnesses, crown witnesses, snitches, witness collaborators, justice collaborators, state witnesses, 'supergrasses', macarons and pentiti (Italian for 'those who have repented')." [3]

United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth realms, the term is to turn Queen's or King's evidence, depending on the sex of the reigning monarch. [4] The term "turning approver" or "turn king's approver" was also historically used, especially in Ireland; an approver "not only admitted his own guilt to a crime but also incriminated his accomplices both past and present" in exchange for avoiding a death sentence (and obtaining a lesser penalty, such as life imprisonment or abjuration of the realm) or improving prison conditions. [5] It has its origins in the 16th century, and allowed a person to become a crown witness and avoid pleading guilty. [6] Even at this early stage, the courts saw crown witness testimony as less reliable than other evidence, because it was encouraged in return for better treatment before the law. In 1751, regulations were introduced, stipulating that crown witness testimony should be corroborated with independent, third-party evidence. [7]

Crown witnesses known as supergrasses were used during the Northern Ireland conflict. In the 1980s, about 30 members of paramilitary groups (both loyalist and republican) gave the authorities evidence against their former comrades in exchange for a more lenient sentence (or immunity from prosecution), as well as a new identity to protect them from retribution. [8] Supergrass testimony was used, for example, in trials against IRA members. [9]

United States

American courts adopted English common-law practices relating to witnesses turning state's evidence, "and expanded them to include leniency agreements as well as immunity agreements." [10]

In American parlance, a defendant who agrees to cooperate with prosecutors and give information against co-conspirators (often those with greater culpability) is also said to flip. [2] [11] [12] [13] Witnesses who have turned state's evidence have been important in organized crime cases in the United States, such as those against the American Mafia. The first mafiosi who turned state's evidence, such as Joseph Valachi and Jimmy Fratianno, did so in response to threats on their life from Mafia associates; later cooperators were motivated to cooperate in order to avoid heavy sentences, such as those provided for under the RICO Act. Some who turned state's evidence were permitted to participate in the Witness Security Program (WITSEC). [14] Among the highest-ranking Mafia members to turn state's evidence was Salvatore Gravano ("Sammy the Bull"), an underboss of the Gambino crime family who pleaded guilty to 19 murders and agreed to testify against family boss John Gotti; as a result, Gravano was sentenced to 5 years and Gotti was sentenced to life imprisonment in 1992. [15] [16] Joseph Massino was also the first boss of one of the Five Families in New York City to turn state's evidence. [17]

Germany

A crown witness style system has operated in Germany since the RAF trials in the 1970s. The Justice Minister at that time, Diether Posser, wanted to enable witnesses to testify in return for a lenient sentence if there was little chance of successfully prosecuting a criminal. Four attempts were made to introduce the system to anti-terror legislation, but it was not included in the 1976 legislation. [18] Additionally, Germany lacked a witness protection program such as that found in the United States; Ulrich Schmücker was murdered after he informed on his former associates in the 2 June Movement. [19] Another crown witness, Karl-Heinz Ruhland, recanted his testimony against the Baader–Meinhof Group, as he initially did not receive protection from the state. [19] The treatment crown witnesses received at this time was viewed as illegal by the media, but necessary by the prosecution. [20] In 1981, Germany introduced a "small crown witness rule" in drug-related trials which permitted a lower sentence for witnesses who turned state's evidence. [21] In 1989, during the Government of Helmut Kohl, Germany introduced a law effectively called the "crown witness rule" which enabled witnesses in terror related cases to turn state's evidence. Initially only valid until 1992, [22] it was extended several times [23] until it was abolished in 1999. [24] A law adopted in 2000 lowered the sentence of a witness who came to an agreement with the prosecution in trials concerning money-laundering, but it was not called a crown witness rule. [25] In 2009 a new crown witness rule came into force and since then, witnesses in a wider range of cases have been allowed to become a crown witnesses. [26] [27]

Prisoner's dilemma

The incentives to turn state's evidence, or to not to do so, are explored in the famous prisoner's dilemma, created by Merrill Flood and Melvin Dresher. [28]

See also

Related Research Articles

A plea bargain is an agreement in criminal law proceedings, whereby the prosecutor provides a concession to the defendant in exchange for a plea of guilt or nolo contendere. This may mean that the defendant will plead guilty to a less serious charge, or to one of the several charges, in return for the dismissal of other charges; or it may mean that the defendant will plead guilty to the original criminal charge in return for a more lenient sentence.

In law, a witness is someone who, either voluntarily or under compulsion, provides testimonial evidence, either oral or written, of what they know or claim to know.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joseph Valachi</span> American mobster (1904–1971)

Joseph Michael Valachi was an American mobster in the Genovese crime family who was the first member of the Italian-American Mafia to acknowledge its existence publicly in 1963. He is credited with the popularization of the term cosa nostra.

The Gambino crime family is an Italian-American Mafia crime family and one of the "Five Families" that dominate organized crime activities in New York City, within the nationwide criminal phenomenon known as the American Mafia. The group, which went through five bosses between 1910 and 1957, is named after Carlo Gambino, boss of the family at the time of the McClellan hearings in 1963, when the structure of organized crime first gained public attention. The group's operations extend from New York and the eastern seaboard to California. Its illicit activities include labor and construction racketeering, gambling, loansharking, extortion, money laundering, prostitution, fraud, hijacking, and fencing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joseph Massino</span> American mobster (1940–2023)

Joseph Charles Massino was an American mobster. He was a member of the Mafia and boss of the Bonanno crime family from 1991 until 2004, when he became the first boss of one of the Five Families in New York City to turn state's evidence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Salvatore Vitale</span> American former underboss

Salvatore "Good Looking Sal" Vitale is an American former underboss of the Bonanno crime family before he became a government informant. After his arrest in 2003, Vitale agreed to cooperate with the government and testify against his brother-in-law, boss Joseph Massino, and in July 2004, Massino was convicted in a RICO case. Vitale had admitted to 11 murders, however, in October 2010, was sentenced to time served due to his cooperation, and entered the witness protection program.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Informant</span> Person who provides information

An informant is a person who provides privileged information, or information intended to be intimate, concealed, or secret, about a person or organization to an agency, often a government or law enforcement agency. The term is usually used within the law-enforcement world, where informants are officially known as confidential human sources (CHS), or criminal informants (CI). It can also refer pejoratively to someone who supplies information without the consent of the involved parties. The term is commonly used in politics, industry, entertainment, and academia.

Supergrass is a British slang term for an informant who turns King's evidence, often in return for protection and immunity from prosecution. In the British criminal world, police informants have been called "grasses" since the late 1930s, and the "super" prefix was coined by journalists in the early 1970s to describe those who witnessed against fellow criminals in a series of high-profile mass trials at the time.

Shareef Cousin is an African-American man from New Orleans who was convicted of the first-degree murder of Michael Gerardi in 1996 and sentenced to death as a juvenile in Louisiana. At age 17, he became the youngest condemned convict to be put on death row in Louisiana, and one of the youngest in the United States.

Witness immunity from prosecution occurs when a prosecutor grants immunity to a witness in exchange for testimony or production of other evidence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gaspare Spatuzza</span> Member of the Sicilian Mafia and later pentito (born 1964)

Gaspare Spatuzza is a Sicilian mafioso from the Brancaccio quarter in Palermo. He was an assassin for the brothers Filippo and Giuseppe Graviano who headed the Mafia family of Brancaccio. After the arrest of the Gravianos in January 1994, he apparently succeeded them as the regent of the Mafia family. He was arrested in 1997 and started to cooperate with the judicial authorities in 2008. In his testimony, he stated that media tycoon and then prime minister Silvio Berlusconi made a deal with the Sicilian Mafia in 1993 that put the country in the hands of Cosa Nostra.

Evidence-based prosecution refers to a collection of techniques utilized by prosecutors in domestic violence cases to convict abusers without the cooperation of an alleged victim. It is widely practiced within the American legal system by specialized prosecutors and state's attorneys and relies on utilizing a variety of evidence to prove the guilt of an abuser with limited or adverse participation by the abuser's victim, or even no participation at all.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Assassination of Róbert Remiáš</span> 1996 murder in Bratislava, Slovakia

The assassination of Róbert Remiáš took place on April 29, 1996, in Karlova Ves, Bratislava, Slovakia. Remiáš, an ex-police officer, was one of the key figures in the trial against Slovak Information Service in the case of the kidnapping of the Slovak President's son into Austria from 1995. Remiáš's car was remotely detonated in the middle of a busy crossroad at Karloveská Street. There were numerous high-ranking mafia organised crime figures present at the crime scene watching the explosion, as well as Slovak Information Service operatives. The crime has never been solved. The anniversary of the assassination was often used by political parties critical of Vladimír Mečiar to call out for the annulment of his amnesties which prevented some key political crimes from the mid-1990s to be investigated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Franzese Jr.</span> American mobster

John Franzese Jr., now living as Mat Pazzarelli, is an American former mobster and associate of the Colombo crime family, and son of former underboss John "Sonny" Franzese. He is the first son of a New York mobster to turn state's evidence and testify against his father.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Willie Jerome Manning</span> American man on death row in Mississippi

Willie Jerome "Fly" Manning is on death row at Mississippi State Penitentiary, USA, with two death sentences for a conviction of double murder. He was previously also convicted and sentenced to death for an unrelated double murder, but the State Supreme Court overturned this verdict and ordered a new trial. The charges against him for the Jimmerson-Jordan murders were then dropped, and the Death Penalty Information Center listed him as a 2015 death row exoneree for this case.

Sachsensumpf is the name given by journalists to a political, judicial and intelligence scandal in the German state of Saxony climaxing in 2007 when domestic intelligence dossiers about the purported implication of judicial and business figures in cases of child prostitution and illegal property deals during the early 1990s became public, raising the suspicion of parts of the state's government and judiciary being corrupted by criminal networks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ernst Heinrichsohn</span> German SS, SD, and Gestapo official

Ernst Heinrichsohn was a German lawyer and member of the SS who participated in the deportation of French Jews to Auschwitz during World War II.

Kurt Rebmann was a German lawyer and from 1977 to 1990 'Generalbundesanwalt', the highest federal prosecutor of Germany.

The Kurdish trial in Düsseldorf was a major trial and span from between October 1989 to March 1994. It took place in a for this trial renovated court house at the High Court in Düsseldorf. The court room had to be adapted to the requirements for the case which demanded an extensive an amount of fifteen additional special compartments for the talks between lawyers and defendants. Additionally the trial demanded that court files like the declarations of witnesses, lawyers and judges were to be translated into the languages Turkish, Kurdish and German.

In Germany, a crown witness is a witness in a criminal trial who testifies against accomplices in order to receive a lower sentence from the prosecution. Crown witnesses came to prominence during the Red Army Faction (RAF) trials in the 1970s. The German Bar Association has criticized the system, claiming that testimony by crown witnesses often obstructs trials.

References

  1. Pomeroy, John Norton (1876). "State's Evidence". In Barnard, Frederick A. P. (ed.). Johnson's new universal cyclopædia a scientific and popular treasury of useful knowledge. New York; Pittsburgh, Pa.: A. J. Johnson & son. p. 495‒496.
  2. 1 2 3 Howard Abadinsky, Organized Crime (9th ed: Cengage Learning, 2010), p. 368.
  3. "Good practices for the protection of witnesses in criminal proceedings involving organized crime" (PDF). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. 2008. p. 19.
  4. W. McMordie, English Idioms and How to Use Them (Oxford University Press, 1954), p. 79.
  5. Sara M. Butler, Forensic Medicine and Death Investigation in Medieval England (Routledge, 2015), p. 151.
  6. King Jr., H. Lloyd (1999). "Why prosecutors are permitted to offer witness inducements: A matter of constitutional authority" (PDF). Stetson.edu: 160. Retrieved 1 November 2020.
  7. King (1999). pp. 160–161
  8. Rachel Monaghan (2019). "Loyalist supergrass trials: an opportunity for open source intelligence?". Intelligence and National Security. 34 (7): 1014–1026. doi:10.1080/02684527.2019.1646518. S2CID   201344178.
  9. "IRA members jailed for 4,000 years". BBC News. 1983.
  10. King (1999), p. 163
  11. Mark D. West, Secrets, Sex, and Spectacle: The Rules of Scandal in Japan and the United States (University of Chicago Press, 2006), p. 36.
  12. Chris Strohm, Mueller Uses Classic Prosecution Playbook Despite Trump Warnings, Bloomberg News (August 23, 2017).
  13. Evan Thomas, The Man to See (Touchstone, 1991), p. 407.
  14. Robert J. Kelly, Ko-lin Chin, Rufus Schatzberg, "Without Fear of Retribution: The Witness Security Program" in Handbook of Organized Crime in the United States (Greenwood, 1994), p. 499.
  15. "Ex-Mob Underboss Given Lenient Term For Help as Witness". nytimes.com. September 27, 1994. Archived from the original on January 5, 2019.
  16. Michael D. Lyman, Practical Drug Enforcement (3rd ed.: CRC Press, 2007), p. 85.
  17. Raab, p. 688.
  18. Janßen, Karl-Heinz; Brunner, Erwin; Riedl, Joachim; Sontheimer, Michael (21 November 1986). "Wunderwaffe Kronzeuge". www.zeit.de. p. 5. Retrieved 2020-11-01.
  19. 1 2 "KRONZEUGEN : Pakt mit dem König - DER SPIEGEL 13/1975". Der Spiegel. 23 March 1975. Retrieved 2020-11-01.
  20. ""Heute diene ich mit der reinen Wahrheit" - DER SPIEGEL 20/1979". Der Spiegel. 13 May 1979. Retrieved 2020-11-01.
  21. Janßen, Karl-Heinz; Brunner, Erwin; Riedl, Joachim; Sontheimer, Michael (21 November 1986). "Wunderwaffe Kronzeuge". www.zeit.de. p. 4. Retrieved 2020-11-01.
  22. "Gesetzentwurf der Fraktionen der CDU/CSU und F.D.P." (PDF).
  23. "Kronzeugenregelung wird verlängert". Die Tageszeitung: taz (in German). 1993-01-15. p. 2. ISSN   0931-9085 . Retrieved 2020-11-01.
  24. LTO. "Reform der Kronzeugenregelung: Wenn kriminelle Insider auspacken". Legal Tribune Online (in German). Retrieved 2020-11-01.
  25. "Bundeskartellamt - Bonusregelung - Bonusregelung". www.bundeskartellamt.de. Retrieved 2020-11-01.
  26. "§ 46b StGB: Die neue Kronzeugenregelung im Strafrecht". Juraexamen.info - Online-Zeitschrift für Jurastudium, Staatsexamen und Referendariat (in German). 2009-09-01. Retrieved 2020-11-01.
  27. Janßen, Karl-Heinz; Brunner, Erwin; Riedl, Joachim; Sontheimer, Michael (21 November 1986). "Wunderwaffe Kronzeuge". www.zeit.de. p. 6. Retrieved 2020-11-01.
  28. Robert D. Behn, Rethinking Democratic Accountability (Brookings Institution Press, 2001), pp. 47–48.

Further reading