United States v. DiFrancesco

Last updated
United States v. DiFrancesco
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Argued October 6, 1980
Decided December 9, 1980
Full case nameUnited States v. DiFrancesco
Citations449 U.S. 117 ( more )
Argument Oral argument
Opinion announcement Opinion announcement
Case history
Prior604 F.2d 769 (CA2 1979)
Holding
The Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 does not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed and remanded.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr.  · Potter Stewart
Byron White  · Thurgood Marshall
Harry Blackmun  · Lewis F. Powell Jr.
William Rehnquist  · John P. Stevens
Case opinions
MajorityBlackmun, joined by Burger, Stewart, Powell, Rehnquist
DissentBrennan, joined by White, Marshall, Stevens
DissentStevens

United States v. DiFrancesco, 449 U.S. 117(1980), was a United States Supreme Court case decided in 1980. In a five-to-four decision, the Court held that a provision of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, which allowed the federal government to appeal certain criminal sentences after they are imposed, did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Though such an appeal could potentially lead to the defendant's sentence being lengthened, the Court concluded that because "the Double Jeopardy Clause does not require that a sentence be given a degree of finality that prevents its later increase", this practice did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause. [1] [2]

References

  1. United States v. DiFrancesco, 449 U.S. 117, 137 (1980)
  2. Westen, Peter (June 1, 1980). "The Three Faces of Double Jeopardy: Reflections on Government Appeals of Criminal Sentences". Michigan Law Review. 78 (7): 1001–1065. ISSN   0026-2234.