USS Sumter Three

Last updated
The Sumter Three - Jenkins, Barnwell and Blackwell in Camp Hensen Courtroom, Okinawa The Sumter Three - Jenkins, Barnwell and Blackwell.jpg
The Sumter Three - Jenkins, Barnwell and Blackwell in Camp Hensen Courtroom, Okinawa

In late August and early September 1972, a series of incidents on board the USS Sumter (LST-1181) off the coast of Vietnam resulted in three Black marines being charged with three counts of mutiny and eleven counts of assault, with the possibility of execution. [1] [2] This was "the first time since the US Civil War that American sailors or Marines had been charged with mutiny at sea". [3]

Contents

The event that led to the arrests was a song played over the ship's radio station. Private First Class (PFC) Alexander Jenkins Jr., a 19-year-old Black marine in his role as the ship's DJ, decided to play a song by a Black artist that was popular among Black Americans at the time. The normal shipboard radio fare, which broadcast to the hundreds of sailors and marines on board, had up to this time been mainly popular white artists. As Jenkins recalled years later, "playing 'White Man’s Got a God Complex' by The Last Poets really set the white guys off." During the following days, an increasing number of disagreements and fistfights broke out between white and Black sailors and marines on board, with "some started by whites, others by Blacks." [3] [4] :p.121

Three Black marines were singled out as the "ringleaders", transported by helicopter to a military base in Da Nang and charged with mutiny, as well as assault, riot, and resisting arrest. The charges were so extreme that one GI underground newspaper called it an "outrageous" case of "racist prosecution". [2] They were then transferred to Okinawa, where they spent months in the brig with the military prosecutor "pushing for 65 years of prison" after being ordered by the Marine Corps to drop the mutiny charges as clearly excessive. With the help of civilian lawyers and the prospect of charges of racism being aired during the trial, the military eventually backed down and settled for less than fully honorable discharges for the three. Three white marines also initially faced charges ranging from dereliction of duty to disorderly conductnowhere near as serious as mutiny or assault. However, they were acquitted or received no punishment. [5] The events were characterized by The New York Times as "about race but also about structural racism." [3]

Background

The late 1960s and early 1970s were a contentious time for race relations in the U.S. Military as the civil rights and Black liberation movements found expression within the armed forces. Especially Black troops were responding to discrimination and racism in various ways. In 1971, a Congressional Black Caucus investigation concluded, "Racism has become institutionalized at all levels of the military...Black and other minority servicemen are victims of discrimination from the time that they enter the services until the time that they are discharged." The Caucus also reported that "sixty-four percent" of Black sailors and "seventy-three percent" of Black marines felt their branch of the military to be "a poor place for Blacks to be". [6] All of this combined with growing antiwar sentiment within the military, reflecting similar sentiments in U.S. society and worldwide. The U.S. ground war in Southeast Asia had essentially stalemated with Army grunts increasingly refusing to fight or resisting the war in various other ways. [7] By 1972, the U.S. military was forced to shift from ground operations and turn increasingly to air bombardment. This meant that a large part of U.S. combat operations was now concentrated in the Navy's Seventh Fleet and launched from its aircraft carriers in the Gulf of Tonkin. [8] [4] :p.114

Also in 1972, several unprecedented developments on board U.S. Navy ships dramatically exposed the intersection of antiwar sentiment, civil rights issues, discontent over working and safety conditions, and racism. By late that year approximately 12 percent “of new Navy recruits were black” and they were often "thrust into the dreariest, most menial, and most unpopular jobs on board" [9] [10] :259 In October, "racial unrest triggered the worst shipboard riot in U.S. Navy history" on board the giant aircraft carrier, the USS Kitty Hawk. [9] When arrests were made, all 25 of those arrested were Black. A Black Navy official observed, "Anytime you have a so-called race riot and you lock up 25 blacks, that has to raise some questions." [11] As word spread in the fleet about the incidents on board the Kitty Hawk, many of the Black sailors on the USS Constellation were “swearing an affinity with their beleaguered brothers on the Kitty Hawk.” [10] :268 They formed a group called the “Black Fraction,” and attempted to negotiate with the ship's captain, but were told that "six of them would be given immediate less-than-honorable discharges” and 250 men would be administratively discharged. [4] :p.122 Over 100 sailors responded with a sit-in, forcing the captain to return the ship to shore. Once docked, 144 crew members left the ship, including 8 whites. The Constellation returned to sea but returned a few days later to pick up the mutinous sailors. Most of the men, however, refused to board and “staged a defiant dockside strike - perhaps the largest act of mass defiance in naval history.” [12] During this same month, another riot occurred on board the oiler USS Hassayampa at the Subic Bay Naval Base in the Philippines. Again, of the 11 crewmen arrested, all were Black. [13]

While the incidents aboard the USS Sumter took place the month before these other incidents, they had similar precipitating causes.

Mutiny at sea

USS Sumter (LST-1181) USS Sumter (LST-1181) stbd beam view.jpg
USS Sumter (LST-1181)

Sun, up down
On the corner, up town
I turn around and hear the sound
A voice is talking about who's gonna die next
Cause the White Man's got a God complex [14]

These were the opening words of a song played by the Black marine DJ, PFC Jenkins, to the hundreds of men aboard the USS Sumter in late August 1972. The Black GIs onboard hadn't complained about the usual fare of white artists on the ship's radio, but for many of the white GIs, especially the white Marine sergeants and officers, this song and its lyrics were a problem. "The spoken word song centered on drugs, poverty, white supremacy, and the killings of Blacks and Native Americans." [15] Jenkins quickly found himself in "a small room" being "questioned by a group of higher-ranking white Marines" and being accused of "playing music that would incite a riot." A white Marine captain got so incensed he "jumped out of his chair so forcefully that it flipped over." The tension and animosity were just beginning. [3]

Over the following days, several fistfights broke out with increasing frequency between Black and white GIs"some started by whites, other by Blacks." Meanwhile, Jenkins was ordered to stop playing The Last Poets, an order which so upset the 65 Black marines on board that 64 of them sent an informal complaint to the commanding Marine officer on the ship. The marines insisted that "they were being denied the right to play their own music", and requested a meeting with their battalion commander. The request was denied, "further inflaming" the tensions on board. In response, some of the Black marines were heard humming The Last Poets' tune as they carried out their shipboard duties. [3] According to the Omega Press, a GI underground newspaper based out of Okinawa, Japan, "Whites, armed with pipes and wrenches, roamed the ship at times looking for blacks." [16] One of the Black marines onboard who wasn't charged told The New York Times, "We were nonviolent until they came after us and said they didn’t like our music. Then there were riots." [17] During one of the fights between Black and white marines on September 8, a Marine officer reported being hit by Jenkins as he attempted to separate the fighters. Jenkins didn't remember hitting him, but he was accused nonetheless. Soon, Jenkins, PFC Roy L. Barnwell, and Lance CPL James S. Blackwell found themselves "singled out as leaders" and charged with mutiny, assault, riot and resisting arrest. These were the "most severe" charges brought against any of the GIs involved in any of the incidents and rebellions which were discussed above, as well as the most severe brought against any marines since the Civil War. [3] [16]

Hearing and trials

Once the Sumter Three arrived in Okinawa, they were able to obtain civilian lawyers, which significantly changed the dynamics of the case. The attorneys were able to mount a strong defense, including documenting some of the discrimination and racism experienced by the Black marines on board the ship. For example, the Black marine's daily routine often included "verbal attacks from white sergeants and officers", mess cooks serving them "cold and inedible food", unannounced uniform and bunk inspections, harassment and punishment for petty infractions, and more. One Black marine was confined to the brig for three days on bread and water for a minor uniform infraction, another had a "wrench thrown at him," while another was "attacked with a knife". None of these incidents were ever "investigated by the Marine leadership." [18] [3]

When the official Article 32 hearing commenced (the military's version of a preliminary hearing), the marines' civilian lawyers were able to quickly challenge and dispute the initial charges of mutiny as it was clear nothing like mutiny had taken place. However, the military soon added additional charges, including "riot and criminal slander". The slander charges were lodged against Blackwell for calling his marine commander a racist. [3] [2] Jenkins was scheduled for "a special court-martial on charges of disrespecting an officer and resisting arrest", while Barnwell and Blackwell were facing "general courts-martial for numerous counts of assault and resisting arrest." [19] The military offered the three marines a deal to avoid court-martial by accepting undesirable discharges, but the marines refused. Blackwell told the press that he, Jenkins, and Blackwell were willing "to give up 10 years of our life to stop this". "[A]ll we want to do is just expose the marine corps of its racism, show how black and other third world GIs are constantly being railroaded into court and then given bad discharges and time." [19]

During a lengthy five-week pre-trial hearing, many of the remaining additional charges were shown to be groundless, with even the investigating officer recommending that may be dropped or changed. [16] In the end all charges were dropped on Barnwell and Blackwell, and they received honorable discharges for the "good of the service". Jenkins received a three-month sentence for two minor offenses after a special court-martial and was given "a general discharge under honorable conditions". [20] [3]

Conclusion

In the book American Defense Reform: Lessons from Failure and Success in Navy History, two military experts looked at the incidents on board the Sumter, the Kitty Hawk, the Constellation, and the Hassayampa, and called them "just the tip of an iceberg of unrest." During four months in 1972, they cataloged 98 race-related criminal cases, and they reported that "the Navy was suffering from an epidemic of sabotage by sailors disgruntled with social or racial conditions that were threatening the readiness of the entire fleet." [1]

The events on board the Sumter and the military's prosecution of the Sumter Three were some of the earlier events during this period and the racial underpinnings could not be ignored. Even the chief of naval operations, Elmo Zumwalt, was critical of what he called the "lily-white racist Navy". [21] Historically, "racial bias" has often played a role in the military's decisions about who to prosecute for racial unrest. A 1972 Department of Defense study reported that Black GIs "received a higher proportion of general and undesirable discharges than whites of similar aptitude and education." As recently as 2015 a study by Protect Our Defenders, a "legal justice group", found that Black service members were still "substantially more likely than white service members to face military justice or disciplinary action". [3]

For those directly involved, the repercussions were long-lasting. According to The New York Times, Jenkins, Barnwell, and Blackwell had difficult lives after their experiences on board the ship. As Jenkins put it, "That situation on the Sumter screwed up my whole life." [3]

See also

Events

General

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mutiny</span> Disobeying of superiors

Mutiny is a revolt among a group of people to oppose, change, or remove superiors or their orders. The term is commonly used for insubordination by members of the military against an officer or superior, but it can also sometimes mean any type of rebellion against any force. Mutiny does not necessarily need to refer to a military force and can describe a political, economic, or power structure in which subordinates defy superiors.

USS <i>Constellation</i> (CV-64) Kitty Hawk-class aircraft carrier

USS Constellation (CV-64) was a Kitty Hawk-class supercarrier and the third ship of the United States Navy to be named in honor of the "new constellation of stars" on the flag of the United States. One of the fastest ships in the Navy, as proven by her victory during a battlegroup race held in 1985, she was nicknamed "Connie" by her crew and officially as "America's Flagship".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Port Chicago disaster</span> 1944 munitions ship explosion in California

The Port Chicago disaster was a deadly munitions explosion of the ship SS E. A. Bryan on July 17, 1944, at the Port Chicago Naval Magazine in Port Chicago, California, United States. Munitions being loaded onto a cargo vessel bound for the Pacific Theater of Operations detonated, killing 320 sailors and civilians and injuring at least 390 others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Military history of African Americans</span> Aspect of African American history

The military history of African Americans spans African-American history, the history of the United States and the military history of the United States from the arrival of the first enslaved Africans during the colonial history of the United States to the present day. African Americans have participated in every war which has been fought either by or within the United States, including the Revolutionary War, the War of 1812, the Mexican–American War, the Civil War, the Spanish–American War, World War I, World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, the War in Afghanistan, and the Iraq War.

<i>Sir! No Sir!</i> 2005 film about anti-Vietnam War soldiers and sailors

Sir! No Sir! is a 2005 documentary by Displaced Films about the anti-war movement within the ranks of the United States Armed Forces during the Vietnam War. The film was produced, directed, and written by David Zeiger. The film had a theatrical run in 80 cities throughout the U.S. and Canada in 2006, and was broadcast worldwide on Sundance Channel, Discovery Channel, BBC, ARTE France, ABC Australia, SBC Spain, ZDF Germany, YLE Finland, RT, and several others.

USS <i>Kitty Hawk</i> riot 1972 racial conflict

The USS Kitty Hawk riot was a racial conflict between white and black sailors aboard the United States Navy aircraft carrier Kitty Hawk on the night of 12–13 October 1972, while positioned at Yankee Station off the coast of North Vietnam during the Vietnam War.

There have been several mutinies by African-Americans in the United States Armed Forces, often owing to racism against African Americans in the U.S. military.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Concerned Officers Movement</span> Organization of U.S. military officers opposed to the Vietnam War

The Concerned Officers Movement (COM) was an organization of mainly junior officers formed within the U.S. military in the early 1970s. Though its principal purpose was opposition to the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, it also fought for First Amendment rights within the military. It was initiated in the Washington, D.C., area by commissioned officers who were also Vietnam Veterans, but rapidly expanded throughout all branches and many bases of the U.S. military, ultimately playing an influential role in the opposition to the Vietnam War. At least two of its chapters expanded their ranks to include enlisted personnel (non-officers), in San Diego changing the group's name to Concerned Military, and in Kodiak, Alaska, to Concerned Servicemen's Movement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">GI's Against Fascism</span> First antiwar and resistance group within the U.S. Navy during the Vietnam War

GI's Against Fascism was a small but formative organization formed within the United States Navy during the years of conscription and the Vietnam War. The group developed in mid-1969 out of a number of sailors requesting adequate quarters, but coalesced into a formal organization with a wider agenda: a more generalized opposition to the war and to perceived institutional racism within the U.S. Navy. Although there had been earlier antiwar and GI resistance groups within the U.S. Army during the Vietnam era, GI's Against Fascism was the first such group in the U.S. Navy. The group published an underground newspaper called Duck Power as a means of spreading its views.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Movement for a Democratic Military</span> Anti-war and GI rights organization during the Vietnam War

The Movement for a Democratic Military (MDM) was an American anti-war, anti-establishment, and military rights organization formed by United States Navy and Marine Corps personnel during the Vietnam War. Formed in California in late 1969 by sailors from Naval Station San Diego in San Diego and Marines from Camp Pendleton Marine Base in Oceanside, it rapidly spread to a number of other cities and bases in California and the Midwest, including the San Francisco Bay Area, Long Beach Naval Station, El Toro Marine Air Station, Fort Ord, Fort Carson, and the Great Lakes Naval Training Center.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">G.I. coffeehouses</span> Antiwar coffeehouses near U.S. military bases during and after the Vietnam War

GI coffeehouses were coffeehouses set up as part of the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War era as a method of fostering antiwar and anti-military sentiment within the U.S. military. They were mainly organized by civilian antiwar activists, though many GIs participated in establishing them as well. They were created in numerous cities and towns near U.S. military bases throughout the U.S as well as Germany and Japan. Due to the normal high turnover rate of GIs at military bases plus the military's response which often involved transfer, discharge and demotion, not to mention the hostility of the pro-military towns where many coffeehouses were located, most of them were short-lived, but a few survived for several years and "contributed to some of the GI movement's most significant actions". The first GI coffeehouse of the Vietnam era was set up in January 1968 and the last closed in 1974.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stop Our Ship</span> Campaign of U.S. sailors and civilians against the Vietnam War

The Stop Our Ship (SOS) movement, a component of the overall civilian and GI movements against the Vietnam War, was directed towards and developed on board U.S. Navy ships, particularly aircraft carriers heading to Southeast Asia. It was concentrated on and around major U.S. Naval stations and ships on the West Coast from mid-1970 to the end of the Vietnam War in 1975, and at its height involved tens of thousands of antiwar civilians, military personnel and veterans. It was sparked by the tactical shift of U.S. combat operations in Southeast Asia from the ground to the air. As the ground war stalemated and Army grunts increasingly refused to fight or resisted the war in various other ways, the U.S. “turned increasingly to air bombardment”. By 1972 there were twice as many Seventh Fleet aircraft carriers in the Gulf of Tonkin as previously and the antiwar movement, which was at its height in the U.S. and worldwide, became a significant factor in the Navy. While no ships were actually prevented from returning to war, the campaigns, combined with the broad antiwar and rebellious sentiment of the times, stirred up substantial difficulties for the Navy, including active duty sailors refusing to sail with their ships, circulating petitions and antiwar propaganda on board, disobeying orders, and committing sabotage, as well as persistent civilian antiwar activity in support of dissident sailors. Several ship combat missions were postponed or altered and one ship was delayed by a combination of a civilian blockade and crewmen jumping overboard.

<i>Waging Peace in Vietnam</i> 2019 book edited by Ron Carver, David Cortright and Barbara Doherty

Waging Peace in Vietnam: U.S. Soldiers and Veterans Who Opposed the War is a non-fiction book edited by Ron Carver, David Cortright, and Barbara Doherty. It was published in September 2019 by New Village Press and is distributed by New York University Press. In March 2023 a Vietnamese language edition of the book was launched at the War Remnants Museum in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Court-martial of Susan Schnall</span> U.S. Navy nurse court-martialed for anti-Vietnam War activity

The court-martial of Susan Schnall, a lieutenant U.S. Navy nurse stationed at the Oakland Naval Hospital in Oakland, California, took place in early 1969 during the Vietnam War. Her political activities, which led to the military trial, may have garnered some of the most provocative news coverage during the early days of the U.S. antiwar movement against that war. In October 1968, the San Francisco Chronicle called her the “Peace Leaflet Bomber” for raining tens of thousands of antiwar leaflets from a small airplane over several San Francisco Bay Area military installations and the deck of an aircraft carrier. The day after this “bombing” run, she marched in her officer’s uniform at the front of a large antiwar demonstration, knowing it was against military regulations. While the Navy was court-martialing her for "conduct unbecoming an officer", she was publicly telling the press, "As far as I'm concerned, it's conduct unbecoming to officers to send men to die in Vietnam."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Military history of African Americans in the Vietnam War</span>

African Americans played a prominent role in the Vietnam War. The Vietnam War was the first American war in which Black and White troops were not formally segregated, and even saw significant growth in the number of African Americans engaged in battlefield combat, though some de facto segregation still occurred.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intrepid Four</span> U.S. Sailors who deserted to oppose the Vietnam War

The Intrepid Four were a group of United States Navy sailors who grew to oppose what they called "the American aggression in Vietnam" and publicly deserted from the USS Intrepid in October 1967 as it docked in Japan during the Vietnam War. They were among the first American troops whose desertion was publicly announced during the war and the first within the U.S. Navy. The fact that it was a group, and not just an individual, made it more newsworthy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pacific Counseling Service</span> Antiwar GI counseling service organization during the Vietnam War

The Pacific Counseling Service (PCS) was a G.I. counseling service organization created by antiwar activists during the Vietnam War. PCS saw itself as trying to make the U.S. Armed Forces "adhere more closely to regulations concerning conscientious objector discharges and G.I. rights." The Armed Forces Journal, on the other hand, said PCS was involved in "antimilitary activities", including "legal help and incitement to dissident GIs." PCS evolved out of a small GI Help office started by a freshly discharged Air Force Sergeant in San Francisco, California in January 1969. The idea rapidly caught on among antiwar forces and within a year PCS had offices in Monterey, Oakland, and San Diego in California, plus Tacoma, Washington. By 1971 it had spread around the Pacific with additional offices in Los Angeles, Hong Kong, Okinawa, the Philippines, as well as Tokyo and Iwakuni in Japan. Each location was established near a major U.S. military base. At its peak, PCS was counseling hundreds of disgruntled soldiers a week, helping many with legal advice, conscientious objector discharges and more. As the war wound down, ending in 1975, the offices closed with the last office in San Francisco printing its final underground newspaper in 1976.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">GI Underground Press</span> Military press produced without official approval or acceptance during the Vietnam War

The GI Underground Press was an underground press movement that emerged among the United States military during the Vietnam War. These were newspapers and newsletters produced without official military approval or acceptance; often furtively distributed under the eyes of "the brass". They were overwhelmingly antiwar and most were anti-military, which tended to infuriate the military command and often resulted in swift retaliation and punishment. Mainly written by rank-and-file active duty or recently discharged GIs, AWOLs and deserters, these publications were intended for their peers and spoke the language and aired the complaints of their audience. They became an integral and powerful element of the larger antiwar, radical and revolutionary movements during those years. This is a history largely ignored and even hidden in the retelling of the U.S. military's role in the Vietnam War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fort Dix 38</span> 38 U.S. Army soldiers accused of rioting in the Fort Dix stockade during the Vietnam War

On June 5, 1969, during the height of the Vietnam War and the soldier and sailor resistance to it, 250 men rioted in the military stockade at U.S. Army post Fort Dix located near Trenton, New Jersey. The prisoners called it a rebellion and cited grievances including overcrowding, starvation, beatings, being chained to chairs, forced confessions and participation in an unjust war. One soldier said you can only treat us "like animals for so long", while another described "unbearable circumstances". The Army initially called it a "disturbance" caused by a small number of "instigators" and "troublemakers", but soon charged 38 soldiers with riot and inciting to riot. The antiwar movement, which had been increasingly recognizing and supporting resistance to the war within the military, quickly moved to defend the rebels/rioters and those the Army singled out for punishment. On June 18, the Army announced charges against 38 soldiers for "participating in a riot", "destruction of Government property, arson and conspiracy to riot." Soon the slogan "Free the Fort Dix 38" was heard in antiwar speeches, written about in underground newspapers and leaflets, and demonstrations were planned.

<i>Soldiers in Revolt: GI Resistance During the Vietnam War</i> Non-fiction book about soldier & sailor resistance during the Vietnam War

Soldiers in Revolt: GI Resistance During the Vietnam War was the first comprehensive exploration of the disaffection, resistance, rebellion and organized opposition to the Vietnam War within the ranks of the U.S. Armed Forces. It was the first book written by David Cortright, a Vietnam veteran who is currently Professor Emeritus and special adviser for policy studies at the Keough School of Global Affairs and Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies at the University of Notre Dame, and the author, co-author, editor or co-editor of 22 books. Originally published as the war was ending in 1975, it was republished in 2005 with an introduction by the well known progressive historian Howard Zinn. Despite being first published 49 years ago, it remains the definitive history of this often ignored subject. The book argues persuasively, with encyclopedic rigor, the still under appreciated fact that by the early 1970s the U.S. armed forces, particularly its ground forces, were essentially breaking down; experiencing a deep crises of moral, discipline and combat effectiveness. Cortright reveals, for example, that in fiscal year 1972, there were more conscientious objectors than draftees, and precipitous declines in both officer enrollments and non-officer enlistments. He also documents "staggering level[s]" of desertions, increasing nearly 400% in the Army from 1966 to 1971. Perhaps more importantly, Cortright makes a convincing case for this unraveling being both a product and an integral part of the anti-Vietnam War sentiment and movement widespread within U.S. society and worldwide at the time. He documents hundreds of GI antiwar and antimilitary organizations, thousands of individual and group acts of resistance, hundreds of GI underground newspapers, and highlights the role of Black GIs militantly fighting racism and the war. This is where the book stands alone as the first and most systematic study of the antiwar and dissident movements impact and growth within the U.S. armed forces during the Vietnam War. While other books, articles and studies have examined this subject, none have done it as thoroughly and systematically.

References

  1. 1 2 Oliver, Dave; Toprani, Anand (2022). American Defense Reform: Lessons from Failure and Success in Navy History. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. p. 97. ISBN   9781647122751.
  2. 1 2 3 "Bust on USS Sumter". content.wisconsinhistory.org. Wisconsin Historical Society: GI Press Collection. Omega Press. 1973-02-28. p. 4.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Ismay, John (2020-08-19). "The Untold Story of the Black Marines Charged With Mutiny at Sea". The New York Times.
  4. 1 2 3 Cortright, David (2005). Soldiers In Revolt. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books. ISBN   1931859272.
  5. "Bust on USS Sumter". content.wisconsinhistory.org. Wisconsin Historical Society: GI Press Collection. Camp News. 1973-01-15.
  6. Racism in the Military - Hon. Louis Stokes of Ohio in the House of Representatives (PDF). U.S. Government Printing Office. October 14, 1972. p. 36582. Retrieved 2024-09-11.
  7. Heinl, Robert D. (1971-06-07). "THE COLLAPSE OF THE ARMED FORCES". Armed Forces Journal.
  8. "The Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War, 4 Volumes, A Political, Social, and Military History". ABC-CLIO. p. 26. From 1964 to 1975 carriers averaged three on-station at a time, but they reached peaks of seven in June 1972 and January 1973.
  9. 1 2 Faram, Mark D. (2017-02-28). "Race riot at sea—1972 Kitty Hawk incident fueled fleet-wide unrest". Navy Times.
  10. 1 2 Guttridge, Leonard (1992). Mutiny: A History of Naval Insurrection. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press. ISBN   0870212818.
  11. Hersh, Seymour (1972-11-12). "Some Very Unhappy Ships". The New York Times.
  12. Holles, Everett (1972-11-10). "130 Refuse to Join Ship; Most Reassigned by Navy". The New York Times.
  13. "Riot on Oiler". content.wisconsinhistory.org. Wisconsin Historical Society: GI Press Collection. Up From the Bottom. 1972-12-15. p. 2.
  14. "White Man's Got a God Complex". genius.com. Genius.
  15. Taylor, Mildred Europa (23 November 2021). "That time when three Black Marines were charged with mutiny at sea". face2faceafrica.com. Face 2 Face Africa.
  16. 1 2 3 "Brass Backs Down in Sumter Cases". content.wisconsinhistory.org. Wisconsin Historical Society: GI Press Collection. Omega Press. 1973-05-31. p. 2.
  17. Ismay, John (2020-08-19). "Two Marines Who Once Stood Up to Discrimination Reunite". The New York Times.
  18. Galvin, William Francis. "The Path to Integration: African Americans in the Armed Forces" (PDF). sec.state.ma.us.
  19. 1 2 "Brass to Press Sumter Cases". content.wisconsinhistory.org. Wisconsin Historical Society: GI Press Collection. Omega Press. p. 12.
  20. "Brass Backs Down in Sumter Cases". content.wisconsinhistory.org. Wisconsin Historical Society: GI Press Collection. Camp News. 1973-04-15. p. 10.
  21. "ARMED SERVICES: Keelhauling the United States Navy". Time USA, LLC. Time. 1972-11-27.