UC Irvine Institute of Transportation Studies

Last updated
UC Irvine Institute of Transportation Studies
UCI-ITS.jpg
4000 Anteater Instruction and Research Building
Type Research Institute
Established1974
DirectorDr. Stephen Ritchie
Address
University of California, Irvine
Institute of Transportation Studies
4000 Anteater Instruction and Research Bldg.
Irvine, CA 92697-3600
(949) 824-6564
, , ,
33°38′34″N117°50′18″W / 33.64278°N 117.83833°W / 33.64278; -117.83833
Website www.its.uci.edu

The UC Irvine Institute of Transportation Studies (ITS), is a University of California organized research unit with sister branches at UC Berkeley, UC Davis, and UCLA. ITS was established to foster research, education, and training in the field of transportation. UC Irvine ITS is located on the fourth floor of the Anteater Instruction and Research Building at University of California, Irvine's main Campus, and also houses the UC Irvine Transportation Science graduate studies program.

UCISign.jpg

A fundamental goal of the institute is the stimulation of interdisciplinary research on contemporary transportation issues. ITS research involves faculty and students from The Henry Samueli School of Engineering, the School of Social Sciences, the School of Social Ecology, the Paul Merage School of Business, the School of Law, and the Bren School of Information and Computer Science. The institute also hosts visiting scholars from the U.S. and abroad to facilitate cooperative research and information exchange, and sponsors conferences and colloquia to disseminate research results.

Research at ITS covers a broad spectrum of transportation issues. Current funded research projects at Irvine focus upon:

Research on advanced transportation technologies, a focus at Irvine, is supported by a wide range of programs. These include:

The transportation research program at Irvine is also supported by computerized access to the ITS Transportation Library at UC Berkeley. In addition to the resources available from the ITS Berkeley Library, ITS at UCI subscribes to the major transportation research journals and offers a variety of computer-based information retrieval services. ITS is linked to the broader professional community through a series of research colloquia and specialty conferences. The latter programs attract an international audience.

The institute also houses the UC Irvine Transportation Science graduate program.

The institute maintains a regular publication series which documents research conducted within its programs. The institute maintains the Frank Haight Memorial Library located in the Anteater Instructional Research Building on campus, named after Emeritus Professor Frank Haight, who founded the transportation research journals Transportation Research Part A and B, and Accident Analysis and Prevention. [1]

Timeline of Significant Research

The significance of research from an institution can be quantified using the h-index. The h-index value from Web of Science for UCI in transportation related journals as of July 2011 was 31, which means 31 publications had at least 31 citations or more. UCI ITS ranks 7th globally in transportation research, and 5th nationally, as of 2011. [2] A select number of those publications are listed here in a timeline format.

1979 – Charles Lave developed the first disaggregate automobile choice model, using multinomial logit [3]

1985 – Gordon Fielding, Timlynn Babistky, and Mary Brenner identified a set of performance measures to assess bus transit performance [4]

1986 – Will Recker and Michael McNally proposed the theoretical background for the first operational activity-based model, STARCHILD [5]

1986 – Will Recker and Michael McNally presented part II of their STARCHILD model [6]

1987 – Thomas Golob, Will Recker, and John Leonard studied truck-related accidents using log-linear models and found that durations of accidents were log-normally distributed [7]

1992 – Kenneth Small proposed a revenue distribution model to make congestion pricing practical and politically viable [8]

1992 – Genevieve Giuliano reviewed congestion pricing policies and suggested politically acceptable alternatives [9]

1994 – Charles Lave and Patrick Elias examined the 65 mph speed limit systematically at the statewide level and showed that the change from 55 mph reduced fatality rates [10]

1995 – Kelvin Cheu and Stephen Ritchie developed an incident detection algorithm based on inductive loop data and an artificial neural network method [11]

1995 – Kenneth Small measured the costs of air pollution in Los Angeles from motor vehicles [12]

1995 – Jayakrishnan, Wei Tsai, and Anthony Chen developed a dynamic traffic assignment model with network loading that made use of DYNASMART, the first mesoscopic traffic simulation model [13]

1996 – Michael Zhang, Stephen Ritchie, and Will Recker formulated the ramp metering control as a dynamic optimal control problem and presented solution methods and validation [14]

1997 – Thomas Golob and Michael McNally used a structural model to explain interactions between household members [15]

1998 – Randall Crane empirically tested the hypothesis that urban design can influence travel, showing that no such evidence could be found from local household travel survey and GIS data [16]

1999 – Carlos Sun, Stephen Ritchie, Kevin Tsai, and Jayakrishnan formulated the vehicle reidentification problem as a lexicographic optimization problem and demonstrated robust performance [17]

2000 – David Brownstone explored the advantages of merging stated preference and revealed preference data in an empirical study to evaluate alternative fuel vehicle market penetration [18]

2000 – Thomas Golob developed a model that jointly generates activity participation, travel time, and trip generation [19]

2000 - Anthony Chen formulated the traffic equilibrium problem as an unconstrained optimization problem that is equivalent to the nonlinear complementarity problem. [20]

2001 – Kenneth Small measured values of time and reliability from 1998 data where commuters chose between a free and a variably tolled route [21]

2001 – Marlon Boarnet further showed that the influence of land use on travel behavior is high sensitive to the choice of behavioral and statistical assumptions [22]

2001 – Thomas Golob and Amelia Regan explored ways of applying information technology to personal travel and freight research [23]

2003 – Thomas Golob conducted a review of the literature on structural equation modelling for travel behavior research [24]

2004 - Kenneth Small argued that second-best toll pricing requires explicit consideration of user heterogeneity. [25]

2005 – By merging RP and SP data, David Brownstone and Kenneth Small showed that value of time under revealed conditions are more than two times higher than from stated preferences, suggesting a perception bias in value of time [26]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intelligent transportation system</span> Advanced application

An intelligent transportation system (ITS) is an advanced application which aims to provide innovative services relating to different modes of transport and traffic management and enable users to be better informed and make safer, more coordinated, and 'smarter' use of transport networks.

Traffic psychology is a discipline of psychology that studies the relationship between psychological processes and the behavior of road users. In general, traffic psychology aims to apply theoretical aspects of psychology in order to improve traffic mobility by helping to develop and apply crash countermeasures, as well as by guiding desired behaviors through education and the motivation of road users.

Robert Duncan Luce was an American mathematician and social scientist, and one of the most preeminent figures in the field of mathematical psychology. At the end of his life, he held the position of Distinguished Research Professor of Cognitive Science at the University of California, Irvine.

In transportation engineering, traffic flow is the study of interactions between travellers and infrastructure, with the aim of understanding and developing an optimal transport network with efficient movement of traffic and minimal traffic congestion problems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transportation demand management</span> Policies to reduce transportation demands

Transportation demand management or travel demand management (TDM) is the application of strategies and policies to increase the efficiency of transportation systems, that reduce travel demand, or to redistribute this demand in space or in time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transportation forecasting</span>

Transportation forecasting is the attempt of estimating the number of vehicles or people that will use a specific transportation facility in the future. For instance, a forecast may estimate the number of vehicles on a planned road or bridge, the ridership on a railway line, the number of passengers visiting an airport, or the number of ships calling on a seaport. Traffic forecasting begins with the collection of data on current traffic. This traffic data is combined with other known data, such as population, employment, trip rates, travel costs, etc., to develop a traffic demand model for the current situation. Feeding it with predicted data for population, employment, etc. results in estimates of future traffic, typically estimated for each segment of the transportation infrastructure in question, e.g., for each roadway segment or railway station. The current technologies facilitate the access to dynamic data, big data, etc., providing the opportunity to develop new algorithms to improve greatly the predictability and accuracy of the current estimations.

California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH) is a collaboration between the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), UC Berkeley, other public and private academic institutions, and private industry. PATH's mission: applying advanced technology to increase highway capacity and safety, and to reduce traffic congestion, air pollution, and energy consumption. The organization recently celebrated its twentieth year.

Microscopic traffic flow models are a class of scientific models of vehicular traffic dynamics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Traffic count</span> Determination of the number of vehicles

A traffic count is a count of vehicular or pedestrian traffic, which is conducted along a particular road, path, or intersection. A traffic count is commonly undertaken either automatically, or manually by observers who visually count and record traffic on a hand-held electronic device or tally sheet. Traffic counts can be used by local councils to identify which routes are used most, and to either improve that road or provide an alternative if there is an excessive amount of traffic. Also, some geography fieldwork involves a traffic count. Traffic counts provide the source data used to calculate the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT), which is the common indicator used to represent traffic volume. Traffic counts are useful for comparing two or more roads, and can also be used alongside other methods to find out where the central business district (CBD) of a settlement is located. Traffic counts that include speeds are used in speed limit enforcement efforts, highlighting peak speeding periods to optimise speed camera use and educational efforts.

Urban computing is an interdisciplinary field which pertains to the study and application of computing technology in urban areas. This involves the application of wireless networks, sensors, computational power, and data to improve the quality of densely populated areas. Urban computing is the technological framework for smart cities.

Paramics is traffic microsimulation software, originally developed by Quadstone Ltd. There is a related pedestrian microsimulation product called the Urban Analytics Framework.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Truck lane restriction</span>

Truck lane restriction within transportation traffic engineering, is a factor impacting freeway truck lanes and traffic congestion. In traffic flow theory, intuitively, slow vehicles will cause queues behind them, but how it relates to the kinematic wave theory was not revealed until Newell. Leclercq et al did a complete review of Newell's theory. In addition to the simulation models developed by Laval and Daganzo on the basis of numerical solution methods for Newell's theory to capture the impacts of slow vehicle, Laval also mathematically derived the analytical capacity formulas for bottlenecks caused by single-type of trucks for multi-lane freeway segments.

Clifford Winston is an applied microeconomist and senior fellow in the Economic Studies program at the Brookings Institution. He studies microeconomic policy and its impact on government performance, specializing in industrial organization, regulation, and transportation.

Urban traffic modeling and analysis is part of the advanced traffic intelligent management technologies that has become a crucial sector of Traffic management and control. Its main purpose is to predict congestion states of a specific urban transport network and propose improvements in the traffic network. Researches rely on three different informations. Historical and recent information of a traffic network about its density and flow, a model of the transport network infrastructure and algorithms referring to both spatial and temporal dimensions. The final objective is to provide a better optimization of the traffic infrastructure such as traffic lights. Those optimizations should result into a decrease of the travel times, pollution and fuel consumption.

Washington Yotto Ochieng is a Kenyan academic who is Head of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Imperial College London. Previously, he was Head of the Centre for Transport Studies and Co-Director of the Institute for Security Science and Technology(ISST) together with Deeph Chana. Ochieng is a Senior Security Science Fellow in ISST. He also serves as Director of the Engineering Geomatics Group and Chair of Positioning and Navigation Systems.

Kumares C. Sinha is an Indian-American engineer, researcher and educator known for contributions to transportation systems analysis, transportation infrastructure economics and management, transportation safety, and the use of emerging technologies in transportation. He has served as Edgar B. and Hedwig M. Olson Distinguished Professor of Civil Engineering at Purdue University. since 1998.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michel Bierlaire</span> Belgian-Swiss mathematician

Michel Bierlaire is a Belgian-Swiss applied mathematician specialized in transportation modeling and optimization. He is a professor at EPFL and the head of the Transport and Mobility Laboratory.

Autonomous mobility on demand (AMoD) is a service consisting of a fleet of autonomous vehicles used for one-way passenger mobility. An AMoD fleet operates in a specific and limited environment, such as a city or a rural area.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Baher Abdulhai</span> Canadian civil engineer, academic

Baher Abdulhai is a Canadian civil engineer, academic, entrepreneur, and researcher. He is a Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering, Director of Intelligent Transportation Systems Centre, and Co-Director of iCity Centre for Automated and Transformative Transportation at the University of Toronto. He is also the CEO and managing director of IntelliCAN Transportation System Inc.

Hani S. Mahmassani is a Lebanese-American engineer and currently the William A. Patterson Distinguished Chair in Transportation at Northwestern University and the Directory at the Northwestern University Transportation Center (NUTC). He holds joint appointments in Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences at the Robert R. McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science and in Managerial Economics and Decision Sciences at the Kellogg School of Management. He is widely regarded as one of the most influential figures in modern transportation engineering and has been elected into the National Academy of Engineering in 2021 for his contributions to modeling of intelligent transportation networks and to interdisciplinary collaboration in transportation engineering.

References

  1. http://www.julianhaight.com/fah/Frank_Haight.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  2. http://uctc.net/about/UCTCworkplan%202012-2013.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  3. Lave, Charles A.; Train, Kenneth (1979). "A disaggregate model of auto-type choice". Transportation Research Part A: General. 13: 1–9. doi:10.1016/0191-2607(79)90081-5.
  4. Fielding, Gordon J.; Babitsky, Timlynn T.; Brenner, Mary E. (1985). "Performance evaluation for bus transit". Transportation Research Part A: General. 19: 73–82. doi:10.1016/0191-2607(85)90009-3.
  5. Recker, W.W.; McNally, M.G.; Root, G.S. (1986). "A model of complex travel behavior: Part I—Theoretical development". Transportation Research Part A: General. 20 (4): 307. doi:10.1016/0191-2607(86)90089-0.
  6. Recker, W.W.; McNally, M.G.; Root, G.S. (1986). "A model of complex travel behavior: Part II—An operational model". Transportation Research Part A: General. 20 (4): 319. doi:10.1016/0191-2607(86)90090-7.
  7. Golob, Thomas F.; Recker, Wilfred W.; Leonard, John D. (1987). "An analysis of the severity and incident duration of truck-involved freeway accidents". Accident Analysis & Prevention. 19 (5): 375–395. doi:10.1016/0001-4575(87)90023-6. PMID   3675808. S2CID   41930636.
  8. Small, Kenneth A. (1992). "Using the revenues from congestion pricing". Transportation. 19 (4): 359–381. doi:10.1007/BF01098639. S2CID   2061704.
  9. Giuliano, Genevieve (1992). "An assessment of the political acceptability of congestion pricing". Transportation. 19 (4): 335–358. doi:10.1007/BF01098638. S2CID   153656996.
  10. Lave, Charles; Elias, Patrick (1994). "Did the 65 mph speed limit save lives?". Accident Analysis & Prevention. 26: 49–62. doi:10.1016/0001-4575(94)90068-X. PMID   8110357. S2CID   21929276.
  11. Cheu, Ruey L.; Ritchie, Stephen G. (1995). "Automated detection of lane-blocking freeway incidents using artificial neural networks". Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 3 (6): 371. doi:10.1016/0968-090X(95)00016-C.
  12. Small, Kenneth A.; Kazimi, Camilla (January 1995). "On the Costs of Air Pollution from Motor Vehicles". Journal of Transport Economics and Policy. 29 (1): 7–32. ISSN   0022-5258. JSTOR   20053058.
  13. Jayakrishnan, R.; Tsai, Wei K.; Chen, Anthony (1995). "A dynamic traffic assignment model with traffic-flow relationships". Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 3: 51–72. doi:10.1016/0968-090X(94)00015-W.
  14. Zhang, H.; Ritchie, S.G.; Recker, W.W. (1996). "Some general results on the optimal ramp control problem". Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 4 (2): 51. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.476.5811 . doi:10.1016/0968-090X(96)00002-2.
  15. Golob, Thomas F.; McNally, Michael G. (1997). "A model of activity participation and travel interactions between household heads". Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 31 (3): 177. doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(96)00027-6. S2CID   55777849.
  16. Crane, Randall; Crepeau, Richard (1998). "Does neighborhood design influence travel?: A behavioral analysis of travel diary and GIS data". Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 3 (4): 225. doi:10.1016/S1361-9209(98)00001-7. S2CID   18644759.
  17. Sun, Carlos; Ritchie, Stephen G.; Tsai, Kevin; Jayakrishnan, R. (1999). "Use of vehicle signature analysis and lexicographic optimization for vehicle reidentification on freeways". Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 7 (4): 167. doi:10.1016/S0968-090X(99)00018-2.
  18. Brownstone, David; Bunch, David S.; Train, Kenneth (2000). "Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles". Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 34 (5): 315. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.409.4145 . doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(99)00031-4. S2CID   6734773.
  19. Golob, Thomas F. (2000). "A simultaneous model of household activity participation and trip chain generation". Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 34 (5): 355–376. doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(99)00028-4. S2CID   85538077.
  20. Lo, Hong K.; Chen, Anthony (2000). "Traffic equilibrium problem with route-specific costs: Formulation and algorithms". Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 34 (6): 493. doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(99)00035-1.
  21. Lam, Terence C.; Small, Kenneth A. (2001). "The value of time and reliability: Measurement from a value pricing experiment". Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 37 (2–3): 231. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.294.4781 . doi:10.1016/S1366-5545(00)00016-8.
  22. Boarnet, Marlon; Crane, Randall (2001). "The influence of land use on travel behavior: Specification and estimation strategies". Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 35 (9): 823. doi:10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00019-7.
  23. Golob, Thomas F.; Regan, Amelia C. (2001). "Impacts of information technology on personal travel and commercial vehicle operations: Research challenges and opportunities". Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 9 (2): 87. doi:10.1016/S0968-090X(00)00042-5. S2CID   17093104.
  24. Golob, Thomas F (2003). "Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research". Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 37: 1–25. doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(01)00046-7. S2CID   15617252.
  25. Verhoef, Erik T.; Small, Kenneth A. (January 2004). "Product Differentiation on Roads". Journal of Transport Economics and Policy. 38 (1): 127–156.
  26. Brownstone, David; Small, Kenneth A. (2005). "Valuing time and reliability: Assessing the evidence from road pricing demonstrations". Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 39 (4): 279. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.319.7782 . doi:10.1016/j.tra.2004.11.001. S2CID   10036350.