UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

Discipline	American law, Technology law, Intellectual property law
Language	English
Former name	John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law
Standard abbreviations ISO 4 (alt) · Bluebook (alt) NLM  · MathSciNet
Bluebook	UIC Rev. Intell. Prop. L.
ISO 4	Find out here
Links
Journal homepage

The UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (formerly the John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law) is a student-run law review covering legal scholarship in the field of intellectual property, established in 2001 ^[1] at the John Marshall Law School (Chicago). The journal publishes four issues per year, which are available on LexisNexis and Westlaw. Articles in the Journal have been cited by U.S. Courts of Appeals, including the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. ^[2] When JMLS was merged into the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law, the journal was renamed the "UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law."

Notable contributions

• John Paul Stevens, Section 43(A) of the Shakespeare Canon of Statutory Construction: The Beverly W. Pattishall Inaugural Lecture in Trademark Law, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 179 (2002).
• Paul Redmond Michel, Founding a New Journal in the Age of Electronic Law, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 Archived 2011-07-23 at the Wayback Machine (2001).
• Richard Linn, Effective Appellate Practice Before the Federal Circuit, 2 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2002).
• Richard Posner, Transaction Costs and Antitrust Concerns in the Licensing of Intellectual Property, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 325 (2005).
• Q. Todd Dickinson, et al., The Genetic Age: Who Owns the Genome?, 2 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 6 (2002) (symposium).
• Marybeth Peters, Copyright & Privacy - Through the Legislative Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 266 (2005).

References

1. UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law web site, Archived 2007-10-08 at the Wayback Machine .
2. See, e.g., Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc. , 795 F.3d 1024. 1031 n. 3 (9th Cir. 2015), citing Patricia Larios, The U.S. International Trade Commission's Growing Role in the Global Economy, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 290, 294 (2009); Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc., 735 F.3d 735, 741 (7th Cir. 2013), citing Robert H. Thornburg, "Trademark Surveys: Development of Computer-Based Survey Methods," 4 John Marshall Rev. Intellectual Property L. 91, 97 (2004); Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe Inc., 323 F.3d 956, 983 (Fed. Cir. 2002) (citing Harold C. Wegner, An Enzo White Paper: A New Judicial Standard for a Biotechnology “Written Description” Under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶1, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 254, 263 (2002)); Larball Publ'g Co., Inc. v. Lipa, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56768 (S.D.N.Y 2025) citing Rachael Belensz, Un-Blurred Lines: A Proposal for A More Objective Method in Determining the Extent of Similarities Between Musical Works for the Purpose of Probative Copying, 20 UIC Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 251, 270 (2021).

External links

• Official website