Uniformed Services Former Spouses' Protection Act

Last updated
Uniformed Services Former Spouses' Protection Act
Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg
Long titleUniformed Services Former Spouses' Protection Act
Acronyms (colloquial)USFSPA
NicknamesFormer Military Spouses' Protection Act
Enacted bythe 97th United States Congress
EffectiveFebruary 1, 1983
Citations
Public law 97-252
Statutes at Large 96  Stat.   718
Codification
Titles amended 29 U.S.C.: Armed Forces
U.S.C. sections created 10 U.S.C. ch. 71 § 1408 et seq.
Legislative history
United States Supreme Court cases
McCarty v. McCarty [1] (pre-enactment) Mansell v. Mansell [2] (post-enactment)

The Uniformed Services Former Spouses' Protection Act (or USFSPA) is a U.S. federal law enacted on September 8, 1982 to address issues that arise when a member of the military divorces, and primarily concerns jointly-earned marital property consisting of benefits earned during marriage and while one of the spouses (or both) is a military service member. [3] The divisibility of U.S. military retirement payments in divorce proceedings has had a turbulent legislative and legal history, and the USFSPA has not closely tracked its civilian cousin enacted in 1975, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), although they are similar in some respects with regard to public policy aims.

Contents

Types of post-service pay at issue

Military retirees fall into two general categories: those retired for disabilities and those retired for length of service. [4] Members of the U.S. military who serve honorably for a specified period, generally at least 20 years, [5] are entitled to retire and to receive retirement pay. [6] Military veterans are entitled to compensation for service-connected disabilities, a benefit generally called VA disability, with some exceptions. [7] Some service members may be entitled to a different benefit called combat-related special compensation (CRSC) because of disability caused either by direct engagement in an armed conflict or through an instrumentality of war, such as exposure to Agent Orange. [8] [9] In general, eligible service members must elect either retirement pay, or any disability benefit awarded for a service-connected disability, or choose a CRSC benefit alone, but they may not receive all three. However, some veterans may qualify to receive both retirement pay and a disability benefit. [10]

Disposable retired pay is a measure of post-service pay defined as the gross retired pay less (A) any prior military retirement overpayments and recoupments required by law, (B) any court-martial forfeitures, (C) retirement pay waived in order to receive disability payments from the VA, and (D) the premium costs paid for a spouse, or former spouse pursuant to court order, as a designated survivor under the Survivor Benefit Plan. [11]

Former spouses can receive their marital share of the retirement benefit directly from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) rather than from the ex-spouse, but to do so must have at least 10 years of marriage to the service member which overlaps the military service. [12] The Department of Defense Financial Management (DoDFM) Regulation section 7000.14-R entitled Former Spouse Payments from Retired Pay sets forth all of the requirements for former spouses to receive direct payment from DFAS. [13] [14]

Prior history

Military retirement pay has been characterized as both property and as reduced pay for reduced services, and therefore has been a relevant issue in divorce actions for military retirees. [4] [15] Before the enactment of the USFSPA, former spouses had no statutory right to receive a portion of a member's military retired pay such as they would under later revisions of ERISA; [16] for example, in the 1981 McCarty case, the U.S. Supreme Court determined there was total preemption of any such right concerning federal military retirement benefits. [1] The interval between the McCarty decision and the enactment of the USFSPA is known by some courts as the "McCarty period" or the "McCarty interval." [17]

Enactment effect

The USFSPA was enacted in response to the McCarty decision, overturning it, and in the USFSPA the Congress authorized State courts to distribute, with certain limitations, disposable retired pay in a divorce proceeding. [18] The USFSPA specifically allows State courts to treat military retired pay either as the marital property of both the member and spouse (the marital community in community property States) and to allocate it accordingly, or as the property solely of the member, depending upon all the facts and circumstances. [19]

Post-enactment application

Subsequent to the enactment of the USFSPA, State courts grappled with issues raised by its application in marital dissolution proceedings, such as whether the USFSPA may be applied retroactively to divorce decrees that were final and were not appealed after the Supreme Court decision in McCarty and before enactment of the USFSPA, [17] i.e., during the McCarty interval.

The DoDFM regulations implement the USFSPA, and the purpose of the 2009 DoDFM Regulation 7000.14-R [20] is to explain to former spouses how to apply for payments from military retired pay. [21]

Retirement pay waiver for disability benefits

The statute 38 U.S.C. § 3101(a) protects recipients of disability benefits from the claims of creditors and is designed to provide security to the recipient's family and dependents, [22] [23] [24] while 38 U.S.C. § 1310 provides for Dependency and Indemnity Compensation ("DIC") benefits to a surviving spouse. [25] The definition of a former spouse under 10 U.S.C. § 1447(10) is different from the definition of a surviving spouse under 38 U.S.C. § 101(3), notwithstanding any abused spouse issues related to a divorce. [26]

In 1989, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed rights under the USFSPA in the Mansell case and further limited the authority of State courts to assign spousal rights to military retirement pay. [2] In Mansell, the court ruled that the USFSPA does not grant State courts the power to treat, as property divisible upon divorce, military retirement pay which has been waived in order to receive VA disability benefits. [2] In other words, a State court is prohibited from distributing in a divorce action disposable retired pay which constitutes that portion of retired pay that has been waived by the retiree under 38 USC § 5305 in favor of receiving VA disability benefits. [27]

The statute 38 USC § 5305 provides specific rules to follow in order to establish that the military retiree's receipt of VA disability payments resulted from a valid waiver of retirement pay contemplated by the statute. [28] State courts have held, since the Mansell decision, that a military retiree may not agree to pay a portion of their retirement pay as spousal support (alimony) or as a division of marital interests, but then elect, post-judgment, to receive disability pay in an attempt to avoid the obligation to the former spouse, [29] and a State court may order indemnity payments from a retiree who waives retired pay to receive VA disability benefits after a decree of divorce has issued. [30]

Tax treatment

The federal Tax Court has noted that there is no law which excludes military retired pay from income, and ruled in 2012 that the purpose of the USFSPA is not to address the tax treatment of military benefits, but rather to permit Federal, State, and certain other courts to consider military retired pay when fixing property rights between parties to a divorce, dissolution, annulment, or legal separation. [21] [19] Retirees whose former spouses receive a shared portion of the retirement pay do not pay income tax on that portion of retirement pay that is transferred to the former spouse, but the share transferred to the former spouse is taxable to the former spouse. [21] In general, States may not tax retirement pay of military retirees if they do not tax the benefits received by retired State and local government employees. [31]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social Security (United States)</span> American retirement system

In the United States, Social Security is the commonly used term for the federal Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) program and is administered by the Social Security Administration (SSA). The Social Security Act was passed in 1935, and the existing version of the Act, as amended, encompasses several social welfare and social insurance programs.

A prenuptial agreement, antenuptial agreement, or premarital agreement is a written contract entered into by a couple before marriage or a civil union that enables them to select and control many of the legal rights they acquire upon marrying, and what happens when their marriage eventually ends by death or divorce. Couples enter into a written prenuptial agreement to supersede many of the default marital laws that would otherwise apply in the event of divorce, such as the laws that govern the division of property, retirement benefits, savings, and the right to seek alimony with agreed-upon terms that provide certainty and clarify their marital rights. A premarital agreement may also contain waivers of a surviving spouse's right to claim an elective share of the estate of the deceased spouse.

According to the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO), there are 1,138 statutory provisions in which marital status is a factor in determining benefits, rights, and privileges. These rights were a key issue in the debate over federal recognition of same-sex marriage. Under the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the federal government was prohibited from recognizing same-sex couples who were lawfully married under the laws of their state. The conflict between this definition and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution led the U.S. Supreme Court to rule DOMA unconstitutional on June 26, 2013, in the case of United States v. Windsor. DOMA was finally repealed and replaced by the Respect for Marriage Act on December 13, 2022, which retains the same statutory provisions as DOMA and extends them to interracial and same-sex married couples.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Military discharge</span> Release from military service

A military discharge is given when a member of the armed forces is released from their obligation to serve. Each country's military has different types of discharge. They are generally based on whether the persons completed their training and then fully and satisfactorily completed their term of service. Other types of discharge are based on factors such as the quality of their service, whether their service had to be ended prematurely due to humanitarian or medical reasons, whether they had been found to have drug or alcohol dependency issues and whether they were complying with treatment and counseling, and whether they had demerits or punishments for infractions or were convicted of any crimes. These factors affect whether they will be asked or allowed to re-enlist and whether they qualify for benefits after their discharge.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Railroad Retirement Board</span> Independent agency of the United States government

The U.S. Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) is an independent agency in the executive branch of the United States government created in 1935 to administer a social insurance program providing retirement benefits to the country's railroad workers.

A qualified domestic relations order, is a judicial order in the United States, entered as part of a property division in a divorce or legal separation that splits a retirement plan or pension plan by recognizing joint marital ownership interests in the plan, specifically the former spouse's interest in that spouse's share of the asset. A QDRO's recognition of spousal ownership interest in a plan participant's (employee's) pension plan awards a portion of the plan participant's benefit to an alternate payee. An alternate payee must be a spouse, former spouse, child or other dependent of the plan participant. A QDRO may also be entered for spousal support or child support.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Defense Commissary Agency</span> Agency of the United States Department of Defense

The Defense Commissary Agency (DeCA), headquartered at Fort Gregg-Adams, Virginia, is an agency of the United States Department of Defense (DoD) that operates nearly 240 commissaries worldwide. American military commissaries sell groceries and household goods to active-duty, Guard, Reserve, and retired members of all eight uniformed services of the United States and eligible members of their families at cost plus surcharge, saving authorized patrons thousands of dollars compared to civilian supermarkets.

A VA loan is a mortgage loan in the United States guaranteed by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The program is for American veterans, military members currently serving in the U.S. military, reservists and select surviving spouses and can be used to purchase single-family homes, condominiums, multi-unit properties, manufactured homes and new construction. The VA does not originate loans, but sets the rules for who may qualify, issues minimum guidelines and requirements under which mortgages may be offered and financially guarantees loans that qualify under the program.

The Federal Employees' Retirement System (FERS) is the retirement system for employees within the United States civil service. FERS became effective January 1, 1987, to replace the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) and to conform federal retirement plans in line with those in the private sector.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Veterans Benefits Administration</span> Component of U.S. Department Veterans Affairs

The Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) is an agency of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. It is responsible for administering the department's programs that provide financial and other forms of assistance to veterans, their dependents, and survivors. Major benefits include Veterans' compensation, Veterans' pension, survivors' benefits, rehabilitation and employment assistance, education assistance, home loan guaranties, and life insurance coverage.

Marital deduction is a type of tax law that allows a person to give assets to his or her spouse with reduced or no tax imposed upon the transfer. Some marital deduction laws even apply to transfers made postmortem. The right to receive property conveys ownership for tax purposes. A decree of divorce transfers the right to that property by reason of the marriage and is also a transfer within a marriage. It makes no difference whether the property itself or equivalent compensation is transferred before, or after the decree dissolves the marriage. There is no U.S. estate and gift tax on transfers of any amount between spouses, whether during their lifetime or at death. There is an important exceptions for non-citizens. The U.S. federal Estate and gift tax marital deduction is only available if the surviving spouse is a U.S. citizen. For a surviving spouse who is not a U.S. citizen a bequest through a Qualified Domestic Trust defers estate tax until principal is distributed by the trustee, a U.S. citizen or corporation who also withholds the estate tax. Income on principal distributed to the surviving spouse is taxed as individual income. If the surviving spouse becomes a U.S. citizen, principal remaining in a Qualifying Domestic Trust may then be distributed without further tax.

Social Security Disability Insurance is a payroll tax-funded federal insurance program of the United States government. It is managed by the Social Security Administration and designed to provide monthly benefits to people who have a medically determinable disability that restricts their ability to be employed. SSDI does not provide partial or temporary benefits but rather pays only full benefits and only pays benefits in cases in which the disability is "expected to last at least one year or result in death." Relative to disability programs in other countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the SSDI program in the United States has strict requirements regarding eligibility.

United States military pay is money paid to members of the United States Armed Forces. The amount of pay varies according to the member's rank, time in the military, location duty assignment, and by some special skills the member may have.

<i>United States v. Gotcher</i>

United States v. Gotcher, 401 F.2d 118, is a tax case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

In the United States, the question whether any compensation plan is qualified or non-qualified is primarily a question of taxation under the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). Any business prefers to deduct its expenses from its income, which will reduce the income subject to taxation. Expenses which are deductible ("qualified") have satisfied tests required by the IRC. Expenses which do not satisfy those tests ("non-qualified") are not deductible; even though the business has incurred the expense, the amount of that expenditure remains as part of taxable income. In most situations, any business will attempt to satisfy the requirements so that its expenditures are deductible business expenses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Defined benefit pension plan</span> Type of pension plan

Defined benefit (DB) pension plan is a type of pension plan in which an employer/sponsor promises a specified pension payment, lump-sum, or combination thereof on retirement that depends on an employee's earnings history, tenure of service and age, rather than depending directly on individual investment returns. Traditionally, many governmental and public entities, as well as a large number of corporations, provide defined benefit plans, sometimes as a means of compensating workers in lieu of increased pay.

In the United States, the Physical Evaluation Board ("PEB") is a board within each military service that

"determine[s] the fitness of Service members with medical conditions to perform their military duties and, for members determined unfit because of duty-related impairments, their eligibility for benefits pursuant to chapter 61 of Reference (c) [10 USC Chapter 61]...Service members may appeal the decision of the PEB. The PEB process includes the informal physical evaluation board, formal physical evaluation board and appellate review of PEB results."

In July 2008 the Post-9/11 GI Bill was signed into law, creating a new robust education benefits program rivaling the WWII Era GI Bill of Rights. The new Post 9/11 GI Bill, which went into effect on August 1, 2009, provides education benefits for service members who served on active duty for 90 or more days since September 10, 2001. These benefits are tiered based on the number of days served on active duty, creating a benefit package that gives current and previously activated National Guard and Reserve members the same benefits as active duty servicemembers.

In the United States, ERISA reimbursement refers to the efforts of an ERISA Plan administrator to obtain repayment from an insured person who had previously received payments for personal injury medical bills.

Military divorce is a specific type of divorce that arises when one or both partners are members of the military. Although typically an uncontested divorce, military divorces are different because they require additional requirements to be fulfilled. Divorces occur less frequently than within the civilian population. They present a special set of challenges that make military divorces more complicated than a typical divorce. For example, The Federal Service Members Civil Relief Act of 2003 requires any person seeking a divorce to state that their spouse is or is not currently a member of the United States armed forces. This is meant to prevent spouses from seeking divorces from service members who would be unable to attend divorce proceedings.

References

  1. 1 2 McCarty v. McCarty , 453 US 210, 101 S. Ct. 2728, 69 L. Ed. 2d 589 (1981). (The Supreme Court decision overturned by the enactment of the USFSPA.) Accessed 2015-11-15.
  2. 1 2 3 Mansell v. Mansell , 490 US 581, 109 S. Ct. 2023, 104 L. Ed. 2d 675 (1989). Accessed 2015-11-15.
  3. ↑ Uniformed Services Former Spouses' Protection Act (USFSPA), 10 U.S. Code §1408, Legal Information Institute (LII). Accessed 2015-11-15.
  4. 1 2 Ives, J. and Davidson, M., Court-Martial Jurisdiction Over Retirees Under Articles 2(4) and 2(6): Time to Lighten Up and Tighten Up?, Military Law Review, v.175, p.5, March 2003.
  5. ↑ U.S. General Accounting Office, Military Retirement: Possible Changes Merit Further Evaluation , Rep. No. GAO/NSAID-97-17, p.21, Nov. 15 1996. (Full report, 57 pp.) Accessed 2015-11-16.
  6. ↑ 10 U.S. Code §6321 et seq.
  7. ↑ 38 U.S. Code §1101 et seq.
  8. ↑ 10 U.S. Code §1413a.
  9. ↑ CRSC Information Paper, Military Compensation, DOD, May 2008. Accessed 2015-11-16.
  10. ↑ Concurrent Receipt Programs, Concurrent Retirement & Disability Payments (CRDP) and Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC), (both are non-taxable benefits), Military Compensation, DOD, May 2008. Accessed 2015-11-16.
  11. ↑ USFSPA, 10 U.S. Code §1408(a)(4).
  12. ↑ USFSPA, 10 U.S. Code §1408(d).
  13. ↑ Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), Financial Management Regulation, Former Spouse Payments from Retired Pay, Summary of Major Changes, Volume 7b, Chapter 29, DoD 7000.14-R, December 2010. Accessed 2015-11-15.
  14. ↑ Black & Graham, LLC, Military Divorce Guide re: VA Disability/Indemnity for VA Waiver. Accessed 2015-11-15.
  15. ↑ See also: U.S. v. Tyler, 105 U.S. 244, (1881), Lemly v. U.S., 109 Ct. Cl. 760 (1948), and Costello v. U.S., 587 F.2d 424 at 426 (1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 929 (1979).
  16. ↑ ERISA provides the legal framework for qualified domestic relations orders (QDROs) with respect to civilian pension and retirement plans subject to ERISA's provisions. See 26 U.S. Code §414(p).
  17. 1 2 In the Matter of the Marriage of Flannagan , 709 P. 2d 1247, 42 Wash. App. 214, WA Ct. App., 2nd Div (1985). Accessed 2015-11-15.
  18. ↑ USFSPA, 10 U.S. Code §1408 [a][2][C]; [a][4].
  19. 1 2 S. Rept. No. 97-502, at 1 (1982), 1982 U.S.C.C.A.N. 1596, 1596.
  20. ↑ DoDFM Regulation 7000.14-R volume 7B, ch. 29, para. 2901, February 2009, (DoDFM regulation, para. 2901).
  21. 1 2 3 Schuller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue , TC Memo 347, U.S. Tax Court (2012). Accessed 2015-11-15.
  22. ↑ 38 U.S.C. §3101.
  23. ↑ Parker v. Parker , 335 Pa.Super. 348, 351, 484 A.2d 168, 169, Pa.Sup.Ct. (1984). Accessed 2015-11-15.
  24. ↑ With respect to retirement annuities covered by the Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan , see also 10 U.S. Code §1440, (Annuities not subject to legal process). Accessed 2015-11-16.
  25. ↑ 38 U.S.C. §1310.
  26. ↑ Haynes v. McDonald , Court of Appeals, No. 2015-7014, Fed. Cir. (2015). Accessed 2015-11-15.
  27. ↑ Dachille v. Dachille , 43 Misc. 3d 241, 983 NYS 2d 193, NY Sup. Ct. (2014). Accessed 2015-11-15.
  28. ↑ Repash v. Repash , 148 Vt 70, 528 A2d 744, Vermont Sup. Ct. (1987). Accessed 2015-11-15.
  29. ↑ Megee v. Carmine , 802 N.W.2d 669, 290 Mich. App. 551, Mich. Ct.App. (2010). Accessed 2015-11-15.
  30. ↑ King v. King , 149 Mich. App. 495; 386 N.W.2d 562; Mich. App. (1986); LEXIS 2490. Accessed 2015-11-15.
  31. ↑ Barker v. Kansas , 503 US 594, 112 S.Ct. 1619, 118 L.Ed.2d 243 (1992). Accessed 2015-11-16.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.