Uplift modelling

Last updated

Uplift modelling, also known as incremental modelling, true lift modelling, or net modelling is a predictive modelling technique that directly models the incremental impact of a treatment (such as a direct marketing action) on an individual's behaviour.

Contents

Uplift modelling has applications in customer relationship management for up-sell, cross-sell and retention modelling. It has also been applied to political election and personalised medicine. Unlike the related Differential Prediction concept in psychology, Uplift Modelling assumes an active agent.

Introduction

Uplift modelling uses a randomised scientific control not only to measure the effectiveness of an action but also to build a predictive model that predicts the incremental response to the action. The response could be a binary variable (for example, a website visit) [1] or a continuous variable (for example, customer revenue). [2] Uplift modelling is a data mining technique that has been applied predominantly in the financial services, telecommunications and retail direct marketing industries to up-sell, cross-sell, churn and retention activities.

Measuring uplift

The uplift of a marketing campaign is usually defined as the difference in response rate between a treated group and a randomized control group. This allows a marketing team to isolate the effect of a marketing action and measure the effectiveness or otherwise of that individual marketing action. Honest marketing teams will only take credit for the incremental effect of their campaign.

However, many marketers define lift (rather than uplift) as the difference in response rate between treatment and control, so uplift modeling can be defined as improving (upping) lift through predictive modeling.

The table below shows the details of a campaign showing the number of responses and calculated response rate for a hypothetical marketing campaign. This campaign would be defined as having a response rate uplift of 5%. It has created 50,000 incremental responses (100,000 - 50,000).

GroupNumber of CustomersResponsesResponse Rate
Treated1,000,000100,00010%
Control1,000,00050,0005%

Traditional response modelling

Traditional response modelling typically takes a group of treated customers and attempts to build a predictive model that separates the likely responders from the non-responders through the use of one of a number of predictive modelling techniques. Typically this would use decision trees or regression analysis.

This model would only use the treated customers to build the model.

In contrast uplift modeling uses both the treated and control customers to build a predictive model that focuses on the incremental response. To understand this type of model it is proposed that there is a fundamental segmentation that separates customers into the following groups (their names were suggested by N. Radcliffe and explained in [3] )

The only segment that provides true incremental responses is the Persuadables.

Uplift modelling provides a scoring technique that can separate customers into the groups described above.

Traditional response modelling often targets the Sure Things being unable to distinguish them from the Persuadables.

Return on investment

Because uplift modelling focuses on incremental responses only, it provides very strong return on investment cases when applied to traditional demand generation and retention activities. For example, by only targeting the persuadable customers in an outbound marketing campaign, the contact costs and hence the return per unit spend can be dramatically improved.

Removal of negative effects

One of the most effective uses of uplift modelling is in the removal of negative effects from retention campaigns. Both in the telecommunications and financial services industries often retention campaigns can trigger customers to cancel a contract or policy. Uplift modelling allows these customers, the Do Not Disturbs, to be removed from the campaign.

Application to A/B and multivariate testing

It is rarely the case that there is a single treatment and control group. Often the "treatment" can be a variety of simple variations of a message or a multi-stage contact strategy that is classed as a single treatment. In the case of A/B or multivariate testing, uplift modelling can help in understanding whether the variations in tests provide any significant uplift compared to other targeting criteria such as behavioural or demographic indicators.

History of uplift modelling

The first appearance of true response modelling appears to be in the work of Radcliffe and Surry. [4]

Victor Lo also published on this topic in The True Lift Model (2002), [5] and later Radcliffe again with Using Control Groups to Target on Predicted Lift: Building and Assessing Uplift Models (2007). [6]

Radcliffe also provides a very useful frequently asked questions (FAQ) section on his web site, Scientific Marketer. [7] Lo (2008) provides a more general framework, from program design to predictive modeling to optimization, along with future research areas. [8]

Independently uplift modelling has been studied by Piotr Rzepakowski. Together with Szymon Jaroszewicz he adapted information theory to build multi-class uplift decision trees and published the paper in 2010. [9] And later in 2011 they extended the algorithm to multiple treatment case. [10]

Similar approaches have been explored in personalised medicine. [11] [12] Szymon Jaroszewicz and Piotr Rzepakowski (2014) designed uplift methodology for survival analysis and applied it to randomized controlled trial analysis. [13] Yong (2015) combined a mathematical optimization algorithm via dynamic programming with machine learning methods to optimally stratify patients. [14]

Uplift modelling is a special case of the older psychology concept of Differential Prediction. [15] In contrast to differential prediction, uplift modelling assumes an active agent, and uses the uplift measure as an optimization metric.

Uplift modeling has been recently extended and incorporated into diverse machine learning algorithms, like Inductive Logic Programming, [15] Bayesian Network, [16] Statistical relational learning, [12] Support Vector Machines, [17] [18] Survival Analysis [13] and Ensemble learning. [19]

Even though uplift modeling is widely applied in marketing practice (along with political elections), it has rarely appeared in marketing literature. Kane, Lo and Zheng (2014) published a thorough analysis of three data sets using multiple methods in a marketing journal and provided evidence that a newer approach (known as the Four Quadrant Method) worked quite well in practice. [20] Lo and Pachamanova (2015) extended uplift modeling to prescriptive analytics for multiple treatment situations and proposed algorithms to solve large deterministic optimization problems and complex stochastic optimization problems where estimates are not exact. [21]

Recent research analyses the performance of various state-of-the-art uplift models in benchmark studies using large data amounts. [22] [1]

A detailed description of uplift modeling, its history, the way uplift models are built, differences to classical model building as well as uplift-specific evaluation techniques, a comparison of various software solutions and an explanation of different economical scenarios can be found here. [23]

Implementations

In Python

In R

Other languages

Datasets

Notes and references

  1. 1 2 Devriendt, Floris; Moldovan, Darie; Verbeke, Wouter (2018). "A literature survey and experimental evaluation of the state-of-the-art in uplift modeling: A stepping stone toward the development of prescriptive analytics". Big Data. 6 (1): 13–41. doi:10.1089/big.2017.0104. PMID   29570415.
  2. ↑ Gubela, Robin M.; Lessmann, Stefan; Jaroszewicz, Szymon (2020). "Response transformation and profit decomposition for revenue uplift modeling". European Journal of Operational Research. 283 (2): 647–661. arXiv: 1911.08729 . doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2019.11.030. S2CID   208175716.
  3. ↑ N. Radcliffe (2007). Identifying who can be saved and who will be driven away by retention activity. Stochastic Solution Limited
  4. ↑ Radcliffe, N. J.; and Surry, P. D. (1999); Differential response analysis: Modelling true response by isolating the effect of a single action, in Proceedings of Credit Scoring and Credit Control VI, Credit Research Centre, University of Edinburgh Management School
  5. ↑ Lo, V. S. Y. (2002); The True Lift Model, ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, Vol. 4, No. 2, 78–86, available at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=4FD247B4987CBF2E29186DACE0D40C3D?doi=10.1.1.99.7064&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  6. ↑ Radcliffe, N. J. (2007); Using Control Groups to Target on Predicted Lift: Building and Assessing Uplift Models, Direct Marketing Analytics Journal, Direct Marketing Association
  7. ↑ The Scientific Marketer FAQ on Uplift Modelling
  8. ↑ Lo, V. S.Y. (2008) “New Opportunities in Marketing Data Mining.” In Encyclopedia of Data Warehousing and Mining, 2nd edition, edited by Wang (2008), Idea Group Publishing.
  9. ↑ Rzepakowski, Piotr; Jaroszewicz, Szymon (2010). "Decision Trees for Uplift Modeling". 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. Sydney, Australia. pp. 441–450. doi:10.1109/ICDM.2010.62. ISBN   978-1-4244-9131-5. S2CID   14362608.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  10. ↑ Rzepakowski, Piotr; Jaroszewicz, Szymon (2011). "Decision trees for uplift modeling with single and multiple treatments". Knowledge and Information Systems. 32 (2): 303–327. doi: 10.1007/s10115-011-0434-0 .
  11. ↑ Cai, T.; Tian, L.; Wong, P. H.; and Wei, L. J. (2009); Analysis of Randomized Comparative Clinical Trial Data for Personalized Treatment Selections, Harvard University Biostatistics Working Paper Series, Paper 97
  12. 1 2 Nassif, Houssam; Kuusisto, Finn; Burnside, Elizabeth S; Page, David; Shavlik, Jude; Santos Costa, Vitor (2013). "Score as You Lift (SAYL): A Statistical Relational Learning Approach to Uplift Modeling". Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 8190. Prague. pp. 595–611. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40994-3_38. ISBN   978-3-642-38708-1. PMC   4492311 . PMID   26158122.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  13. 1 2 Jaroszewicz, Szymon; Rzepakowski, Piotr (2014). "Uplift modeling with survival data" (PDF). ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Health Informatics (HI KDD'14). New York, USA.
  14. ↑ Yong, F.H. (2015), "Quantitative Methods for Stratified Medicine," PhD Dissertation, Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/17463130/YONG-DISSERTATION-2015.pdf?sequence=1 .
  15. 1 2 Nassif, Houssam; Santos Costa, Vitor; Burnside, Elizabeth S; Page, David (2012). "Relational Differential Prediction". Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 7523. Bristol, UK. pp. 617–632. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33460-3_45. ISBN   978-3-642-33459-7.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  16. ↑ Nassif, Houssam; Wu, Yirong; Page, David; Burnside, Elizabeth (2012). "Logical Differential Prediction Bayes Net, Improving Breast Cancer Diagnosis for Older Women". American Medical Informatics Association Symposium (AMIA'12). 2012: 1330–1339. PMC   3540455 . PMID   23304412.
  17. ↑ Kuusisto, Finn; Santos Costa, Vitor; Nassif, Houssam; Burnside, Elizabeth; Page, David; Shavlik, Jude (2014). "Support Vector Machines for Differential Prediction". Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 8725. Nancy, France. pp. 50–65. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44851-9_4. ISBN   978-3-662-44850-2. PMC   4492338 . PMID   26158123.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  18. ↑ Zaniewicz, Lukasz; Jaroszewicz, Szymon (2013). "Support Vector Machines for Uplift Modeling". The First IEEE ICDM Workshop on Causal Discovery. Dallas, Texas.
  19. ↑ Sołtys, Michał; Jaroszewicz, Szymon; Rzepakowski, Piotr (2015). "Ensemble methods for uplift modeling". Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 29 (6): 1531–1559. doi: 10.1007/s10618-014-0383-9 .
  20. ↑ Kane, K.; Lo, V.S.Y.; Zheng, J. (2014). "Mining for the Truly Responsive Customers and Prospects Using True-Lift Modeling: Comparison of New and Existing Methods". Journal of Marketing Analytics. 2 (4): 218–238. doi:10.1057/jma.2014.18. S2CID   256513132.
  21. ↑ Lo, V.S.Y.; Pachamanova, D. (2015). "From Predictive Uplift Modeling to Prescriptive Uplift Analytics: A Practical Approach to Treatment Optimization While Accounting for Estimation Risk". Journal of Marketing Analytics. 3 (2): 79–95. doi:10.1057/jma.2015.5. S2CID   256508939.
  22. ↑ Gubela, Robin M.; Bequé, Artem; Lessmann, Stefan; Gebert, Fabian (2019). "Conversion Uplift in E-Commerce: A Systematic Benchmark of Modeling Strategies". International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making. 18 (3): 747–791. doi:10.1142/S0219622019500172. hdl: 10419/230773 . S2CID   126538764.
  23. ↑ R. Michel, I. Schnakenburg, T. von Martens (2019). „Targeting Uplift“. Springer, ISBN   978-3-030-22625-1
  24. ↑ Chen, Huigang; Harinen, Totte; Lee, Jeong-Yoon; Yung, Mike; Zhao, Zhenyu (2020-03-02), CausalML: Python Package for Causal Machine Learning, arXiv, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2002.11631, arXiv:2002.11631, retrieved 2025-01-22
  25. 1 2 Chernozhukov, Victor; Chetverikov, Denis; Demirer, Mert; Duflo, Esther; Hansen, Christian; Newey, Whitney; Robins, James (2018-02-01). "Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters". The Econometrics Journal. 21 (1): C1 –C68. doi:10.1111/ectj.12097. ISSN   1368-4221.

See also

Related Research Articles

Machine learning (ML) is a field of study in artificial intelligence concerned with the development and study of statistical algorithms that can learn from data and generalize to unseen data, and thus perform tasks without explicit instructions. Advances in the field of deep learning have allowed neural networks to surpass many previous approaches in performance.

In marketing, customer lifetime value, lifetime customer value (LCV), or life-time value (LTV) is a prognostication of the net profit contributed to the whole future relationship with a customer. The prediction model can have varying levels of sophistication and accuracy, ranging from a crude heuristic to the use of complex predictive analytics techniques.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Analytics</span> Discovery, interpretation, and communication of meaningful patterns in data

Analytics is the systematic computational analysis of data or statistics. It is used for the discovery, interpretation, and communication of meaningful patterns in data, which also falls under and directly relates to the umbrella term, data science. Analytics also entails applying data patterns toward effective decision-making. It can be valuable in areas rich with recorded information; analytics relies on the simultaneous application of statistics, computer programming, and operations research to quantify performance.

Quantitative structure–activity relationship models are regression or classification models used in the chemical and biological sciences and engineering. Like other regression models, QSAR regression models relate a set of "predictor" variables (X) to the potency of the response variable (Y), while classification QSAR models relate the predictor variables to a categorical value of the response variable.

Data Stream Mining is the process of extracting knowledge structures from continuous, rapid data records. A data stream is an ordered sequence of instances that in many applications of data stream mining can be read only once or a small number of times using limited computing and storage capabilities.

Predictive learning is a machine learning (ML) technique where an artificial intelligence model is fed new data to develop an understanding of its environment, capabilities, and limitations. This technique finds application in many areas, including neuroscience, business, robotics, and computer vision. This concept was developed and expanded by French computer scientist Yann LeCun in 1988 during his career at Bell Labs, where he trained models to detect handwriting so that financial companies could automate check processing.

Churn rate is a measure of the proportion of individuals or items moving out of a group over a specific period. It is one of two primary factors that determine the steady-state level of customers a business will support.

Predictive modelling uses statistics to predict outcomes. Most often the event one wants to predict is in the future, but predictive modelling can be applied to any type of unknown event, regardless of when it occurred. For example, predictive models are often used to detect crimes and identify suspects, after the crime has taken place.

In predictive analytics, data science, machine learning and related fields, concept drift or drift is an evolution of data that invalidates the data model. It happens when the statistical properties of the target variable, which the model is trying to predict, change over time in unforeseen ways. This causes problems because the predictions become less accurate as time passes. Drift detection and drift adaptation are of paramount importance in the fields that involve dynamically changing data and data models.

Predictive analytics, or predictive AI, encompasses a variety of statistical techniques from data mining, predictive modeling, and machine learning that analyze current and historical facts to make predictions about future or otherwise unknown events.

Disease Informatics (also known as infectious disease informatics) studies the knowledge production, sharing, modeling, and management of infectious diseases. It became a more studied field as a by-product of the rapid increases in the amount of biomedical and clinical data widely available, and to meet the demands for useful data analyses of such data.

In machine learning, multi-label classification or multi-output classification is a variant of the classification problem where multiple nonexclusive labels may be assigned to each instance. Multi-label classification is a generalization of multiclass classification, which is the single-label problem of categorizing instances into precisely one of several classes. In the multi-label problem the labels are nonexclusive and there is no constraint on how many of the classes the instance can be assigned to.

Customer attrition, also known as customer churn, customer turnover, or customer defection, is the loss of clients or customers.

Artificial intelligence marketing (AIM) is a form of marketing that uses artificial intelligence concepts and models such as machine learning, natural language processing (NLP), and computer vision to achieve marketing goals. The main difference between AIM and traditional forms of marketing resides in the reasoning, which is performed by a computer algorithm rather than a human.

Lead scoring is a methodology used to rank prospects against a scale that represents the perceived value each lead represents to the organization. The resulting score is used to determine which leads a receiving function will engage, in order of priority.

In marketing, attribution, also known as multi-touch attribution (MTA), is the identification of a set of user actions that contribute to a desired outcome, and then the assignment of a value to each of these events. Marketing attribution provides a level of understanding of what combination of events in what particular order influence individuals to engage in a desired behavior, typically referred to as a conversion.

The following outline is provided as an overview of, and topical guide to, machine learning:

Automated machine learning (AutoML) is the process of automating the tasks of applying machine learning to real-world problems. It is the combination of automation and ML.

Himabindu "Hima" Lakkaraju is an Indian-American computer scientist who works on machine learning, artificial intelligence, algorithmic bias, and AI accountability. She is currently an Assistant Professor at the Harvard Business School and is also affiliated with the Department of Computer Science at Harvard University. Lakkaraju is known for her work on trustworthy AI and ethics of artificial intelligence. More broadly, her research focuses on developing machine learning models and algorithms that are interpretable, transparent, fair, and reliable. She also investigates the practical and ethical implications of deploying machine learning models in domains involving high-stakes decisions such as healthcare, criminal justice, business, and education. Lakkaraju was named as one of the world's top Innovators Under 35 by both Vanity Fair and the MIT Technology Review.

Owkin is an AI biotech company that uses artificial intelligence to identify new treatments, optimize clinical trials and develop AI diagnostics. The company uses federated learning, a type of privacy preserving technology, to access multimodal patient data from academic institutions and hospitals to train its AI models for drug discovery, development, and diagnostics. Owkin has collaborated with pharmaceutical companies around the world to improve their therapeutic programs.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.