Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act (1970)

Last updated

The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act (1970) ("URA") was passed by the U.S. federal government in 1970. It was intended to ensure fair compensation and assistance for those whose property was compulsorily acquired for public use under eminent domain law. Similar provisions have been introduced by most of the individual states.

Contents

History and purpose

Constitutional rights and pre-URA programs

The Fifth Amendment's Takings clause does not provide for the compensation of relocation expenses if the government takes a citizen's property. [1] Therefore, until 1962, citizens displaced by a federal project were guaranteed just compensation for the property taken by the government, but had no legal right or benefit for the expenses they paid to relocate. [1]

Prior to the URA's passing, starting in 1962, the federal government acted under two separate legislative programs to handle relocation caused by urban blight renewal and federal highway expansion. [2] : 553  In addition to these programs, several federal agencies, such as the Federal Aeronautics Administration, had their own compensation regulations for compensating displaced individuals. [2] : 553  However, all benefits from these programs were quite small. [1]

To provide better benefits to displaced individuals and to make the treatment of those individuals more uniform, Congress passed the URA in 1970 which abrogated the existing patchwork scheme of relocation assistance. [2] : 554 

In the Act, Congress declared its purpose in enacting the URA to be the establishment of: [3]

A uniform policy for the fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced as a result of Federal and federally assisted programs in order that such persons shall not suffer disproportionate injuries as a result of programs designed for the benefit of the public as a whole.

In 1972, tenants of foreclosed properties who were not eligible for URA benefits challenged the constitutionality of the URA in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. [4] [1] The Court rejected this argument and the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision. [5]

Nonetheless, the URA generated litigation due to dislocated parties' various interpretations of the Act's language. Moreover, enactment of the URA without corresponding regulations "resulted in significant differences in administration of relocation benefits by various state and federal programs." [1] : .03  For instance, utilities and billboard/signage businesses were often required to sue in order to qualify for benefits under the URA due to the Act's ambiguous provisions. [1] : .03 

As a result of the Act's deficiencies, in 1985, a presidential memorandum from President Ronald Reagan made changes to the Act's implementation, including the designation of the U.S. Department of Transportation as the lead agency for URA regulation promulgation purposes. [1] : .03(iv) 

Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987

Following lengthy congressional hearings due to the URA's failings, Congress passed the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987 which significantly amended the URA. [1]

Important amendments made to the definition section by the 1987 act include: [1] : .03 

The Act also significantly increased the moving and related expenses covered by the URA and increased the maximum replacement housing allowance for homeowners to $22,500. [1] It also ensured that relocation assistance payments were not considered income subject to taxation under the law, or considered in agency determination's of the displaced person's federal aid eligibility, other than low-income housing assistance. [1] Finally, the Act codified the 1985 presidential memorandum. [1] : .04 

Statutory amendments and regulatory updates

A 1997 amendment to the act amended the definition of "displaced person" under the URA to exclude "illegal aliens". [1]

In 2005, an expansive update of URA regulations was completed by the Federal Highway Administration ("FHWA") (a division of the Department of Transportation). [1] The regulations further liberalized the definition of "displaced person", added a definition for "mobile home", and created a new subpart setting forth the URA's applicability to mobile home occupants displaced by a federal or federally-assisted project. [1]

In 2012, President Barack Obama signed the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act ("MAP-21") which made further changes to the URA, specifically increasing the amount of benefits given to displacees. [6] Using the authority given to it in MAP-21, the U.S. Department of Transportation published a proposed final rule in December 2022, proposing further changes to URA regulations. These proposed regulatory changes would, among other things, bring URA regulations into alignment with MAP-21. [7]

The Act's Provisions

Eligibility

The Act's provisions only apply to displaced persons, which it defines as: [8]

(i) any person who moves from real property, or moves his personal property from real property-

(I) as a direct result of a written notice of intent to acquire or the acquisition of such real property in whole or in part for a program or project undertaken by a Federal agency or with Federal financial assistance; or

(II) on which such person is a residential tenant or conducts a small business, a farm operation, or a business defined in paragraph (7)(D), as a direct result of rehabilitation, demolition, or such other displacing activity as the lead agency may prescribe, under a program or project undertaken by a Federal agency or with Federal financial assistance in any case in which the head of the displacing agency determines that such displacement is permanent; and

(ii) solely for the purposes of sections 4622(a) and (b) and 4625 of this title, any person who moves from real property, or moves his personal property from real property-

(I) as a direct result of a written notice of intent to acquire or the acquisition of other real property, in whole or in part, on which such person conducts a business or farm operation, for a program or project undertaken by a Federal agency or with Federal financial assistance; or

(II) as a direct result of rehabilitation, demolition, or such other displacing activity as the lead agency may prescribe, of other real property on which such person conducts a business or a farm operation, under a program or project undertaken by a Federal agency or with Federal financial assistance where the head of the displacing agency determines that such displacement is permanent.

Benefits

If a person is eligible for URA benefits, they are entitled to either actual reasonable moving expenses or a moving expense allowance which is determined by the administering agency according to schedules (created via federal regulations) which dictate the amount of benefits allowed to be distributed. [9] [2] : 555  The Department of Transportation manages the distribution allowance schedules and posts notices in the Federal Register when a region distribution schedule is being changed. [10]

A displacee “is entitled to payment of his or her actual moving and related expenses, as the Agency determines to be reasonable and necessary.” [11] As of December 2022, the moving cost payments permitted under the URA are stated in 49 C.F.R. § 24.301. [1] Courts determining the reasonableness of an agency's decision to reimburse moving expenses have used the "arbitrary and capricious" standard in the past. [12]

Administration and other requirements

While the U.S. Department of Transportation serves as the lead agency for URA regulatory promulgation and implementation coordination, each federal agency is responsible for URA compliance and administration across their own programs and activities. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's website details general requirements under the URA, including notice requirements, pre-negotiation appraisals, offers, and payments prior to possession, with focus placed on URA compliance and implementation across its own programs. [13]

The states' response to the URA

Most states have enacted similar legislation and require very similar relocation compensation for displacement by state-level activities. [14] Typically, the language of their statutes mirror that of the URA, though of late, some states have raised the amounts of compensation for dislocated businesses, with both goodwill and business value as traits of respective statutes. [14] Connecticut's parallel version of the URA is one that attempts to compensate goodwill to non-chain businesses by allowing one to claim up to $10,000.00 of one's annual net income due to loss of a "substantial part of their patronage." [15] Connecticut provides that a state agency can choose to utilize the compensation levels under the Federal URA in lieu of the state's act. Its own relocation compensation requirements are lower than the URA's. [16]

It is important to note that the URA addresses federal interaction with the states regarding the funding of projects and compensation of owners. Any state agency receiving funding from a federal counterpart must demonstrate similar compensation efforts as that of the Act (albeit there is no indication that the state's benefits must be the same or higher), and that federal agency is prohibited from supplying the monies unless it has received the appropriate assurances from the state that fair and reasonable compensation is made for an owner's relocation. [17]

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Sackman, Julius L. (2022). "34". Nichols on Eminent Domain. Vol. 6A (3rd ed.). Matthew Bender.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Barbier, Margaret; Fisher, Shireen (1976-01-01). "The Uniform Relocation Act: A Viable Solution to the Plight of the Displaced". Catholic University Law Review. 25 (3): 552–579.
  3. ↑ URA § 201, 42 U.S.C. § 4621 (1970).
  4. ↑ Caramico v. Romney, 390 F. Supp. 210 (E.D.N.Y. 1972)
  5. ↑ Caramico v. Secretary of Dep't of Housing & Urban Development, 509 F.2d 694, 696, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 5616.
  6. ↑ "MAP-21 AND ITS EFFECT ON THE URA" (PDF). 2012.
  7. ↑ "View Rule". www.reginfo.gov. Retrieved 2022-12-28.
  8. ↑ 42 U.S.C § 4601 PD-icon.svg This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain .
  9. ↑ Nicole Stelle Garnett, The Neglected Political Economy of Eminent Domain, 105 Mich. L. Rev. 101, 121 (2006).
  10. ↑ See, e.g., Federal Register, Vol. 80, No. 142, page 44182 (July 24, 2015) (changing the schedules for several states).
  11. ↑ 49 C.F.R. § 24.301(A); see also 42 U.S.C. § 4622 (a)(1) (enabling statute).
  12. ↑ In re Wiseway Motor Freight, Inc., CX-99-648, 1999 Minn. App. LEXIS 1100 (Ct. App. Sep. 28, 1999)
  13. ↑ "Real Estate Acquisition and Relocation/U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)".
  14. 1 2 Garnett, Neglected, p.123-24.
  15. ↑ See CGS §§ 267, et seq.
  16. ↑ Joseph Holstead, Research Analyst. "Uniform Relocation Assistance Act". Cga.ct.gov. Retrieved 2022-08-13.
  17. ↑ 42 U.S.C. §§ 4627, 4630.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act</span> Federal highway legislation

The Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987 is a United States Act of Congress, containing in Title I, the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1987.

Eminent domain, land acquisition, compulsory purchase, resumption, resumption/compulsory acquisition, or expropriation is the power of a state, provincial, or national government to take private property for public use. It does not include the power to take and transfer ownership of private property from one property owner to another private property owner without a valid public purpose. This power can be legislatively delegated by the state to municipalities, government subdivisions, or even to private persons or corporations, when they are authorized by the legislature to exercise the functions of public character.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Redevelopment</span> New construction on a site that has preexisting uses

Redevelopment is any new construction on a site that has pre-existing uses. It represents a process of land development uses to revitalize the physical, economic and social fabric of urban space.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Employee benefits</span> Non-wage compensation provided to employees in addition to normal wages or salaries

Employee benefits and benefits in kind, also called fringe benefits, perquisites, or perks, include various types of non-wage compensation provided to employees in addition to their normal wages or salaries. Instances where an employee exchanges (cash) wages for some other form of benefit is generally referred to as a "salary packaging" or "salary exchange" arrangement. In most countries, most kinds of employee benefits are taxable to at least some degree. Examples of these benefits include: housing furnished or not, with or without free utilities; group insurance ; disability income protection; retirement benefits; daycare; tuition reimbursement; sick leave; vacation ; social security; profit sharing; employer student loan contributions; conveyancing; long service leave; domestic help (servants); and other specialized benefits.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Terrorism Risk Insurance Act</span>

The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) is a United States federal law signed into law by President George W. Bush on November 26, 2002. The Act created a federal "backstop" for insurance claims related to acts of terrorism. The Act "provides for a transparent system of shared public and private compensation for insured losses resulting from acts of terrorism." The Act was originally set to expire December 31, 2005, was extended for two years in December 2005, and was extended again on December 26, 2007. The Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act expired on December 31, 2014.

Just compensation is a right enshrined in the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which is invoked whenever private property is taken by the government. Under some state constitutions, it is also owed when the government "damages" private property.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rehabilitation Act of 1973</span> United States law

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is a United States federal law, codified at 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. The principal sponsor of the bill was Rep. John Brademas (D-IN-3). The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 replaces preexisting laws to extend and revise the authorization of grants to States for vocational rehabilitation services, with special emphasis on services to those with the most severe disabilities, to expand special Federal responsibilities and research and training programs with respect to individuals with disabilities, to establish special responsibilities in the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare for coordination of all programs with respect to individuals with disabilities within the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, and for other purposes. It created the Rehabilitation Services Administration.

For households and individuals, gross income is the sum of all wages, salaries, profits, interest payments, rents, and other forms of earnings, before any deductions or taxes. It is opposed to net income, defined as the gross income minus taxes and other deductions.

Title VI: Providing for victims of terrorism, public safety officers and their families is the sixth of ten titles which comprise the USA PATRIOT Act, an anti-terrorism bill passed in the United States after the September 11, 2001 attacks. It provides aid to the families of Public Safety Officers who were injured or killed in terrorist attacks, and amends the Victims of Crime Act of 1984.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Income tax in the United States</span> Form of taxation in the United States

The United States federal government and most state governments impose an income tax. They are determined by applying a tax rate, which may increase as income increases, to taxable income, which is the total income less allowable deductions. Income is broadly defined. Individuals and corporations are directly taxable, and estates and trusts may be taxable on undistributed income. Partnerships are not taxed, but their partners are taxed on their shares of partnership income. Residents and citizens are taxed on worldwide income, while nonresidents are taxed only on income within the jurisdiction. Several types of credits reduce tax, and some types of credits may exceed tax before credits. An Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) applies at the federal and some state levels.

The USA PATRIOT Act was passed by the United States Congress in 2001 as a response to the September 11, 2001 attacks. It has ten titles, each containing numerous sections. Title III: International Money Laundering Abatement and Financial Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001 is actually an act of Congress in its own right as well as being a title of the USA PATRIOT Act, and is intended to facilitate the prevention, detection and prosecution of international money laundering and the financing of terrorism. The title's sections primarily amend portions of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 and the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Surface Transportation Assistance Act</span> 1982 United States law

The Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 was a comprehensive transportation funding and policy act of the United States Federal Government, 96 Stat. 2097. The legislation was championed by the Reagan administration to address concerns about the surface transportation infrastructure. The Act contained Title V, known as the Highway Revenue Act of 1982, which added five cents to the per gallon gas tax, of which four cents was dedicated to restore interstate highways and bridges, and one cent for public transit. The Act also set a goal of 10 percent for participation of disadvantaged business enterprises in federal-aid projects.

In the United States, compliance requirements are a series of directives United States federal government agencies established that summarize hundreds of federal laws and regulations applicable to federal assistance. They are currently incorporated into the OMB A-133 Compliance Supplement, which was created by the US Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

An employer in the United States may provide transportation benefits to their employees that are tax free up to a certain limit. Under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code section 132(a), the qualified transportation benefits are one of the eight types of statutory employee benefits that are excluded from gross income in calculating federal income tax. The qualified transportation benefits are transit passes, vanpooling, bicycling, and parking associated with these things.

An emotional support animal (ESA) is an animal that provides relief to individuals with "psychiatric disability through companionship." Emotional support animals may be any type of pet, and are not recognized as service animals under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, is American legislation that guarantees certain rights to people with disabilities. It was one of the first U.S. federal civil rights laws offering protection for people with disabilities. It set precedents for subsequent legislation for people with disabilities, including the Virginians with Disabilities Act in 1985 and the Americans with Disabilities Act in 1990.

Article One of the Georgia State Constitution describes the Georgia Bill of Rights, a set of forty paragraphs which enumerate the Rights of Persons, the Origin and Structure of Government and other General Provisions. The Georgia Bill of Rights was written by Thomas R.R. Cobb under the title Declaration of Fundamental Principals, as part of the Georgia Constitution of 1861 when the State of Georgia seceded from the United States of America and joined the Confederate States of America.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act</span>

The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) is a funding and authorization bill to govern United States federal surface transportation spending. It was passed by Congress on June 29, 2012, and President Barack Obama signed it on July 6. The vote was 373–52 in the House of Representatives and 74–19 in the Senate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hazardous Materials Transportation Act</span>

The Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (HMTA), enacted in 1975, is the principal federal law in the United States regulating the transportation of hazardous materials. Its purpose is to "protect against the risks to life, property, and the environment that are inherent in the transportation of hazardous material in intrastate, interstate, and foreign commerce" under the authority of the United States Secretary of Transportation.

The Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was created as a response to the financial crisis in 2007. Passed in 2010, the act contains a great number of provisions, taking over 848 pages. It targets the sectors of the financial system that were believed to be responsible for the financial crisis, including banks, mortgage lenders, and credit rating agencies. Ostensibly aimed at reducing the instability that led to the crash, the act has the power to force these institutions to reduce their risk and increase their reserve capital.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.